Results of H4 VLE Simulations 03.11.2017, Marcel Rosenthal, Nikolaos - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

results of h4 vle simulations
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Results of H4 VLE Simulations 03.11.2017, Marcel Rosenthal, Nikolaos - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Results of H4 VLE Simulations 03.11.2017, Marcel Rosenthal, Nikolaos Charitonidis, Yannis Karyotakis, Yiota Chatzidaki Outline New optics (High Transmission, see Meeting 23.10.17, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/15578/) Definition of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Results of H4 VLE Simulations

03.11.2017, Marcel Rosenthal, Nikolaos Charitonidis, Yannis Karyotakis, Yiota Chatzidaki

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • New optics (High Transmission,

see Meeting 23.10.17, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/15578/)

  • Definition of “GoodParticles”
  • Particle rates for 80 GeV/c secondaries
  • Particle rates for -80 GeV/c secondaries
  • Background Studies:
  • Beam in H2
  • Beam in H4

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

“GoodParticle” Definition

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Schematic overview H4-VLE

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Four explored Options

  • Option 1: same particle hits each detector
  • Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2
  • Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2, BPROFs, COLL1, NP02front
  • Option 2: at least one 𝜌, 𝐿, 𝜈, 𝑓, 𝑞 hit in each detector
  • Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2
  • Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2, BPROFs, COLL1, NP02front

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

5

(𝑱) (𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑾)

  • nly counted

in option 2 counted in option 1 & 2

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Composition 80 GeV/c → 7 GeV/c

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

6

(𝑱)

𝝆 𝑳 𝒒 𝝂 𝒇

(𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑾)

scored @ TRIG2

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Momentum Spectra @ TRIG2

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

7

(𝑱) (𝑱𝑱𝑱)

Momentum of all “GoodParticles” for different options

Timing not considered

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Four explored Options

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

8

(𝑱) (𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑾)

  • Option 1: particle hits each detector
  • Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2
  • Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2, BPROFs, COLL1, NP02front
  • Option 2: at least one 𝜌, 𝐿, 𝜈, 𝑓, 𝑞 hit in each detector
  • Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2
  • Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2, BPROFs, COLL1, NP02front

Following results obtained with selection scheme 3 (but no consideration of timing yet)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Rates for 80 GeV/c

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Pion Rate

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

10

rate ± stat. error (fraction of GoodParticles)

Physics list: FTFP_BERT

  • Kin. energy cut: 10 MeV

Scored at TRIG2 Selection scheme III Normalized to 106 in 4.8s

W-target Cu-target Cu-target

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Total Rate

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

11 Physics list: FTFP_BERT

  • Kin. energy cut: 10 MeV

Scored at TRIG2 Selection scheme III Normalized to 106 in 4.8s

𝒒 𝒇 𝝂 𝑳 𝝆 W-target Cu-target Cu-target

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Rates for -80 GeV/c

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Pion Rate

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

13 Physics list: FTFP_BERT

  • Kin. energy cut: 10 MeV

Scored at TRIG2 Selection scheme III Normalized to 106 in 4.8s

rate ± stat. error (fraction of GoodParticles)

W-target Cu-target Cu-target

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Total Rate

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

14 Physics list: FTFP_BERT

  • Kin. energy cut: 10 MeV

Scored at TRIG2 Selection scheme III Normalized to 106 in 4.8s

𝒒 𝒇 𝝂 𝑳 𝝆 W-target Cu-target Cu-target

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Background Studies

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Full model: H4-beam on

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

16 Particles scored in NP04 Fieldcage volume when H4 beam is on Detector materials currently vacuum: → Score all particles entering LAr volume in direction to field cage

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Simplified detector model

  • Scoring of background currently in light blue box as seen below

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

17

used dimensions: 6.2m ⋅ 6.2m ⋅ 5.9m (!)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Background Composition: 7 GeV/c (H4)

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Background from Neutrons (7 GeV/c)

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

19

1 GeV/c

  • a. u.

375 Hz in NP04 in case of beam in H4

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Background from Neutrons (7 GeV/c)

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

20

Kinetic energy cutoff @ 10 MeV

10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c

  • a. u.

375 Hz in NP04 in case of beam in H4

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Background from Muons (7 GeV/c)

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

21

Kinetic energy cutoff @ 10 MeV

10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c

  • a. u.

312 Hz in NP04 in case of beam in H4

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Muons & Neutrons

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

22

Target Momenta of VLE-magnets

𝜈 𝑜

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Full model: H2-beam on

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

23 Particles scored in NP04 Fieldcage volume when H2 beam is on Detector materials currently vacuum: → Score all particles entering LAr volume in direction to field cage

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Background Composition 12 GeV/c

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

24

NP02 “filled” with Vacuum

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Background Composition 12 GeV/c

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

25

NP02 filled with LAr

Density: 1.396 g/cm3

NP02 filled with Water (for cross-check) < 10 Hz < 10 Hz

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Background from Muons (12 GeV/c)

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

26

10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c

  • a. u.

NP02 filled with Vacuum (40 Hz), much less in case of LAr (or Water)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Background from Muons (12 GeV/c)

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

27

Kinetic energy cutoff @ 10 MeV

10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c

  • a. u.

NP02 filled with Vacuum (40 Hz), much less in case of LAr (or Water)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Background from Neutrons (12 GeV/c)

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

28

Kinetic energy cutoff @ 10 MeV

10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c

  • a. u.

NP02 filled with Vacuum (127 Hz), much less in case of LAr (or Water)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Background Studies PhysicsList Comparison

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Comparison of Background in NP02

  • Geant4 PhysicsLists:
  • FTFP_BERT

Shielding

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

30

Beam in H2, scored in NP02 (detector “filled” with Vacuum)

(recommended list for shielding simulations) 200 Hz increase of n similar estimates as FTFP_BERT

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Comparison of Background in NP02

  • Geant4 PhysicsLists:
  • FTFP_BERT

Shielding

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

31

Beam in H4, scored in NP02 (detector “filled” with Vacuum)

(recommended list for shielding simulations)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Comparison of Background in NP04

  • Geant4 PhysicsLists:
  • FTFP_BERT

Shielding

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

32

Beam in H4, scored in NP04 (detector “filled” with Vacuum)

(recommended list for shielding simulations)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Summary

  • Detailed, combined model for H2 and H4 with VLE extensions

implemented

  • New estimates of the trigger rates available for H4-VLE
  • nTuples for H4 will be made available on shared beamgroupdisk
  • Similar results of Background for different PhysicsLists

“FTFP_BERT” and “Shielding”

03.11.2017

  • M. Rosenthal

33