Regulation 85 Phase 2 Subcommittee November 21, 2016 1 Do not - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

regulation 85 phase 2 subcommittee
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Regulation 85 Phase 2 Subcommittee November 21, 2016 1 Do not - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DRAFT Do not cite or quote Regulation 85 Phase 2 Subcommittee November 21, 2016 1 Do not cite or quote DRAFT Recap from Stakeholder Meeting #1 Except for chlorophyll a , a delay will likely be necessary as it is unlikely that TN and TP


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Regulation 85 Phase 2 Subcommittee

November 21, 2016

1

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Recap from Stakeholder Meeting #1

  • Except for chlorophyll a, a delay will likely be necessary as it is

unlikely that TN and TP numbers will be updated and approved by 2022.

  • Leave 31.17 May 31, 2022 date alone and rely on “will be

considered” and “where necessary” language in 31.17(g)?

  • Develop nutrient reduction strategy and incorporate standards

revision and implementation as part of strategy (consistent w/ Beauvais memo)?

  • Chlorophyll a - do we move forward after 2022?
  • Do nothing?
  • Delayed implementation of Phase 2 as currently envisioned?

2

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Recap from Stakeholder Meeting #1 continued

  • More stringent effluent limitations for facilities currently subject

to Regulation #85? ○ Drinking water protection?

  • Identify more critical areas of the state protect and expand

regulation coverage and then phase/delay based on this information? ○ Harmful Algae Blooms/Lakes?

  • Monitoring to support standards development?
  • Nonpoint sources?

3

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Interests Discussion

  • Certainty on when facility improvements may be required
  • Fiscal responsibility/funding constraints
  • Progress on nutrient reductions
  • Integrated planning
  • Ability to measure progress
  • What is the end goal/when are we finished
  • Approvable standards
  • Promote optimization
  • Forward progress
  • Protect classified uses
  • Headwaters protection

4

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Regulation Adopted, June 2012

  • Regulation 85 Numeric Limits for

Priority Basins effective, July 1, 2013

  • Triennial Review, October 2015
  • Start adoption of Interim

Nitrogen Values to headwater segments, May 31, 2017

Triennial Reviews

  • Delayed implementation of

Regulation 85 expires, May 31, 2022

  • Start adoption of Regulation 31

Interim Values to all stream segments, May 31, 2022

  • Determine if nonpoint source

control measures are needed, May 31, 2022

Rescind/Revise Regulation (2020’s)

Regulation 85 as Originally Envisioned

Now Problematic

5

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Enhance & Extend Regulation 85 Focus on DSVs and Site-Specific Standards Do Nothing Revise Colorado Table Value Standards

Potential options for October 2017 Rulemaking and beyond

6

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Enhance & Extend Regulation 85

  • Adjust dates towards full implementation
  • Revise nitrogen values to protect drinking

water

  • Consider applying tech-based effluent limits

to more watersheds and medium sized facilities, informed by SWAT model

  • Develop a system to prioritize and/or

incentivize treatment plant optimization (design capacity)

  • Delay or rescind unapproved Regulation 31

Interim Nutrient Values (streams)

  • Revised monitoring program

Reg 85 DSVs & SSSs Nothing TVS

7

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Focus on DSVs & Site-Specific Standards

  • Propose approvable standards [EPA

Ecoregion Values, Montana approach, or

  • ther]
  • Focus on providing guidance and assistance

for sector-based DSVs and Site Specific Standards

  • Develop tools for individual DSVs
  • Financial capability tool
  • Technical feasibility tool
  • Revised monitoring program

Reg 85 DSVs & SSSs Nothing TVS

8

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Refine Colorado Table Value Standards

  • Focus on revising or re-doing the Interim

Nutrient Values, with the exception of chlorophyll a

  • Regulation 85 continues as is until 2022
  • DSVs and Site-Specific Standards would be

driven by CDPS permit holders

  • WQCD priorities shift considerably
  • Revised monitoring program

Reg 85 DSVs & SSSs Nothing TVS

9

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Do Nothing

  • Risk of EPA disapprovals
  • Less planning certainty
  • Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living

together, mass hysteria

Reg 85 DSVs & SSSs Nothing TVS

10

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Discussion

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Next Steps

  • Feedback to WQCD
  • Options from WQCD
  • Other options?
  • Thoughts on treatment plant optimization
  • Disadvantaged communities
  • Is another subcommitte meeting needed? (December 13?)
  • Stakeholder Meeting #2 Report-Out
  • January 12, 2017

12

DRAFT

Do not cite or quote