Registered Offerings Post JOBS Act William D. Waddill SVP and CFO, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Registered Offerings— Post JOBS Act William D. Waddill SVP and CFO, Calithera Biosciences SEC Government-Business Forum on Small Business Capital Formation November 19, 2015 1 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2

I m pact of Regulatory Burdens on Em erging Com pany Capital Form ation I nvestors in early-stage com panies provide start-up/ grow th capital to sm all businesses I nvestm ent dollars directly support com pany operations, often in the absence of revenue I nvestors w ant their capital to support com pany progress, eventually generating returns Unnecessary and costly regulatory burdens divert capital aw ay from com pany grow th Many requirem ents do not provide valuable inform ation for investors yet are costly for sm all businesses 2 2 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2

I m pact of Regulatory Burdens on Biotech Capital Form ation Overregulation can reduce investor appetite for investm ent in early-stage entrepreneurial businesses This problem is particularly acute in the biotech industry Most em erging com panies have no product revenue to pay for costly requirem ents I nvestors are m uch m ore concerned w ith clinical trial progress and FDA outlook Unnecessary regulations represent a diversion of investor capital from science to com pliance Appropriately tailored policies can incentivize capital form ation JOBS Act has led to 1 8 0 + biotech I POs 3 3 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2

Right-Sized Regulations vs. One-Size-Fits-All W hat regulatory burdens can be scaled/ elim inated for sm all com panies w hile still protecting investors? SEC and Congress have determ ined that the costs of certain requirem ents outw eigh the benefits for sm aller com panies I nvestors are better served by com panies dedicating their capital and tim e to grow th Policym akers have recognized that the cost and tim e burdens of certain requirem ents are particularly onerous for grow ing businesses Sm aller reporting com panies ( SRCs) and non-accelerated filers benefit from certain regulatory allow ances, thus enhancing their attractiveness to investors 4 4 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2

SRCs & Non-Accelerated Filers SRC & Non-Accelerated Filer Definition Public float < $ 7 5 M * SRCs & non-accelerated filers, and their investors, benefit from scaled com pliance requirem ents SOX 4 0 4 ( b) Filing Deadlines by 1 2 b-2 Filing Status 1 0 -K 1 0 -Q Non-accelerated filers are Non-Accelerated Filers/ SRCs exem pt from the external 90 days 45 days Public Float < $75M auditor attestation of internal controls m andated Accelerated Filers 75 days 40 days by Sarbanes-Oxley ( SOX) $75M < Public Float < $700M Section 4 0 4 ( b) Large Accelerated Filers 60 days 40 days Public Float > $700M * If unable to calculate public float, companies can be 5 designated SRCs if their annual revenues are below $50M. 5 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2

SRCs & Non-Accelerated Filers Regulation S-K Scaled Disclosure for SRCs Item 101 Description of business Item 201 Market price of and dividends on registrant’s common equity and related stockholder matters Item 301 Selected financial data Item 302 Supplementary financial information Item 303 MD&A of financial condition and results of operations Item 305 Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk Item 402 Executive compensation Item 404 Transactions with related persons, promoters and certain control persons Item 407 Corporate governance Item 503 Prospectus summary, risk factors, and ratio of earnings to fixed charges Item 504 Use of proceeds 6 Item 601 Exhibits 6 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2

SRC & Non-Accelerated Filer Definition The SRC & non-accelerated filer definitions inaccurately classify com panies, increasing com pliance costs for m any sm all businesses outside the current narrow definitional scope Overreliance on public float obscures true size of sm all but highly valued com panies Com pliance costs rem ain high for these em erging businesses SRCs/ non-accelerated filers currently represent just 0 .2 % of total public com pany m arket value $ 7 5 M public float ceiling w as indexed to inflation in 2 0 0 8 but has never been increased 7 7 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2

SRC & Non-Accelerated Filer Reform I n 2 0 0 5 , the Advisory Com m ittee on Sm all & Em erging Com panies endorsed scaled regulation for com panies representing up to 6 % of public com pany m arket value – the equivalent of a $ 7 8 7 M m arket cap ceiling in 2 0 0 5 Com pany m arket cap % of total public ( 2 0 1 5 ) com pany m arket value < $ 7 5 M 0 .2 % < $ 2 5 0 M 0 .7 % < $ 7 0 0 M 1 .6 % < $ 1 B 3 .1 % < $ 1 .8 8 B 6 .0 % A slight change in the % of m arket value captured by the SRC/ non-accelerated filer definition could support com pany grow th and capital form ation for a significant num ber of 8 8 sm all businesses BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2

SRC & Non-Accelerated Filer Reform Num erous stakeholders have proposed reform of the SRC & non-accelerated filer definitions: 2014 Public float < $250M or 2013 Annual revenues < $100M* SEC Government-Business Forum 2012 on Small Business Capital 2011 Formation 2010 Public float < $250M 2009 Public float < $250; if public float cannot be 2013 calculated, annual revenues < $100M SEC Advisory Committee on Small & Emerging Companies Committee charter defines “smaller public 2005 companies” as market cap < $250M House Committee on Financial Public float < $250M or 2014 Services Annual revenues < $100M* House Subcommittee on Capital Public float < $250M or 2012 Markets & GSEs Annual revenues < $100M* * Companies qualifying under the revenue test would be capped at a public float of $700M (large accelerated filers) 9 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2 9

SRC & Non-Accelerated Filer Reform Proposed SRC/ Non-Accelerated Filer Definition A com pany w ould have to m eet ONE of the follow ing criteria: There is strong consensus that the $75M cap < $ 2 5 0 M public float should be raised to more accurately reflect the state of small businesses on the market Adding a revenue test would allow truly < $ 1 0 0 M annual small companies that may be highly valued revenues * to be properly classified * Companies qualifying under the revenue test would be capped at a public float of $700M (large accelerated filers) Exposing sm all businesses to burdensom e regulations – from w hich they w ould be exem pt under m ore accurate com pany classifications – slow s com pany grow th and harm s their capital form ation potential Slight changes to the existing definitions w ould provide regulatory relief to grow ing com panies and support early- 1 0 1 0 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON PRESENTATI ON TI TLE I N FOOTER MONTH XX, 2 0 1 2 stage capital form ation