Results Chain Presentation Rangsutra New Delhi, India April 23-25, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Results Chain Presentation Rangsutra

New Delhi, India April 23-25, 2014

Team Members: Rahul Noble Singh Email contact: Rahulnoblesingh@mac.com

Monitoring and (Impact) Evaluation Methods

Needs Assessment Process Evaluation Impact Evaluation Analysis of Beneficiary Needs Analysis of Program Implementation Measures How Much the Program Impacts Beneficiaries

• 1. Services being

delivered?

• 2. Clients satisfied?
• 3. Services reaching

target population?

• 4. Can we improve

cost- effectiveness?

• 1. Health of mothers

and children improved?

• 2. Learning
• utcomes

improved?

• 3. More people in

jobs?

• 4. Less poverty?
• 1. Why are we doing

the project?

• 2. Who is the target

population?

• 3. Why do we think

this approach will work in this context?

• 4. What else could

we do?

PROGRAM INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES IMPACT

Simplified Results Chain

Theory of Change

• 1. Program intervention summary

Brief description of program activities and outputs: Activities:

Aggregation of rural artisans and provision of market linkage Facilitated by: Design Input, Training, Working capital provisions, Quality Control, Marketing. Inclusion of artisans as shareholders in Rangstura. Discussion and creation standards for what “ethical” means in Rangsutra supply chain. Construction of Rangsutra campus and production center. OUTPUTS Outputs: Number of women trained. Estlablishment of Rangsutra campus and production center.

Provide flexible home based work opportunities for women,

A. Who is targeted?

Currently work with over 3,000 artisans (90% women). Mainly women in rural parts of Rajasthan and UP. Aim to work with 10,000 by 2018

B. Where is it conducted? Rajasthan & UP C. When is it conducted? Ongoing

• 2. Intermediate outcomes and impacts
• A. Summary of intermediate outcomes:

Regular work for artisans through the year Increase number of artisans share holders in Rangsutra Value of products purchased Number of artisans directly involved in the supply chain Sense of value of ones own skills and craft Number of artisans children that continue in trade

Summary of key impacts:

Increase in income earned from craft based activities Household/Community level income Women status sense of empowerment in households Perceptions of opportunity/aspirations of artisans Development & Preservation of traditional Indian crafts

• 3. Summary: results chain

PROGRAM

INTERMEDIATE OUTCOME

IMPACT

What is the program about? Inputs  Design input  Working Capital  Human Resources Activities  Design workshops  Training workshops  Purchase equipment  Centralised cutting and QC units  Distribute orders Outputs  Trained women  Mapping of crafts, skills and capacity Impact indicators?  Social and Economic development of Artisans in  Monthly income  Household expenditure by women. Intermediate outcome indicators?  Number of artians Rangsutra works with  Number of Rangsutra shareholders  ETP used  Number of states worked in  Rangsutra “ethical” production

• 4. Data collection: program indicators

A. List program indicators to be collected:

– Daily wage rates – Capacity of artisans groups – Stage of production cycle – Published ethical standards –

B. Method of data collection (e.g. electronic health worker interviews, admin data, etc.):

– Field workers using smart phones, – Interns used to contact every share holder. Short questionnaire –

C. Frequency of data collection: Each time field visited D. Who will collect the data: Field Workers, Interns

• 4. Data collection: intermediate and impact

indicators

A. List indicators to be collected:

– Monthly Income – Cash income from craft as % of household income – Attendance at AGM (yes or no) – Bank account openned in artisans name – Number of artisans working in Rangsutra supply chain

B. Method of data collection (e.g. electronic health worker interviews, admin data, etc.): Register at AGM

• Number of payments made by cheque
• Smart phones interviews conducted by field staff

C. Frequency of data collection: C. Who will collect the data:

• Field Workers

• 5. Impact evaluation design

A. Research question: To what extent does working directly with artisans result in benefit (social & economic) to artisans. What is the implication in terms of achive scale. B. Describe the intervention in the (add treatment arms, if applicable):

• Treatment: Direct engament with artisans
• Control: Artisans managed by an entrepreur/intermediary

C. Describe the sample size (e.g. 30 schools, 15 pupils each)

• Treatment: 5 villages
• Control: 5 villages

D. Describe the program assignment rule: (e.g. random selection of schools)

• 6. Communication of results

Key Message 1 (e.g. communicate program impacts on child health):

A. What is the nature of the key message? Importance of artisans being able to earn income from craft. Crafts in india is a such a rich source

• f cultural and economic resource must be protected and developed.

B. Who is the target audience? C. What communication tools will you use (e.g. brief, video, blog etc.)

Key Message 2:

A. B. C.