Recent Theory and Algorithms December 2, 2015 Predictive Multiscale - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

recent theory and algorithms
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Recent Theory and Algorithms December 2, 2015 Predictive Multiscale - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coarse-Graining with the Relative Entropy: Recent Theory and Algorithms December 2, 2015 Predictive Multiscale Materials Modeling Cambridge, UK M. Scott Shell Department of Chemical Engineering University of California Santa Barbara


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • M. Scott Shell

Department of Chemical Engineering University of California Santa Barbara Support Dreyfus Foundation National Science Foundation

Coarse-Graining with the Relative Entropy: Recent Theory and Algorithms

December 2, 2015 • Predictive Multiscale Materials Modeling • Cambridge, UK

Avi Chaimovich Scott Carmichael

slide-2
SLIDE 2

multi-peptide self assembly

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. Tycko et al., Ann. Rev. of Phys. Chem. (2001)
  • 2. Reches, et al. Science (2003)
  • 3. Amdursky et al, Biomacromolecules (2011)
  • 4. Han et al, Colloids and Biosurfaces B (2011)

amyloid fibril nanotube nanospheres, vesicles gel

20 m

nanowires plates, sheets flowers dendrites

  • 5. Yan et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. (2010)
  • 6. Yan et al., Angewandte Chem. Int. Ed. (2007)
  • 7. Govindaraju et al, Supramolec. Chem. (2011)
  • 8. Su et al, J. Mater. Chem. (2010)

Peptide self-assembled materials

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Zhang et al., J. Chem. Phys., 2009 Pellarin et al., J. Mol. Bio., 2006 Bellesia & Shea, J. Chem. Phys, 2007 Hall & coworkers, Proteins, 2010 HP lattice protein Lau & Dill, Macromol., 1989 bead-spring / Go-like Ueda et al, Biopolymers, 1978

coarse-grained models of folding coarse-grained models of aggregation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

information loss

Shell, JCP (2008); Carmichael and Shell, JPCB (2012); Carmichael and Shell, JCP (2015)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why coarse-grain?

all-atom configuration space coarse-grained configuration space UCG fewer degrees of freedom, simpler interaction potentials, smoother energy landscapes, emergent physics/models

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Basic motivation and theory for relative entropy coarse-graining

1 2

Future prospects for designing CG models

4

Other interesting properties

3

slide-8
SLIDE 8

all-atom peptide model coarse-grained models of varying detail

slide-9
SLIDE 9

(ALA)15

Mapping

slide-10
SLIDE 10

~225 total parameters

Interactions

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Equations of motion (optional)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

reference all-atom simulation / trajectory

A typical scenario in the CG’ing literature

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thinking instead about information loss

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Shell, JCP (2008); Chaimovich and Shell, PRE (2010); Chaimovich and Shell, JCP (2011)

Thinking instead about information loss

slide-19
SLIDE 19

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 2 4 6 8 10 P(x) x

Srel = 0.82

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 2 4 6 8 10 P(x) x

Srel = 0.38

Example in one dimension...

all-atom all-atom coarse- grained coarse- grained

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Shell, JCP (2008); Chaimovich and Shell, PRE (2010); Chaimovich and Shell, JCP (2011)

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Basic motivation and theory for relative entropy coarse-graining

1 2

Future prospects for designing CG models

4

Other interesting properties

3

slide-25
SLIDE 25

CG parameter space (potentials) relative entropy

slide-26
SLIDE 26

reference all- atom simulation CG simulations every time parameters change

slide-27
SLIDE 27

reference all- atom simulation perturb or “reweight” as parameters change reference CG simulation regenerate if perturbation is too far away

slide-28
SLIDE 28

No need for a new CG simulation at each iteration. Reweight the old one instead!

