Reasoning for Humans: Clear Thinking in an Uncertain World PHIL 171 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reasoning for humans clear thinking in an uncertain world
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reasoning for Humans: Clear Thinking in an Uncertain World PHIL 171 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reasoning for Humans: Clear Thinking in an Uncertain World PHIL 171 Eric Pacuit Department of Philosophy University of Maryland pacuit.org Table of contents 1. Arguments 2. Representing Arguments 3. Arguments and Inference 1 Arguments


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Reasoning for Humans: Clear Thinking in an Uncertain World

PHIL 171

Eric Pacuit

Department of Philosophy University of Maryland pacuit.org

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Table of contents

  • 1. Arguments
  • 2. Representing Arguments
  • 3. Arguments and Inference

1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Arguments

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Arguments

An argument is a list of statements, one of which is designated as the conclusion, and the rest of which are designated as premises.

2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Arguments

An argument is a list of statements, one of which is designated as the conclusion, and the rest of which are designated as premises.

2

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Conclusion Indicators

therefore hence for this reason thus implies that entails that so it must be that we may infer wherefore it follows that we may conclude that consequently as a result accordingly

3

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Declarative Sentences

A sentence is declarative if it makes a statement: that is, if it asserts something.

4

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Declarative Sentences

A sentence is declarative if it makes a statement: that is, if it asserts something. Examples Amsterdam is in The Netherlands. Helsinki is in Norway. Textbooks are free in all of my courses. The Terps beat the Buckeyes in football.

4

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Declarative Sentences, Commands, Questions

Attendance is mandatory. (declarative) Show up to the lectures! (imperative) Are you coming to class today? (interrogative)

5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Indexical Sentences

I have been in the Skinner building. My computer was stolen. The dog ate the steak yesterday.

6

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Terminology: Proposition

The premises and conclusion of an argument are not the declarative sentences we use to express the argument, but rather the meanings of those declarative sentences. A proposition is something that can be true or false. Some logic/philosophy texts use “statement” or “claim” instead of “proposition”.

7

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Many sentences can express the same proposition

  • 1. I have taken logic before.
  • 2. I took logic.
  • 3. This is not the first time I have taken logic.

8

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Many sentences can express the same proposition

  • 1. I have taken logic before.
  • 2. I took logic.
  • 3. This is not the first time I have taken logic.
  • 1. There is a cat in the teapot.
  • 2. Hay un gato en la tetera.
  • 3. Il y a un chat dans la th´

ei` ere.

  • 4. Eine Katze ist in der Teekanne.
  • 5. Er is een kat in de theepot

8

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A sentence may express different propositions

  • 1. Ann bumped into the main with an umbrella.
  • 2. No student solved exactly two problems.

9

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Summary

A sentence is declarative if it makes a statement: that is, if it asserts something. A proposition is something that can be true or false. It is the statement expressed by a declarative sentence. The premises and conclusion of an argument are not the declarative sentences we use to express the argument, but rather the propositions expressed by those declarative sentences. Some logic/philosophy texts use “statement” or “claim” instead of “proposition”.

10

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Representing Arguments

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The lecture will either be in the Skinner building or on Zoom. Since classroom space is limited on campus, the lecture will not be in the Skinner building. So, the lecture will be on Zoom.

11

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The lecture will either be in the Skinner building or on Zoom. Since classroom space is limited on campus, the lecture will not be in the Skinner building. So, the lecture will be on Zoom.

11

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The lecture will either be in the Skinner building or on Zoom. Since classroom space is limited on campus, the lecture will not be in the Skinner building. So, the lecture will be on Zoom.

11

slide-20
SLIDE 20

S1 The lecture will either be in the Skinner building or on Zoom. (Premise) S2 Since classroom space is limited on campus, the lecture will not be in the Skinner building. (Premise) S3 The lecture will be on Zoom. (Conclusion)

12

slide-21
SLIDE 21

S1 The lecture will either be in the Skinner building or on Zoom. (Premise) S2 Since classroom space is limited on campus, the lecture will not be in the Skinner building. (Premise) S3 The lecture will be on Zoom. (Conclusion)

12

slide-22
SLIDE 22

S1 The lecture will either be in the Skinner building or on Zoom. (Premise) S2 Since classroom space is limited on campus, the lecture will not be in the Skinner building. (Premise) S3 ∴ The lecture will be on Zoom. (Conclusion)

12

slide-23
SLIDE 23

S1 S2 ∴ S3 S1, S2 ⇒ S3

12

slide-24
SLIDE 24

S1 S2 ∴ S3 S1, S2 ⇒ S3

12

slide-25
SLIDE 25

S1, S2 ⇒ S3

List of premises Separates the premises from the conclusion Conclusion

13

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Arguments and Inference

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. Is this an argument?

14

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. Is this an argument? Yes. What is the premise?

14

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. Is this an argument? Yes. What is the premise? “The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall”. What is the conclusion?

14

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. Is this an argument? Yes. What is the premise? “The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall”. What is the conclusion? “The math department is in the Skinner Building”. Is this a good argument?

14

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. Is this an argument? Yes. What is the premise? “The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall”. What is the conclusion? “The math department is in the Skinner Building”. Is this a good argument? No!

14

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. What’s wrong with this argument?

15

slide-33
SLIDE 33

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. What’s wrong with this argument?

  • 1. The premise is not true.
  • 2. The conclusion does not follow from the premise.

15

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. S1 ⇒ S2

16

slide-35
SLIDE 35

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. S1 ⇒ S2 Eric had steak or fish for dinner. Eric did not have fish. So, Eric had steak for dinner. S1, S2 ⇒ S3

16

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The philosophy department is in Tawes Hall. So, the math department is in the Skinner Building. S1 ⇒ S2 Eric had steak or fish for dinner. Eric did not have fish. So, Eric had steak for dinner. S1, S2 ⇒ S3

16

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Eric had steak OR Eric had fish NOT Eric had fish Eric had steak

17

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Eric had steak OR Eric had fish NOT Eric had fish Eric had steak

17

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Restaurant Example

In a restaurant, Ann ordered Fish, Bob ordered Pasta and Charles ordered

  • Meat. Out of the kitchen comes some new person carrying the three
  • plates. What will happen?

The waiter asks a first question, say “Who ordered the meat?”, and puts that plate in front of Charles. Then he asks a second question “Who

  • rdered the fish?”, and puts that plate in front of Ann.

18

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Restaurant Example

In a restaurant, Ann ordered Fish, Bob ordered Pasta and Charles ordered

  • Meat. Out of the kitchen comes some new person carrying the three
  • plates. What will happen?

The waiter asks a first question, say “Who ordered the meat?”, and puts that plate in front of Charles. Then he asks a second question “Who

  • rdered the fish?”, and puts that plate in front of Ann. And then,

without asking further, he knows where he has to put the remaining plate in front of Bob. What has happened here?

18

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Restaurant Example

In a restaurant, Ann ordered Fish, Bob ordered Pasta and Charles ordered

  • Meat. Out of the kitchen comes some new person carrying the three
  • plates. What will happen?

The waiter asks a first question, say “Who ordered the meat?”, and puts that plate in front of Charles. Then he asks a second question “Who

  • rdered the fish?”, and puts that plate in front of Ann. And then,

without asking further, he knows where he has to put the remaining plate in front of Bob. What has happened here? Meat or Pasta or Fish, not Fish, not Meat =

⇒ Pasta

18

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Ann ordered fish (F) Charles ordered meat (M)

F PM

Bob ordered pasta (P) How many ways could the waiter/waitress distribute the meals?

19

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Ann ordered fish (F) Charles ordered meat (M)

F PM

Bob ordered pasta (P) How many ways could the waiter/waitress distribute the meals?

19

slide-44
SLIDE 44

FMP FPM PFM PMF MPF MFP Does the waiter/waitress know how to distribute the meals?

19

slide-45
SLIDE 45

FMP FPM PFM PMF MPF MFP Does the waiter/waitress know how to distribute the meals?

19

slide-46
SLIDE 46

FMP FPM PFM PMF MPF MFP What happens after learning that Charles ordered meat (M)?

19

slide-47
SLIDE 47

✘✘ ✘ ❳❳ ❳ FMP FPM PFM ✘✘ ✘ ❳❳ ❳ PMF ✘✘ ✘ ❳❳ ❳ MPF ✘✘ ✘ ❳❳ ❳ MFP What happens after learning that Charles ordered meat (M)?

19

slide-48
SLIDE 48

FMP FPM PFM PMF MPF MFP FPM PFM FPM Charles ordered M Ann ordered F

19

slide-49
SLIDE 49

FMP FPM PFM PMF MPF MFP FPM PFM FPM Charles ordered M Ann ordered F

19

slide-50
SLIDE 50

After observing/learning that Charles ordered meat and Ann ordered fish, the waiter/waitress concludes/infers that Bob ordered pasta (P). That is, the only possibility is FPM. F or P or M, not M, not F = ⇒ P

19

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Sudoku

1 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 1 1 or 2 or 3, not 1, not 2 = ⇒ 3

20

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Sudoku

1 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 1 1 or 2 or 3, not 1, not 3 = ⇒ 2

20

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Sudoku

1 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 1 1 or 2 or 3, not 2, not 3 = ⇒ 1

20

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Sudoku

1 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 1 1 or 2 or 3, not 2, not 1 = ⇒ 3

20

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Sudoku

1 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 1 1 or 2 or 3, not 2, not 1 = ⇒ 3

20

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Argument form/inference pattern

From fish or meat or pasta, not fish, not meat infer pasta From 1 or 2 or 3, not 1, not 2 infer 3 The lecture is in Skinner or in Tydings or on Zoom. The lecture is not in

  • Skinner. The lecture is not in LeFrak. So, the lecture is on Zoom.

21

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Argument form/inference pattern

From fish or meat or pasta, not fish, not meat infer pasta From 1 or 2 or 3, not 1, not 2 infer 3 The lecture is in Skinner or in Tydings or on Zoom. The lecture is not in

  • Skinner. The lecture is not in LeFrak. So, the lecture is on Zoom.

ϕ or ψ or χ, not ϕ, not ψ ⇒ χ

21

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Important point

“follows from” should be distinguished from “inferring”.

22

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Important point

“follows from” should be distinguished from “inferring”. Inferring is an activity that a person or computer performs, but “follows from” is a relationship between sentences.

22