Regulating Carbon Emissions Executive Order 57 Work Group August - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

regulating carbon emissions
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Regulating Carbon Emissions Executive Order 57 Work Group August - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Regulating Carbon Emissions Executive Order 57 Work Group August 3, 2015: EPA adopts the final rule October 23, 2015: The rule was published in the Federal Register, triggering the appeal period. West Virginia et al. filed challenges to it


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Regulating Carbon Emissions

Executive Order 57 Work Group

slide-2
SLIDE 2

August 3, 2015: EPA adopts the final rule

slide-3
SLIDE 3

October 23, 2015: The rule was published in the Federal Register, triggering the appeal period.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

West Virginia et al. filed challenges to it the same day.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

And moved for a stay.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Coalition intervenes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

January 21, 2016

slide-8
SLIDE 8

January 26, 2016

slide-9
SLIDE 9

February 4, our coalition filed an

  • pposition
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Opposition to stay

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

slide-12
SLIDE 12

And four days later…

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The merits case

  • The Supreme Court’s decision to stay the rule

did not reach the merits of the rule.

  • The parties submitted merits briefs this spring

to the D.C. Circuit.

  • Our coalition submitted its brief on March 28.
  • Oral argument was set for June 2, but then…
slide-14
SLIDE 14

May 16 order

slide-15
SLIDE 15

D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals

slide-16
SLIDE 16

En banc review

  • The May 16 order moved the case from June 2

to September 27 and from a panel to en banc, meaning that the entire D.C. Circuit would hear the case rather than three judges.

  • This could speed the resolution of the case,

cutting out another level of review at the D.C. Circuit.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Oral argument

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What interests the Court?

  • 1 hour 10 minute on statutory issues (best system
  • f emission reduction, fence-line issues)
  • 44 minutes on section 112 (Congressional intent,

the “scrivener’s error”)

  • 24 minutes on constitutional issues
  • 20 minutes on notice issues (final rule too

different)

  • 1 hour on record-based issues (BSER not

adequately demonstrated; cost-benefit analysis; individual state tailoring)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The ruling

  • We expect a ruling from the D.C. circuit in late

2016 or early 2017. That means that the Supreme Court will most likely hear the case

  • n its Fall 2017 docket, a little more than a

year from now.

  • The case would be decided by the Supreme

Court by December 2017 at the earliest.

  • Approximately 10 months from granting the

case to deciding it.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Questions?