Regulatory Proposal to the AER 2011-2015 AER Public Forum, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Regulatory Proposal to the AER 2011-2015 AER Public Forum, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Regulatory Proposal to the AER 2011-2015 AER Public Forum, Melbourne 17 December 2009 Presenters and Outline Shane Breheny CEO Neil Watt Manager Asset Strategy and Performance Energy & demand Ongoing
2
Presenters and Outline
- Energy & demand
forecasts
- Work program drivers
- Key investments
- Operating costs
- Pricing & tariff outcomes
- Ongoing expectations
and challenges
- Past reliability and
customer service performance
- Key messages
- Expenditure development
process
- Network
- Shane Breheny – CEO
- Neil Watt – Manager Asset Strategy and Performance
3
Expectations & Challenges
Ongoing Expectations Emerging Challenges
- Good reliability and supply
restoration performance
- Security of the network
- Strong emphasis on
bushfire risk mitigation
- High levels of safety for the
public and employees
- Focus on efficient
investment choices
- Facilitating customer choice
in retail
- Environmental challenges
- growth in air conditioning
load
- evolving environmental
policy initiatives impacting
- perations and sales
- Containing ‘energy at risk’
- Ageing infrastructure
- Smarter network
4
CitiPower
5
CitiPower’s Network
Key statistics
- 157 kms supply area
- Region covers Melbourne CBD
and inner suburbs
- Region generates 22% of GSP
- 310,000 customers
- 46.6% network underground
- 1,907 customers per sq km
6
Australia’s most reliable CBD distribution network
59.8 64.1 51.6 41.4 36 43.4 32.4 23.8 41.5 27 88.1 44.7 20.6 16.6 61.2 21.4 21.2 21.9 17.2 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 U n p la n n e d N e tw
- rk S
A ID I (m in s)
Significant load shedding due to generation shortfalls Major storm events ______ Unplanned Network SAIDI Minutes (no exclusions) ______ Unplanned Network SAIDI Minutes (with exclusions)
7
Major investments 2006-10
- Upgrade of the network servicing the Port of Melbourne and
surrounding area to include a second major zone substation supply
- Installation of additional 60MVA of substation capacity at south
western end of CBD to service the CBD and West Melbourne
- Commencement of major security and growth related upgrades to
Melbourne’s CBD
- Replacement of Southbank zone substation
8
Customer service
CitiPow er’s com m itm ent to exceptional service w as acknow ledged at the 2 0 0 8 Custom er Service I nstitute of Australia Australian Service Excellence Aw ard 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 0.02%
0.00% 0.01% 0.02% 0.03% 0.04% 0.05% 0.06% 0.07% 0.08% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 % of ombudsman complaints per customer Result significant given CitiPower has over 310,000 customers
9
Customer service levels & safety performance
- CitiPower’s commitment to customer service is demonstrated by:
– average complaints per 1,000 customer below the industry average since 2002 – a reduction in complaints escalated to the Energy and Water Ombudsman – consistently high satisfaction ratings across residential customers (79 per cent), major customers (86 per cent) and retailers (89 per cent).
- CitiPower was recognised with a Highly Commended Award at the
2008 National Safety Awards of Excellence
10
Proposal highlights - CP
- Forecast net capital expenditure of $1,058m ($2010)
- Forecast operating expenditure of $222m ($2010) over 2011-15
- Maintenance of existing reliability and quality levels
- Enhancement of system security in the CBD
- Mitigation of fault level exceedence in the CBD and surrounding
areas
- Maintain ‘energy at risk’ at or below 2010 levels
- Continued renewal of urban areas driving new connections
- Prudent replacement of aging assets
- Introduction of smarter network technologies using AMI
functionality
11
Expenditure development process
- Methodology:
– Capex: bottom-up approach based
- n asset management plans &
demand forecasts – Opex: revealed costs using recurrent efficient 2009 as base year – Where appropriate subject to external advice/ review
- Based on prudent asset
management plan
- Subject to rigorous governance
process
- Aimed at meeting NEL objectives &
rule requirements
Safety Reliability Security Quality Price
12
Energy forecasts & Max demand trends
- Energy consumption used in
establishing prices
- Energy forecasts developed
by NIEIR
- Energy forecasts influenced
by:
Government energy policy Global financial crisis impacts AMI
- Maximum demand used in
determining Reinforcement Capex
- Forecasted internally and
verified with NIEIR
- Maximum demand
influenced by:
Economic conditions Population growth Appliance purchase & usage patterns
Energy forecasts Maximum demand
13
Growth trends
- 2.0%
- 1.0%
0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 2006-10 2009 2011-15 Average annual growth Customer numbers Energy consumption Maximum demand
14
Work program drivers – peak demand & asset utilisation
- Peak demand growth driven by air
conditioning:
– 2009 heatwave, record demand – New phase, from penetration to upgrade
- Expenditure driven by highest
utilised assets
CitiPower Load Profile
0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 800.00 900.00 1000.00 1100.00 1200.00 1300.00 1400.00 1500.00 :0 1 :0 2 :0 3 :0 4 :0 5 :0 6 :0 7 :0 8 :0 9 :0 1 :0 1 1 :0 1 2 :0 1 3 :0 1 4 :0 1 5 :0 1 6 :0 1 7 :0 1 8 :0 1 9 :0 2 :0 2 1 :0 2 2 :0 2 3 :0 :0
Time of Day - Eastern Standard Time N
- rm
a lis e d lo a d in g 29/01/09 at 43.2oC 28/01/09 at 43.2oC 17/02/09 at 31.7oC 06/02/09 at 33.1oC 12/02/09 at 23.7oC 20/02/09 at 24.5oC
Mild Days Warm Days Hot Days
15
Work program drivers – energy at risk
- Containment of energy at risk to 2010 levels:
- energy at risk has more than doubled in last 4 years
- implies augmentation expenditure levels greater than historic levels
CitiPower Network 2006-2015 Zone Sub Energy at Risk (EDPR Iteration 2)
0MWh 20,000MWh 40,000MWh 60,000MWh 80,000MWh 100,000MWh 120,000MWh 140,000MWh 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Energy at Risk (MWh) - Do Nothing - Using expanded DSPR forecasts Energy at Risk (MWh) - With Augmentation - EDPR Iteration 2
16
Work program drivers – Ageing assets
Asset Replacem ent:
- Portfolio of ageing assets
- Average age in excess of 40 years
- Increasing risk of higher failure rates and rising maintenance
costs
- Prudent conditioning monitoring to manage risk
- replacement of poles
- replacement of underground cables
- Replacement of major plant
17
Demand management
- Network planning process to identify and implement demand
management alternatives where they are economically efficient
- Demand management and/ or non network initiatives:
– West Melbourne
- Extent to which demand management and/ or non- network
alternatives are considered depends on:
– CitiPower receiving expressions of interest from proponents of feasible alternatives – advances in technology which may lead to a greater number of viable and feasible alternatives
18
Key investments 2011-15
Reinforcement of a highly utilised network
– Metro 2012 Capacity Upgrade – CBD Security Upgrade – Regulatory test process completed for both projects
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year R e in fo rm ce m e n t (2 1 $ m ) CBD Security Metro 2012
19
Key investments 2011-15
- Enabling connection of embedded generations whilst ensuring
security of the network
– maintaining fault levels at or below plant and equipment ratings has become an increasing challenge due to an increase in embedded generators – installation of impedance reactors to ensure compliance with fault levels – proposed charge being levied on embedded generation connections
- Safety and the environment
– noise control – drainage of oil and asbestos management
- Creating a network for the future
– AMI leveraged projects – replacement/ renewal of the SCADA network
20
Approach to operating expenditure forecasts
- Use revealed cost methodology using 2009 as base:
– most recent actual performance (5 months of forecast) – efficiency carry over mechanism applies – audited accounts available before AER final decision
± Add/ subtract changes in service classification ± Add/ subtract change in overhead allocation + Add step changes + Add scale escalation for growth across network + Add cost escalation = Forecast operating expenditure
21
Opex – key drivers of cost increases
Debt raising costs: $22m Scale escalation: $20m
– Increased network size – Increased work volume – Additional customers
Scope Step Changes: $24m
– Climate change – Demand Management (WMTS) – Insurance – Self insurance – AEMC Distribution Planning Rule changes – Safety management
Input cost escalation: $19m
– Increased labour – Increased materials
22
Expenditure 2011-15
200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 Gross capex Net capex Operating $m, 2010 2006-10 2011-15
23
Revenue requirement
Return of capital: 29% Opex: 18% Other: 3% Return on capital: 64%
24
Price outcomes for customers - CitiPower
- CitiPower’s success has been achieved whilst delivering real
decreases in average distribution charges of 36 per cent over the last ten years
- CitiPower will continue to ensure value to its customers by:
– maintaining current good performance in the face of increasing peak demand and asset utilisation – enabling connection of embedded generators whilst ensuring security of the network – ensuring sustainable performance in the face of climate change and addressing increasing aging infrastructure
- These challenges mean that prices will be increasing this regulatory
control period:
– 10.1 per cent increase in 2011 and a 8 per cent increase in price per annum over the rest of the regulatory control period
25
