June 2017 1 Cautionary statements ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

june 2017
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

June 2017 1 Cautionary statements ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CORPORATE PRESENTATION June 2017 1 Cautionary statements ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

CORPORATE PRESENTATION

June 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cautionary statements

2

ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance are “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, which address events, results, outcomes or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “targeted”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation of such terms. Forward-looking statements in this presentation include the statements made under “2017 first quarter highlights” and “Rainy River update”, as well as other statements elsewhere in this presentation, including, among others, statements with respect to: guidance for production, operating expense and all-in sustaining costs, and the factors contributing to those expected results, as well as expected capital and other expenditures; planned development activities for 2017 at the Rainy River project, including the completion and commissioning of the processing facilities; planned preparations for operations at the Rainy River project, including the mining rate, removal of overburden and waste, and storage of water; the expected production, costs, economics, grade and other operating parameters of the Rainy River project; the capacity of the starter dam; targeted timing for permits, including the amendment to Schedule 2 of the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations; targeted timing for commissioning, start-up, production and commercial production; and targeting timing for development and other activities related to the Rainy River project. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this presentation, New Gold’s latest annual management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”), Annual Information Form and Technical Reports filed at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. In addition to, and subject to, such assumptions discussed in more detail elsewhere, the forward-looking statements in this presentation are also subject to the following assumptions: (1) there being no significant disruptions affecting New Gold’s operations; (2) political and legal developments in jurisdictions where New Gold operates, or may in the future operate, being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (3) the accuracy of New Gold’s current mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; (4) the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Mexican peso and U.S. dollar being approximately consistent with current levels; (5) prices for diesel, natural gas, fuel oil, electricity and other key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (6) equipment, labour and materials costs increasing on a basis consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (7) arrangements with First Nations and other Aboriginal groups in respect of the Rainy River project being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (8) all required permits, licenses and authorizations, including the amendment to Schedule 2 of the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations, being obtained from the relevant governments and other relevant stakeholders within the expected timelines; (9) the results of the feasibility study for the Rainy River project being realized; (10) in the case of production, cost and expenditure outlooks at the operating mines and the Rainy River project for 2017, commodity prices and exchange rates being consistent with those estimated for the purposes for 2017; and (11) assumes the successful closing of the bond offering and the redemption of the $300 million 7.00% notes. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements and the availability and management of capital resources; additional funding requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for metals and other commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States, Australia and Mexico; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; fluctuation in treatment and refining charges; changes in national and local government legislation in Canada, the United States, Australia and Mexico or any other country in which New Gold currently or may in the future carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits for the Rainy River project; the lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, which may not be immune from the influence of political pressure, corruption or other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of mineral reserves and mineral resources; competition; inherent uncertainties with cost estimates and estimated schedule for the construction and commencement of production at Rainy River as contemplated; loss of key employees; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the feasibility studies for the Rainy River project; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of Indigenous groups; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated with obtaining and maintaining necessary licenses, permits and authorizations and complying with permitting requirements, including those associated with the amendment to Schedule 2 of the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations for the Rainy River project. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses and risks associated with the start of production of a mine, such as Rainy River, (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s Annual Information Form, MD&A and other disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future events could materially differ from those anticipated in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The footnotes, endnotes and appendix to this presentation contain important information. The endnotes and appendix are found at the end of the presentation. All amounts in US dollars unless otherwise indicated.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Key characteristics of New Gold’s portfolio

  • 1. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s December 31, 2016 MD&A. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates
  • f Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Based on 325 Koz annual production from Rainy River and ~485 Koz annual production from Blackwater, as outlined in the feasibility studies for the projects.

Portfolio of Assets in Top-Rated Jurisdictions Among Lowest-Cost Producers with Established Operational Track Record Peer-Leading Growth Pipeline

14.7 Moz

gold reserves(1), >90% located in Canada Q1’17 all-in sustaining costs(2)

  • f $597/oz

~800 Koz annual

production potential from growth projects(3)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

All New Gold assets Ranked in top 5 global mining jurisdictions(1)

4

Operating Mines Development Projects

  • 1. Source: 2015 Behre Dolbear Report – “2015 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment”.
  • 2. Based on 2013 Feasibility Study.
  • 3. Six years of current B-zone reserves plus five years of C-zone.

BLACKWATER

Mine Life 17 years(2)

NEW AFTON

Mine Life 11 years(3)

RAINY RIVER

Mine Life 14 years

1

CANADA

MESQUITE

Mine Life 5 years plus residual leach

3

USA

CERRO SAN PEDRO Residual leach

5

MEXICO

PEAK MINES

Mine Life 5 years

2

AUSTRALIA

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

2017 Organizational priorities

Streamline

  • rganizational

structure and strengthen Rainy River Team Advance

  • rganic growth

projects Enhance Financial Flexibility Deliver operationally and pursue

  • pportunities for

further cash flow

  • ptimization

Execute on updated Rainy River plan

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Production

89,327 oz

Gold

23.8 mlbs

Copper

Costs Lowered Cost Guidance Financial

$77 million

Cash generated from

  • perations

$0.15

Cash flow per share

Balance Sheet

$350 million

Cash balance at Mar. 31, 2017 Increased liquidity position by $230 million through equity financing and the sale

  • f El Morro stream

Rainy River

Project schedule and capital cost estimate in line with updated plan $126 million in capital expenditures during the first quarter

$605 per oz

Gold operating expense

$597 per oz

All-in sustaining costs(1)

