Reactor Neutrinos
Sterile Neutrino Searches with Precision Measurements at Very Short Baselines
Jim Napolitano Temple University for the PROSPECT collaboration
Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions 14-16 December 2015
Reactor Neutrinos Sterile Neutrino Searches with Precision - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Reactor Neutrinos Sterile Neutrino Searches with Precision Measurements at Very Short Baselines Jim Napolitano Temple University for the PROSPECT collaboration Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions 14-16 December 2015 Reminder: The
Jim Napolitano Temple University for the PROSPECT collaboration
Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions 14-16 December 2015
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
Distance (m) 10
2
10
3
10 Data / Prediction 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Previous data Daya Bay Global average Experiments Unc. σ 1- Model Unc. σ 1-
2
Deficit Is the deficit due to antineutrino disappearance?
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
Distance (m) 10
2
10
3
10 Data / Prediction 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Previous data Daya Bay Global average Experiments Unc. σ 1- Model Unc. σ 1-
2
Deficit Is the deficit due to antineutrino disappearance? “Kopp Best Fit”: Point Source @4 MeV
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
3
Δm2 ≈few ev2 and sin22θ “not so small”
14
θ 2
2
sin
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 ]
2
[eV
14 2
m ∆
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
Sensitivity: CL σ Disappearance (Giunti), 2
e
ν SBL Reactor + Gallium Anomaly (LSN), 95% CL SBL Reactor Anomaly (Kopp), 95% CL Disappearance Expts (Kopp), 95% CL
e
ν All Gallium Anomaly (Kopp), 95% CL
Gallium PRC 83(2011)065504 BOONE, MiniBOONE AnnRev 63(2013)45 Global fits JHEP 1305(2013)050 PRD 88(2013)073008 References
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
4
AD1 AD2 AD3 AD4 AD5 AD6 Model / GW / day
2
cm
10 × Y 1.5 1.6 1.7 / fission
2
cm
10 ×
f
σ 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 Daya Bay (stat.) Daya Bay w/ fission fraction corr. (stat.) Daya Bay near site combined (syst.) Huber + Mueller ILL + Vogel
Power Reactors: Mixture of 235U, 239Pu, 241Pu, 238U
Reference: arXiv 1508.04233
ILL+Vogel (1980’s): e− spectra, plus calculation for 238U Huber + Mueller (2011): Inversion with β-decay corrections
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
5
Prompt Positron Energy (MeV) 2 4 6 8 Entries / 250 keV 5000 10000 15000 20000 Data Full uncertainty Reactor uncertainty ILL+Vogel Integrated Prompt Energy (MeV) 2 4 6 8 Ratio to Prediction 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2
(Huber + Mueller) Prompt Energy (MeV) 2 4 6 8 contribution
2
χ 4 − 2 − 2 4 )
i
χ ∼ ( 10 10 10 10 10 10 1
arXiv 1508.04233
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Events / 0.2 MeV
5000 10000 15000
Data MC
Near
(a)
Prompt Energy (MeV) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(Data - MC) / MC
0.1 − 0.1 0.2
Events / 0.2 MeV
(Data - MC) / MC
arXiv 1511.05849
Daya Bay RENO
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
6
PRL 114(2015)012502 PRD 92(2015)033015
2 3 4 5 6 7 8]
fission
) [MeV
ν
S(E ×
ν
σ 0.1 0.2 Nuclear Calculation Conversion, Huber
Conversion, Mueller
Nuclear Calc., Fallot
(c)
Antineutrino Energy [MeV] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 )
ν
(E
conv.
) / S
ν
S(E 0.8 0.9 1 1.1
Daya Bay RENO Double CHOOZ
(d)
2 3 4 5 6 7 EPrompt (MeV) 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 Normalized Ratio to Huber-Mueller
Huber-Mueller uncert. JEFF-3.1.1 ENDF/B-VII.1 Daya Bay
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
EPrompt (MeV)
0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15
Normailzed ratio to Huber-Mueller
Huber-Mueller uncert. JEFF-3.1.1 ENDF/B-VII.1 RENO
Different approaches (and nuclear data bases) give different results, and may point to 238U as the source of “The Bump.”
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
7
Daya Bay, et.al., use “Near+Far” for oscillations, but…
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
7
Daya Bay, et.al., use “Near+Far” for oscillations, but…
evolution uncertainty
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
7
Daya Bay, et.al., use “Near+Far” for oscillations, but…
evolution uncertainty
large size of reactor core
(Research)
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
7
Daya Bay, et.al., use “Near+Far” for oscillations, but…
evolution uncertainty
large size of reactor core
(Research)
the reactor core
no control over source
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
7
➥ Nuclear power plants are not ideal sources for Sterile Neutrino Searches Daya Bay, et.al., use “Near+Far” for oscillations, but…
evolution uncertainty
large size of reactor core
(Research)
the reactor core
no control over source
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
8
See http://aap2015.phys.vt.edu
https://www2.physics.ox.ac.uk/research/mars- project/solid
(See AAP conference presentations)
★ PROSPECT @ HFIR
Recent full description at arXiv:1512.02202
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
9
reactor core SoLid detector modules BR2 ha 5.5 m
distance Energy
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
10
A PRecision Oscillation and SPECTrum measurement using an array of functionally independent detectors
NIST, ORNL, SYSU, Temple, Tennessee, Waterloo, William & Mary, Wisconsin, Yale
definitive exclusion of “Kopp Best Fit” region
complete exclusion of allowed region See arXiv:1512.02202
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
11
180 cm Phase I Detector HFIR Core 7 to 10 meters
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
ν̅e ν̅e
Liquid Scintillator p
e+ 15 cm
11
180 cm Phase I Detector HFIR Core 7 to 10 meters
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
ν̅e ν̅e
Liquid Scintillator p
e+ 15 cm
11
180 cm Phase I Detector HFIR Core 7 to 10 meters n
n+6Li→α+t
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
ν̅e ν̅e
Liquid Scintillator p
e+ 15 cm
11
180 cm Phase I Detector HFIR Core 7 to 10 meters n
n+6Li→α+t
Detection is contained in single cell (or neighbors)
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
12
14.6#cm# 14.6#cm# 14.4#cm# 14.4#cm#b#
1752.6 69.00 2300 90.55 66.93 1700 57.50 1460.5 A A SECTION A-A 78.74 2000 47.24 1200Core Reactor Shielding
PROSPECT Phase I
AD-I LiLS Segments Passive Shielding
(a) (b) AD-I Active Volume (d) AD-I Segments and Containment
14.6 cm 14.6 cm Separator Corner Rod 170.0 cm Section A-A 146.5 cm 200.0 cm 120.0 cm 175.3 cm 230.0 cm 120 cm
(c) AD-I Unit Segment
fiber+sleeve+diffuser detector segments antineutrino detector with optical and source calibration source deployment system with string and guide tubes motor system source path detector segments
with string and guide tubes routing between segments and PMT modules
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
13
HFIR Core
Antineutrino Detector I Antineutrino Detector II
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
13
HFIR Core
Antineutrino Detector I Antineutrino Detector II
In Phase I the detector can move ≈3m
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
13
HFIR Core
Antineutrino Detector I Antineutrino Detector II
In Phase I the detector can move ≈3m Second detector for greater coverage in Phase II
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
14
roughly equal periods of down time in between
https://neutrons.ornl.gov/hfir
37.5 cm 60 cm
Fuel
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
15
Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A806 (2016) 401-419
!3 !2 !1 1 2 3 4 5 y (m) 1 2 3 4 x (m)
3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500
3000 2000 1000
z = 0.1 m
(1)! (2)! (3)! (4)!
Energy (MeV) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Counts/MeV/s 1 10
2
10
3
10
Identifying neutron capture signals via Pulse Shape Discrim. Also helps identify proton recoil from neutron scattering.
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
16
(b)
(c)
μ μ
Reactor Off
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
16
(b)
(c)
μ μ
Reactor Off
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
16
(b)
(c)
μ μ
Reactor Off Reactor background effectively eliminated
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
17
prompt ionization [MeV] prompt ionization [MeV] 2 4 6 8 10 Event rate [mHz/MeV] 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
After all cuts (Simulation)
Cuts IBD signal Cosmic BG PSD 1630 2.1e6 Time (1, 2, 3) 1570 3.4e4 Spatial (4, 5) 1440 9900 Fiducial (6) 660 250
Events Per Day Significant Cosmic Ray Rate in this Configuration
ν̅e Signal Remaining background
Cosmic Ray and Reactor Backgrounds are a challenge, but we are confident that we can achieve S:N=1:1 or better
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
18
14
θ 2
2
sin
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 ]
2
[eV
14 2
m ∆
1 −
10 1 10
Sensitivity: σ Phase I (1 yr) at 3 σ Phase I (3 yr) at 3 σ Phase I + II (3+3 yr) at 3 σ Phase I + II (3+3 yr) at 5 SBL Anomaly (Kopp), 95% CL Disappearance Experiments (Kopp), 95% CL
e
ν All SBL + Gallium Anomaly (LSN), 95% CL Daya Bay Exclusion, 95% CL
14
θ 2
2
sin
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 ]
2
[eV
14 2
m ∆
1 −
10 1 10
σ Phase I for 1 year at 3 Sensitivity: Front Position Movable Position Middle Position SBL Anomaly (Kopp), 95% CL Disappearance Experiments (Kopp), 95% CL
e
ν All SBL + Gallium Anomaly (LSN), 95% CL
Phase I and Phase II Phase I with Positioning
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
18
14
θ 2
2
sin
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 ]
2
[eV
14 2
m ∆
1 −
10 1 10
Sensitivity: σ Phase I (1 yr) at 3 σ Phase I (3 yr) at 3 σ Phase I + II (3+3 yr) at 3 σ Phase I + II (3+3 yr) at 5 SBL Anomaly (Kopp), 95% CL Disappearance Experiments (Kopp), 95% CL
e
ν All SBL + Gallium Anomaly (LSN), 95% CL Daya Bay Exclusion, 95% CL
14
θ 2
2
sin
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 ]
2
[eV
14 2
m ∆
1 −
10 1 10
σ Phase I for 1 year at 3 Sensitivity: Front Position Movable Position Middle Position SBL Anomaly (Kopp), 95% CL Disappearance Experiments (Kopp), 95% CL
e
ν All SBL + Gallium Anomaly (LSN), 95% CL
Phase I and Phase II Phase I with Positioning
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
19
Phase I, Phase I,
Specific tests of models for 235U
Napolitano: Sterile Neutrinos at Reactors UMass AFCI 14-16 Dec 2015
20
difficult to understand the details at the level of 1%
flux is “anomalously low” ⇒ Sterile neutrinos? Other experiments support this hypothesis
research reactors to measure the spectrum shape
“Kopp Best Fit” sterile neutrino solution by 2018