- CitiPower supports continuation of an efficiency benefits sharing
scheme applying to operating expenditure
- CitiPower supports the introduction of a demand management
incentive scheme
- CitiPower supports the proposed service incentive arrangements
with business specific amendments
Incentive arrangements
26
Network tariffs - CitiPower
- Roll out of AMI meters allows for the development of more
innovative and efficient tariff structures
- CitiPower are considering a number of changes to their tariff design
for possible start-up in 2011
- Customers will be transitioned throughout the 2011-15 regulatory
control period as meters are changed over
- CitiPower will be consulting with their customers over 2010 on
proposed tariff design changes
- Final set of tariffs will be outlined in CitiPower’s Pricing Proposal
following the AER’s Final Decision
27
Powercor Australia
28
Powercor Australia’s network
- cc
Key statistics
- 150,000 sq kms supply
area
- Region covers 65 % of
state
- Serves key regional cities
- 683,000 customers
- 4.5 customers per sq km
- 95% network overhead
- cc
Australia’s most reliable rural distribution network
230 198.5 207.7 185.5 186.6 194.4 141.3 198.5 209.9 133.5 124.6 113.2 140.6 110.3 124.5 123.7
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 U nplanned N etw
- rk S
A ID I (m ins)
Storms and third- party incidents caused significant damage to the network Significant load shedding due to generation shortfalls Major storm event ______ Unplanned Network SAIDI Minutes (no exclusions) ______ Unplanned Network SAIDI Minutes (with exclusions)
30
Key investments 2006-10
- Specific projects targets delivered in the last regulatory control
period include:
– focus on small areas of customers receiving low levels of service (Otways) – improving identification and rectification of supply quality issues – additional supply capacity in the Sunshine/ St Albans and Geelong areas to meet demand growth – reinforcement of supply capacity along the Murray River between Mildura and Swan Hill
31
Customer service
Powercor’s commitment to exceptional service was acknowledged at the 2008 Customer Service Institute of Australia Australian Service Excellence Award 0.02% 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 0.04%
0.00% 0.01% 0.02% 0.03% 0.04% 0.05% 0.06% 0.07% 0.08% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 % of ombudsman complaints per customer Result significant given Powercor has over 683,000 customers
32
Customer service levels & safety performance
- Powercor’s commitment to customer service is demonstrated by:
– average complaints per 1,000 customer below the industry average since 2002 – a reduction in complaints escalated to the Energy and Water Ombudsman – consistently high satisfaction ratings across residential customers (84 per cent), major customers (86 per cent) and retailers (89 per cent).
- Powercor was recognised with a Highly Commended Award at the
2008 National Safety Awards of Excellence
– lost time injuries has exhibited a downtrend since late 1990’s – average annual lost time injury rate below one since 2001
33
Proposal highlights - PAL
- Forecast net capital expenditure of $1,588m ($2010)
- Forecast operating expenditure of $869m ($2010) over 2011-15
- Maintain existing reliability and quality of supply levels
- Maintain ‘energy at risk’ at or below 2010 levels
- Prudent condition based asset replacement and renewals
- Managing the impacts of climate change on the network
- Continued growth in new connections across the network
- Introduction of smarter network technologies using AMI
functionality
34
Expenditure development process
- Methodology:
– Capex: bottom-up approach based
- n asset management plans &
demand forecasts – Opex: revealed costs using recurrent efficient 2009 as base year – Where appropriate subject to external advice/ review
- Based on prudent asset
management plan
- Subject to rigorous governance
process
- Aimed at meeting NEL objectives &
rule requirements
Safety Reliability Security Quality Price
35
Energy forecasts & Max demand trends
- Energy consumption used in
establishing prices
- Energy forecasts developed
by NIEIR
- Energy forecasts influenced
by:
Government energy policy Global financial crisis impacts AMI
- Maximum demand used in
determining Reinforcement Capex
- Forecasted internally and
verified with NIEIR
- Maximum demand
influenced by:
Economic conditions Population growth Appliance purchase & usage patterns
Energy forecasts Maximum demand
36
Growth trends
- 2.0%
- 1.0%
0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 2006-10 2009 2011-15 Average annual growth Customer numbers Energy consumption Maximum demand
37
Work program drivers – peak demand & asset utilisation
- Peak demand growth driven by
air conditioning:
- 2009 heatwave, record demand
- New phase, from penetration to
upgrade
- Expenditure driven by highest
utilised assets.
Powercor Load Profile
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 1800.00 2000.00 2200.00 2400.00 :0 1 :0 2 :0 3 :0 4 :0 5 :0 6 :0 7 :0 8 :0 9 :0 1 :0 1 1 :0 1 2 :0 1 3 :0 1 4 :0 1 5 :0 1 6 :0 1 7 :0 1 8 :0 1 9 :0 2 :0 2 1 :0 2 2 :0 2 3 :0 :0
Time of Day - Eastern Standard Time N
- rm
a lis e d lo a d in g 29/01/09 at 44.3oC 28/01/09 at 43.2oC 17/02/09 at 31.7oC 06/02/09 at 33.1oC 12/02/09 at 23.7oC 20/02/09 at 24.5oC
Mild Days Warm Days Hot Days
38
Work program drivers – energy at risk.
- Containment of energy at risk to 2010 levels:
- energy at risk has more than doubled in last 4 years
- implies augmentation expenditure levels greater than historic
levels
PAL Zone Substations Energy at Risk without Single Transformer Stations
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Year E n e rg y a t R is k (M W h rs ) Actuals Do Nothing Augment BAS MD step increase for both summer & winter. Predominantly due to BAS winter MD downturn (mild winter). Predominantly BAS & WPD Projects.
39
Work program drivers – Ageing assets
- Asset Replacement:
– portfolio of ageing assets – average age in excess of 30 years – increasing risk of higher failure rates and rising maintenance costs – prudent conditioning monitoring to manage risk
- replacement of poles
- replacement of cross arms
- replacement of conductor
- replacement of major plant
40
Demand management
- Network planning process to identify and implement demand
management alternatives where they are economically efficient
- Demand management and/ or non network initiatives:
– Charlton zone substation – solar SWER photovoltaic system trial – hot water load management
- Extent to which demand management and/ or non- network
alternatives are considered depends on:
– PAL receiving expressions of interest from proponents of feasible alternatives – advances in technology which may lead to a greater number of viable and feasible alternatives
41
Key investments
- Reinforcement of a highly utilised network
– augmentation of the existing Geelong East Zone Substation – augmentation of the 66kV lines in the Geelong area – increasing the capacity of the 66kV line in the Charlton area
- Maintaining reliability and quality through renewals and
replacement
– major replacement of conductors – replacement of poles – replacement of cross arms
42
Key investments (cont)
- Replacement of conductors
– Powercor will conduct a major replacement conductor program based
- n condition of assets
– enhanced program aims to ensure reliability is maintained in light of continued ageing and deterioration of overhead conductors in rural areas
- Creating a network for the future
– AMI leveraged projects – replacement/ renewal of SCADA network
43
Approach to operating expenditure forecasts
- Use revealed cost methodology using 2009 as base:
– most recent actual performance (5 months of forecast) – efficiency carry over mechanism applies – audited accounts available before AER final decision
± Add/ subtract changes in service classification ± Add/ subtract change in overhead allocation + Add step changes + Add scale escalation for growth across network + Add cost escalation = Forecast operating expenditure
44
Opex – key drivers of cost increases
Debt raising costs: $33m Work volume & Customer growth escalation: $9m Input cost escalation: $78m
– Increased labour – Increased materials
Debt raising costs: $33m Scope Step Changes: $94 m
– Climate change – High risk Victorian towns – Insurance – Self insurance – Vegetation management – Safety management scheme – AEMC Distribution planning changes
Network growth escalation: $53m
– Increased network size
45
Expenditure 2011-15
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Gross capex Net capex Operating $m, 2010 2006-10 2011-15
46
Revenue requirement
Return on capital: 50% Return of capital: 28% Operating expenditure: 33% Other: 0.04%
47
Price outcomes for customers - Powercor
- Powercor’s success has been achieved whilst delivering real
decreases in average distribution charges of 45 per cent over the last ten years
- Powercor will continue to ensure value to its customers by:
– maintaining current good performance in the face of increasing peak demand, asset utilisation and increasing bushfire risk – ensuring sustainable performance in the face of climate change and addressing increasing aging infrastructure
- These challenges mean that prices will be increasing this regulatory
control period:
– 22.3 per cent increase in 2011 and a 5 per cent increase in price per annum over the rest of the regulatory control period
48
- Powercor supports continuation of an efficiency benefits sharing
scheme applying to operating expenditure
- Powercor supports the introduction of a demand management
incentive scheme
- Powercor supports the proposed service incentive arrangements
with business specific amendments
Incentive arrangements
49
Network tariffs - Powercor
- Roll out of AMI meters allows for the development of more
innovative and efficient tariff structures
- Powercor is considering a number of changes to its tariff design for
possible start-up in 2011
- Customers will be transitioned throughout the 2011-15 regulatory
control period as meters are changed over
- Powercor will be consulting with their customers over 2010 on
proposed tariff design changes
- Final set of tariffs will be outlined in Powercor’ Pricing Proposal
following the AER’s Final Decision
50