Recent Experience From Operation & near future Outlook V. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Recent Experience From Operation & near future Outlook

• V. Chohan

CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Follow-up Review of Reception Tests of CryoMagnets, AT Division, 16 December 2003

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Outline

Operation Experience since July 03

• 1. Where are we & Review of 23 July, other Stream-lining Measures
• Staffing
• To-do-list & Application
• Constraints & Limitations in Operation
• 2. Results to date & explanations
• 3. Development of OP Tools
• SMTMS
• Surveillance & Displays
• Faults Logging & general Logbook
• 4. I mprovements Foreseen & Desirable

Glimpse at the future Tests Programme and Certain Proposals

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Talk Abstract

• Will attempt to :
• Give CONTEXT & CONSTRAI NTS on HOW SM18 Testing Works today
• Give a flavour of statistics of all tested magnets via bench occupancy times ,

explanations & hard limits

• With a tongue-in-cheek challenge to connect, cool down & warm up a dipole in 72 hrs

( no cold tests) as expected from I CS & ACR so that we can all benefit from that experience

• Forward near Look in testing of Dipoles
• I mprovements that are necessary / essential for Operation within the confines of the

testing programme as was foreseen.

• Show Quench Limits , 2- Quench criterion if that is really the hard cryo limiting

requirement & in the light of current magnet performance,

• Show way forward for Magnetic Measurement if indeed time saving is desirable and

the secondary benefits available if such option is chosen I n addition, will show the setting up of the OP team in staffing , OP Tools necessary, developed & ones that need further efforts to continue successful operation.

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

July 03 Review, its Implementation &

• ther Measures in stream-lining
• 1. Recommendations were

implemented from 23rd July evening & To-do-List ( Test work programme) modified immediately

• 2. New To-do-List is stream-lined,

easy to understand by all OP crew , without complications of certain tests & related problems ( e.g. 4.4K , many special MM’s, etc..)

• 3. Thanks to stream-lined To-do-

List, the knowledge base required by OP is also reduced and consolidated on the most important tests & principles

• 4. Availability of Sufficient OP staff

to permit 7 day, 24 hr operation ( 6 newcomers from I ndia in July,2 in Sept, 2 in Nov & 1 AB recruit in Oct )

5. 24 hr MTM piquet started end-Aug, hence further efficiency in work; this was not the case Feb-Aug 03(upto 22hr Mon-fri ) 6. Availability of New Benches for testing ( E2 -9 Sept, F2 -9 Oct) and with similar software / hardware as in C cluster for facilitated OP work 7. Stream-lining of magnet tests results storage directly in MTF database brought further simplicity in OP work & approach to tests - D.Tommasini deserves the exclusive thanks for that. 8. ‘Jackie-boxes’ & trotinette , Ohmic M’ment ease 9. Traveller clarifications & move of certain HV tests to I CS in Oct 03

• 10. Establishment of Team Spirit &

Cohesion amongst Op crew of various backgrounds & cultures. ( & resolution

• f other problems in housing, transport

etc for I ndian Associate )

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Staff Issues

Shift Personnel Availability

4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32

F e b M a r c h a p r i l m a y j u n e j u l y a u g s e p t O c t n

• v

d e c

Month in 2003

total no of OP

TOTAL INDIA AB Div Experinced if Tests frozen & systems Consolidated

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Staffing Profile 2003

Y e a r2 0 0 3 F e b M a rc h a p ril m a y ju n e ju ly a u g s e p t O c t n o v d e c

1 k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in 2 G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H 3 J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie 4 Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l 5 N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille 6

J a k o b

F lo r e n c e F lo r e n c e F lo r e n c e F lo r e n c e F lo r e n c e F lo r e n c e F lo r e n c e 7 A B 7 A B 7 A B 7 8

J a c q u e s O J a c q u e s O J a c q u e s O

9

D a v e D a v e D a v e

1 0 G .A d r ia n 1 1 1 2 1 3 g a n d h i g a n d h i g a n d h i g a n d h i d a n ie l d a n ie l d a n ie l d a n ie l d a n ie l d a n ie l d a n ie l 1 1 4 m a ra th e m a r a th e m a r a th e m a r a th e u tta m u tta m u tta m u tta m u tta m u tta m u tta m 2 1 5 p r a m o d p ra m o d p r a m o d p r a m o d p r a m o d p r a m o d p ra m o d M 2 2 M 2 2 M 2 2 M 2 2 3 1 6 m a d h u m a d h u m a d h u m a d h u m a d h u m a d h u m a d h u M 2 3 M 2 3 M 2 3 M 2 3 4 1 7 s a n ja y s a n ja y s a n ja y s a n ja y s a n ja y s a n ja y s a n ja y s a n ja y s a n ja y M 2 4 M 2 4 5 1 8 M 2 5 M 2 5 6 1 9 s h e tty s h e tty s h e tty s h e tty s h e tty s h e tty s h e tty 7 2 0 ra m r a m r a m r a m r a m ra m r a m 8 2 1 K h a r e K h a r e K h a r e K h a r e K h a r e 9 2 2 P a r e e k P a r e e k P a re e k P a r e e k P a r e e k 1 0 2 3 K a s liw a l K a s liw a l K a s liw a l K a s liw a l K a s liw a l 1 1 2 4 S r id h a r S rid h a r S r id h a r S r id h a r S r id h a r 1 2 2 5 2 6 2 7 G re e n M e a n s E x p e rie n c e d Y e llo w M e a n s N e w A rriv a ls F e b M a r c h a p r il m a y ju n e ju ly a u g s e p t O c t n o v d e c T O T A L 1 3 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 3 1 3 1 7 1 7 1 8 2 0 2 2 IN D IA 5 5 5 5 7 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 A B D iv 8 7 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 1 0

E x p e rin c e d if T e s ts fro z e n & s y s te m s C o n s o lid a te d

5 5 5 7 6 8 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 6

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Power & MM Tests pre-23July03

• l

d_t est s 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 P T 1 P T 2 P T 3 P T 4 M M 0 P T 5 M M 1 P T 6 P T 7 M M 2 M M 3 P T 8 M M 4 M M 5 M M 6 P T 9 P T 1 0 P T 1 1 P T 1 2 P T 1 3 P T 1 4 P T M M 1 3 M M 1 4 M M 1 5 P T 2 9 P T 3 0

