RET ETAINING AINING WAL ALL ORDIN INANCE ANCE Summer 2011 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ret etaining aining wal all ordin inance ance
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RET ETAINING AINING WAL ALL ORDIN INANCE ANCE Summer 2011 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kick-Off Meeting Presentation RET ETAINING AINING WAL ALL ORDIN INANCE ANCE Summer 2011 Todays Presentation What are we trying to accomplish? Gather public input. Create objectives for draft ordinance. Discussion topics


slide-1
SLIDE 1

RET ETAINING AINING WAL ALL ORDIN INANCE ANCE

Kick-Off Meeting Presentation

Summer 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Today’s Presentation

  • What are we trying to accomplish?

□ Gather public input. □ Create objectives for draft ordinance.

  • Discussion topics

□ Current code regulations and associated issues. □ Regulations in other jurisdictions. □ Preliminary ideas to address issues.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Current Code Regulations and Associated Issues

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background

  • Current Retaining Wall Ordinance

 Effective: March 9, 2005

  • Follow-up to Baseline Hillside Ordinance

 Effective: May 9, 2011

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • New Retaining Wall Ordinance needs to be

consistent with BHO

  • Before BHO became effective, grading was not

limited

  • BHO grading regulations will act as an indirect limit
  • n the size (e.g., length) of new retaining walls

□ Thus, if the quantity of grading is now limited do you want

to use your allotment on retaining walls?

Relation to Baseline Hillside Ordinance (BHO)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Current Zoning Code

  • “Retaining

wall” defined as freestanding continuous structure, as viewed from the top, intended to support earth, which is not attached to a building

  • “Garden walls” not defined (but considered less than 4 ft. in

height)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current Zoning Code (cont’d)

  • Maximum of one 12 ft. wall or two-10 ft. walls with a

minimum distance of 3 ft. between them

3 ft. Min. 10 ft. Max. 10 ft. Max. Wall 1 Wall 2

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Current Issues

3 ft. Min. 10 ft. Max. 10 ft. Max. Wall 1 Wall 2

  • Definition is unclear and open for

interpretation

  • Number of retaining walls allowed

(2) is too restrictive and encourages excessive grading

  • Maximum length is not defined
  • Horizontal distance between

retaining walls does not allow for appropriate landscaping

  • Maximum wall height
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Other Jurisdictions

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Definition

Denver

  • A wall which is designed to, and in fact does, retain the earth
  • n one side at a higher elevation than the earth on the other

side.

Murrieta

  • A wall designed to resist the lateral displacement of soil or
  • ther materials.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Definition

Beverly Hills

  • A wall or terraced combination of walls used to retain more

than 18 inches of material and not used to support, provide a foundation for, or provide a wall for a building or structure.

Oakland

  • "Enclosed retaining wall” means a retaining wall located on a

lot such that it is visually shielded by other permanent structures and cannot be seen from public streets and adjacent lots.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Number and Height

Anaheim

  • If visible to public right of way 6 ft. max. additional 6 ft. allowed if broken

into 2- 3 ft. steps; if not visible then 14 ft. max.

Brea

  • Cumulative height other than a Loffelstein wall or similar living wall, max.

6 ft. Cumulative height will equal the combined height of any wall or series

  • f walls required to retain a single slope.

Loffelstein (crib) wall Brea

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Number and Height

Santa Barbara

  • 8 ft. wall acceptable if aesthetically pleasing;
  • 6 ft. max. for stucco;
  • Fill slope: 6 ft. max. individual;12 ft. max. combined;
  • Cut slope: 8 ft. max. individual; 16 ft .max. combined;
  • Alternative to tall walls is stepped or terraced.

Cut slope Fill slope

cut cut Natural grade 8’ max. 8’ max. 16’ max. fill fill Natural grade Finish grade 6’ max. 6’ max. 12’ max.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Santa Barbara

  • Max. 50 ft.; continuous walls acceptable if undulated, broken

up by buttresses or pilasters, and made of natural materials.

Length

Buttress wall Undulated wall Pilaster wall

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Santa Clarita

  • Maximum 100 ft.

La Verne

  • In excess of 100 ft. shall employ architectural treatments such

as pilasters, wall caps, or similar treatments in addition to landscaping to provide visual relief.

Length

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Horizontal Distance Between Walls

Oakland

  • Minimum 4 ft. between the exposed faces of each wall.

Murrieta

  • Terraced walls require 6 ft. minimum; walls in required front

yard setback requires 3 ft. minimum.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Horizontal Distance Between Walls

La Verne

  • 5 ft.

Santa Barbara

  • Minimum distance between 2 terraced walls will equal the
  • min. average height of two walls.

Santa Barbara

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Preliminary Ideas

  • Clarify

 If a single wall has a return or makes an angle as it

traverses the site, is it considered one wall?

 No more than one elevation per wall.  What if wall is attached to a building or structure?  Should “garden walls” be defined? What height?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Preliminary Ideas

  • Not limiting number of walls but limiting combined

maximum height (cumulative height).

  • Regulate length and/or surface area of wall.

 If so, what variables should be considered?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Preliminary Ideas

  • Increase minimum

horizontal distance between walls.

 What should the distance

be for proper landscaping/irrigation?

 Should minimum horizontal

distance be related to the height of walls to be separated ?

3 ft. Min. Wall 1 Wall 2

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Next Steps

  • Compose draft ordinance
  • Workshop for draft ordinance
  • Public Hearing
  • City Planning Commission
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Thank You

For further information or comments/questions please contact:

Davi vid d Ol Olivo at at david.oli id.olivo@lacity

  • @lacity.o

.org rg (213) 3) 473-9769 69

For updates on this project and other Code Studies projects, please visit us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/LACityCodeStudies