Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure Digital Vision Background - - PDF document

reappointment promotion tenure digital vision background
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure Digital Vision Background - - PDF document

Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure Digital Vision Background Introduction Benchmarking Digital RPT system is inevitable Di it l RPT t i i it bl Commercial Products These products would have to be customized at


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure Digital Vision

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • Introduction
  • Benchmarking

Di it l RPT t i i it bl – Digital RPT system is inevitable – Commercial Products

  • These products would have to be customized at significant cost
  • Lengthy process

e gt y p ocess

  • Would not keep us consistent with COM or COM would have to change
  • COM product will meet needs at reasonable cost

– Proven 10 years of effective use y – Customizable through UCIT – Meets AAUP guidelines – Continuity across all colleges Continuity across all colleges

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background, Cont.

  • Plan for roll-out:

– Pilot: Select 2-3 colleges to pilot for next Promotion/Tenure Cycle Oct. 2011 – Full Implementation: All colleges by Promotion/Tenure Cycle Oct. 2012 Full Implementation: All colleges by Promotion/Tenure Cycle Oct. 2012

  • Keys for Successful Pilot

1 Faculty Engagement – appreciation for positive change

  • 1. Faculty Engagement – appreciation for positive change
  • 2. Faculty Commitment – faculty governance supports
  • 3. Faculty Participation – willingness to:
  • Submit dossier digitally without increased college administration costs

Submit dossier digitally without increased college administration costs

  • Keep all documents digital throughout process
  • May move RPT deadlines up slightly to accommodate pilot (6 mo notice)

4. Representative cross-section of colleges

slide-4
SLIDE 4

System Benefits

  • For Faculty Candidates:
  • For Faculty Candidates:

– No printing, sorting, binding, carting, retrieving – Flexibility in dossier submissions (no space or media limits, can still have non-digital components) non digital components) – Continuous access to see status in the process – Automatic notifications of new material additions – Adheres to CBA requirements – Confidentiality maintained (subject to Ohio law limits)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

System Benefits

  • For Reviewers:
  • For Reviewers:

– Continuous access to see status in the process – Immediate access to any dossier additions – Simultaneous access for all committee members – Simultaneous access for all committee members – At all levels, access to full files, not just short files – Recommendation letter “shells” automatically generated with addressee & similar fields populated – Automatic notifications (receive & send)

  • When ready for review
  • When new materials are added
  • When responses are added
  • When request for reconsideration is added
  • When remands occur
  • When recommendation is uploaded

– Adheres to CBA requirements (remands, responses, reconsiderations)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

System Benefits

  • For Administration:
  • For Administration:

– No scanning, downloading, moving files to network – Database-driven; better population of UCFlex – Permanent secure record of actions (“paper trail” plus decisions & dates) – Permanent, secure record of actions ( paper trail plus decisions & dates) – Less waste of paper & labor – Adheres to CBA requirements

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pilot Overview

  • College Benefits for Pilot:
  • College Benefits for Pilot:

– Coordination during development of customizations – Early adopter = more attention A id i – Avoid semester conversion

  • Pilot Process:

– Data gathering to populate application – System design to ensure needs of College are met – Implementation and Testing – Training possibility for reviewers – “In-Line Help” for Candidates – RPT process as usual!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

System Features

  • Faculty Candidate
  • Faculty Candidate

– Secure Login (6+2) – Dossier View

  • Document Checklist
  • Selection of Nomination
  • Routing History and Workflow
  • Reviewers
  • Reviewers

– All Users: Secure Login (6+2) – Reviewer:

  • Process a recommendation
  • Tools for writing a recommendation to add to the dossier

– Committee: Voting on a Recommendation – Reporting

slide-9
SLIDE 9

System Features: y

Faculty Candidate

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Secure Login (6+2)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Digital Dossier

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Selecting a Nomination Routing History on Dossier

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Uploading Documents

slide-14
SLIDE 14

System Features: y

Reviewers

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Secure Login (6+2)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

View of Candidates View of Candidates

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Filtering for C did t Candidates

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Digital Dossier

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Recommendations Routing History on Dossier

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Voting Feature for Committees

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Adding a Letter to the Dossier

slide-22
SLIDE 22

G ti Generating a Template Letter

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Reporting Features

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure Digital Vision

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Process Overview Process Overview