restoration of symmetry in time dependent calculations
play

Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. Guillaume SCAMPS Center for computational sciences, Tsukuba University November 6th 2017 Collaboration : Y. Hashimoto, T.


  1. Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. Guillaume SCAMPS Center for computational sciences, Tsukuba University November 6th 2017 Collaboration : Y. Hashimoto, T. Nakatsukasa Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 1 / 25

  2. Recent evolution of the mean-field dynamics TDHF+BCS TDHFB TDHF Simplified pairing Full pairing No pairing correlations correlations Computational time Computational time × 1 . 5 × 1000 TDHF+BCS : S. Ebata, T. Nakatsukusa, et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 034306 (2010). G. Scamps, D. Lacroix, Phys. Rev C 87, 014605 (2013). Time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (TDHFB) : I. Stetcu, A. Bulgac, P. Magierski, and K. J. Roche, Phys. Rev. C 84, 051309(R) (2011). Y. Hashimoto, Phys. Rev. C 88, 034307 (2013). Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 2 / 25

  3. Collision between two superfluid nuclei described with TDHFB with a Gogny force HFB breaks the particle-number symmetry → qp-vacuum states Results : have define gauge angles ) 0 1 / fm 1 45 20 O+ 20 O ( 90 P z / h 135 / 0 Relative momentum 20 O -1 20 O -2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 at t=0, rotation of the gauge Relative distance R (fm) E cm = 11.41 MeV angle : Y. Hashimoto, G. Scamps, Phys. U → e i ϕ U θ ( z ) Rev. C 94, 014610 (2016) V → e − i ϕ V θ ( z ) Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 3 / 25

  4. Evolution of two TDHFB calculation at the vicinity of the barrier κ ( r , ↑ , r , ↓ ) = | κ ( r , ↑ , r , ↓ ) | e 2 i ϕ ( r ) Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 4 / 25

  5. Evolution of two TDHFB calculation at the vicinity of the barrier κ ( r , ↑ , r , ↓ ) = | κ ( r , ↑ , r , ↓ ) | e 2 i ϕ ( r ) Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 4 / 25

  6. Josephson transfer 20 O+ 20 O 20 O 20 O J s ∝ sin (2 ϕ ) . Transfer Josephson effect The transfer of nucleons depends on the relative gauge angle. Y. Hashimoto, G. Scamps, Phys. Rev. C 94, 014610 (2016) Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 5 / 25

  7. Problem Question The relative gauge angle is not a parameter of the reaction. Does those results of TDHFB are spurious ? Projection method We should restore the symmetry of the relative gauge angle | Ψ( t = 0) � = ˆ P N L − N R ( N L − N R ) | φ � , � 2 π P N L − N R ( N L − N R ) = 1 e i ϕ [ (ˆ N L − ˆ N R ) − ( N L − N R ) ] d ϕ ˆ 2 π 0 We have to consider an evolution of a mixture of HFB states N N 2 1 Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 6 / 25

  8. Approximation Starting point M Evolution � | Ψ( t = 0) � = c n | φ n ( t = 0) � , n =1 | φ n ( t = 0) � = e i 2 n π ˆ N L | φ ( t = 0) � . M Assumption during the evolution Observables M O = � Ψ( t ) | ˆ O | Ψ( t ) � � | Ψ( t ) � = c n | φ n ( t ) � , � Ψ( t ) | Ψ( t ) � n =1 | φ n ( t ) � evolves with the TDHFB equation of motion We assume an evolution of a set of TDHFB trajectories with fixed coefficients. Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 7 / 25

  9. Multi-nucleon transfer in the sub-barrier regime Motivations : Transfer under the barrier Montanari et al., PRL 113 (2014) Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 8 / 25

  10. Calculation of the transfer probabilities Projection method with pairing Projection method for TDHF P L ( N ) = � Ψ( t ) | ˆ P L ( N )ˆ P ( N tot ) | Ψ( t ) � P L ( N ) = � Ψ( t ) | ˆ P L ( N ) | Ψ( t ) � � Ψ( t ) | ˆ P ( N tot ) | Ψ( t ) � � 2 π P L ( N ) = 1 e i ϕ (ˆ ˆ N L − N ) d ϕ 2 π 0 G. Scamps, D. Lacroix, PRC 87, (2013). *only when one of the fragment is C. Simenel, PRL 105 (2010). superfluid Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 9 / 25

  11. Triple projection method Triple projection method P L ( N , t ) = � Ψ( t ) | ˆ P L ( N ) | Ψ( t ) � � Ψ( t ) | Ψ( t ) � � 2 π � 2 π 1 N − N tot ) ˆ d ϕ 2 e i ϕ 1 (ˆ U TDHFB ( t 0 , t ) e i ϕ 2 (ˆ N L − N L ) | φ ( t = 0) � | Ψ( t ) � = d ϕ 1 (2 π 2 ) 0 0 TDPHFB TDHFB t=t f t=0 t=0 t=t f Û Û Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 10 / 25

  12. Triple projection : Pfaffian method Evolution Overlap G. F. Bertsch and L. M. Robledo, PRL 108, 042505 (2012) Optimized Pfaffian calculation : M. Wimmer, ACM Trans. Math Softw. 38, 30 (2012). Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 11 / 25

  13. Test on toy model Simple model Exact solution Time-dependent V ( t ) = V 0 exp ( − α t 2 ) Multi-configuration method K. Dietrich, Phys. Let. B 32, 6 (1970). Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 12 / 25

  14. Toy model Result 0.0045 Exact 0.004 0.0035 0.003 0.0025 P 2 0.002 0.0015 0.001 0.0005 0.0 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 t [10 − 22 s] Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 13 / 25

  15. Toy model Result 0.12 TDHFB 0.1 Exact x10 0.08 0.06 P 2 0.04 0.02 0.0 -0.02 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 t [10 − 22 s] Conclusion Spurious result with the TDHFB evolution Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 13 / 25

  16. Stationary condition Assumption during the evolution Stationary condition M � | Ψ( t ) � = c n | φ n ( t ) � , Without interaction : n =1 � φ n ( t + dt ) | φ n ( t ) � ≃ 0 | φ n ( t ) � evolves with the TDHFB equation of motion Important point We need to impose stationary condition in the TDHFB equation of motion Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 14 / 25

  17. Modification of the equation of motion � U ( t ) � U ( t ) i � ∂ � � = H , V ( t ) V ( t ) ∂ t � h ∆ � H = (1) − ∆ ∗ − h ∗ � h − δλ L , R ( t ) − ǫ k ( t ) ∆ � H = (2) − h ∗ + δλ L , R ( t ) − ǫ k ( t ) − ∆ ∗ δλ L , R ( t ) = λ L , R ( t ) − λ L , R ( t = 0) 0.014 TDHFB eq. (1) 0.012 TDHFB eq. (2) Exact 0.01 0.008 P 2 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.0 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 t [10 − 22 s] Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 15 / 25

  18. Comparison Results 10 − 1 10 − 2 P 2 10 − 3 10 − 4 TDHFB exact 10 − 5 10 − 3 10 − 2 10 − 1 1 2 5 2 5 2 5 − V 0 [MeV] Conclusion The method works well in the toy model. We can expect a predictive power in realistic calculations. Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 16 / 25

  19. TDHFB with Gogny interaction x z y N base = 2760 x and y direction : Harmonic oscillator basis n x + n y ≤ 4 In comparison, a full cartesian mesh is about z direction : Lagrange mesh nz= 46 100 000 degrees of freedom Cost of the calculation : one collision done in one day with 20 CPUs Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 17 / 25

  20. Dispersion of the trajectories Evolution of the set of TDHFB trajectories Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 18 / 25

  21. Dispersion of the trajectories Evolution of the set of TDHFB trajectories Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 18 / 25

  22. Effect of the dispersion of the trajectories Non stable results Overlap 0.25 0.14 TDHFB 0.2 0.12 Intrinsic frame |� φ 1 ( t ) | φ 2 ( t ) �| 2 0.1 0.15 0.08 P 2 0.1 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.0 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 t [fm/c] t [fm/c] Guillaume SCAMPS Restoration of symmetry in time-dependent calculations. Josephson effect study with the Gogny TDHFB calculation. November 6th 2017 19 / 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend