radiology reporting with life three years experience
play

Radiology Reporting with Life: Three Years' Experience using - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Radiology Reporting with Life: Three Years' Experience using Hyperlinked Interactive Multimedia Reporting Adoption and Value: Objective Evaluation via Click Through Rates Authors: Folio LR, Cohen G, Machado LB Radiology and Imaging Sciences,


  1. Radiology Reporting with Life: Three Years' Experience using Hyperlinked Interactive Multimedia Reporting Adoption and Value: Objective Evaluation via Click Through Rates Authors: Folio LR, Cohen G, Machado LB Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center National Institutes of Health Presenting author: Les Folio, DO, MPH, MSc, MAS Col (ret) USAF Director, Clinical Image Processing Service and Lead Radiologist for CT, NIH CC Adjunct Clinical Professor of Radiology, George Washington University Hospital @LesFolio #SIIM18

  2. Disclosures, Disclaimers, Conflicts of Interest Presenter manages a research agreement with Carestream Health (the NIH Clinical Center PACS shown in this presentation) Presenter has government issued diagnostic imaging patents (unrelated; no royalties) Presenter receives book author royalties (Springer) This research was supported [in part] by the NIH Clinical Center Intramural Research Program The content is the responsibility of the presenter and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health @LesFolio t #SIIM18 s

  3. Objectives • Graphically depict adoption rates of hyperlinks in interactive reporting • over time since we implemented in Feb 2015 • among radiology subspecialties and modalities supporting efficiency • Analyze clinicians/radiologists interaction with EMR, PACS, reports • and report hyperlinks evidenced by click through analysis by referring medical subspecialties • Objectively assess report value by exploring multimedia report interaction • by click through behaviors of referring clinicians and radiologists Work in progress, AI: link to annotation supervised deep learning • how interactive reports help mitigate the deep learning missing “link” @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  4. Background • Radiology reports have not dramatically changed in over 100 years • Since Roentgen’s discovery (1895) • Radiologist and oncologists surveyed on reporting preferences • verified oncologists and radiologists prefer hyperlinks • Descriptions in our reports are hyperlinked to measurements • to the annotation, providing unique opportunities: • to objectively analyze referring physicians Click Through Rate (CTR) • provides valuable labeling for Artificial Intelligence (AI)/ deep learning * Folio L. Quantitative Radiology Reporting and Tumor Metrics: @LesFolio t #SIIM18 Survey of Oncologists and Radiologists. AJR. Oct 2015.

  5. Background (cont.) Template-based reports used 100 years ago… Example of Dr. Carman’s report (1913), Mayo Clinic Russell D. Carman 1875-1926 Head of Roentgenology at the Mayo Clinic @LesFolio #SIIM18 Source: “Radiology: an illustrated history” by Ronald L. Eisenberg

  6. Example Hyperlink Insertion while Dictating Record FINDINGS : Chest CT: Lungs, pleurae: Unchanged lung nodules for example right upper lobe (1.9 cm x 1.5 cm) (series 4, image 81) • Minimizes crosscheck • Metadata automatically includes: x,y,z location, who measured, when, relation and Series 4 designation, name, lesion type Image 81 • “Active annotation” is either most recent measured, clicked or “b” shortcut @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  7. @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  8. @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  9. @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  10. Multimedia Enhanced Radiology Reports FINDINGS : Chest CT: Lungs, pleurae: Unchanged lung nodules for example right upper lobe (0.8 cm x 0.4 cm) (series 4, image 84) Mediastinum, heart, great vessels: Unchanged mediastinal adenopathy for example subcarinal (2.5 cm x 1.4 cm) (series 2, image 27) and right hilar adenopathy for example (5.1 cm x 2.4 cm) (series 2, image 32) and (2.1 cm x 1.4 cm) (series 2, image 25) Abdomen CT: Lymph nodes, abdominopelvic vascular: unremarkable Liver, spleen, biliary, gallbladder, pancreas: unremarkable GU Kidneys, ureters, adrenal glands: unremarkable GI Small and large bowel, mesentery, peritoneum: unremarkable Pelvic CT: Central pelvis, sidewalls: Unchanged anterior pelvic wall mass. Osseous structures, spine, body wall, soft tissues: unremarkable IMPRESSION : 1. Unchanged lung nodules 2. Stable mediastinal and hilar adenopathy/masses 3. Unchanged anterior pelvic wall masses 4. No evidence of new soft tissue mass @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  11. Mu Mult ltim imedia ia a and Hyperlin links F s Facili ilitate Repor ortin ing f for or Clin linic ical Tria rials ls RECIST 1.1 Radiology Report Impression: Evaluation of target lesions Disappearance of target lesions “Stable metastatic lesions” Complete Response (CR) (LN<1cm) ≥ 30% decrease from baseline sum of Partial Response (PR) Partial Response = Hope target lesions size ≥ 20% increase from baseline or best Stable Disease = “therapy is not reducing my cancer” response * + absolute increase ≥ 5mm Progressive Disease (PD) on target or Non target lesions / New Patients can get conflicting messages in Patient Portal lesions Stable Disease (SD) Neither CR or PD This number is what “counts” @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  12. @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  13. Creation of Bookmarks 1 & Report Hyperlinks 2 (by Modality) Hyperlinks 3 implemented Feb 2015 July 2014 – Dec 2017 1 Bookmarks = any image annotation Not all bookmarks are hyperlinked Bookmark capability preceded links 2 Hyperlinks = hyperlinked text-to-annotation Requires a bookmark 3 We had bookmark capability before hyperlinks @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  14. Creation of Bookmarks & Report Hyperlinks (Modality & Subspecialty) July 2016 – Dec 2017 @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  15. Adoption by Radiologists • Radiologists immediately implemented interactive reporting • Shortly after capability was implemented • Expected subspecialty and modality variation • Body radiologists adopted more than neuro radiologists • Also greater adoption for CT and PET-CT than MRI • NIH adoption was greater than other centers; perhaps because of NIH emphasis on oncology and clinical trials @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  16. Click Through Analysis • Objective evaluation value of report hyperlinks to referring docs • Also to radiologists; we show body radiologist CTR • CTR is an indirect, yet objective measure of report value • A clinician must open a report to click; usually indicates reading them • We target PACS & EMR capability refreshers to infrequent users • To those clicking on report hyperlinks least often • Surgeons infrequent @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  17. Body Radiologists click throughs of bookmarks and hyperlinks Access from PACS to report bookmarks and hyperlinks by BODY (CT+MR) Radiologists Dec 2017 More studies 1600 are accessed 1403 1400 # of studies 1116 than created 1200 1000 822 800 600 400 200 0 Total created* Total created with Total read and bookmarks or bookmark or hyperlinks** hyperlink clicked*** * Total CT and MR studies with reports signed by Body radiologists ** As above but where the study contains bookmarks or the report contains hyperlinks Body radiologists find value in bookmarks they create for follow up purposes *** Total CT and MR Body studies with bookmarks or hyperlinks where these were clicked at least once by a radiologist @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  18. Physician Clicks from EMR to Thin Client Viewer Showing Images/Report About 80% of click throughs from our EMR to our PACS are from four NIH institutes. Example action: Can help target EMR/ PACS training Institute Report ”Click Through” analysis confirms value of imaging exams and reports @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  19. Discussion • Revolutionary technologic implementation (hyperlinks) often challenging • widespread adoption support improved efficiency • Applying advanced hyperlink analytic tools to radiology reports • can be objective evidence of report value • Study limitations include a small sample and unique capability • based on our experience of interactive reporting • we are confident our sample is representative of our hyperlink use • annotations can be distracting (initial complaints) • training provided to show Ctrl+G hides graphics; also “show only mine” @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  20. Optimal Radiologist Annotations? Intersection over union (IoU) and paired t-tests: Linear, two-diameter, and oval were 0.29±0.23, 0.70±0.22, and 0.73±0.15 respectively. @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  21. Supervised Deep Learning Model of Annotated Lung CT images Interconnected with Hyperlinks in Interactive Radiology Reports Do M, Folio L, Machado L. APECED Deep Learning. SCBTMR 2018. @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  22. DeepLesion: 32,735 measured lesions/ bounding boxes (soon to be publically available) @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  23. Real estate mantra (Location 3 ) twist: Location, Labeling, Learning @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  24. Conclusions • We demonstrated adoption of bookmark and hyperlink use • subdivided by radiology subspecialty; supporting efficiency • body radiologists had the highest hyperlink usage • We objectively assessed report value by referring clinicians & institutes • by analyzing CTR of hyperlinks within our EMR, reports • Report text lined directly to annotations help fill missing DL link Manuscript Submitted to JDI May 2018. @LesFolio t #SIIM18

  25. Thank you Les.Folio@nih.com @LesFolio t #SIIM18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend