Recent Schemes for X X Increasing the Quantum Z Z - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

recent schemes for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Recent Schemes for X X Increasing the Quantum Z Z - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Recent Schemes for X X Increasing the Quantum Z Z Fault-tolerance U L Threshold Ben Reichardt Berkeley Z Z X X X X Z Z Z X X X X Z X X Z Z Z Z Z X X X X Z X X Z Z Z X X Z Z Z X X X Z Z Z Z


slide-1
SLIDE 1

X Z X Z Z X X X Z X Z Z X X Z X Z X Z X X Z X Z Z X Z Z Z Z X Z X Z X

Z

X Z X Z X Z X

Recent Schemes for Increasing the Quantum Fault-tolerance Threshold

Ben Reichardt

Berkeley UL

X X Z Z

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

[Von Neumann ‘56]

Classical fault-tolerance

Make fault-tolerant a circuit consisting of a universal set of operations, some faulty: 1 ,

,

Perfect op’s: Faulty op’s:

AND, NOT

1 1 1 1 Transverse gate application

r a n d

  • m

p e r m u t a t i

  • n

r a n d

  • m

p e r m u t a t i

  • n

1 1 1 Error correction

0L = 1L =

Encoding 1

1 1

fraction of 1’s

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Quantum bit (qubit)

Continuous quantum states

Classical bit

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Errors inevitable
  • Continuous quantum states
  • Tradeoff between controllability and stability
  • No cloning: local duplication undefined

Qu disadvantages Qu advantage!

  • Can defer exposure of data to operations

?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Universality result

– Theorem: Stabilizer operations plus the ability to prepare any pure state not a stabilizer state gives quantum universality.

Overview

Improved threshold result

– Modification of standard error correction scheme increases estimated threshold 3x, to almost 1%.

Knill’s threshold result

– Theorem: Threshold for erasure errors is for Bell measurements. – Estimated 5-10% threshold for independent depolarizing errors.

Postselection Teleportation Magic states distillation

[R ‘04] [R ‘04]

Defer exposure of data to operations

?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

0 / 1 Larger, fault-tolerant

U

, , ,

Quantum fault-tolerance problem

a b a a b

00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11

CNOT:

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Discrete errors

Duality: bit flips: phase flips:

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Quantum codes

  • Classical codewords in the 0/1 basis

Correct bit flip X errors

  • Classical codewords in the +/- basis

Correct phase flip Z errors

  • E.g., quantum [[7,1,3]] code corrects arbitrary error on one qubit

Based on classical Hamming [7,4,3] code

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

X

X X X

X

[Steane,…]

Standard fault-tolerance scheme

X Z a b a a b Def: CNOT data ancilla Fact 1: Fact 2: 1-a b 1-a 1-a+b

slide-22
SLIDE 22

. 5 . 1 . 1 5 . 2 . 2 5 . 5 . 1 . 1 5 . 2 . 2 5

Physical gate error rate Logical gate error rate

Threshold from concatenation

~p22 p23 p c p2 Probability

  • f error

1 Physical bits per logical bit 7 72 73 O(log log N) concatenations O(log N) physical bits / logical

  • N gate circuit

Want error 1/N 1/c

  • [[7, 1, 3]] code only

corrects 1 error

slide-23
SLIDE 23

[R ‘04]

Universality result

– Theorem: Stabilizer operations plus the ability to prepare any pure state not a stabilizer state gives quantum universality.

Improved threshold result

– Modification of standard error correction scheme increases estimated threshold 3x, to almost 1%.

Knill’s threshold result

– Theorem: Threshold for erasure errors is for Bell measurements. – Estimated 5-10% threshold for independent depolarizing errors.

  • Postselection
  • Teleportation
  • Magic states distillation

[R ‘04]

Overview

Defer exposure of data to operations

!

slide-24
SLIDE 24

X Z X Z X Z X Z X Z X Z Z X Z X Z X Z X Z X Z X Z X Z X Z X Z X Z X Z X error correction

d d e e t t e e c c t t i i

  • n

n ! !

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Time to prepare encoded ancilla

5 10 15 20 25 .001 .002 .003 .004 .005 .006 .007 .008 .009 .010 Physical error rate Steane avg Reject avg

Logical ancilla errors

.000001 .00001 .0001 .001 .01 .1 .001 .002 .003 .004 .005 .006 .007 .008 .009 .010 Physical error rate Logical ancilla error rate Steane Z Steane X Reject Z Reject X

Effect on threshold

.0001 .001 .01 .1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 1 . 1 1 Physical error rate Crash rate Steane Reject 3/4

Effect of postselection in ancilla preparation

[R ‘04]

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Teleportation: Knill’s erasure threshold of

Theorem [Knill ‘03]: Threshold for erasure error is for Bell measurements. X Z

Teleportation

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Teleportation

Alice Bob

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Teleportation

+ Computation

U Alice Bob

Assume no errors!

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Teleportation: Knill’s erasure threshold of

Theorem [Knill ‘03]: Threshold for erasure error is for Bell measurements. [Knill ‘04]: Estimated threshold of 5-10%. X Z UL

X X Z Z + Computation + Fault-tolerance

U

Teleportation

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Errors inevitable in quantum computers
  • Fault-tolerance schemes can tolerate physically plausible error rates

Open questions

Efficient? Provable? UL

X X Z Z

?

[R ‘04] [Knill ‘04]

slide-31
SLIDE 31