T i me i n M i n u t e s

t est s r emoved

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Power & MM Tests post-23July03

New_t est s 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 P T 2 P T 3 P T 4 M M 0 P T 5 P T 1 6 P T 6 M M 3 P T 8 M M 4 P T 1 1 P T 3 0 P T 0 9 T i me i n mi n ut e s New

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

To Do List Dipoles(1) post-23July03

Prep ICS Connection 720 1440 ICS ICS Prep 5 Lyre test 30 120 MTM Prep 6 IAP at WARM : Conf Res meas CDW1 120 60 MTM Prep 7 HV Insulation Test w arm after Bolting 90 90 MTM Prep 9 Electrical connection of TRU w ith the mobile rack 60 30 MTM Leak Test 72 720 Prep 12 Launch cycle to cool dow n 2160 2160 cryo PT 2 IAP at cold 180 180 MTM PT 3 HV tests at cold & QH res. Meas CDAP. 90 90 MTM PT 4 slow pow er abort check 1KA (125 A/s) 30 30 MTM MM0 Shaft alignment, MMPChecks at 1500 A 90 90 MTM PT 5 Provoked Quench at 1.5 kA; ALL LF, All HF 360 240 MTM PT 16 Diode Test Min NRJ at 3KA 180 180 MTM Interbench recuperation time (8 quenches) 480 PT 6 Training Quenches at 1.9K (4) 1200 1200 MTM PT 7 PT 7

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

To Do List Dipoles(2) post-23July03

MM3 LHC cycle 150 150 MTM MM1 PT8 Check of detraining effect : 30 30 MTM MM4 Full load line & Joints Meas 180 180 MTM MM2 PT 11 Ramp to 12850 A and fast de-excitation test 30 30 MTM PT 9 PT 30 HV Insulation Tests at 1.9 K 90 90 MTM PT 10 PT 09 Minimum Energy Quench @ 6.5 KA + RRR and final w arm up. 240 240 MTM PT 11 PT 31 Launch Thermal cycle w arm up 720 1440

cryo cryo

PT 12 PT 13 Electrical disconnection of TRU and mobile rack. 30 30 PT 13 PT 15 IAP at w arm Conf Res meas CDW2 30 60 PT ICS2 Final HV & Disconnection 720 1440 ICS ICS Time for tests and prep 53.5 60 Miscellaneous( Shafts issues, cryo, faults, etc….) ~10% 5 6 ESTIMATE COLD TESTS (1.9K) Time HOURS 58.5 66 Time for connection/disconnection -ICS [12 +12 hrs] 24 24 48 48 Time for w armup/cool dow n - cryo [ 36 +12 ] 48 48 60 60 Total time in hours 130.5 174.0 Total Time In DAYS 5.4 7.3

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Review & slope Change in testing rate

Dipoles Tested vs estimated To-Do-List Test Hrs per Dipole

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

24-mars 31-mars 7-avr. 14-avr. 21-avr. 28-avr. 5-mai 12-mai 19-mai 26-mai 2-juin 9-juin 16-juin 23-juin 30-juin 7-juil. 14-juil. 21-juil. 28-juil. 4-août 11-août 18-août 25-août 1-sept. 8-sept. 15-sept. 22-sept. 29-sept. 6-oct. 13-oct. 20-oct. 27-oct. 3-nov. 10-nov. 17-nov. 24-nov. 1-déc.

Date

Dipoles tested ~120 hrs

~58 hrs

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

OP Staff, Shifts & Benches vs. Time

5 10 15 20 25

31/ 03/ 03 07/ 04/ 03 14/ 04/ 03 21/ 04/ 03 28/ 04/ 03 05/ 05/ 03 12/ 05/ 03 19/ 05/ 03 26/ 05/ 03 02/ 06/ 03 09/ 06/ 03 16/ 06/ 03 23/ 06/ 03 30/ 06/ 03 07/ 07/ 03 14/ 07/ 03 21/ 07/ 03 28/ 07/ 03 04/ 08/ 03 11/ 08/ 03 18/ 08/ 03 25/ 08/ 03 01/ 09/ 03 08/ 09/ 03 15/ 09/ 03 22/ 09/ 03 29/ 09/ 03 06/ 10/ 03 13/ 10/ 03 20/ 10/ 03 27/ 10/ 03 03/ 11/ 03 10/ 11/ 03 17/ 11/ 03 24/ 11/ 03 01/ 12/ 03 08/ 12/ 03

Date Number of staff or shifts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dipole Usable No of Benches

C2 C1 F1 F2 E2 E1 C2 to SSS A 2 Only

N Benches

E1 Prblm staff

Shifts per week

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Tested Dipoles, Benches, Shifts & Test hrs

[dipoles x benches x shifts/ test hrs] & [no. of Usable Benches] vs. Date

40 80 120 160 200 240

24/3 31/3 7/4 14/4 21/4 28/4 5/5 12/5 19/5 26/5 2/6 9/6 16/6 23/6 30/6 7/7 14/7 21/7 28/7 4/8 11/8 18/8 25/8 1/9 8/9 15/9 22/9 29/9 6/10 13/10 20/10 27/10 3/11 10/11 17/11 24/11 1/12 8/12

Week

[dipoles * benches * shifts] / Test hrs 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of Usable Benches dipole*bench/test_hrs N

• of U

sable B enches

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Constraints & Limitations in the Last 6 months

SUPPORT I SSUES

1. The OP crew work 24 hrs a day;

however, the MTM Piquet 24hr support could only start end-Aug

2. No outside hrs support from Supplier

Groups like AB/ CO which often is essential to go forward , e.g., Files & Config problems, Files upload problems, Applic. S/W, H/W problems, Network, Workstations, etc

3. Similar,lesser extent as above for AB/ PO 4. Shafts & Outside Hrs support: had not

been totally possible even under ICS; now MTM has taken over since several months with new constraint in Inserting or Pulling

• ut: the new requirement is to do this

at cold only ( < 80 K) - so an additional constraint for Operation ( often, in pulling out !) 5. I CS staff worked 35 hr/ week but then

doubled the staff & worked 14 hrs/ day

• nly from 3 Nov

6. 11 Nov, [ & 14 July, 8 May..] Support

OTHER GLOBAL I SSUES

1. Commissioning Benches or Testing SSS first time as well as normal Dipole Testing Operation ; new Eqp Tests [MTM] 2. Cryostating crisis (Aug-Sept) & ‘chomage

technique’= keeping magnets ‘on’ & cold longer [CRI ,I CS]

3. Anticryo+ MRB crisis & I CS Logistics 4. Shafts Crisis : Lack of sufficient Equip

availability , meaning a constant juggling act to use the 2 available pairs for all

possible no of magnets under test and

with the constraints in insertion/pulling out

[MTM] 5. CFB issues ( C1 :Vclamp Quenches, Tempr.

Probes, etc), E1 mishap,..Leaks, etc [ACR]

6. New I FS Boxes & “goodness” [MEL] 7. Extra or New Tests required :Cold axis,

field Direction, Diode Connections, Qheaters with higher Resistance… [MAS,SU etc]

8. Floor Painting & ROCLA, He Dewar [CRI ,ACR,ADM..]

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Cryo Limits for SM18 Tests (JPLamboy-10Nov03)

COOLDOWN TI MES THAT NEED TO BE OBEYED For CFB’s ( new Benches only)

Refroidissement de 300K à 80K : 12 heures 12 heures Refroidissement de 80K à 4.5K : 12 heures 12 heures Sous refroidissement de 4.5K à 1.9K : 2.5 heures 2.5 heures Temps entre 2 quenches sur un même banc : 5 hrs 5 hrs Temps entre 2 quenches sur 2 bancs différents : 2.5 hrs 2.5 hrs

WI TH THESE LI MI TS, WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE AT THE SAME TI ME :

• 2 Magnets at 1.9 K under

2 Magnets at 1.9 K under Measurements Measurements

• 1 magnet under recovery

1 magnet under recovery from a Quench from a Quench

• 1 Magnet between 80 K &

1 Magnet between 80 K & 4.4 K 4.4 K

WARM UP TIMES

• CFB Benches :

12 hrs

• Old A Bench (only till Dec03) :

32 hrs

OTHER HARD LI MI T : 8 HF QUENCHES PER DAY

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Bench Occupancy 2001-2

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

1001 1002 2001 3001 3002 1003 2003 2002 1005 1004 1008 1006 1010 1007 1011 1012 3004 1014 1013 1009

magnet days on Test bench 2001-2

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Bench Occupancy 2003

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60

2 4 1 1 6 1 1 9 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 4 1 2 6 3 5 1 3 5 1 2 5 3 1 3 2 6 3 9 2 7 2 2 3 3 1 4 2 8 2 9 2 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 5 3 7 3 3 8 1 4 5 3 4 1 2 1 8 2 2 2 1 7 3 4 6 1 3 1 s s s 3 2 8 3 4 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 4 2 2 2 3 4 7 3 3 9 3 4 5 1 2 1 4 2 2 2 5 3 4 4 1 5 2 2 8 2 2 4 1 4 9 3 5 4 2 2 6 s s s 4 1 5 2 3 8 1 4 8 3 5 5 1 3 9 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 3 4 3 2 7 3 3 4 3 2 2 2 2 7 2 2 9 3 5 9 1 2 9 1 2 7 1 2 8 3 6 5 1 3 2 1 3 8

magnet

days on Test bench in 2003

End July & Review

Sept

Oct Nov Dec

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Per Bench Occupancy Overview

Bench F2 15 sept-21 Nov

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

MBBR2025 MBBR1049 MBBR1039 MBBR3034

bench A2: 1 sept-21 Nov

5 10 15 20

MBAR3022 MBBR1020 MBBR3042 MBAR3028 MBAR3054 MBAR3055

Bench C1: 18 Sept to 19 Nov

5 10 15

MBAR3027 MBBL1048 MBAR2024 MBAL3044 MBAL3045 MBBR2021

Bench E2: 28 Aug-25 Nov

5 10 15 20 25

MBBR1031 MBBR2010 MBBR3039 MBBL1050 MBAR2029 MBAR3008 MBBR1034

Bench E1: 9 Sept- 26 Nov 5 10 15 20 25 MBAR3043 MBBR2002 MBBR1042 MBAR2028 MBAR2026 MBBR3012 MBAR2027

Bench F1 9 Oct-24 Nov

5 10 15 20

MBBR2002 MBAR1052 MBBR1021 MBAL3059

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Total Time For few Short-stay Dipoles

Total Time : few best case examples

24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 1042 1032 1034 1052 1039 2029 3008 3044 3022 3027

M agnet Time in Hours

Total Time(Hours)

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Cold Test times for few short-stay Dipoles

Total Time and Cold Test Time: Few Best Case Examples

1+1

27%

0+2

22% 23%

2

19%

4

33% 21%

2

21%

2

35%

1+1

33%

1+1

17%

45 56 85 3 48 36 63 1+1 36 48 SSW No LL 49 4K 42 4K no antiC 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 1042 1032 1034 1052 1039 2029 3008 3044 3022 3027

M agnet Time in Hours

Total Time(Hours) Cold test Time(Hours)

• Avg. [cold/Total] ~26%

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Long-Stay Magnets & details

Total Time and Cold Test Time of some long-bench-stay magnets

4K 1+1 25%

TC 4K 8+3

51%

4K 1+1

28%

4K 3

47%

4K 5

24%

TC 4K 8+2

42%

128 159 120 169 85 130

96 192 288 384 480

1050 1031 3028 3042 1020 1029

Magnet Time in Hours

Total Time(Hours) Cold test Time(Hours)

• Avg. % Utilisation=36%

A2 bench

7 Oct; Extra MMP

A2 bench

22Sept A2 bench

01Sept

Spec MMP 1st E2 28Aug + WE. Shafts E2 15Oct WE. Shafts C1 with SSS 19 Nov

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

New Benches Operational Usage

WE USED 2025 & 2002 to COMMISSION E & F BENCHES

DATES for Routine New Magnet Testing in Operation

• E2 : 28 Aug : 1031

E2 : 28 Aug : 1031

• E1 : 09 Sept: 3043

E1 : 09 Sept: 3043

• F2 : 22 Oct : 1049

F2 : 22 Oct : 1049

• F1 : 28 Oct : 1052

F1 : 28 Oct : 1052

• D2: 08 Dec : 3059

D2: 08 Dec : 3059

• D1:

D1:

ID Task Name 1

CFUA1

2

CFUA2

3

CFBC2

4

CFBC1

5

CFBE1

6

CFBE2

7

CFBF2

8

CFBF1

9

CFBD1

10

CFBD2

11

CFBB1

12

CFBB2

13

CFBA1

14

CFBA2

14-07 21-07 18-08 25-08 10-11 17-11 28-01 28-01 22-03 29-03 2003

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

E1 & E2 Bench Occupancy

Cold T Tests H s Hour

• urs:

s: E1 & E1 & E E2 B Benches enches

50 1+1 36 5 38 ssw 2 44 1+1 159 4K TC 8 88 4K 3 140 4K 5 128 4K 1+1 50 4 69 4K TC 7 67 3 31 no shft 4K 1+1 72 4K 5 134 4K 4 48 96 144 192 240 288 336 384 432 480 3043 2002 1042 2028 2026 3012 1031 2010 3039 1050 3008 1034 2029 1032 M agnet .

• No. of Hours

total hrs Cold Tests

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Time Distribution from Disconnection of Previous Dipole

Time Distribution from Disconnection of Previous Dipole: E1 & E2 Benches

24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 312 336 360 384 3043 2002 1042 2028 2026 3012 1031 2010 3039 1050 3008 1034 2029 1032 Magnet

• No. of Hours

Change Over Time Pumping & Cooling Cold Tests Warming Warm Final Tests

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

E Cluster Example

C o l

• l d T

d T e s t s H o u r H o u r s : E E 1 & 1 & E E 2 B e n e n c h e c h e s 5 0 1 + 1 3 6 5 3 8 s s w 2 4 4 1 + 1 1 5 9 4 K T C 8 8 8 4 K 3 1 4 0 4 K 5 1 2 8 4 K 1 + 1 5 0 4 6 9 4 K T C 7 6 7 3 3 1 n o s h ft 4 K 1 + 1 7 2 4 K 5 1 3 4 4 K 4 4 8 9 6 1 4 4 1 9 2 2 4 0 2 8 8 3 3 6 3 8 4 4 3 2 4 8 0 3 0 4 3 2 0 0 2 1 0 4 2 2 0 2 8 2 0 2 6 3 0 1 2 1 0 3 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 3 9 1 0 5 0 3 0 0 8 1 0 3 4 2 0 2 9 1 0 3 2 M a g n e t .

• No. of Hours

to ta l h rs C o ld T e s ts

Time Distribution from Disconnection of Previous Dipole: E1 & E2 Benches

24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 312 336 360 384 3043 2002 1042 2028 2026 3012 1031 2010 3039 1050 3008 1034 2029 1032 Magnet N

• . o

f H

• u

rs

Change Over Time Pumping & Cooling Cold Tests Warming Warm Final Tests

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Standard Model Reminder

Standard Model

12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 Per Any Magnet disconnect warm up cold tests cooldown pump down connection

Standard Model 12 *8 slices

12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 Per Any Magnet disconnect warm up cold tests cooldown pump down connection

St a n a nda r da rd M d M ode

• de l :N

l :N o C

• Cold
• ld T

T e st s s so M I N I N I M U M 7 2 H H O U R O U RS R REQ U I U I RED

12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 Per Any Magnet disconnect warm up cooldown pump down connection

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Standard Model : No Cold Tests & challenge to be able to do so in 72 hrs

St a nda r a nda rd M d M ode l :N

• de l :N o C
• Cold T

ld T e s e st s s so M I N I N I M U M U M 7 7 2 H O U R H O U RS R REQ U I Q U I RED

12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 Per Any Magnet disconnect warm up cooldown pump down connection

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Total Occupancy Time For few Short-stay occupancy = best case examples so far ( 6-8 days)

Total Time : few best case examples

24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 1042 1032 1034 1052 1039 2029 3008 3044 3022 3027

M agnet Time in Hours

Total Time(Hours)

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Typical times Extracted from SMTMS [L.Walckiers]

19-Oct-03 26-Oct-03 2-Nov-03 9-Nov-03 16-Nov-03 23-Nov-03 30-Nov-03 7-Dec-03 A2 3054 C1 2024 F1 1052 F2 1049 C1 1048 E1 2026 E2 3008 A2 3055 F2 1039 E1 3012 E2 1034 F1 1021 A2 3022 C1 3027 E2 2029 F1 3059.1 F2 3034 E1 2027 E2 1032 F1 3065 F2 1027 C1 1029 A2 1028 E2 3070 A2 3021 F2 1038 C1 2054 D2 3059.2 F1 3015

Remove Connect Leak Search Cool-Down Cold Test Warm Up

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Development of OP Tools

SMTMS Surveillance & Displays Faults Logging & general Logbook

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

SM18 SMTMS

• SM Test & Measurement Storage Web site

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

SMTMS

• Keep a track of the tests

Keep a track of the tests according to :To Do List according to :To Do List

• Statistics

Statistics

• MTF EXCEL files export

MTF EXCEL files export

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

SMTMS & MTF & Tests Progress

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

SMTMS & Tests

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Statistics of Magnets Tested

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Case of 1042 (no Anti-Cryostat)

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

SMTMS

• Tools to help

communication between shifts (especially ‘consignes’ and work done

– “Consignes” – Calendar – Information Displays for OP – CERN standard Displays Distribution

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Operational Status of Testing at any Instant

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Global Status Display for Operation & Anticryostat Surveillance

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Weekly OP Follow-up + Schedule Meetings

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Schedule for next & Follow up of past

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Faults Follow-up of Previous Week

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Faults Logbook (old version)

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Automatic Extraction of Faults Statistics for any given period

STR 13/11/03 Night No Fault STR 14/11/03 MorninNo Fault STR 14/11/03 Afterno 14/11/2003 16:00 14/11/2003 21:00 STR TBC1 Cryogenics Liquefactor STR 14/11/03 Afterno 14/11/2003 16:00 14/11/2003 21:00 STR TBF1 Cryogenics Liquefactor STR 14/11/03 Afterno 14/11/2003 16:00 14/11/2003 21:00 STR TBF2 Cryogenics Liquefactor STR 14/11/03 Night No Fault STR 15/11/03 MorninNo Fault STR 15/11/03 AfternoNo Fault STR 15/11/03 Night 15/11/2003 23:30 16/11/2003 03:06 STR TBC1 Cryo NOT OK current leads spare broken STR 15/11/03 Night 16/11/2003 01:00 16/11/2003 03:06 STR TBF2 Electronics switch box trigger sent STR 15/11/03 Night 16/11/2003 03:06 16/11/2003 03:06 STR TBF2 MMP serial communication STR 16/11/03 Mornin 16/11/2003 06:51 16/11/2003 13:00 STR TBF2 Power converters lead water STR 16/11/03 AfternoNo Fault STR 16/11/03 Night 16/11/2003 22:09 17/11/2003 06:00 STR TBC1 Protection systems V bus external card STR 17/11/03 Mornin 17/11/2003 06:00 17/11/2003 07:42 STR TBC1 Protection systems V bus external card STR 17/11/03 Mornin 17/11/2003 08:37 17/11/2003 11:30 STR TBC1 Protection systems V bus external card STR 17/11/03 AfternoNo Fault

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Faults statistics

OP Reported Faults 18Aug-24 Nov03

50 100 150 200 250 MTM ACR AB/CO AB/PO Faults Source Incidence

OP Reported Faults 18Aug-24 Nov03

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 MTM ACR AB/CO AB/PO Faults Source Incidence in %

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Faulty Quenches C-Cluster

C 1 1 0 1 9 S S L K 0 3 0 3 1 4 1 7 0 0 . n 0 1 C 1 1 0 1 9 S S L K 0 3 0 3 1 7 0 9 1 0 . n 0 2 C 1 1 0 1 9 S S L K 0 3 0 3 1 7 1 3 1 2 . n 0 3 C 1 1 0 1 9 S S L K 0 3 0 3 1 7 1 6 2 9 . n 0 4 C 1 1 0 1 9 S S L K 0 3 0 3 2 7 0 8 3 9 . n 0 5 C 1 1 0 1 9 S S l K 0 3 0 3 2 7 1 0 5 7 . n 0 6 C 1 1 0 1 9 M M K 0 3 0 3 0 4 1 5 0 4 . m d 0 1 c l a m p C 1 1 0 1 9 T r a i n i n g K 0 3 0 3 0 7 1 6 5 9 . a 0 4 I n t c l a m p C 1 1 0 2 4 S S L L 0 3 0 6 0 9 1 6 1 6 . n 0 1 C 1 1 0 2 4 1 / 2 H F 2 L 0 3 0 6 0 2 2 2 3 1 . h a 0 2 V b u s I n t C 1 1 0 2 4 a l l H F L 0 3 0 6 0 4 1 2 5 4 . h a 0 5 V b u s E x t C 1 2 0 2 5 T r a i n i n g L 0 3 0 7 3 1 0 0 3 4 . a 0 4 V c l a m p - e x t C 1 3 0 4 1 S S L L 0 3 0 8 2 1 0 2 1 4 . n 0 1 V c l a m p - e x t C 1 3 0 4 1 S S L L 0 3 0 8 2 4 0 4 2 2 . n 0 4 V c l a m p - e x t C 1 3 0 4 1 S S L L 0 3 0 8 2 4 1 0 2 2 . n 0 6 V c l a m p - i n t C 1 3 0 4 6 S S L L 0 3 0 9 0 2 1 4 2 6 . n 0 2 V c l a m p C 1 3 0 4 6 S S L L 0 3 0 9 0 2 1 7 5 8 . n 0 3 V c l a m p - e x t C 1 3 0 4 6 S S L L 0 3 0 9 0 2 2 2 5 2 . n 0 5 V c l a m p - e x t C 1 3 0 4 6 P r o v . Q u e n c h @ 1 . 5 K A L 0 3 0 9 0 7 0 8 0 1 . h a 0 2 V b u s - e x t C 1 3 0 4 6 P r o v . Q u e n c h @ 1 . 5 K A L 0 3 0 9 0 7 0 8 5 0 . h a 0 3 V b u s - e x t C 1 3 0 4 6 P r o v . Q u e n c h @ 1 . 5 K A L 0 3 0 9 0 7 0 9 1 6 . h a 0 4 V b u s - e x t C 1 3 0 4 6 D R Q L 0 3 0 9 1 0 1 4 3 2 . p a 0 1 V b u s - e x t C 1 3 0 4 6 D R Q L 0 3 0 9 1 0 1 5 0 8 . p a 0 2 V c l a m p - e x t C 2 1 0 1 5 S S L L 0 3 0 4 0 3 0 9 4 9 . n 0 1 e x t c l a m p C 2 1 0 1 5 S S l L 0 3 0 4 0 3 1 6 1 0 . n 0 2 C 2 1 0 1 5 S S L L 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 8 4 3 . n 0 3 C 2 1 0 1 5 S S l L 0 3 0 4 0 4 1 2 3 3 . n 0 4 C 2 1 0 1 5 S S L L 0 3 0 4 0 4 1 7 4 0 . n 0 5 C 2 3 0 0 5 S S L K 0 3 0 4 1 7 1 0 0 8 . n 0 1 C 2 3 0 0 5 S S L K 0 3 0 4 2 3 1 9 3 7 . n 0 4 C 2 3 0 0 5 S S L k 0 3 0 4 2 3 2 3 4 2 . n 0 5 C 2 3 0 0 5 S S L k 0 3 0 4 2 4 0 3 5 2 . n 0 6 C 2 3 0 0 5 S S L k 0 3 0 4 2 4 0 7 0 7 . n 0 7 C 2 3 0 0 5 D R Q K 0 3 0 4 2 4 1 1 1 4 . p a 0 1 C 2 3 0 0 5 D R Q K 0 3 0 4 2 4 1 5 2 1 . p b 0 1 C 2 3 0 1 3 S S L k 0 3 0 5 1 6 0 2 5 7 . n 0 1 C 2 3 0 1 3 S S L k 0 3 0 5 2 7 2 3 3 2 . n 0 2 C 2 3 0 1 3 S S L k 0 3 0 5 2 8 0 3 0 7 . n 0 3 C 2 3 0 1 3 S S L k 0 3 0 5 2 8 1 6 5 5 . n 0 4 C 2 3 0 1 3 S S L k 0 3 0 5 2 8 2 1 4 0 . n 0 5 C 2 3 0 1 3 S S L k 0 3 0 5 2 9 0 2 5 5 . n 0 6 C 2 3 0 1 3 D R Q k 0 3 0 5 2 9 0 7 0 4 . p a 0 1 C 2 3 0 1 3 D R Q k 0 3 0 5 2 9 1 1 5 6 . p a 0 2 C 2 3 0 1 3 V R Q k 0 3 0 5 3 0 0 0 1 8 . p a 0 3 V C l a m p e x t a t 9 7 9 1 A C 2 3 0 1 3 M i n e n e r g y K 0 3 0 5 2 3 2 0 2 6 . k a 0 4 e n t r y i n f a u l t y l i s t o f q u e n c h t a b l e C 2 3 0 1 3 M i n e n e r g y K 0 3 0 5 2 6 1 9 4 4 . k a 0 4 V c l a m p I n t a s p e r q u e n c h t a b l e C 2 1 0 2 6 S S L K 0 3 0 6 2 0 2 1 5 3 . n 0 1 V c l a m p a t 7 3 0 2 A C 2 1 0 2 6 S S L K 0 3 0 6 2 0 0 1 1 0 . n 0 2 V c l a m p a t 5 7 6 9 A C 2 1 0 2 6 S S L K 0 3 0 6 2 0 0 4 1 1 . n 0 3 V c l a m p a t 9 9 5 3 A C 2 1 0 2 6 S S L K 0 3 0 6 2 0 0 4 1 1 . n 0 4 V c l a m p a t 1 0 0 8 9 A

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Improvements Foreseen or Desirable

By Definition, OP takes a detached view in requesting changes or improvements that ENCOMPASS all parties involved which leads to successful OPERATI ON

The few points here are based WITHIN THE CONFINES OF HOW IT WAS DEFINED & SUPPOSED TO WORK

• Magnet Connectors : longer hrs & hours of working
• Cryogenics: Better interaction in ICS-ACR(ALLS), instilling OP culture,

more frequent experts presence in SMCR , [ future

future e e-

• Traveller

Traveller will Help will Help ]

• MTM : SSS ( = Support, Support & Support … for :

– all Equipment, – Shafts handling, – Special Equip Handling….

• MAS : Tests and Tests Economy, Info passing to OP
• MEL: IFS Boxes, reliability & Support
• & last but not least : AB-Controls & AB-Power Group Support in Faults

Fixing etc.

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

E-Traveller (Jerome A.)

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Glimpse at Future

• Staff Profile
• Guesstimates

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Staffing Profile necessary in 2004

Shift staff Availability

4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32

Jan Feb March april may june july aug sept Oct nov dec

Month in 2004

total no of OP

TOTAL INDIA AB Div Experinced if Tests frozen & systems Consolidated

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Near Future Estimates Feb-June 04

• For Dipoles and extrapolating from current experience :

– Feb: 24+ 2 Assumes both D2 , D1 operational in early Feb – March: 28+ 2 – April: 32+ 3 – May: 36+ 3 – June: 40+ 3 TOTAL:~

173 Dipoles ( in addition to ones already tested)

• SSS remains an uncharted territory from the OP point of view and

we need some experience before estimating the numbers

• I t really depends on :

1. how a full Cluster may be equipped & dedicated solely for SSS testing, 2. OP-friendliness of SSS Tests Equipment, 3. SSS OP Methods DEFI NED & 4. OP EXPERI ENCE GAI NED

• However, a conservative estimate would be ~ 13 SSS till end

June if we use the C1, C2 in cohabitation mode like up to now.

• GRAND TOTAL GUESSTI MATE ( Dipoles + SSS ) ~ 186

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Tested Dipoles, Benches, Shifts & Test hrs

[dipoles x benches x shifts/ test hrs] & [no. of Usable Benches] vs. Date

40 80 120 160 200 240

24/3 31/3 7/4 14/4 21/4 28/4 5/5 12/5 19/5 26/5 2/6 9/6 16/6 23/6 30/6 7/7 14/7 21/7 28/7 4/8 11/8 18/8 25/8 1/9 8/9 15/9 22/9 29/9 6/10 13/10 20/10 27/10 3/11 10/11 17/11 24/11 1/12 8/12

Week

[dipoles * benches * shifts] / Test hrs 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of Usable Benches dipole*bench/test_hrs N

• of U

sable B enches

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Crystal ball gazing…

[Dipoles x Benches x Shifts/ Test Hrs] & [no. of Dipole Usable Benches]

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

2 4 / 3 / 3 7 / 4 / 3 2 1 / 4 / 3 5 / 5 / 3 1 9 / 5 / 3 2 / 6 / 3 1 6 / 6 / 3 3 / 6 / 3 1 4 / 7 / 3 2 8 / 7 / 3 1 1 / 8 / 3 2 5 / 8 / 3 8 / 9 / 3 2 2 / 9 / 3 6 / 1 / 3 2 / 1 / 3 3 / 1 1 / 3 1 7 / 1 1 / 3 1 / 1 2 / 3 1 5 / 1 2 / 3 2 9 / 1 2 / 3 1 2 / 1 / 4 2 6 / 1 / 4 9 / 2 / 4 2 3 / 2 / 4 8 / 3 / 4 2 2 / 3 / 4 5 / 4 / 4 1 9 / 4 / 4 3 / 5 / 4 1 7 / 5 / 4 3 1 / 5 / 4 1 4 / 6 / 4 2 8 / 6 / 4

Week

[dipoles * benches * shifts] / Test hrs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Usable Benches (dipole*bench)*shifts/test_hrs N

• of U

sable B enches

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Attempts at Projection Feb-June 04

• Postulate from L.Walckiers ( Dipoles & SSS Total ~ 214)

Hyp : 1 MB or SSS pe r be nch pe r w e e k N benches MB SSS S4 Total MB SSS S4 Total 26/01/2004 6 1 7 0 D2 02/02/2004 6 1 7 6 1 7 09/02/2004 7 1 8 13 2 15 D1 16/02/2004 7 1 8 20 3 23 23/02/2004 7 1 8 27 4 31 01/03/2004 7 1 8 34 5 39 08/03/2004 8 1 9 42 6 48 B1 15/03/2004 8 1 9 50 7 57 22/03/2004 8 2 10 58 9 67 B2 29/03/2004 8 2 10 66 11 77 05/04/2004 8 2 10 74 13 87 12/04/2004 8 2 10 82 15 97 19/04/2004 8 2 10 90 17 107 26/04/2004 8 2 10 98 19 117 03/05/2004 8 2 10 106 21 127 10/05/2004 8 2 10 114 23 137 17/05/2004 6 5 1 12 120 28 0.5 148.5 A1 A2 24/05/2004 6 5 1 12 126 33 1 160 31/05/2004 6 5 1 12 132 38 1.5 171.5 07/06/2004 6 5 1 12 138 43 2 183 14/06/2004 6 5 1 12 144 48 2.5 194.5 21/06/2004 6 5 1 12 150 53 3 206 28/06/2004 6 5 1 12 156 58 3.5 217.5 Already accepted 90 3

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Tests Programme Reductions

• Proposal for Quench Level & test acceptance
• Anticryostats & SSW only for Magnetic M’ments

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

First Quench Level: All Magnets to 11Nov03

M agnets Appraisal

8350 8850 9350 9850 10350 10850 11350 11850 12350 12850 13350

M agnet

Amps

First Quench

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Ramp2 Levels for All Magnets to 11Dec03

ALL ramp2

8350 8850 9350 9850 10350 10850 11350 11850 12350 12850 13350

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Propose 2 Quench CERN Internal Criteria

( only because everyone talks of minimizing no of Quenches … due to time & Cryo hard limits )

• I f on 2nd ATTEMPT (ramp) the Dipole passes or

Equates :

11850 Amps = 8.33 Tesla THEN,

• THE DI POLE QUENCH PERFORMANCE I S

CONSI DERED SATI SFACTORY & HENCE, STOP FURTHER TRAI NI NG , ..etc

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Ramp3 Levels for All Magnets to 11Dec03 [does not seem to give additional info on ‘goodness’]

ALL ramp3

10350 10850 11350 11850 12350 12850 13350 Magnet c u r r e n t

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Ramp2 & Ramp3

ALL ramp3

10350 10850 11350 11850 12350 12850 13350

Magnet current ALL ramp2

10350 10850 11350 11850 12350 12850 13350

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Proposal: MM & Anticryostats : way forward if indeed we are short of time….

• We have enough Anticryostats+ MRB’s to Equip Magnets
• Shafts are limited in numbers, very fragile and a

nightmare in getting them in or out at the right time &

• n right magnet and under all operation scenarios
• IF COLD-WARM Correlation is sufficient then, Single

Stretch Wire (SSW) may complement with enough information( Integral Field, Angle) to go forward. SSW requires Anticryostats

• PROPOSE TO MOUNT ANTI CRYOSTATS ON ALL

DI POLES & MAKE SSW M’MENT ONLY ; NO SHAFT MOUNTI NG EXCEPT in SPECI AL CASES

– Caveat: SSW MUST BE ROBUST & OPERATI ON-FRI ENDLY

• FURTHER BONUS in TIME : Do 1 Aperture only in SSW if

‘magnetically’ acceptable

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

No Shafts in Routine Tests and Simplification

1.

• 1. No Shafts mean no quench location & enormous

No Shafts mean no quench location & enormous simplicity in setting up for tests for Quench Location simplicity in setting up for tests for Quench Location hardware ( hardware (QLoc QLoc channels, etc) channels, etc) 2.

• 2. No mobile rack & TRU connections & error

No mobile rack & TRU connections & error-

• prone ,

prone , fragile cabling fragile cabling 3.

• 3. No need for OP to

No need for OP to Analyse Analyse Q location signals Q location signals 4.

• 4. No need for shaft alignment checks

No need for shaft alignment checks 5.

• 5. No need for Magnetic

No need for Magnetic M M’ ’ment ment System Checks at 1500A System Checks at 1500A 6.

• 6. No LHC cycle or Load Line & enormously reduced

No LHC cycle or Load Line & enormously reduced quantity of hardware ,software use (MUX, MXI, Motor .. quantity of hardware ,software use (MUX, MXI, Motor .. Errors that have never been resolved but would now Errors that have never been resolved but would now go away !) go away !) 7.

• 7. ……

……

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Mobile Racks, Cables, Connections

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Mobile Racks & Cables /Connectors

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Epilogue

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

On the whole, Ambience has been good…

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

AT-MTM, I ndian Associates from 4

different I nstitutes, AB-OP, AB-PO, AB-CO,

AT-ACR(ALLS) all do work together….

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Tests Methods & status

LI ST OF OPERATI ON METHODS FOR POWER TESTS& Mag. M’ments I N SM18

• No Tests Method Prepared By

Revised/ Updated By Remarks

• Slow Power Abort

P.K.Kavalan, BARC, India, P.Radheshyam CAT,India

Check at 1000 A

DanielBabu, BARC, India S.Sridhar, IGCAR, India

• Provoked Quench at 1500 A, ALL LF -do
• do-
• Provoked Quench at 1500 A, ALL HF -do
• do-
• All Training Quenches at 1.8 K -do-
• do-
• De-training and
• do-
• do-

Fast De-excitation test

• Minimum Energy Quenches
• do-
• do-
• Short Sample Limit Quenches -do-
• do-

at 4.4 K

• Direct Ramp To Quench -do-
• do-
• V-Precycle Ramp To Quench -do-
• do-
• LHC Cycle -do-

P.Radheshyam, CAT,India

• Full Load Line -do-

P.Radheshyam, CAT,India

• MM positioning at 1500A To be revised , if necessary
• Joints Resistance

O.Berrig, CERN,Geneva

Measurement

• I nstrument Analysis

B.Maurya, BARC, India S.Malhotra , BARC, India Procedure

• RRR measurement

S.Malhotra, BARC, India

• HV tests
• M. Gandhi, CAT, India
• A/ C Transfer Function

R.Marathe, CAT, India

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Control Room Now

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Magnet Appraisal & Perf Sheet(MAPS)

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Cold Tests Shifts Personnel

Y e a r2 0 0 4 J a n F e b M a rc h a p ril m a y ju n e ju ly a u g s e p t O c t n o v d e c 1 k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in k e v in 2 G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H G -H H 3 J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie J a c k ie 4 Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l Is m a e l 5 N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille N iq u ille 6 F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e F lo re n c e 7 E ric E ric E ric E ric E ric E ric E ric E ric E ric E ric E ric E ric 8

J a c q u e sO J a c q u e sO J a c q u e sO J a c q u e sO J a c q u e sO

9

D a v e D a v e D a v e D a v e D a v e

1 0 G .Ad ria n G .Ad ria n G .Ad ria n G .Ad ria n G .Ad rian 1 1

A B 1 1 A B 1 1

1 2

A B 1 2 A B 1 2

1 3 d a n ie l d a n ie l d a n ie l d a n ie l M 3 4 M 3 4 M 3 4 M 3 4 M 3 4 M 3 4 M 3 4 M 3 4 1 1 4 u tta m u tta m u tta m u tta m M 3 5 M 3 5 M 3 5 M 3 5 M 3 5 M 3 5 M 3 5 M 3 5 2 1 5 M 2 2 M 2 2 M 2 2 M 2 2 M 2 2 M 2 2 M 2 2 M 2 2 M 4 2 M 4 2 M 4 2 M 4 2 3 1 6 M 2 3 M 2 3 M 2 3 M 2 3 M 2 3 M 2 3 M 2 3 M 2 3 M 4 3 M 4 3 M 4 3 M 4 3 4 1 7 M 2 4 M 2 4 M 2 4 M 2 4 M 2 4 M 2 4 M 2 4 M 2 4 M 2 4 M 2 4 5 1 8 M 2 5 M 2 5 M 2 5 M 2 5 M 2 5 M 2 5 M 2 5 M 2 5 M 2 5 M 2 5 6 1 9 s h e tty s h e tty s h e tty s h e tty M 3 6 M 3 6 M 3 6 M 3 6 M 3 6 M 3 6 M 3 6 M 3 6 7 2 0 ra m ra m ra m ra m M 3 7 M 3 7 M 3 7 M 3 7 M 3 7 M 3 7 M 3 7 M 3 7 8 2 1 K h a r e K h a re K h a re K h a r e K h a re K h a re M 3 8 M 3 8 M 3 8 M 3 8 M 3 8 M 3 8 9 2 2 P a re e k P a re e k P a re e k P a re e k P a re e k P a re e k M 3 9 M 3 9 M 3 9 M 3 9 M 3 9 M 3 9 1 0 2 3 K a s liw a l K a s liw a l K a s liw a l K a s liw a l K a s liw a l K a s liw a l M 4 0 M 4 0 M 4 0 M 4 0 M 4 0 M 4 0 1 1 2 4 S rid h a r S r id h a r S rid h a r S rid h a r S r id h a r S rid h a r M 4 1 M 4 1 M 4 1 M 4 1 M 4 1 M 4 1 1 2 2 5 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 M 2 6 1 3 2 6 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 M 2 7 1 4 2 7 M 2 8 M 2 8 M 2 8 M 2 8 M 2 8 M 2 8 M 2 8 M 2 8 M 2 8 M 2 8 1 5 2 8 M 2 9 M 2 9 M 2 9 M 2 9 M 2 9 M 2 9 M 2 9 M 2 9 M 2 9 M 2 9 1 6 2 9 M 3 0 M 3 0 M 3 0 M 3 0 M 3 0 M 3 0 M 3 0 M 3 0 M 3 0 M 3 0 1 7 3 0 M 3 1 M 3 1 M 3 1 M 3 1 M 3 1 M 3 1 M 3 1 M 3 1 M 3 1 M 3 1 1 8 3 1 M 3 2 M 3 2 M 3 2 M 3 2 M 3 2 M 3 2 M 3 2 M 3 2 1 9 3 2 M 3 3 M 3 3 M 3 3 M 3 3 M 3 3 M 3 3 M 3 3 M 3 3 2 0 3 3 2 1 3 4 2 2 G re e n M e a n s E xp e rie n c e d Ye llo w M e a n s N e w Arriva ls J a n F e b M a rc h a p ril m a y ju n e ju ly a u g s e p t O c t n o v d e c T O T AL 2 4 2 4 2 8 2 5 2 7 2 7 2 7 2 7 2 7 2 7 3 0 3 0 IN D IA 1 4 1 4 1 8 1 8 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 8 1 8 AB D iv 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 2 1 2

Exp erin ced if T ests fro zen & system s C o n so lid ated

1 7 1 7 1 9 1 9 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 7 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 3

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Staffing Profile : India 2004-7

S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 22 42 56 23 43 57 24 58 25 59 26 44 60 27 45 61 28 46 62 29 47 63 30 64 31 65 32 48 66 33 49 67 34 50 68 35 51 69 36 52 70 37 71 38 53 72 39 54 73 40 55 74 41 75 W1 W3 W5 W2 W4 W6

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Preparatory Tests pre-23July03

Ol d 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 P r e p1 P r e p2 P r e p3 P r e p4 P r e p5 P r e p6 P r e p7 P r e p8 P r e p9 P r e p1 0 P r e p1 1 P r e p1 2 P T 3 1 P T 3 2 P T 3 3 P T 3 4 P T 3 5 Pr ep1 Pr ep2 Pr ep3 Pr ep4 Pr ep5 Pr ep6 Pr ep7 Pr ep8 Pr ep9 Pr ep10 Pr ep11 Pr ep12 PT3 1 PT3 2 PT3 3 PT3 4 PT3 5 r emoved

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Preparatory Tests post-23July03

n ew_pr ep+con n ect i

• n / di

scon n ect i

• n +cool

i n g/ war mi n g 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 P r e p I C S P r e p 5 P r e p 6 P r e p 7 P r e p 9 P r e p 1 2 P T 3 1 P T 1 3 P T 1 5 P T I C S 2 T i me i n mi n ut e s con n ect i

• n

di scon n ect i

• n

war m up cooldown

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Future SMTMS Enhancements

• Quench Table
• Automatic Updates

– Link with AT-ACR & e-Traveller – Link (from AB-OP) with AB-CO for certain Tests

• Whiteboard
• Faults handling
• MAPS, …
• etc

16 December 2003 V.Chohan Follow-up Review of Reception tests of Cryomagnets

Other Tools: Surveillance of certain Useful parameters for OP

• PC Based programme to Survey status of :

Benches Active /passive Rotary Switch Q Heaters HF/LF Current Main or Aux CFB Cryogenic OK/NOK for 1.9 K or 4.4K Anticryostat Temperature Condition OK/NOK ( equip Protection)

Display Mechanism using Video Distribution from PCR &

fully supported all year long thro’ D.Bakker/AB-CO