Results of H4 VLE Simulations 03.11.2017, Marcel Rosenthal, Nikolaos - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Results of H4 VLE Simulations 03.11.2017, Marcel Rosenthal, Nikolaos - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Results of H4 VLE Simulations 03.11.2017, Marcel Rosenthal, Nikolaos Charitonidis, Yannis Karyotakis, Yiota Chatzidaki Outline New optics (High Transmission, see Meeting 23.10.17, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/15578/) Definition of
Outline
- New optics (High Transmission,
see Meeting 23.10.17, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/15578/)
- Definition of “GoodParticles”
- Particle rates for 80 GeV/c secondaries
- Particle rates for -80 GeV/c secondaries
- Background Studies:
- Beam in H2
- Beam in H4
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
2
“GoodParticle” Definition
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
3
Schematic overview H4-VLE
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
4
Four explored Options
- Option 1: same particle hits each detector
- Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2
- Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2, BPROFs, COLL1, NP02front
- Option 2: at least one 𝜌, 𝐿, 𝜈, 𝑓, 𝑞 hit in each detector
- Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2
- Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2, BPROFs, COLL1, NP02front
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
5
(𝑱) (𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑾)
- nly counted
in option 2 counted in option 1 & 2
Composition 80 GeV/c → 7 GeV/c
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
6
(𝑱)
𝝆 𝑳 𝒒 𝝂 𝒇
(𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑾)
scored @ TRIG2
Momentum Spectra @ TRIG2
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
7
(𝑱) (𝑱𝑱𝑱)
Momentum of all “GoodParticles” for different options
Timing not considered
Four explored Options
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
8
(𝑱) (𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑱𝑱) (𝑱𝑾)
- Option 1: particle hits each detector
- Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2
- Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2, BPROFs, COLL1, NP02front
- Option 2: at least one 𝜌, 𝐿, 𝜈, 𝑓, 𝑞 hit in each detector
- Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2
- Detectors: TOF1, TRIG1, TRIG2, BPROFs, COLL1, NP02front
Following results obtained with selection scheme 3 (but no consideration of timing yet)
Rates for 80 GeV/c
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
9
Pion Rate
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
10
rate ± stat. error (fraction of GoodParticles)
Physics list: FTFP_BERT
- Kin. energy cut: 10 MeV
Scored at TRIG2 Selection scheme III Normalized to 106 in 4.8s
W-target Cu-target Cu-target
Total Rate
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
11 Physics list: FTFP_BERT
- Kin. energy cut: 10 MeV
Scored at TRIG2 Selection scheme III Normalized to 106 in 4.8s
𝒒 𝒇 𝝂 𝑳 𝝆 W-target Cu-target Cu-target
Rates for -80 GeV/c
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
12
Pion Rate
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
13 Physics list: FTFP_BERT
- Kin. energy cut: 10 MeV
Scored at TRIG2 Selection scheme III Normalized to 106 in 4.8s
rate ± stat. error (fraction of GoodParticles)
W-target Cu-target Cu-target
Total Rate
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
14 Physics list: FTFP_BERT
- Kin. energy cut: 10 MeV
Scored at TRIG2 Selection scheme III Normalized to 106 in 4.8s
𝒒 𝒇 𝝂 𝑳 𝝆 W-target Cu-target Cu-target
Background Studies
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
15
Full model: H4-beam on
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
16 Particles scored in NP04 Fieldcage volume when H4 beam is on Detector materials currently vacuum: → Score all particles entering LAr volume in direction to field cage
Simplified detector model
- Scoring of background currently in light blue box as seen below
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
17
used dimensions: 6.2m ⋅ 6.2m ⋅ 5.9m (!)
Background Composition: 7 GeV/c (H4)
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
18
Background from Neutrons (7 GeV/c)
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
19
1 GeV/c
- a. u.
375 Hz in NP04 in case of beam in H4
Background from Neutrons (7 GeV/c)
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
20
Kinetic energy cutoff @ 10 MeV
10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c
- a. u.
375 Hz in NP04 in case of beam in H4
Background from Muons (7 GeV/c)
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
21
Kinetic energy cutoff @ 10 MeV
10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c
- a. u.
312 Hz in NP04 in case of beam in H4
Muons & Neutrons
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
22
Target Momenta of VLE-magnets
𝜈 𝑜
Full model: H2-beam on
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
23 Particles scored in NP04 Fieldcage volume when H2 beam is on Detector materials currently vacuum: → Score all particles entering LAr volume in direction to field cage
Background Composition 12 GeV/c
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
24
NP02 “filled” with Vacuum
Background Composition 12 GeV/c
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
25
NP02 filled with LAr
Density: 1.396 g/cm3
NP02 filled with Water (for cross-check) < 10 Hz < 10 Hz
Background from Muons (12 GeV/c)
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
26
10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c
- a. u.
NP02 filled with Vacuum (40 Hz), much less in case of LAr (or Water)
Background from Muons (12 GeV/c)
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
27
Kinetic energy cutoff @ 10 MeV
10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c
- a. u.
NP02 filled with Vacuum (40 Hz), much less in case of LAr (or Water)
Background from Neutrons (12 GeV/c)
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
28
Kinetic energy cutoff @ 10 MeV
10 GeV/c 1 GeV/c 0.1 GeV/c
- a. u.
NP02 filled with Vacuum (127 Hz), much less in case of LAr (or Water)
Background Studies PhysicsList Comparison
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
29
Comparison of Background in NP02
- Geant4 PhysicsLists:
- FTFP_BERT
Shielding
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
30
Beam in H2, scored in NP02 (detector “filled” with Vacuum)
(recommended list for shielding simulations) 200 Hz increase of n similar estimates as FTFP_BERT
Comparison of Background in NP02
- Geant4 PhysicsLists:
- FTFP_BERT
Shielding
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
31
Beam in H4, scored in NP02 (detector “filled” with Vacuum)
(recommended list for shielding simulations)
Comparison of Background in NP04
- Geant4 PhysicsLists:
- FTFP_BERT
Shielding
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
32
Beam in H4, scored in NP04 (detector “filled” with Vacuum)
(recommended list for shielding simulations)
Summary
- Detailed, combined model for H2 and H4 with VLE extensions
implemented
- New estimates of the trigger rates available for H4-VLE
- nTuples for H4 will be made available on shared beamgroupdisk
- Similar results of Background for different PhysicsLists
“FTFP_BERT” and “Shielding”
03.11.2017
- M. Rosenthal
33