$760-$800 per oz

All-in sustaining costs(1) $65 per ounce reduction from

  • riginal guidance range
  • 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

2017 first quarter highlights Record low quarterly all-in sustaining costs

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2017 Consolidated guidance Full-year cost guidance reduced

7

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Key Input Assumptions

Gold Production

380-430

Koz

Copper Production

100-110

Mlbs

Gold Operating Expense All-in Sustaining Costs(1)

$760-$800

$/oz

$630-$670

$/oz

Copper $2.50/lb Silver $16.00/oz CDN/USD $1.30 AUD/USD $1.35 MXN/USD $20.00

  • All-in sustaining cost guidance reduced by $65 per ounce due to a combination of the

company’s business improvement initiatives, capital deferrals and copper hedges

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Disciplined management of Capital resources and liquidity position

  • 1. Cash and cash equivalents as at March 31, 2017.
  • 2. Undrawn credit facility as at March 31, 2017. $123 million of $400 million facility used for Letters of Credit and $100 million drawn at March 31, 2017.
  • 3. From April 1, 2017 to November 2017 commercial production.

Liquidity Position

$527

million

Cash and cash equivalents(1)

$350

million

$177

million Undrawn credit facility(2)

+

Ongoing Sustaining Free Cash Flow and Increased Cash Flow Certainty with Gold/Copper Contracts in 2017

Remaining Rainy River capital $389 million(3)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Short-term and long-term Financial flexibility

  • 120,000 ounces of New Gold’s first half 2017

gold production

  • Option contracts cover 20,000 ounces of gold per

month from January to June 2017

  • 31.7 million pounds (5.3 million pounds per month

from January to June 2017) at $2.52 per pound

  • 43.7 million pounds (7.3 million pounds per month

from July to December 2017) at $2.73 per pound

9

$1,400 /oz

Upside

5.3

million pounds per month

$2.52 /lb

at

Short-Term Cash Flow Certainty

$1,300 /oz

Floor

20,000

  • unces per month

7.3

million pounds per month

$2.73 /lb

at

Gold Option Contracts Copper Swaps

Long-Term Balance Sheet Flexibility

  • No debt due until 2022
  • Recent debt restructuring extended maturity

and provides further flexibility

  • Summary of new terms:

APRIL 2012 NOTES MAY 2017 NOTES Face Value $300 million $300 million Maturity April 15, 2020 May 15, 2025 Interest Rate 7.00% 6.375%

  • Face value $900 million in long-term debt
  • Face value $500 million, 6.25% notes due in 2022
  • Callable at 103.1% after November 2017
  • Face value $300 million, 6.375% notes due in 2025
  • Face value $100 million drawn on credit facility(1)

Extended maturity Lowered interest rate

  • 1. $177 million undrawn credit facility as at March 31, 2017. $123 million of $400 million facility used for Letters of Credit and $100 million drawn at March 31, 2017.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Rainy River project summary

3.0 Moz at 1.0 g/t

Open Pit Underground

0.9 Moz at 5.3 g/t

3.9 Moz

1.7 Moz at 0.8 g/t

Open Pit Underground

0.6 Moz at 3.7 g/t

2.3 Moz

Resource Scale(2)

  • 1. Source: Based on 2015 Behre Dolbear Report – “2015 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment”.
  • 2. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s December 31, 2016 MD&A. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning

estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

  • Supportive local

government and community

  • Close to regional infrastructure
  • ~400 people currently on
  • perations team
  • >70% from local community,

including >30% from Indigenous communities

Country Ranking(1) Land package over 200 square kilometres

Ontario, Canada

1

Jurisdiction

Gold Reserves Gold M&I Resources

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Rainy River Current status

First Production Capital Spent Project to Date Total Remaining Capital

September

2017 Through March 2017 From April 2017 through targeted November commercial production

$903 million $389 million

  • Mining rate during the quarter averaged
  • ver 110,000 tonnes per day
  • Approximately 800,000m3 of

construction material has been placed at the starter cell

  • Installation of mechanical, piping,

electrical and instrumentation in processing facilities approximately 85% complete

  • Primary crusher and conveyor system

approximately 95% complete

  • Commissioning of the crusher commenced

in March with first crush expected in early May 2017

  • Received approval to pump 1.4 million

cubic metres into water management pond

  • Commissioning of SAG and ball mills

during second quarter, dry and wet commissioning of full process facility scheduled for August 2017

  • Schedule 2 amendment expected to be

received in January 2018

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Rainy River the opportunity

  • 1. First nine years.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

New Afton

2017 Guidance Rainy River

FY 2017E Rainy River

Production

330 – 370 Koz ~325 Koz(1)

(excluding Rainy River) (when in full production)

Mesquite Peak Mines Cerro San Pedro Rainy River

Gold Operating Expense(1) All-in Sustaining Costs(1)(2)

$710

$/oz

$575

$/oz

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Long-term growth optionality

New Afton C-Zone

Blackwater Rimfire

Peak Life Extension

  • Long-term growth

potential in mining friendly jurisdictions

  • Growth portfolio

benefits from

  • Projects at different

stages of development cycle

  • Projects with varying

capital requirements

  • Projects with

flexible timelines

Five year mine life extension opportunity 8.2 million ounce gold reserve in Canada Exploration success and discovery of new zones Earn-in agreement on Fifield Project located in Australia

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Operating Mines

Strong Canadian presence Multiple organic growth options in portfolio

14

  • 1. Source: 2015 Behre Dolbear Report – “2015 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment”.
  • 2. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s December 31, 2016 MD&A. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning

estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

Our Footprint in Canada

Top global mining jurisdiction(1)

>90%

gold reserves(2) in Canada

Significant Canadian dollar exposure

>50%

  • f 2016 operating

margin from Canadian

  • perations

~25%

gold production from Canadian assets

Development Projects

NEW AFTON

(production) 1.2 Moz Gold Reserve(2) 1.0 Blb Copper Reserve(2) 2016 operating margin: $182 million

RAINY RIVER

(construction) 3.9 Moz Gold Reserve(2) 10.0 Moz Silver Reserve(2) 204 km2 land package

BLACKWATER

(permitting) 8.2 Moz Gold Reserve(2) 60.8 Moz Silver Reserve(2) 1,058 km2 land package

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

A history of long-term value creation

  • 1. New Gold/Western Goldfields business combination announced in March 2009.
  • 2. S&P/TSX Global Gold Index includes 47 gold companies in various stages of development/production, inclusive of dividends.

Performance Since Beginning of 2016

21% Dec 31/15 16% Today 59%

Performance Since Beginning of 2009(1)

Compound Annual Growth Rate New Gold (NYSE MKT) Gold Price S&P/TSX Global Gold Index(2)

97% Dec 31/08 39%

10.6% 5.0% (4.6%)

Today (42%)

New Gold (NYSE MKT) Gold Price S&P/TSX Global Gold Index

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Establishing the Leading Intermediate Gold Company

Invested and Experienced Team Among Lowest- Cost Producers with Established Operational Track Record Portfolio of Assets in Top-Rated Jurisdictions Peer-Leading Growth Pipeline A History of Value Creation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Appendices

Corporate 18 New Afton 27 Rainy River 30 Blackwater, Exploration, Reserves and Resources 37

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Experienced, significantly invested team Directly aligned with shareholders

18

Executive Management Team

Ian Pearce

Chair of the Board, New Gold

Board of Directors

David Emerson

Former Canadian Cabinet Minister

James Estey

Chairman, PrairieSky Royalty

Vahan Kololian

Founder, TerraNova Partners

Hannes Portmann

President & Chief Executive Officer

Martyn Konig

Chief Investment Officer, T Wealth Management

Kay Priestly

Former Chief Executive Officer, Turquoise Hill Resources

Randall Oliphant

Former Executive Chairman, New Gold

Raymond Threlkeld

Interim Chief Operating Officer

Hannes Portmann

President & Chief Executive Officer

Brian Penny

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Raymond Threlkeld

Interim Chief Operating Officer

Cory Atiyeh

Vice President, Operations

Appendix 1

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary of debt

19

  • 1. $177 million undrawn credit facility as at March 31, 2017. $123 million of $400 million facility used for Letters of Credit and $100 million drawn at March 31, 2017.

Appendix 1

CREDIT FACILITY SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES (November 2012) SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES (May 2017) Face Value

$400 million(1) $500 million $300 million

Maturity

August 14, 2019 November 15, 2022 May 15, 2025

Interest Rate

See ‘Key features’ 6.25% 6.375%

Payable

Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually

Conversion price

n/a n/a n/a

Current trading value

n/a ~102 ~100

Key features

  • Interest rate spread

varies between 1.00%-3.25% based

  • n leverage ratio
  • Current interest rate

spread of 3.25%

  • Senior unsecured
  • Redeemable after

November 15, 2017 at par plus half coupon, declining ratably to par

  • Unlimited dividends if

leverage ratio below 2:1

  • Senior unsecured
  • Redeemable after

May 15, 2020 at 104.8% down to 100% of face after 2023

  • Unlimited dividends if

leverage ratio below 2:1

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Credit facility overview

  • $123 million(1) of the

facility was used to issue letters of credit for closure obligations at New Gold’s producing mines and development projects

20

Current Revolving Credit Facility ($mm) Credit Facility Financial Covenants

Revolving credit facility (expires August 14, 2019)

$400

Letters of credit issued

$123

Drawn

$100

Undrawn credit facility

$177

AT MARCH 31, 2017 CURRENT TERMS Maximum Net Debt/EBITDA

2.1x Q2’17-Q3’17 Q4’17-Q1’18 Thereafter 4.5x 4.0x 3.5x Appendix 1

  • 1. $177 million undrawn credit facility as at March 31, 2017. $123 million of $400 million facility used for Letters of Credit and $100 million drawn at March 31, 2017.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

2017 First Quarter

Gold Production (Koz)

89,327

Gold Operating Expense(1) ($/oz)

$605

All-in Sustaining Costs(2) ($/oz)

$597

21 30 28 10

$458 $695 $596 $1,150 ($505) $765 $674 $1,255

Mine-by-mine operating results Record low quarterly all-in sustaining costs

  • 1. Operating expense: Silver - $8.23/oz, Copper - $1.21/lb.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. New Afton co-product all-in sustaining costs: First quarter: Gold - $679/oz, Copper - $1.36/lb.
  • 4. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Peak Mines co-product all-in sustaining costs: First quarter: Gold - $828/oz, Copper - $1.91/lb.
  • $403 per ounce of reported all-in

sustaining costs at Cerro San Pedro related to cash expenditures incurred in prior periods

Appendix 1

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Consolidated financial summary

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on average realized prices under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on operating margin under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on adjusted net earnings under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 4. Refer to Endnote on net cash generated from operations before changes in working capital under the

heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Financial Summary

GOLD ($/oz)

7%

COPPER ($/lb)

21%

SILVER ($/oz)

19%

Average Realized Prices(1)

$1,206 $1,286

$2.14

$2.58

$$14.72

$17.51

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31

2017 2016 Revenues

$170 $155

Operating margin(2)

87 73

Net earnings

38 26

Net earnings per share

0.07 0.05

Adjusted net earnings/(loss)(3)

9 (2)

Adjusted net earnings per share(3)

0.02 nil

Cash generated from operations

77 62

Cash generated from operations before changes in non-cash

  • perating working capital(4)

69 62 Appendix 1

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Detailed operating results and assumptions

23

NEW AFTON MESQUITE PEAK MINES 2016A 2017E 2016A 2017E 2016A 2017E Tonnes processed (000 tonnes)

5,773 5,600 – 5,800 18,969 18,500 – 19,500 736 680 – 700

Total tonnes mined (000 tonnes)

6,113 6,500 – 6,700 58,751 54,000 – 58,000 755 900 – 1100

Strip ratio

– – 2.1 1.9 – 2.1 – –

Gold grade (g/t)

0.65 0.54 – 0.58 0.38 0.39 – 0.43 4.82 4.30 – 4.50

Silver grade (g/t)

– – – – – –

Copper grade (%)

0.81% 0.87% – 0.91% – – 1.03% 1.00% – 1.10%

Gold recovery(1) (%)

81.9% 74.0% – 76.0% ~60% ~60% 93.3% 92.0% – 94.0%

Silver recovery (%)

– – – – – –

Copper recovery (%)

84.4% 82.0% – 84.0% – – 90.1% 83.0% – 85.0%

PRODUCTION Gold production (Koz)

98.1 70.0 – 80.0 111.1 140.0 – 150.0 107.4 85.0 – 95.0

Silver production (Koz)

– – – – – –

Copper production (Mlbs)

87.3 85.0 – 95.0 – – 15.0 ~15.0

Reserve Grade at December 31, 2016 Gold grade (g/t)

– 0.60 – 0.51 – 2.83

Silver grade (g/t)

– 2.0 – – – 9.6

Copper grade (%)

– 0.78% – – – 1.32%

  • 1. Represents implied recoveries.

Appendix 1

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2017 All-in sustaining costs sensitivities

24

CATEGORY COPPER PRICE CDN/USD AUD/USD Base Assumption

$2.50 $1.30 $1.35

Sensitivity

+/-$0.25 +/-$0.05 +/-$0.05

COST PER OUNCE IMPACT Rainy River

– +/-$45 –

New Afton

+/-$35 +/-$80 –

Mesquite

– – –

Peak Mines

+/-$40 – +/-$50

New Gold Total

+/-$15 +/-$20 +/-$10

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Appendix 1

Copper sensitivity includes impact of copper hedges

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2017 Capital expenditures by category

25 New Afton Peak Mines Mesquite Rainy River(1) Blackwater

New Afton

Total Capital Expenditures

~$640 million

Growth Capital

~$535

million Sustaining Capital

~$105

million

$20 million $30 million $55 million $5 million $10 million $515 million

Appendix 1

Peak Mines

$5 million

  • 1. Growth capital to November 2017 commercial production.
slide-26
SLIDE 26

2017 Capital expenditures by category (cont’d)

26

Rainy River(1) New Afton Peak Mines

  • $305 million

mining, infrastructure and process facilities

  • $170 million
  • wners’ costs,

indirects and other

  • $40 million

contingency

  • $55 million

mine development, plant and equipment

  • $5 million

C-zone exploration

  • $30 million

plant and equipment and underground development

  • $5 million

future development

  • f Great Cobar

Growth capital Sustaining capital

Mesquite Blackwater

  • $20 million

plant and equipment, capital components

  • $10 million

permitting, environmental assessment approvals and trade-off studies

$515

million

$60

million

$35

million

$20

million

$10

million Appendix 1

  • 1. Growth capital to November 2017 commercial production.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

New Afton C-zone opportunity(1)

27

Jurisdiction Annual Gold Production

108 Koz

Annual Copper Production

81 Mlbs

Mine Life

5 years

Development Capital(2)

British Columbia, Canada

  • 1. Based on 2016 Feasibility Study.
  • 2. Includes $41 million provision for capital escalation and $88 million for contingency.

$402 mm

Appendix 2

slide-28
SLIDE 28

New Afton C-zone

28 Measured Indicated Inferred

Appendix 2

1,180m

C-zone Block Cave Volume Open at depth Main Zone Extraction Level

C-zone

slide-29
SLIDE 29

$0.25 per pound change in copper price ~$34 million in after-tax NPV and 1.9% change in IRR

New Afton C-zone feasibility study economics

29

C-zone: Key Sensitivities

C-zone: Project Economics

(Long-term consensus commodity prices and foreign exchange rates) Appendix 2 $100 per ounce change in gold price ~$18 million in after-tax NPV and 1.0% change in IRR $0.05 change in exchange rate ~$24 million in after-tax NPV and 1.5% change in IRR

Foreign Exchange (CDN/USD)

$1,200 $2.75 $1.25

Gold Price ($/oz) Copper Price ($/lb) 2016 FEASIBILITY STUDY

After-tax 5% NPV ($mm) 84 After-tax IRR (%) 10.3 After-tax Payback (years) 3.4

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Rainy River site layout

Appendix 3

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Rainy River Plant site construction photos

31

August 2015 November 2015 October 2015 Appendix 3 April 2015

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Rainy River Plant site construction photos (cont’d)

32

December 2015 February 2016 building July 2016 June 2016 Appendix 3

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Rainy River Plant site construction photos (cont’d)

33

Primary crusher Coarse ore reclaim Elevated section from coarse ore to transfer tower Pebble crusher Appendix 3

September 2016

CIP tank installation

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Rainy River Plant site construction photos (cont’d)

34

Piping installation Gold room Process plant Mechanical and piping installation Appendix 3

October 2016

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Mechanical and piping installation

April 2017

Rainy River Plant site construction photos (cont’d)

Crusher Feed Process Water System Tailings Cell Open Pit Appendix 3

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

$195

million

$40 million $45 million

Total mining, G&A costs, and temporary construction camp costs associated with a three-month project delay Use of mining contractors for discrete areas Contingency

$40 million $35 million

Completion and commissioning

  • f the process

facilities

Key drivers of increased capital costs:

$35 million

Earthworks costs related to completing the water management pond, tailings starter cell and

  • ther mine infrastructure

Rainy River capital costs

Appendix 3

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Blackwater Flagship project already in portfolio

37

Jurisdiction Significant Gold Reserve(1)

8.2 Moz

Silver Reserve(1)

60.8 Koz

Land Package

1,058 km2

Environmental Assessment permits expected in 2017

  • 1. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s December 31, 2016 MD&A. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of

Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

British Columbia, Canada

Appendix 4

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

$17

million

Peak Mines New Afton Rainy River Fifield

$2

million

$4

million

$8

million

$3

million Appendix 4

  • Underground infill

drilling to upgrade the lower portion of the C-zone to measured confidence level and reconnaissance drilling on emerging prospects

  • Continue to advance

district reconnaissance and target identification

  • New Gold has
  • pportunity to

earn a 70% interest

Included in 2017 all-in sustaining costs

2017 Exploration program overview

slide-39
SLIDE 39

2017 Exploration program overview (cont’d)

39

2017 Program

Peak Mines

  • Further extend mine’s history of mineral reserve and resource replacement, particular focus on

gold-dominant targets in Southern Mine Corridor

Perseverance New Occidental New Cobar Chesney

Jubilee

Peak Great Cobar

Dapville

Gladstone Chronos

Peak Mill

9 kilometres

Anjea

Southern Mine Corridor Northern Mine Corridor

Pb-Zn Lenses Main Gold Lens Pb-Zn Lens Copper-Gold Lens Proteus Area

Appendix 4

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Mineral Reserves and resources summary

40

  • 1. 2015 information per Annual Information Form dated March 29, 2016.

AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2016 AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2015 GOLD Koz SILVER Moz COPPER Mlbs GOLD Koz SILVER Moz COPPER Mlbs

Proven and Probable reserves

14,704 76 1,113 14,985 76 1,193

New Afton

1,161 4 1,033 1,228 4 1,112

Mesquite

1,179 – – 1,492 – –

Peak Mines

251 1 80 267 1 82

Cerro San Pedro

– – – 13 – –

Rainy River

3,943 10 – 3,814 9 –

Blackwater

8,170 61 – 8,170 61 –

Measured and Indicated resources (exclusive of reserves)

6,222 22 1,121 6,659 34 1,065

Inferred resources

1,644 5 291 1,844 24 194

Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary

Appendix 4

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41 METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL

TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs

New Afton A&B Zones Proven

– – – – – – –

Probable

34,649 0.51 2.1 0.78 566 2,383 598

C-zone Proven

– – – – – – –

Probable

25,687 0.72 1.8 0.77 594 1,492 435

Total New Afton P&P

60,336 0.60 2.0 0.78 1,161 3,874 1,033

Peak Mines Southern Mine Corridor Proven

514 6.78 15.7 0.75 112 259 8

Probable

492 5.45 13.6 0.60 86 215 7

Total Southern Mine Corridor P&P

1,006 6.13 14.7 0.68 198 475 15

Northern Mine Corridor Proven

787 0.94 7.0 1.81 24 176 31

Probable

902 0.85 6.4 1.64 25 185 33

Total Northern Mine Corridor P&P

1,689 0.89 6.6 1.72 48 361 64

Stockpile Proven

66 1.92 8.5 0.86 4 18 1

Combined P&P Proven

1,370 3.18 10.3 1.36 140 453 41

Probable

1,390 2.48 9.0 1.28 111 401 39

Total Peak Mines P&P

2,760 2.83 9.6 1.32 251 854 80

Mesquite Proven

7,882 0.49 – – 123 – –

Probable

63,479 0.52 – – 1,056 – –

Total Mesquite P&P

71,361 0.51 – – 1,179 – –

Mineral Reserves Statement as at December 31, 2016

Proven and Probable

Appendix 4

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42 METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs Rainy River Direct processing material Open Pit Proven 16,944 1.41 2.5 – 771 1,353 – Probable 45,001 1.19 3.2 – 1,728 4,692 – Open Pit P&P (direct processing) 61,946 1.25 3.0 – 2,499 6,045 – Underground Proven – – – – – – – Probable 5,411 5.34 11.2 – 929 1,956 – Underground P&P (direct processing) 5,411 5.34 11.2 – 929 1,956 – Stockpile material Open Pit Proven 9,322 0.45 1.5 – 135 462 – Probable 27,081 0.44 1.8 – 380 1,540 – Open Pit P&P (stockpile) 36,403 0.44 1.7 – 516 2,002 – Combined P&P Proven 26,266 1.07 2.1 – 906 1,815 –

Probable

77,493 1.22 3.3 – 3,037 8,188 –

Total Rainy River P&P

103,760 1.18 3.0 – 3,943 10,003 –

Blackwater Direct processing material Proven

124,500 0.95 5.5 – 3,790 22,100 –

Probable

169,700 0.68 4.1 – 3,730 22,300 –

P&P (direct processing)

294,200 0.79 4.7 – 7,520 44,400 –

Stockpile material Proven

20,100 0.50 3.6 – 325 2,300 –

Probable

30,100 0.34 14.6 – 325 14,100 –

P&P (stockpile)

50,200 0.40 10.2 – 650 16,400 –

Total Blackwater P&P

344,400 0.74 5.5 – 8,170 60,800 –

Total P&P

14,704 75,531 1,113

Mineral Reserves Statement as at December 31, 2016

Proven and Probable continued

Appendix 4

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Mineral Resources Statement as at December 31, 2016

43 METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs New Afton A&B Zones Measured

16,081 0.66 2.1 0.85 339 1,072 302

Indicated

10,904 0.46 2.2 0.67 161 784 160

A&B Zone M&I

26,985 0.58 2.1 0.78 500 1,856 462

C-zone Measured

2,071 1.09 2.4 1.20 72 162 55

Indicated

16,744 0.76 2.2 0.90 410 1,156 330

C-zone M&I

18,815 0.80 2.2 0.93 483 1,318 385

HW Lens Measured

– – – – – – –

Indicated

10,764 0.51 2.1 0.43 176 713 103

HW Lens M&I

10,764 0.51 2.1 0.43 176 713 103

Total New Afton M&I

56,592 0.64 2.1 0.76 1,158 3,887 950

Mesquite Measured

5,479 0.37 – – 64 – –

Indicated

65,002 0.47 – – 976 – –

Total Mesquite M&I

70,481 0.46 – – 1,040 – –

Peak Mines Southern Mine Corridor Measured

666 5.53 8.2 0.70 118 174 9

Indicated

770 4.14 10.4 0.84 103 258 14

Southern Mine Corridor M&I

1,436 4.79 9.4 0.77 216 429 25

Northern Mine Corridor Measured

804 2.32 5.0 1.00 60 129 18

Indicated

3,030 0.99 5.1 2.02 97 489 130

Northern Mine Corridor M&I

3,840 1.28 5.1 1.80 158 619 147

Combined M&I Measured

1,470 3.78 6.4 0.87 178 303 27

Indicated

3,800 1.63 6.2 1.78 200 747 144

Total Peak Mines M&I

5,270 2.23 6.2 1.52 378 1,050 171

Measured and Indicated (Exclusive of Reserves)

Appendix 4

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Mineral Resources Statement as at December 31, 2016

44 METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs Rainy River Direct processing material Open Pit Measured

3,638 1.11 2.8 – 130 329 –

Indicated

28,976 1.16 3.7 – 1,079 3,485 –

Open Pit M&I (direct processing)

32,614 1.15 3.6 – 1,209 3,814 –

Underground Measured

– – – – – – –

Indicated

5,035 3.71 10.4 – 601 1,678 –

Underground M&I (direct processing)

5,035 3.71 10.4 – 601 1,678 –

Stockpile material Open Pit Measured

2,490 0.36 2.8 – 29 223 –

Indicated

34,984 0.43 2.4 – 483 2,694 –

Open Pit M&I (stockpile)

37,474 0.42 2.4 – 512 2,917 –

Combined M&I Measured

6,128 0.81 2.8 – 159 552 –

Indicated

68,995 0.97 3.5 – 2,163 7,857 –

Total Rainy River M&I

75,123 0.96 3.5 – 2,322 8,409 –

Blackwater Direct processing material Measured

289 1.39 6.6 – 13 61 –

Indicated

42,444 0.85 4.6 – 1,160 6,277 –

M&I (direct processing)

42,733 0.85 4.6 – 1,173 6,339 –

Stockpile material Measured

– – – – – – –

Indicated

14,602 0.32 3.9 – 150 1,831 –

M&I (stockpile)

14,602 0.32 3.9 – 150 1,831 –

Total Blackwater M&I

57,335 0.72 4.4 – 1,323 8,169 –

Total M&I Exclusive of Reserves

6,222 21,515 1,121

Measured and Indicated (Exclusive of Reserves) continued

Appendix 4

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Mineral Resources Statement as at December 31, 2016

45 METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs New Afton

A&B Zones

7,344 0.35 1.3 0.35 83 304 57

C-zone

6,900 0.43 1.3 0.46 96 295 70

HW Lens

978 0.69 1.4 0.46 22 45 10

Total New Afton Inferred

15,219 0.41 1.3 0.41 200 644 137

Peak Mines Southern Mine Corridor

440 3.66 9.6 0.63 52 133 6

Northern Mine Corridor

3,540 1.11 6.0 1.94 126 679 148

Total Peak Inferred

3,980 1.39 6.4 1.80 178 812 154

Mesquite

7,118 0.32 – – 74 – –

Rainy River Direct processing material Open Pit

5,808 1.01 2.8 – 188 528 –

Underground

5,130 3.53 2.8 – 583 467 –

Total Direct Processing

10,938 2.19 2.8 – 771 995 –

Stockpile Open Pit

8,916 0.40 1.5 – 114 435 –

Total Rainy River Inferred

19,854 1.39 2.2 – 885 1,430 –

Blackwater Direct processing

10,908 0.80 3.8 – 279 1,333 –

Stockpile

2,660 0.33 3.2 – 28 274 –

Total Blackwater Inferred

13,568 0.70 3.7 – 307 1,606 –

Inferred

Total Inferred

1,644 4,492 291

Appendix 4

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Mineral Resources Statement as at December 31, 2016

46

Inferred

METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL

TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % LEAD % ZINC % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs LEAD Mlbs ZINC Mlbs

Peak Mines Southern Mine Corridor

1,410 0.73 35.3 0.34 5.93 6.23 33 1,640 11 194 181

Northern Mine Corridor

100 0.19 24.7 0.28 3.56 9.11 1 80 1 20 8

Peak Pb-Zn Lenses Inferred

1,510 0.69 34.6 0.34 5.78 6.42 34 1,720 11 214 189

  • In addition to the Peak Mines inferred resource stated above, the below table summarizes additional inferred

resources contained in satellite lead-zinc lenses at the Chronos, Peak and Great Cobar deposits.

Appendix 4

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Reserves and resources notes

47 MINERAL PROPERTY RESERVES LOWER CUT-OFF RESOURCES LOWER CUT-OFF New Afton Main Zone – B1 & B2 Block: C$ 17.00/t All Resources: 0.40% CuEq B3 Block & C-Zone: C$ 24.00/t GOLD $/oz SILVER $/oz COPPER $/lb LEAD $/pound ZINC $/pound CAD/USD AUD/USD MXN/USD

Mineral Reserves $1,250 $15.00 $2.75 N/A N/A $1.25 $1.30 $17.00 Mineral Resources $1,350 $17.00 $3.00 $0.85 $1.00 $1.25 $1.30 $17.00

  • 1. New Gold’s Mineral Reserves and Resources have been estimated in accordance with the CIM Standards, which are incorporated

by reference in NI 43-101.

  • 2. All Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for New Gold’s properties and projects are effective December 31, 2016.
  • 3. New Gold’s year-end 2016 Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources have been estimated based on the following metal prices and

foreign exchange rate criteria: Lower cut-offs for the company’s Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are outlined in the following table:

Blackwater O/P direct processing: O/P stockpile: 0.26 – 0.38 g/t AuEq 0.32 g/t AuEq All Resources: 0.40% AuEq Mesquite Oxide & Transitional: 0.16 g/t Au (0.005 oz/t Au) 0.12 g/t Au (0.0035 oz/t Au) Sulphide: 0.41 g/t Au (0.012 oz/t Au) 0.24 g/t Au (0.007 oz/t Au) Peak Mines All ore types: A$ 80/t to A$ 146/t A$ 113/t to A$ 150/t Cerro San Pedro All ore types: US$ 6.00/t NA Rainy River O/P direct processing: 0.30 – 0.60 g/t AuEq 0.30 – 0.45 g/t AuEq O/P stockpile: 0.30 g/t AuEq 0.30 g/t AuEq U/G direct processing: 3.50 g/t AuEg 2.50 g/t AuEq

  • 4. Lower cut-offs for the company’s Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are outlined in the following table:

Appendix 4

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Reserves and resources notes (cont’d)

48

  • 5. New Gold reports its Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Measured and Indicated Mineral

Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Mineral Resources have a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence, economic and legal feasibility, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are likewise exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Numbers may not add due to rounding.

  • 6. Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred based on relative levels of confidence in their estimation and on

technical and economic parameters consistent with the methods most suitable to their potential commercial exploitation. Where different mining and/or processing methods might be applied to different portions of a Mineral Resource, the designators ‘open pit’ and ‘underground’ are used to indicate the envisioned mining method. The designators ‘oxide’, ‘non-oxide’ and ‘sulphide’ have likewise been applied to indicate the type of mineralization as it relates to the appropriate mineral processing method and expected payable metal recoveries, and the designators ‘direct processing’ and ‘stockpile’ have been applied to differentiate material envisioned to be mined and processed directly from material to be mined and stored in a stockpile for future processing. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing and other risks and relevant issues. Additional details regarding Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimation, classification, reporting parameters, key assumptions and associated risks for each of New Gold’s material properties are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports, which are available at www.sedar.com.

  • 7. Rainy River Project: In addition to the criteria described above, Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the Rainy River project

are reported according to the following additional criteria: Underground Mineral Reserves are reported peripheral to and/or below the

  • pen pit Mineral Reserve pit shell, which has been designed and optimized based on an $800/oz gold price. Underground Mineral

Resources are reported below a larger Mineral Resource pit shell, which has been defined based on a $1,350/oz gold price. Approximately forty percent (40%) of the gold metal content defined as underground Mineral Reserves is derived from material located between the Mineral Reserve pit shell and the Mineral Resource pit shell; the remaining sixty percent (60%) of the metal content defined as underground Mineral Reserves is derived from material located below the Mineral Resource pit shell. Open pit Mineral Resources exclude material reported as underground Mineral Reserves.

  • 8. Qualified Person: The preparation of New Gold's Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates has been done by Qualified

Persons as defined under NI 43-101, under the oversight and review of Mr. Mark A. Petersen, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.

