regulation industry structure market power the way
play

Regulation, Industry Structure & Market Power The Way Forward - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Regulation, Industry Structure & Market Power The Way Forward for Energy Users Roman Domanski Executive Director Energy Users Association of Australia ACCC Conference, Gold Coast, 1 August 2003 Where Are We (Users) Coming From


  1. Regulation, Industry Structure & Market Power – The Way Forward for Energy Users Roman Domanski Executive Director Energy Users Association of Australia ACCC Conference, Gold Coast, 1 August 2003

  2. Where Are We (Users) Coming From … • Energy reform … what is it good for? – Absolutely nothing! • Well not quite, because there have been benefits – But they • Have varied over time (in the energy market) • Been limited geographically • Are constantly under threat from market power and monopolies • We need market structures and regulation to deliver benefits to users – We aren’t getting enough of this yet

  3. Why Did We Reform Energy? • Supposedly to benefit energy users – That’s what we were told at the time and was the foundation for user support – We’ve had a bit of this but not enough • Reality is that the reforms have conferred far too few benefits on users – Businesses sold off at inflated prices to increase returns to pre-existing ‘owners’ – Government owners have manipulated businesses, regulators and policy for budgetary purposes – Well-known con trick – Buyers, competitive markets & users have paid the cost • Little point in reforming energy markets without benefiting the users of energy

  4. A $6 Billion Hole in the NEM! One Way Users Have Lost Out 12MMAv SPOT PRICE ($/MWh) CUMULATIVE DIFFERENTIAL SPOT $100/MWh $10 PRICE VALUE ($ billions) Cumulative RRP Difference value QLD 12MMAv NSW 12MMAv $80/MWh $8 VIC 12MMAv SA 12MMAv SNOW 12MMAv $60/MWh $6 $40/MWh $4 $20/MWh $2 $0/MWh $0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 • Differential regional spot prices has cost end-users $6 billion since NEM start • Caused by transmission & structural problems

  5. Excessive Rates of Return for Energy Monopolies – Another Way Users Have Lost Out 8.0% ESTIMATED WACC ("Vanilla" Real, post-tax) 7.5% Gas - ACCC 1998 (Trans) Gas - IPART 2000 (Dist) Gas - OFFGAR 2000 (Dist) 7.0% Gas - OFFGAR 2002 (Draft) ACCC - Vic Gas ORG - Elec Dist OFFGAR - EPIC Gas - ESC 2002 AIE - 6.82% ESC - Gas CE - 6.80% Elec - IPART 1999 (Dist) ACCC - Transgrid Transend Elec - ORG 2000 (Dist) OFFGAR - Gas Dist IE - 6.54% 6.5% Elec - QCA 2000 (Dist) EA - 6.49% Elec - ACCC 2000 (Transgrid) ACCC - Powerlink Elec - ACCC 2002 (ElectraNet)) IPART - Gas Elec - ACCC 2001 (Powerlink) ACCC - ElectraNet IPART - Elec Dist 6.0% Elec - ACCC 2002 (SPI PowerNet)) ACCC - SPI PowerNet Water - IPART 2000 QCA - Elec Dist UK Gas - OFGEM 2001 (Transco) UK Gas - OFGEM 2002 (Ind Trans) IPART - Water UK Elec - OFGEM 1999 (Dist) 5.5% UK Elec - OFGEM 2000 (NGC) UK W&SCo - OFWAT 1999 (Large Co) UK WoC - OFWAT 1999 (Small Co) US Gas - Average by year 5.0% US Elec - Average by year Elec Transend 2003 Elec Country Energy Elec EnergyAustralia 4.5% Elec Integral US RoR estimated real, post-tax @ 60% gearing Elec Australian Inland YEAR 4.0% 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05

  6. The Way Forward – If We Are To Get It Right For Energy Users • Let’s remind ourselves of – IC energy inquiry – Hilmer – Original basis for NEM and gas reform – Parer – ABARE analysis of electricity markets (R.I.P.) • It’s clear what we need to do – But it’s taking too bloody long – Meanwhile, we are costing ourselves • Let’s take a look at the main bits again …

  7. Competition, Market Structure & Market Power … one key to overcoming the $6 billion hole

  8. Market Structure • We have taken some important steps, but have not gone far enough • Vertical separation (except in WA?) • Horizontal separation of generation poor in NSW, Qld, WA, SA & Tas (1/6 isn’t good enough) • Gas upstream & retail competition still lacking • This situation means we have market power problems that still need to be dealt with

  9. Fixing Markets • Further horizontal separation of generation needed in NSW, Qld, WA & Tas • Measures needed to enhance upstream gas competition • Fixing transmission in the NEM – National approach needed – at least to planning & approvals – Better process needed to deal with constraints – Need +/- incentives for service – Need free flowing transmission links • A key to competition, trade, liquidity, reliability, etc

  10. • Demand management – NEM is a supply-side dominated market – Healthy NEM needs a demand side response (DSR) – A complex, difficult and longer-term issue, but the gains make it very worthwhile – EUAA’s DSR trial shows there is a practical and effective way forward (worth $2 billion pa) • Gas reforms – More upstream competition needed – Some emerging through market, new contracts, etc – Policy & regulatory action needed to re-enforce this • Pipelines – A key to competition in gas supply – Existing regulation appropriate for mature pipelines – Need to deal more effectively with new pipelines

  11. Regulating Energy Networks • Monopolies and need to be regulated • Support continued use of incentive-based regulation, but it has been overly-generous to networks • Regulation needs to improve and not become static • Is there a case for performance-based regulation?

  12. Our Conclusions • If we can’t take these structural & other reforms – Then we need stronger regulation to keep market power in check when it breaks out – Current approach of relying on instruments, powers of instruments such as National Electricity Code and TPA is totally inadequate • Unless there is a decent policy & regulatory response soon, we have no choice but to support stronger and more specific regulatory powers – Electricity has strong scope for market power abuse that cannot be left unchecked – Hope gas could be handled through more effective application of existing laws and instruments

  13. The MCE & Implementing Parer • Critical role & users looking for leadership and action on all major fronts • Useful first step in June – Looking for other positive signs from today’s meeting • Energy regulator – EUAA’s check list – Independent (from Govts/industry) & transparent – National & pro-competitive objectives – Seamless role along the whole energy chain – Appropriate powers, enforcement & penalties – Rationalise number of regulators & processes – Consultation & involvement from users – Resources • Action on regulator not enough – Need steps in other areas too

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend