Regularity and asynchrony when tapping to tactile, auditory and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

regularity and asynchrony when tapping to tactile
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Regularity and asynchrony when tapping to tactile, auditory and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Regularity and asynchrony when tapping to tactile, auditory and combined pulses Joren Six , Laura Aarens, Hade Demoor, Thomas Kint, Marc Leman IPEM, University Ghent ESCOM 2017 - August 2017 - Ghent Overview I Context Feedback modality


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Regularity and asynchrony when tapping to tactile, auditory and combined pulses

Joren Six, Laura Aarens, Hade Demoor, Thomas Kint, Marc Leman IPEM, University Ghent ESCOM 2017 - August 2017 - Ghent

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview I

Context Feedback modality Feedback synchronization Feedback timing Problem - Multimodal processing Experimental results Regularity Asynchrony Asynchrony Discussion Bibliography

2/23

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Context

Figure: Tango lesson.

How to dance the tango without being able to follow the beat. For:

  • Early-deafened late-implanted adult

cochlear implant users [2]

  • People with beat deafness[3]

3/23

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Context

How to dance the tango without being able to follow the beat. Emphasize beats using a non-sound modality. × Which feedback modality? × How to provide feedback events in sync with music? × When to provide this feedback?

4/23

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Feedback modality

Which feedback modality? × Visual feedback is distracting and obtrusive. × Perception of smell is slow. × Taste is unpractical. → Tactile feedback can be fast, wearable and inconspicuous.

5/23

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Feedback modality

Which feedback modality? × How to provide feedback events in sync with music? × When to provide this feedback?

6/23

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Feedback synchronization

Figure: Schema of beat feedback technology.

Demo-movie, More details in [5]

7/23

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Feedback synchronization

Which feedback modality? How to provide feedback events in sync with music? × When to provide this feedback?

8/23

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Problem - Multimodal processing

We want to provide:

  • tactile feedback
  • in musical tempi (90-150BPM)
  • perceived at the same time as audible beats

9/23

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Problem - Multimodal processing

Only limited literature on multisensory integration available [4, 1] When exactly to provide tactile feedback? Specific experiment seemed required.

10/23

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Method - Tapping experiment

Subjects: 27 subjects, 3 CI users Set-Up: A table with a drum in quiet room Procedure: Tap along with stimulus at 90, 120 or 150BPM. Auditory stimulus Continuous vs discrete Tactile stimulus Rigid vs Micro-timing Combined auditory and tactile stimulus

11/23

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Method - Tapping experiment

Figure: Measurement schema set-up.

12/23

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Method - Tapping experiment

Figure: Micro-controller for precise measurement.

13/23

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Method - Tapping experiment

Figure: Experimental data includes regularity (vector size) and asynchrony (angle).

14/23

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Regularity

Definition

Regularity quantifies the differences in repeated inter event intervals. Main effects were found for Tempo, Sound and Stimulus No significant effect between auditory vs auditory + tactile, suggestive

15/23

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Asynchrony

Definition

Asynchrony quantifies the time differences between actual and expected events. Main effects were found for Tempo and Stimulus

16/23

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Asynchrony

−100 −50 50 100 Slow Medium Fast Tap after beat (ms) +- STD Auditory Tactile Combined

Figure: Asynchrony for tactile pulses seems tempo dependent - from anticipatory to reactionary behavior.

17/23

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Discussion

Suggests an assistive technology should modify tactile feedback dependent on tempo.

Figure: Simplified model of total system delay, the contribution of each sub-system is unknown. The red line shows the ideal sync point.

18/23

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Discussion

Are late implanted CI-users able to dance? Motion capture study? Insights into multisensory integration processes.

19/23

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Bibliography I

Mark T Elliott, AM Wing, and AE Welchman. Multisensory cues improve sensorimotor synchronisation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31(10):1828–1835, 2010. Christina Fuller, Lisa Mallinckrodt, Bert Maat, Deniz Baskent, and Rolien Free. Music and quality of life in early-deafened late-implanted adult cochlear implant users. Otology & Neurotology, 34(6):1041–1047, 2013.

20/23

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Bibliography II

Jessica Phillips-Silver, Petri Toiviainen, Nathalie Gosselin, Olivier Pich´ e, Sylvie Nozaradan, Caroline Palmer, and Isabelle Peretz. Born to dance but beat deaf: a new form of congenital amusia. Neuropsychologia, 49(5):961–969, 2011. Bruno H Repp and Yi-Huang Su. Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic bulletin & review, 20(3):403–452, 2013.

21/23

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Bibliography III

Joren Six and Marc Leman. A framework to provide fine-grained time-dependent context for active listening experiences. In Proceedings of the AES Conference on Semantic Audio 2017, 2017.

22/23

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Inconclusive tapping performance

−100 −50 50 100 Slow Medium Fast Tap after beat (ms) +- STD Auditory Tactile Combined

Figure: Inconclusive tapping performance by three CI users.

23/23