Chaimovich and Shell, JCP (2011); Carmichael and Shell, JPCB (2012)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

reference all-atom trajectory adaptive coarse-grained simulations model system: (ALA)15

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Carmichael and Shell, JPCB (2012)

~80 total parameters

slide-31
SLIDE 31

CG (ALA)15

slide-32
SLIDE 32

CG (ALA)15

slide-33
SLIDE 33

(AEAAKA)4

9 bead types 81 potential terms

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Shell, JCP (2008); Carmichael and Shell, JPCB (2012); Carmichael and Shell, JCP (2015)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Folding in bulk solution

slide-36
SLIDE 36

all-atom coarse-grained RMSDalpha helix Rg

Folding in bulk solution

helix hairpin coil

slide-37
SLIDE 37

16 chains of (ALA)15 (different colors) T = 300 K

multi-peptide self assembly

slide-38
SLIDE 38

16 chains of (ALA)15 (different colors) T = 300 K

multi-peptide self assembly

slide-39
SLIDE 39

isotropic water all-atom water

109.5° 109.5°

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • 2
4 1 3

u(r) r

Lennard-Jones Gaussian (LJG) pair potential

  • C. H. Cho, S. Singh, and G. W. Robinson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1651 (1996)
slide-41
SLIDE 41

D R

Hammer, Anderson, Chamovich, Shell, Israelachvili, Faraday Disc.(2010)

  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 PMF (kcal/mol) R (Å) Shimizu & Chan (2000) Czaplewski et al. (2005) this work, CG water

methanes

slide-42
SLIDE 42

55 vs. 50 mJ/m2 in experiment

20 40 60 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 γeff = ΔFmin / A [mJ/m2] D [nm] ≈ 79∙D ≈ 55

D R

Chaimovich and Shell, JCP (2013).

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Basic motivation and theory for relative entropy coarse-graining

1 2

Future prospects for designing CG models

4

Othe her r interesti teresting ng prope perties rties

3

slide-44
SLIDE 44

What to match? (comparison to other CG metho

Chaimovich and Shell, JCP (2011) see also: Rudzinski and Noid, JCP 135, 214101 (2011)

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • A. Chaimovich and M. S. Shell, Phys. Rev. E(2010); J. Chem. Phys. (2011).
slide-46
SLIDE 46

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 [<n0n1>-<n>2]err srel/β 0.0 0.2 0.5 |μ-μc| 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 [<n2>-<n>2]err srel/β 0.000 0.002

errors in particle fluctuations nearest-neighbor bulk

atomistic 2D lattice gas, pairwise coarse-grained 2D lattice gas, mean-field

Chaimovich and Shell, J. Chem. Phys.(2011)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Useful for theoretical models too

Shell, JCP (2012)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

configuration space distance (D) E configuration space distance (D)

 E0 

Pritchard-Bell and Shell, Biophys J. (2011).

 

        

2 2

2 exp ) (  

i i CG

D E E i p

Fitting protein structure predictions to folding

slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51

Basic motivation and theory for relative entropy coarse-graining

1 2

Future ture prospects spects for designing igning CG models dels

4

Other interesting properties

3

slide-52
SLIDE 52

(ALA)15

Mapping

slide-53
SLIDE 53

all-atom system coarse-grained hydrogens coarse-grained functional groups coarse-grained amino acid residues

slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55

The vast space of all possible CG models

50 100 150 200 100 200 300 400 500 600

N

ln S n, N

ln(# of CG models) sites in CG model

200 all-atom sites 150 100 50

slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57
slide-58
SLIDE 58

average probability of all AA configurations in the corresponding CG state

slide-59
SLIDE 59
slide-60
SLIDE 60

average AA energies within the CG state all of the complex ex stuff! f!

  • multibody interactions
  • temperature dependence

Foley, Shell, Noid, J. Chem. Phys. (2015)

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Foley, Shell, Noid, J. Chem. Phys. (2015)

“all-atom” 120 amino acid sites

Case study: Gaussian Network Model

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Foley, Shell, Noid, J. Chem. Phys. (2015)

coarse-grained 12 pseudoatom sites

Case study: Gaussian Network Model

slide-63
SLIDE 63

number of CG sites

Foley, Shell, Noid, J. Chem. Phys. (2015) “intrinsic resolution”

slide-64
SLIDE 64
slide-65
SLIDE 65

number of CG sites

Foley, Shell, Noid, J. Chem. Phys. (2015) “intrinsic resolution”

slide-66
SLIDE 66
slide-67
SLIDE 67

The relative entropy provides a general statistical mechanical framework for coarse- graining that offers:

Summary

numerical methods to create CG force fields theoretical bridges between various coarse- graining strategies insight into intrinsic resolutions and

  • ptimal mappings