Reasoning for Humans: Clear Thinking in an Uncertain World PHIL 171 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reasoning for humans clear thinking in an uncertain world
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reasoning for Humans: Clear Thinking in an Uncertain World PHIL 171 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reasoning for Humans: Clear Thinking in an Uncertain World PHIL 171 Eric Pacuit Department of Philosophy University of Maryland pacuit.org Table of contents 1. Course Overview 2. Introduction to Reasoning 3. Logic 1 Introduction First


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Reasoning for Humans: Clear Thinking in an Uncertain World

PHIL 171

Eric Pacuit

Department of Philosophy University of Maryland pacuit.org

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Table of contents

  • 1. Course Overview
  • 2. Introduction to Reasoning
  • 3. Logic

1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

slide-4
SLIDE 4

First Steps

  • 1. Watch the introductory video.
  • 2. Make sure you are signed up and can login to Piazza

https://piazza.com/umd/fall2020/phil171.

  • 3. Sign up for https://app.tophat.com/e/601505 with join code
  • 601505. You must purchase the pro-subscription.
  • 4. Watch the video introducing the online tools we will use this

semester (see https://phil171.org/weeks/1/#watch-this).

  • 5. Read the course policies (https://phil171.org/policies) and

syllabus (https://umd.instructure.com/courses/1289360/ assignments/syllabus).

  • 6. Answer the introductory quiz on Tophat:

https://app.tophat.com/e/601505/page/234795750

2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

First Steps

https://umd.instructure.com/courses/1289360/pages/ first-steps?module_item_id=10222574

3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Grading Participation 30% Problem Sets 40% Exam 1 10% Exam 2 10% Final Exam 10%

4

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Online Tools

Course Website: umd.instructure.com/courses/1279694 Online Notes: text.phil171.org Online Discussion: https://piazza.com/umd/fall2020/phil171 Participation Questions: https://app.tophat.com/e/601505

5

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Topics

  • Introduction (Reasoning, Arguments and Inferences)
  • Logic
  • Logic and Reasoning
  • Probability
  • Probabilistic Inference
  • Other topics: Lottery Paradox, The Grue Paradox, Bayesian

Epistemology, . . .

6

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction to Reasoning

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Reasoning

Reasoning is a “transition in thought, where some beliefs (or thoughts) provide the ground or reasons for coming to another”

  • J. Adler.

Introduction: Philosophical Foundations (Sections 1 - 4). in Reasoning: Studies in Human Inference and its Foundations, Cambridge University Press, 2008.

7

slide-11
SLIDE 11

I need to make lunch for my daughter at 12:15. Oh, I better put the slides on the website.

8

slide-12
SLIDE 12

I need to make lunch for my daughter at 12:15. ✟ ✟ ❍ ❍ Oh So, I better put the slides on the website.

8

slide-13
SLIDE 13

My keys are either in my office or locked in my car. My keys are not in my office. So, my keys are locked in my car.

9

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Bill brought his backpack to class every day of the semester. So, [probably] Bill will bring it to the next class.

10

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What is the course about?

What are the rules or formal constraints that govern rational transitions in thought?

11

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What is the course about?

What are the rules or formal constraints that govern rational transitions in thought? What does it mean to be rational or reasonable as opposed to irrational

  • r unreasonable?

11

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Logic

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Logic - Both a very old and very modern discipline

12

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Question

Ann is looking at Bob, and Bob is looking at Charles. Ann is married and Charles is not married.

13

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Question

Ann is looking at Bob, and Bob is looking at Charles. Ann is married and Charles is not married. M Ann ?? Bob UM Charles Is it true that a married person is looking at an unmarried person?

  • 1. Yes.
  • 2. No.
  • 3. There is not enough information to answer this question.

13

slide-21
SLIDE 21

M Ann ?? Bob UM Charles Bob is married Bob is not married

14

slide-22
SLIDE 22

M Ann ?? Bob UM Charles Bob is married Bob is looking at Charles Charles is not married Bob is not married

14

slide-23
SLIDE 23

M Ann ?? Bob UM Charles Bob is married Bob is looking at Charles Charles is not married Bob is not married Ann is looking at Bob Ann is married

14

slide-24
SLIDE 24

M Ann ?? Bob UM Charles Bob is married Bob is looking at Charles Charles is not married Bob is not married Ann is looking at Bob Ann is married A married person is looking at an unmarried person

14

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Logic

Logicians study under what circumstances a sentences follows from

  • ther sentences.

15

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Logic

Logicians study under what circumstances a sentences follows from

  • ther sentences.

Sentence 1 follows from sentence 2 if every time we use sentence 2 in a true way we could use sentence 1.

15

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Logic

Logicians study under what circumstances a sentences follows from

  • ther sentences.

Sentence 1 follows from sentence 2 if every time we use sentence 2 in a true way we could use sentence 1. Example: Every elephant moves follows from every animal hops.

15

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Arguments

The word “argument” can mean several different things: Ann and Bob are having an argument. Ann is advancing the argument that such-and-such is true. The value of a function depends on the value of its arguments.

16

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Arguments

The word “argument” can mean several different things: Ann and Bob are having an argument. Ann is advancing the argument that such-and-such is true. The value of a function depends on the value of its arguments. One advances an argument by giving certain reasons designed to persuade the reader/hearer that a certain claim is correct.

16

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Arguments

An argument is a list of statements, one of which is designated as the conclusion, and the rest of which are designated as premises.

17

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Arguments

An argument is a list of statements, one of which is designated as the conclusion, and the rest of which are designated as premises.

17

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Conclusion Indicators

therefore hence for this reason thus implies that entails that so it must be that we may infer wherefore it follows that we may conclude that consequently as a result accordingly

18

slide-33
SLIDE 33

19