Appendix 4

slide-49
SLIDE 49

2017 guidance assumptions

Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions

49

Spot

SPOT Gold price ($/oz) 1,225 Silver price ($/oz) 16.30 Copper price ($/lb) 2.50 AUD/USD 1.36 CDN/USD 1.37 MXN/USD 19.00 2017 Silver price ($/oz) 16.00 Copper price ($/lb) 2.50 AUD/USD 1.35 CDN/USD 1.30 MXN/USD 20.00

Appendix 4

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Endnotes

50

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Information concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this presentation are Canadian mining terms as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council on May 10, 2014 and incorporated by reference in National Instrument 43-101. While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As such, certain information contained in this presentation concerning descriptions of mineralization and mineral resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements

  • f the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

An “Inferred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher confidence category. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve estimation is made. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. In addition, the definitions of “Proven Mineral Reserves” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICAL INFORMATION The scientific and technical information contained herein has been reviewed and approved by Mark A. Petersen, Vice President, Exploration of New Gold, except for the scientific and technical information regarding capital costs at Rainy River set out under the heading "Projects Update - Rainy River - Capital Expenditures", which has been reviewed and approved by Arshya Qureshi, Co-Founder and Project Manager at LQ Consulting and Management Inc. Mr. Qureshi is a Professional Engineer registered with Professional Engineers of Ontario.

  • Mr. Petersen is a SME Registered Member, AIPG Certified Professional Geologist. Mr. Petersen and Mr. Qureshi are "Qualified Persons" for the purposes of NI 43-101.

For additional technical information on New Gold’s material properties, including a detailed breakdown of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources by category, as well as key assumptions, parameters and risks, refer to New Gold’s MD&A and Annual Information Form filed on www.sedar.com and included in New Gold’s Form 40-F filed at www.sec.gov. NON-GAAP MEASURES (1) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure. Consistent with guidance announced in 2013 by the World Gold Council, an association of various gold mining companies from around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold defines “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce as the sum of total cash costs, capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature, corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature and environmental reclamation costs, all divided by the ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. New Gold believes this non-GAAP financial measure provides further transparency into costs associated with producing gold and assists analysts, investors and other stakeholders of the company in assessing the company’s operating performance, its ability to generate free cash flow from current

  • perations and its overall value. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. All-in sustaining costs presented do not have a

standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under IFRS. Further details regarding historical all-in sustaining costs and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. “Sustaining costs” is a non-GAAP financial measure. New Gold defines sustaining costs as the difference between all-in sustaining costs and total cash costs, being the sum of net capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature, corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature, and environmental reclamation costs. Management uses sustaining costs to understand the aggregate net result of the drivers of all-in sustaining costs other than total cash costs. The line items between cash costs and all in sustaining costs in the tables below break down the components of sustaining costs. Sustaining costs is intended to provide additional information

  • nly and does not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered

in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Endnotes

51

(2) TOTAL CASH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure which is calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products that ceased operations in 2002. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. The company believes that certain investors use this information to evaluate the company’s performance and ability to generate liquidity through operating cash flow to fund future capital expenditures and working capital needs. This measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of the company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing and administration costs, royalties, production taxes, and realized gains and losses on fuel contracts, but are exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs and net of by-product sales. Total cash costs are then divided by ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. Co-product cash costs remove the impact of other metal sales that are produced as a by-product of gold production and apportion the cash costs to each metal produced on a percentage of revenue basis, and subsequently divides the amount by the total ounces of gold or silver or pounds of copper sold, as the case may be, to arrive at per ounce or per pound figures. Unless otherwise indicated, all total cash cost information in this news release is net of by-product sales. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total cash costs and co-product cash costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining

  • companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow

from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding historical total cash costs and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. (3) AVERAGE REALIZED PRICE “Average realized price per ounce or pound sold” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS. Management uses this measure to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold, silver, and copper sales. Average realized price is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS; it should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently and this measure is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Further details regarding average realized price and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. (4) ADJUSTED NET (LOSS)/EARNINGS “Adjusted net (loss)/earnings” and “adjusted net (loss)/earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. Net (loss)/earnings have been adjusted and tax affected for the group

  • f costs in “Other gains and losses” on the condensed consolidated income statement. The adjusted entries are also impacted for tax to the extent that the underlying entries are

impacted for tax in the unadjusted net (loss)/earnings from continuing operations. The company uses this measure for its own internal purposes. Management’s internal budgets and forecasts and public guidance do not reflect fair value changes on senior notes and non-hedged derivatives, foreign currency translation and fair value through profit or loss and financial asset gains/losses. Consequently, the presentation of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share enables investors and analysts to better understand the underlying operating performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our business and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and other mining companies. Adjusted net (loss)/earnings and adjusted net (loss)/earnings per share are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flows from operations as determined under IFRS. Further details regarding adjusted net (loss)/earnings and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. (5) OPERATING MARGIN “Operating margin” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS, which management uses to evaluate the Company’s aggregated and mine-by-mine contribution to net earnings before non-cash depreciation and depletion charges. Further details regarding operating margin and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. (6) CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE CHANGES IN NON-CASH OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL “Cash generated from operations before changes in working capital” and “cash generated from operations before changes in working capital per share” are non-GAAP financial measures with no standard meaning under IFRS, which exclude changes in non-cash operating working capital. Management uses this measure to evaluate the Company’s ability to generate cash from its operations before temporary working capital changes. Further details regarding cash generated from operations before changes in working capital and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

JULIE TAYLOR

Director, Corporate Communications and Investor Relations 416-324-6015 julie.taylor@newgold.com

Investor Relations