Relevance of information overlay services and their status in the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2015 SHOM WENDWG5

Relevance of information overlay services and their status in the global IHO ENC programme (WENDWG5-04b)

2015 SHOM WENDWG5

Additional layer (S-57 format, S-63 encrypted) to ENCs Available through AVCS and on compatible equipment Contains all Admiralty T&P NMs and provides additional preliminary information that is specific to ENCs

AIO (Admiralty information overlay) service

Displayed as a red-transparent area with an associated window

2015 SHOM WENDWG5

Although a digital product for the safety of navigation, AIO is not a IHO or IMO official product compliant with IHO standard On 53 IHO MS producers of ENCs, 30 issue (in 2014) ENC revisions to cover their paper chart NtMs Paper chart ENC

T or P NtM End of T or P NtM ER ER AIO

Redundancy If different, which is the good one?

2015 SHOM WENDWG5

SOLAS, V9/3: “…Contracting Governments undertake to ensure the greatest possible uniformity in charts and nautical publications and to take into account, whenever possible, relevant international resolutions and recommendations” IHO resolution 7/1919: “Hydrographic Offices should avoid creating products where another Hydrographic Office has charting responsibility for the waters concerned and already

• ffers up-to-date products adequate for customers' requirements”

SOLAS, V2: “Nautical chart or nautical publication is […] issued officially by or on the authority of a Government, authorized Hydrographic Office…”

On the compliance of AIOs with :

2015 SHOM WENDWG5

“The Overlay makes passage planning simpler and safer…” (from AIO user guide) “To help bridge crews identify areas of possible navigational uncertainty and risk at the crucial passage planning stage, all AVCS customers receive the unique ADMIRALTY Information Overlay” (from AVCS documentation) => IHO ENC service not as safe as it should be? Not adequate for costumers’ requirements?

2015 SHOM WENDWG5

If AIO is considered by IHO offering an advantage for safety of navigation (that can not be achieved by a better application of rules already existing or to be improved), then: Its use should be envisaged by IHO (through actions to be programmed), AIO should be interoperable with all type approved systems Coastal States should be informed as soon as possible

• f the “additional” information concerning safety of

navigation in waters they are responsible for. If not (risks exceed advantages): Procedures should be agreed and applied between AVCS producer and IHO ENC producers so AIO should not be necessary

2015 SHOM WENDWG5

Assessment of the defaults AIO aims to deal with should be undertaken Ways and means to correct them should be considered by IHO in order to fulfil its commitment to the mariners. Stakeholders should be invited to consider whether IO services should be either improved or generalized or abandoned as soon as all T&P NtM are coded in ENCs => WENDWG should propose IRCC include in its PoW an action to propose a position and a way ahead about the provision of IO

Conclusions and recommendations: