resilient response in complex systems
play

Resilient Response in Complex Systems John Allspaw SVP, Tech Ops - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Resilient Response in Complex Systems John Allspaw SVP, Tech Ops Friday, March 9, 12 OPERABILITY Friday, March 9, 12 PRODUCTION Friday, March 9, 12 http://whoownsmyavailability.com Friday, March 9, 12 Friday, March 9, 12 How important


  1. Resilient Response in Complex Systems John Allspaw SVP, Tech Ops Friday, March 9, 12

  2. OPERABILITY Friday, March 9, 12

  3. PRODUCTION Friday, March 9, 12

  4. http://whoownsmyavailability.com Friday, March 9, 12

  5. Friday, March 9, 12

  6. How important is this? Friday, March 9, 12

  7. Friday, March 9, 12

  8. Friday, March 9, 12

  9. Friday, March 9, 12

  10. Friday, March 9, 12

  11. Friday, March 9, 12

  12. Friday, March 9, 12

  13. Friday, March 9, 12

  14. Friday, March 9, 12

  15. Friday, March 9, 12

  16. Friday, March 9, 12

  17. Friday, March 9, 12

  18. Friday, March 9, 12

  19. How important is this? Friday, March 9, 12

  20. How Can This Happen? Friday, March 9, 12

  21. Complicated? Complex? Friday, March 9, 12

  22. Complex Systems • Cascading Failures • Di ffi cult to determine boundaries • Complex systems may be open • Complex systems may have a memory • Complex systems may be nested • Dynamic network of multiplicity • May produce emergent phenomena • Relationships are non-linear • Relationships contain feedback loops Friday, March 9, 12

  23. 1998 Friday, March 9, 12

  24. How Can This Happen? It does happen. And it will again. And again. Friday, March 9, 12

  25. Friday, March 9, 12

  26. Optimization MTBF MTTR Friday, March 9, 12

  27. http://www.flickr.com/photos/sparktography/75499095/ Friday, March 9, 12

  28. How does team troubleshooting happen? Friday, March 9, 12

  29. Problem Starts Detection Evaluation Response Stable PostMortem Confirmation All Clear Time Friday, March 9, 12

  30. Problem Starts Stress Detection Evaluation Response Stable PostMortem Confirmation All Clear Time Friday, March 9, 12

  31. Forced beyond learned roles Actions whose consequences are both important and di ffi cult to see Cognitively and perceptively noisy Coordinative load increases exponentially Friday, March 9, 12

  32. Friday, March 9, 12

  33. So What Can We Do? Friday, March 9, 12

  34. We Learn From Others Friday, March 9, 12

  35. Characteristics of response to escalating scenarios Friday, March 9, 12

  36. Characteristics of response to escalating scenarios ...tend to neglect how processes develop within time (awareness of rates) versus assessing how things are in the moment “On the Difficulties People Have in Dealing With Complexity” Dietrich Doerner, 1980 Friday, March 9, 12

  37. Characteristics of response to escalating scenarios ...have di ffi culty in dealing with exponential developments (hard to imagine how fast something can change, or accelerate) “On the Difficulties People Have in Dealing With Complexity” Dietrich Doerner, 1980 Friday, March 9, 12

  38. Characteristics of response to escalating scenarios ...inclined to think in causal series, instead of causal nets. A therefore B, instead of A, therefore B and C (therefore D and E), etc. “On the Difficulties People Have in Dealing With Complexity” Dietrich Doerner, 1980 Friday, March 9, 12

  39. Pitfalls Thematic Vagabonding Friday, March 9, 12

  40. Pitfalls Goal Fixation (encystment) Friday, March 9, 12

  41. Pitfalls Refusal to make decisions Friday, March 9, 12

  42. Heroism Non-communicating lone wolf-isms Friday, March 9, 12

  43. Distraction Irrelevant noise in comm channels Friday, March 9, 12

  44. Jens Rasmussen, 1983 Senior Member, IEEE “Skills, Rules, and Knowledge; Signals, Signs, and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Models” IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, May 1983 Friday, March 9, 12

  45. SKILL - BASED Simple, routine RULE - BASED Knowable, but unfamiliar KNOWLEDGE - BASED WTF IS GOING ON? (Reason, 1990) Friday, March 9, 12

  46. Team Dynamics Friday, March 9, 12

  47. High Reliability Organizations • Complex Socio-Technical • Air Tra ffi c Control systems • Naval Air Operations At Sea • E ffi ciency <-> Thoroughness • Electrical Power Systems • Time/Resource Constrained • Etc. • Engineering-driven Friday, March 9, 12

  48. Friday, March 9, 12

  49. “The Self-Designing High-Reliability Organization: Aircraft Carrier Flight Operations at Sea” Rochlin, La Porte, and Roberts. Naval War College Review 1987 Friday, March 9, 12

  50. Friday, March 9, 12

  51. Close interdependence between groups Friday, March 9, 12

  52. Close reciprocal coordination and information sharing, resulting in overlapping knowledge Friday, March 9, 12

  53. High redundancy: multiple people observing the same event and sharing information Friday, March 9, 12

  54. Broad definition of who belongs to the team. Friday, March 9, 12

  55. Teammates are included in the communication loops rather than excluded. Friday, March 9, 12

  56. Lots of error correction. Friday, March 9, 12

  57. High levels of situation comprehension: maintain constant awareness of the possibility of accidents. Friday, March 9, 12

  58. High levels of interpersonal skills Friday, March 9, 12

  59. Maintenance of detailed records of past incidents that are closely examined with a view to learning from them. Friday, March 9, 12

  60. Patterns of authority are changed to meet the demands of the events: organizational flexibility. Friday, March 9, 12

  61. The reporting of errors and faults is rewarded, not punished. Friday, March 9, 12

  62. So What Else Can We Do? Friday, March 9, 12

  63. We Drill Friday, March 9, 12

  64. We GameDay Friday, March 9, 12

  65. Friday, March 9, 12

  66. We Learn To Improvise Friday, March 9, 12

  67. IMPROVISATION Friday, March 9, 12

  68. IMPROVISATION Friday, March 9, 12

  69. We Learn From Our Mistakes Friday, March 9, 12

  70. Postmortems • Full timelines: What happened, when • Review in public, everyone invited • Search for “second stories” instead of “human error” • Cultivating a blameless environment • Giving requisite authority to individuals to improve things Friday, March 9, 12

  71. Qualifying Response High signal:noise in comm channels? Troubleshooting fatigue? Troubleshooting hando ff ? All tools on-hand? Improvised tooling or solutions? Metrics visibility? Collaborative and skillful communication? Friday, March 9, 12

  72. Remediation Friday, March 9, 12

  73. Mature Role of Automation “Ironies of Automation” - Lisanne Bainbridge http://www.bainbrdg.demon.co.uk/Papers/Ironies.html Friday, March 9, 12

  74. Mature Role of Automation • Moves humans from manual operator to supervisor • Extends and augments human abilities, doesn’t replace it • Doesn’t remove “human error” • Are brittle • Recognize that there is always discretionary space for humans • Recognizes the Law of Stretched Systems Friday, March 9, 12

  75. Law of Stretched Systems “Every system is stretched to operate at its capacity; as soon as there is some improvement, for example, in the form of new technology, it will be exploited to achieve a new intensity and tempo of activity” D. Woods, E. Hollnagel, “Joint Cognitive Systems: Patterns” 2006 Friday, March 9, 12

  76. We Share Near-Miss Events Friday, March 9, 12

  77. Near Misses Hey everybody - Don’t be like me. I tried to X, but that wasn’t a good idea. It almost exploded everyone. So, don’t do: (details about X) Love, Joe Friday, March 9, 12

  78. Near Misses • Can act like “vaccines” - help system safety without actually hurting anything • Happen more often, so provide more data on latent failures • Powerful reminder of hazards, and slows down the process of forgetting to be afraid Friday, March 9, 12

  79. A parting word A parting challenge Friday, March 9, 12

  80. Two Propositions Friday, March 9, 12

  81. 100 changes 6 change-related issues Friday, March 9, 12

  82. 100 > 6 Friday, March 9, 12

  83. Proposition #1 “Ways in which things go right are special cases of the ways in which things go wrong.” Friday, March 9, 12

  84. Proposition #1 Successes = failures gone wrong Study the failures, generalize from that. Potential data sources: 6 out of 100 Friday, March 9, 12

  85. Proposition #2 “Ways in which things go wrong are special cases of the ways in which things go right.” Friday, March 9, 12

  86. Proposition #2 Failures = successes gone wrong Study the successes, generalize from that Potential data sources: 94 out of 100 Friday, March 9, 12

  87. 94/100 ? OR 6/100 ? Friday, March 9, 12

  88. What and WHY Do Things Go RIGHT? Friday, March 9, 12

  89. Not just: why did we fail? But also: why did we succeed? Friday, March 9, 12

  90. Resilient Response • Can learn from other fields • Can train for outages • Can learn from mistakes • Can learn from successes as well as failures Friday, March 9, 12

  91. http://www.flickr.com/photos/sparktography/75499095/ Friday, March 9, 12

  92. THE END Friday, March 9, 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend