Responsibility and Resource Sharing Ken Long Mark Palmer May 8, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Apr 07, 2024 41 likes •101 views

MICE Construction: Responsibility and Resource Sharing Ken Long Mark Palmer May 8, 2013 MIPO Draft: 02/2013 Rev. E MICE International Project Team RAL PPD Director MICE Collaboration D. Wark A. Blondel (Spokesperson) MICE International

SLIDE 1

MICE Construction: Responsibility and Resource Sharing

Ken Long Mark Palmer May 8, 2013

SLIDE 2

MIPO

May 7-8, 2013 MICE RLS Review (RAL) 2

MICE International Project Office

MICE Project Manager

A. Nichols

MICE-UK Capital Project

R. Preece

Responsibility Consultation

MICE International Project Team

MICE-US Construction Project

A. Bross

Draft: 02/2013 Rev. E

RAL PPD Director

D. Wark

MICE-International Project Contributions

Mechanical Integration Electrical Integration US MAP Dir

M. Palmer

Focus Coil Liquid Hydrogen Delivery RF Power MICE-UK PI

K. Long

MICE-UK PMO US MAP PMO RF Magnets Detector Magnetic Shielding Component Integration Beam Line Integration Scientist

MICE Collaboration

A. Blondel (Spokesperson)

Experimental Integration Scientist

US Reporting Line UK Reporting Line Collaboration Interface

SLIDE 3

MIPO

Provides a mechanism for:

– Detailed and integrated scheduling – Assessing realistic budget constraints with contingency – A management chain integrated with the funding paths, thus providing a clear chain of responsibility

Comments:
A realistic and robust schedule cannot be achieved on the basis of a

simplistic model of components being delivered to RAL for modular integration into a beam line

– Risks and potential for contingencies are simply too great – Systems integration issues are significant – These issues have major budget and manpower impacts for the primary members of the construction effort

Construction and integration of a muon cooling channel requires a

more holistic approach

May 7-8, 2013 MICE RLS Review (RAL) 3

SLIDE 4

Near Term MIPO Priorities

Detailed analysis of contingency issues

– Requires integrated team – Requires integrated tools – Requires an agreed upon model for managing a project with significant technical risks still active

Thus providing a schedule which

– Realistically assesses the budget and contingency constraints – Can specify the expected dates for experimental capabilities with a high degree of reliability

And also budget assumptions to complete each

experimental step which are believable

May 7-8, 2013 MICE RLS Review (RAL) 4

SLIDE 5

MIPO Challenges

Have already discussed integrated scheduling and a

mutually agreed upon model for assessing budget and contingency

Management of contingency across international

funding boundaries remains challenging

– Potential bias in the solutions chosen – Potential inefficient use of resources

Need a clear funding profile among all major

participants that accounts for contingency so as to enable proper execution a Would like to negotiate with funding agencies how to implement this

May 7-8, 2013 MICE RLS Review (RAL) 5

SLIDE 6

MIPO: in operation

Many discussions on implementation of MIPO, how it
perates, interface with MICE collaboration etc.

– Realised when asked at RLSR that we were not clear amongst ourselves about the details of its operation

Propose to produce a one-page specification for the
peration of MIPO in time for the MICE collaboration

meeting at FNAL/IIT in 17—19 June 2013

– Andy Nichols has agreed to produce this document on this timescale

May 7-8, 2013 MICE RLS Review (RAL) 6