results of stable collision data
play

Results of stable Collision Data Merve Ince Emine Gurpinar, Yalcin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 09, 2022 •133 likes •688 views

Results of stable Collision Data Merve Ince Emine Gurpinar, Yalcin Guler Shuichi Kunori, Isa Dumanoglu Bayram Tali HCAL Analysis Meeting 11.06.2015 11.06.2015 1 Introduction We have analyzed sqrt(s)=13 TeV stable collision events for

  1. Results of stable Collision Data Merve Ince Emine Gurpinar, Yalcin Guler Shuichi Kunori, Isa Dumanoglu Bayram Tali HCAL Analysis Meeting 11.06.2015 11.06.2015 1

  2. Introduction  We have analyzed sqrt(s)=13 TeV stable collision events for 246908, 246926 .  We applied Luminosity situation according to Luminosity Block distribution of run 246908 . We want to understand condition of low energy events .  Analyzed setup and run information • CMSSW_7_4_2 • GR_E_V47::All  We used /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/246/908 /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/246/926  You can find all information about these runs at this link . https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/CMSNonStableCollisions2015 11.06.2015 2

  3. Stable Collision Run 246908 sqrt(s) = 13TeV /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/246/908/ 11.06.2015 3

  4. Luminosity Block & Bunch Crossing Distributions • We applied two LS cut :  0 < LS < 50  70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 4

  5. Individual RecHit Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HE HF HO HB 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 HB HE HF HO 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 5

  6. Individual RecHit Time for HB,HE,HO,HF HF HO HB HE 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 HO HB HE HF 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 11.06.2015 6 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

  7. Individual RecHit Time(E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF HB HE HO HF 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 HO HB HE HF 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 7

  8. RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB: Time vs Energy HE: Time vs Energy HF: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 HB: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HE: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HF: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HO: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 8

  9. RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB: Time vs Energy HE: Time vs Energy HF: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 HB: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HE: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HF: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HO: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 9

  10. CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 and eta-phi Distributions 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 10

  11. CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 -phi and emFraction Distributions 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 11

  12. CaloMETphi Distributions (MET 𝑸 𝑼 >80 GeV and MET 𝑸 𝑼 >20GeV) 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 12

  13. CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsMET- CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloJetPhi- CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloMetPhi Distributions 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 11.06.2015 13 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

  14. Stable Collision Run 246926 sqrt(s) = 13TeV /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/246/926/ 11.06.2015 14

  15. Individual RecHit Energy and Time for HB,HE,HO,HF HE HF HO HB HB HE HF HO sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 15

  16. Individual RecHit Time(E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 16

  17. RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB: Time vs Energy HE: Time vs Energy HF: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HB: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HE: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HF: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 17

  18. HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>2GeV) Depth2 Depth3 Depth1 11.06.2015 18

  19. HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>4GeV) 11.06.2015 19

  20. CaloJet-CaloMet 𝑸 𝑼 -emFraction and eta-phi Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 20

  21. CaloMETphi Distributions (MET 𝑸 𝑼 >80 GeV and MET 𝑸 𝑼 >20GeV) sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 21

  22. CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsMET- CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloJetPhi- CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloMetPhi Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 22

  23. Luminosity Block & Bunch Crossing Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 23

  24. Energy-Time PLOTS for Stable Collision Run 246908 11.06.2015 24

  25. HB: Energy-Time Map for Depth1 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 25

  26. HE: Energy-Time Map for Depth1,2,3 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 26

  27. HF: Energy-Time Map for Depth1,2 iphi 43 iphi 43 11.06.2015 27 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

  28. HO: Energy-Time Map for Depth 4 11.06.2015 28 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

  29. Conclusion  We analyzed stable run 246908 with two LS situation( 0<LS<50 – 70<LS<130) and compared their results .  We observed plots at two regions.  Besides we gained some plots of stable run 246926 . We will continue other stable new runs .  Mean time is depend on the cut value and we can say that 4GeV energy cut is more stable than other . Also when we increase value of energy cut, energy is more stable .  We checked both detector performance and quality of data by looking at some kinematic plots . 11.06.2015 29

  30. BACK UP 11.06.2015 30

  31. Stable Collision Run 246908 sqrt(s) = 13TeV /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/246/908/ 11.06.2015 31

  32. HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>2GeV) Depth3(HE) Depth1 Depth2 11.06.2015 32 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

  33. HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>2GeV) 11.06.2015 33 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

  34. Stable Collision Run 246936 sqrt(s) = 13TeV /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/246/936/ 11.06.2015 34

  35. Individual RecHit Energy and Time for HB,HE,HO,HF HE HF HO HB HE HB HF HO sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 35

  36. Individual RecHit Time(E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 36

  37. RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB: Time vs Energy HE: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy HF: Time vs Energy HB: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HE: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HF: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HO: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 37

  38. CaloJet-CaloMet 𝑸 𝑼 -emFraction and eta-phi Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 38

  39. CaloMETphi Distributions (MET 𝑸 𝑼 >80 GeV and MET 𝑸 𝑼 >20GeV) sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 39

  40. CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsMET- CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloJetPhi- CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloMetPhi Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 40

  41. Luminosity Block & Bunch Crossing Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 41

  42. HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>2GeV) 11.06.2015 42 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

  43. HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>4GeV) 11.06.2015 43 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

  44. Stable Collision Run 247073 sqrt(s) = 13TeV /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/247/073/ 11.06.2015 44

  45. Individual RecHit Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB HE HF HO Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger HB HE HF HO L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 45

  46. Individual RecHit Time for HB,HE,HO,HF HB HE HF HO Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger HB HE HF HO 11.06.2015 46

  47. Individual RecHit Time(E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF HB HE HF HO Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger HB HE HF HO 11.06.2015 47

  48. RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 48

  49. RecHitTime vs Energy (E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 49

  50. CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 and eta-phi Distributions Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 50

  51. CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 -phi and emFraction Distributions Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 51

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

10-Collision Response Collision Response Collision Response [Moore and Wilhelms 88]:

10-Collision Response Collision Response Collision Response [Moore and Wilhelms 88]:

10-Collision Response Collision Response Collision Response [Moore and Wilhelms 88]: automatic suggestions about the motions of objects immediately following a collision; animation systems using dynamical simulation inherently must respond

767 views • 53 slides
Collision Detection Part 2. Narrow Phase Collision Detection The Narrow Phase Exact collision

Collision Detection Part 2. Narrow Phase Collision Detection The Narrow Phase Exact collision

Collision Detection Part 2. Narrow Phase Collision Detection The Narrow Phase Exact collision detection: Where precisely have objects touched, where to apply forces, torques? Collision Response The following is an equation for Rigid Body

1.06k views • 79 slides
Q44.2 Consider the collision p + p -&gt; p + p + 0 p + p + Consider the collision p + p

Q44.2 Consider the collision p + p -&gt; p + p + 0 p + p + Consider the collision p + p

Q44.2 Consider the collision p + p -&gt; p + p + 0 p + p + Consider the collision p + p A. It is exoergic. g B. It is endoergic C These terms dont apply to this type of collision C. These terms don t apply to this type of collision

596 views • 20 slides
Collision Detection Collision detection weaknesses Naive collision detection suffers from 3 known

Collision Detection Collision detection weaknesses Naive collision detection suffers from 3 known

07 Tutorial: Broadphase Collision Detection Collision detection weaknesses Naive collision detection suffers from 3 known weaknesses Fixed-timestep weakness All-pairs weakness Pair-processing weakness Two-phase collision detection

833 views • 20 slides
Bank of Georgia Nine Months 2006 Results Overview February, 2007 Introduction To Bank Of Georgia

Bank of Georgia Nine Months 2006 Results Overview February, 2007 Introduction To Bank Of Georgia

FitchRatings: B/B Stable Moodys: B3/NP (FC) &amp; Baa3/P - 3 (LC); Stable Standard &amp; Poors: B+/B Stable LSE: BGEO GSE: GEB Berlin-Bremen Boerse: B7D1 Bank of Georgia Nine Months 2006 Results Overview

649 views • 26 slides
I. Introduction II. Collision of Domain Walls in 5D Minkowski Space III. Reheating by Collision

I. Introduction II. Collision of Domain Walls in 5D Minkowski Space III. Reheating by Collision

I. Introduction II. Collision of Domain Walls in 5D Minkowski Space III. Reheating by Collision of Branes IV. Fermion Localization at Collision V. Collision of Domain Walls in Asymptotically AdS Space VI. Summary Kei-ichi Maeda Waseda Univ.

451 views • 26 slides
News Review: Collision Proxy Tradeoffs Review: Spatial Data Structures CPSC 314 Computer

News Review: Collision Proxy Tradeoffs Review: Spatial Data Structures CPSC 314 Computer

University of British Columbia News Review: Collision Proxy Tradeoffs Review: Spatial Data Structures CPSC 314 Computer Graphics uniform grids BSP trees extra TA office hours in lab for hw/project collision proxy (bounding volume) is

169 views • 3 slides
Class 29: More collisions Simple collision problem in 1D Before collision: m 1 m 2 #2 v 2i v 1i

Class 29: More collisions Simple collision problem in 1D Before collision: m 1 m 2 #2 v 2i v 1i

Class 29: More collisions Simple collision problem in 1D Before collision: m 1 m 2 #2 v 2i v 1i #1 After collision: m 2 m 1 #1 v 1f v 2f #2 Equation of motion: m 1 v 1i + m 2 v 2i = m 1 v 1f + m 2 v 2f Can solve for any one unknown from v 1i , v

452 views • 9 slides
Collision Detection http://www.cse.iitd.ac.in/ Collision Detection IIT Delhi Collision handling

Collision Detection http://www.cse.iitd.ac.in/ Collision Detection IIT Delhi Collision handling

IIT Delhi Collision Detection http://www.cse.iitd.ac.in/ Collision Detection IIT Delhi Collision handling is fundamental to animation or dynamic scenes in virtual environments. http://www.cse.iitd.ac.in/ Applications IIT Delhi Games

519 views • 23 slides
Collision Detection Based on Collision Series On XNA Creators Club Collision Detection Circular

Collision Detection Based on Collision Series On XNA Creators Club Collision Detection Circular

Collision Detection Based on Collision Series On XNA Creators Club Collision Detection Circular Rectangular Pixel based Rotated rectangles Pixel based with rotations Minimize work (to do) Circular Collision Detection

486 views • 19 slides
CS 1666 www.cs.pitt.edu/~nlf4/cs1666/ Collision detection Collision detection We already had to

CS 1666 www.cs.pitt.edu/~nlf4/cs1666/ Collision detection Collision detection We already had to

CS 1666 www.cs.pitt.edu/~nlf4/cs1666/ Collision detection Collision detection We already had to implement some basic collision detection in the motion example I.e., to keep our square from moving out of the window Checking for

679 views • 14 slides
Bank of Georgia Q3 2007 Results Overview January 2008 Introduction To Bank of Georgia Market

Bank of Georgia Q3 2007 Results Overview January 2008 Introduction To Bank of Georgia Market

Standard &amp; Poors: B+/B Stable Moodys: B3/NP (FC) &amp; Ba1/NP (LC); Stable Fitch Ratings: B+/B Stable LSE: BGEO GSE: GEB Berlin-Bremen Boerse: B7D1 Reuters: BGEO.L Bloomberg: BGEO.LI Bank of Georgia Q3

945 views • 73 slides
Exact Collision Detection Recent Developments and Applications Dan Halperin danha@tau.ac.il Tel

Exact Collision Detection Recent Developments and Applications Dan Halperin danha@tau.ac.il Tel

Exact Collision Detection Recent Developments and Applications Dan Halperin danha@tau.ac.il Tel Aviv University MOVIE, Toulouse 2005 Exact Collision Detection 1 Outline background, motivation, earlier results multi-axis NC machining exact

411 views • 30 slides
Cost-efficient Emergency Intervention for Collision Mitigation Development and Evaluation Results

Cost-efficient Emergency Intervention for Collision Mitigation Development and Evaluation Results

Cost-efficient Emergency Intervention for Collision Mitigation Development and Evaluation Results Thomas Wohllebe, Volkswagen AG interactIVe Final Event 20 th -21 st November 2013 Content Overview Objectives Functions and

157 views • 14 slides
Collision Detection I Motivation F d X S, X Collision Force detection response F d F r

Collision Detection I Motivation F d X S, X Collision Force detection response F d F r

CPSC 599.86 / 601.86 Sonny Chan - University of Calgary Collision Detection I Motivation F d X S, X Collision Force detection response F d F r Control algorithms Haptic rendering Problem Definition We seek efficient algorithms to

822 views • 42 slides
Notes Rigid Collision Algorithms Use the same collision response algorithm as Assignment 2

Notes Rigid Collision Algorithms Use the same collision response algorithm as Assignment 2

Notes Rigid Collision Algorithms Use the same collision response algorithm as Assignment 2 instability - dont worry with particles about it right now Identify colliding points as perhaps the deepest Please read penetrating

499 views • 5 slides
Spice up your website with Machine Learning! Evelina Gabasova @evelgab F# Snippets F# Snippets

Spice up your website with Machine Learning! Evelina Gabasova @evelgab F# Snippets F# Snippets

Spice up your website with Machine Learning! Evelina Gabasova @evelgab F# Snippets F# Snippets fssnip.net Searching through F# snippets over 1600 snippets over 1100 different tags Searching through F# snippets Do we need a custom system?

752 views • 53 slides
JUDGMENT What we can learn about judgment from a little dog named Gizmo thewordandtheway.net

JUDGMENT What we can learn about judgment from a little dog named Gizmo thewordandtheway.net

JUDGMENT What we can learn about judgment from a little dog named Gizmo thewordandtheway.net &quot;Do not judge so that you will not be judged. (Mat 7:1) thewordandtheway.net &quot;Do not judge so that you will not be judged. For in the

611 views • 9 slides
Dont Judge Me! Jesus condemns hypocritical judgment (Matthew 7:1-5). Jesus

Dont Judge Me! Jesus condemns hypocritical judgment (Matthew 7:1-5). Jesus

Dont Judge Me! Jesus condemns hypocritical judgment (Matthew 7:1-5). Jesus condemns hypocritical judgment (Matthew 7:1-5). You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the

441 views • 12 slides
Factorisation algebras associated to Hilbert schemes of points Emily Cliff University of Oxford

Factorisation algebras associated to Hilbert schemes of points Emily Cliff University of Oxford

Factorisation algebras associated to Hilbert schemes of points Emily Cliff University of Oxford 14 December, 2015 Motivation Learn about factorisation: Provide and study examples of factorisation spaces and algebras of arbitrary

668 views • 38 slides
P1 P1 ORI ORIEN ENTATIO TION 2020 N 2020 1 OB OBJEC JECTIVES TIVES Welcome parents to

P1 P1 ORI ORIEN ENTATIO TION 2020 N 2020 1 OB OBJEC JECTIVES TIVES Welcome parents to

P1 P1 ORI ORIEN ENTATIO TION 2020 N 2020 1 OB OBJEC JECTIVES TIVES Welcome parents to the school community and engage them so that they gain clarity on different issues that concern them. Provide information about school policies

938 views • 76 slides
How Software Projects Fail Software Failures Software appears, by its nature, to be difficult to

How Software Projects Fail Software Failures Software appears, by its nature, to be difficult to

How Software Projects Fail Software Failures Software appears, by its nature, to be difficult to engineer on a large scale. Nevertheless, there is an insatiable demand for sizeable, well-engineered software. Dr. James A. Bednar We continue to

69 views • 6 slides
Outline Rollbacks idiosyncrasies and remedies CSCI 8220 Error Handling Dynamic Memory

Outline Rollbacks idiosyncrasies and remedies CSCI 8220 Error Handling Dynamic Memory

Outline Rollbacks idiosyncrasies and remedies CSCI 8220 Error Handling Dynamic Memory Allocation Parallel &amp; Distributed Simulation Event Retraction Improving the cost of rollbacks Lazy Cancellation PDES: Time Warp

295 views • 6 slides
Probabilistic and Logistic Circuits: A New Synthesis of Logic and Machine Learning Guy Van den

Probabilistic and Logistic Circuits: A New Synthesis of Logic and Machine Learning Guy Van den

Probabilistic and Logistic Circuits: A New Synthesis of Logic and Machine Learning Guy Van den Broeck HRL/ACTIONS @ KR Oct 28, 2018 Foundation: Logical Circuit Languages Negation Normal Form Circuits = (sun rain rainbow)

1.01k views • 74 slides

More recommend