reflections on the arts funding in flanders
play

Reflections on the arts funding in Flanders Does it contribute to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reflections on the arts funding in Flanders Does it contribute to the sustainable development of careers, organizations and the arts field, and how? Dirk De Wit Helsinki 25 APRIL 2019 3 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE Introduction Milestones in


  1. Reflections on the arts funding in Flanders Does it contribute to the sustainable development of careers, organizations and the arts field, and how? Dirk De Wit · Helsinki 25 APRIL 2019

  2. 3 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  3. Introduction Milestones in the development of policy instruments 1976-2006 2006-1016 2016-2019 Discussion Intentions of new policy instruments Evaluation Case : visual arts Caring for the arts eco-system 4 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  4. Introduction 5 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  5. Flanders: northern part of Belgium, a federal state. Regional autonomy in the 1970ies, with education and culture New generation artists in the 1980ies emerged: -international careers -new infrastructure for the production and presentation of arts -asking for change of arts funding Policy makers were open for dialogue. They could start from scratch. 6 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  6. Rosas, Fase. Four Movements to the Music of Steve Reich 1982 7 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  7. 1976-2006 8 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  8. Policy instruments Theatre Decree 1976-1993 Performing arts Decree 1993-2006 Music Decree 1999 visual arts regulation 1999 funds Flanders Literature fund 2000 Flanders Audiovisual Fund 2002 Decrees and funds established in close dialogue with sector Structure of policy instruments based on developments in field 9 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  9. DISCUSSION - Equal treatment: budget, assessment, subsidy forms -How to deal with multidisciplinary , transdisciplinary - Tailor made for each art discipline versus separations , competition, corporatism -Making the arts stronger -Are policy instruments open for future innovation ? Do policy instruments run behind reality? Are policy instruments adapted to new developments? Minister of Culture engages advisors which were innovators in the arts during the 90ies 10 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  10. DISCUSSION Theatre Decree one decree? Performing arts Decree Music Decree visual arts regulation Funds stay autonomous Flanders Literature fund Flanders Audiovisual Fund 11 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  11. 2006: First Art decree (parliament act) 12 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  12. Structure Art disciplines multidisciplinary: forms and themes -Performing arts -arts centers for production presentation -Visual arts -festivals -Music -organizations for art education -Architecture -organizations socio-artistic work -Design -magazines, publications -workspaces (R&D) Subsidy for organizations, projects, subsidies for artists (scholarships, projects), international projects Structural funding: 2 or 4 years and project funding (one year) 13 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  13. Assessment -fixed committees of assessors / art discipline and form-theme -assessment artistic plan and business plan -focus on quality, no quantitative criteria -ranking -priorities of Minister -integrated advise towards Minister by Advisory Board of the Arts (12 members), committees work with predefined budget envelopes based on historical needs Budget : cuts in 2010 14 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  14. EVALUATION Intention: equal for all -not equal: unable to break historical inequalities -committees advocate for their sector (corporatism) -solution for multidisciplinary versus separations between forms/themes and art disciplines -organizational forms are closed boxes -no solution for organizations working with different art disciplines -2 year structural funding does not make sense 15 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  15. 2016: New art decree (second version) Equal for all, open and future oriented More for less. 16 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  16. Structure Art Disciplines Performing arts, visual arts, music, architecture, design, transdisciplinary (detailed) Functions (NO organizational forms, no themes) -Development -Production -Presentation -Reflection -Participation (co-creation) Mix is possible, make your DNA explicit 17 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  17. Performing arts •dance Architecture and design •theatre •architecture •musictheatre •design •performance •other Music •musictheatre (Audio)visual arts •classical music •Audiovisual arts •pop/rock •Visual arts •jazz •Sound art •folk •experimental media art •World •other •other Transdisciplinair 18 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  18. Type of subsidy -Structural funding (5 year for non-profit organizations) -Project subsidy (1, 2 or 3 years, for artists, curators, organizations) -Scholarship (1, 2 or 3 years, only for artists) Other subsidy types, not based on functions -loans, partnerships, co-financing international projects -presentation abroad, focus on Flanders, artists residencies -art acquisition 19 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  19. Assessment -pool of over 200 experts, expertise in art disciplines and functions -based on open call -ad hoc commissions: match between dossier and experts -presidents are only facilitators -artistic and business criteria for each function, quality, questions and limited amount of characters (homogeneous, comparable) -artistic and business assessment -no predefined budget envelopes, integrated advise by Ministry -decision by Minister Budget : recovery 20 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  20. EVALUATION - unequal : big becomes bigger -lack of overview eco-system: holes, balance -quality of reviewers -differences between committees - power of the admin - inflow versus ‘less for more’ (from 270 to 220) -focus on structural funding versus projects and artists 21 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  21. Policy instruments Theatre Decree 1976-1993 Performing arts Decree 1993-2006 Music Decree 1999 visual arts regulation 1999 Art Decree First 2006 New (second) 2016 Visual art lagging behind in development 22 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  22. 23 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  23. 2019: New art decree, small changes 24 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  24. -mix: fix reviewers and rotating reviewers -less application dates for projects -smaller committees for ‘scholarships’ (3) -more own revenue 25 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  25. CONCLUSIONS 26 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  26. EVALUATION - dialogue between politicians, ministry and sector -mutual win win, follow the actor - trust in sector (based on international recognition) -trust empowers sector - facilitating versus restrictions and control -focus on quality - peer review, experts from sector -right people on the right place 27 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  27. -Innovation means also inflow of new players -inflow pushed into precarity -effect of budget cuts in 2011 (economical crisis) 28 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  28. FINAL REMARKS Power : -government – arts sector power: -between art disciplines -institutions versus artists and art workers (project spaces, inflow) Fair practice Care for balances in the eco-system Open dialogue, also within the sector 29 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  29. 30 FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE

  30. WWW.FLANDERSARTSINSTITUTE.BE https://issuu.com/kunstenpuntflandersartsinstitute/docs/kunstenpocket_3_en

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend