Quarterly update 30 September 2014 3-year 5-year 10-year N/A Fund - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quarterly update 30 september 2014
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quarterly update 30 September 2014 3-year 5-year 10-year N/A Fund - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quarterly update 30 September 2014 3-year 5-year 10-year N/A Fund performance* and AUM (EUR) NAV, 30 September 2014 (EUR) Class RC 12.67 Q3 2014 +0.3% Class IC 12.31 YTD 2014 +7.8% Class ID 9.96 5 yrs (annualised) +7.1% AUM (mn)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Q3 2014 +0.3% YTD 2014 +7.8% 5 yrs (annualised) +7.1% AUM (mn) 15.20 Class RC 12.67 Class IC 12.31 Class ID 9.96

Fund performance* and AUM (EUR) NAV, 30 September 2014 (EUR)

Quarterly update 30 September 2014

N/A 3-year 5-year 10-year *Class RC

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Save Earth Fund

The strategy and the team

  • A global environmental fund: identifies and invests with the

top managers within renewables, cleantech and water

  • Concentrated portfolio (6-10 funds)
  • Benchmark: MSCI World Net
  • Objective: Lower standard deviation than benchmark
  • Objective: Outperform benchmark over 12 months

About Save Earth Fund

  • Company founded in 1994
  • Family owned, acting under the supervision of the Swedish

Financial Supervisory Authority

  • Guidelines: active, ethical and long-term
  • An ethical framework is applied in the portfolio management
  • The team is based in Stockholm, Sweden; fund

administration is performed in Luxembourg

About CB Fonder The team

Carl Bernadotte

Portfolio manager/owner >25 years’ experience Born 1955

Marcus Grimfors

Portfolio manager 6 years’ experience Born 1981

Alexander Jansson

Portfolio manager/CEO 6 years’ experience Born 1983

Erik Allenius Somnell

Business development 2 years’ experience Born 1984

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Investment-case: Three megatrends

Water treatment

  • Filtration
  • Saving/Efficiency
  • Infrastructure

Cleantech

  • Energy storage
  • Energy infrastructure
  • Energy efficiency
  • Transportation
  • Emissions control
  • Smart materials
  • Recycling & Waste treatment

Renewable energy

  • Wind
  • Solar
  • Hydro
  • Bio
  • Geothermal

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Save Earth Fund

Portfolio management: Multi-Manager

Every asset manager has a certain skill: one can be a specialist in Swedish Large Caps, another in Emerging Market high-yield debt. To be an expert in every field is hard if not impossible, and generally the complexity increases when analysing lesser developed markets, sectors or companies. Our ambition is to identify the managers that, over time, have performed best-in-class in each region and/or sector in order to deliver the best possible overall performance. To make a simple illustration of this point, we have made a comparison between the personal best marks of Carolina Klüft (successful Swedish heptathlon athlete) and the gold medallists' performance in each individual event in the 2012 London Olympics. Carolina’s performances are of course astonishingly good but can in no single event match that of the specialist. Multi-manager, or Fund of Funds, is in others words a method of identifying and selecting specialists with the ambition to deliver a consistently higher return: the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.

Gold, London 2012 Olympics 12.35 s 2.05 m 21.88 s 20.7 m 7.12 m 69.55 m 1:56.19 Carolina Klüft Personal best 13.15 s 1.95 m 22.98 s 15.05 m 6.97 m 50.96 m 2:08.9

Source: Wikipedia

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Save Earth Fund

5

Environmental strategies as an asset class: a ”satellite”

  • The basic idea of a so called Core/Satellite strategy is to invest a large part of the portfolio in large caps with a similar

risk/return profile as the broad market (e.g. MSCI World) and to add smaller positions (10-20% of the portfolio) in niche strategies, so called satellites, with a different risk/return profile.

  • We argue that environmental strategies in the form of global stocks with strong long-term drivers and an attractive and

different risk/return profile, have the right characteristics to fit well in this type of strategy as a satellite/complement to the core in a global portfolio. Compare, for example, with the characteristics of emerging markets.

Large caps in developed markets Example of a Core/Satellite-portfolio

Bonds Environmental strategies Hedge funds EM HY Credit Real Estate

Environmental strategies as a complement to a global portfolio

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Save Earth Fund

6

Environmental strategies as an asset class: a ”satellite”

  • The renewable energy index (NEXEUT) and the cleantech index (CTIUS) has clearly differing risk profiles compared to the

broad developed market indices (MSCI Europe, MSCI World and MSCI USA).

  • The water index (S&P Global Water Index), however, has a risk profile in line with the broad developed markets. Seen

from that perspective it can be argued that the sector is part of the core rather than the satellites.

Risk and return, 10 years (EUR) Risk and return, 2 years (EUR)

Source: S&P, MSCI, Reuters

Environmental strategies as a complement to a global portfolio

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Save Earth Fund

7

The fund in (Swedish) media

News report about environmental investing and interview with Alexander Jansson

EFN, 23 Sep 2014

News report about the water sector and interview with Alexander Jansson

EFN, 24 Sep 2014

“’It is mainly companies within renewable energy that has performed really well this year’, says Alexander Jansson, who manages the environmental fund CB Save Earth, which in the last 12 months has returned 26 percent [in SEK] … The portfolio manager do not hold high expectations for the UN Environmental Summit this week. ‘These summits rarely lead to anything

  • positive. Furthermore, we have now reached a more mature stage where the dependence on political decisions has decreased.

Renewable energy, cleantech and other similar sectors have come to look more like mature industrials’, he states.”

Swedish business newspaper Dagens Industri, ”Lönsamt att satsa på miljö”, 24 Sep 2014

N.B. Our translation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Save Earth Fund

8

The sector in the media: The Rockefellers ”goes green” and Martin Wolf questions fossil fuel subsidies

‘John D Rockefeller, the founder of Standard Oil, moved America out of whale oil and into petroleum,’ Stephen Heintz, president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, said in a statement. ‘We are quite convinced that if he were alive today, as an astute businessman looking out to the future, he would be moving out of fossil fuels and investing in clean, renewable energy.’ ‘With Monday’s announcement, more than 800 global investors – including foundations such as the Rockefeller Brothers, religious groups, healthcare organisations, cities and universities – have pledged to withdraw a total of $50bn from fossil fuel investments over the next five years.’

The Guardian, “Heirs to Rockefeller oil fortune divest from fossil fuels over climate change”, Sep 22

  • 2014. Read the full article here.

The report estimates subsidies to fossil fuels at $600bn a year, against subsidies of just $90bn to clean energy. This makes no sense at all.

Martin Wolf in Financial Times, ”Clean growth is a safe bet in the climate casino”, Sep 23 2014. Read the full article here.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Save Earth Fund

9

Performance: The fund and indices

Source: MSCI, CB Fonder

+14.7% +23.3%

Performance for different sector indices, 1 year (EUR)

  • Environmental investments have generally performed well over the past year, which has also been the

case for MSCI World, the latter driven by a strengthening US dollar as well as a very strong performance in the US stock market.

  • The index for renewable energy (Wilderhill New Energy Index), the most volatile sector in the comparison,

is also the leading performer gaining 23.3% during the last 12 months.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Save Earth Fund

10

Source: CB Fonder, Bloomberg

Performance and risk, since inception (EUR)* Sharpe, since inception*

*Monthly data from Bloomberg for the period 2008-06-30 – 2014-09-30, EUR.

Performance: The fund and peers

Standard deviation Return p.a.

  • Save Earth Fund’s objective is to offer investors a low risk alternative within a segment characterised by

high risk. The fund has, since inception in 2008, had a significantly lower risk than many competitors while delivering a highly competitive return; a combination that results in a high Sharpe ratio.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Save Earth Fund

11

The portfolio: Largest exposures

Largest company exposures

*Estimation made from data available on the holdings of underlying funds as well as Save Earth Fund’s exposure to these funds, as of 30 September 2014.

  • For 2015, high profit growth is

expected, which gives attractive valuations (given that these numbers are met): PEG ratio of 1.3.

  • Exposure to large companies with a

long history; no mayflies.

  • A mixture of high-yielding utilities

and growth companies.

  • Due to a concentrated

portfolio (6-10 managers; 6 as

  • f 30 September 2014) our

company exposures are fairly large.

Company Founded/listed Country Sector Market cap, € bn Share of AUM* EPS growth, 2015E PEG, 2015 DY American Water 1886/2008 USA Water 6.9 2.2% 7.8% 2.4 2.5% Pennon Group 1989/1989 UK Water 4.0 1.8% 13.0% 1.5 4.5% Suez Environnement 1858/2008 France Water 7.3 1.7% 18.3% 0.9 5.0% Arcadis 1888/1995 Holland Cleantech 2.0 1.6% 21.7% 0.6 2.3% Andritz 1852/2001 Austria Renewables 4.3 1.6% 33.2% 0.5 2.4% Veolia Environnement 1853/2000 France Water 7.8 1.5% 66.2% 0.3 3.1% United Utilities 1989/1989 UK Water 7.3 1.5%

  • 8.5%
  • 5.3%

A.O. Smith Corp 1874/1983 USA Water 3.9 1.5% 12.6% 1.5 1.2% Xylem 2011/2011 USA Water 5.3 1.5% 15.3% 1.1 1.4% Geberit 1874/1999 Switzerland Water 9.8 1.5% 6.8% 3.3 2.0% Total/Average 5.9 16.3% 18.6% 1.3 3.0%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Save Earth Fund

12

The portfolio: Exposure, share of AUM

Sector allocation, 36 months Geographical allocation, 36 months

As of September 2014 As of September 2014 *Including cash in underlying funds.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Save Earth Fund

13

Risk profile: Standard deviation and beta

*36 months data on a 60-day rolling basis (EUR)

Standard deviation* Beta against MSCI World*

8.5% 8.4%

The fund’s standard deviation is consistently lower/in line with that of the benchmark, MSCI World The fund’s beta is consistently below 1

+0.84

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Period 1. 2008-06-13 - 2009-03-09

  • 41.9%
  • 30.8%

11.1% 2. 2010-04-26 - 2010-07-02

  • 10.3%
  • 8.0%

2.3% 3. 2011-02-17 - 2011-08-19

  • 20.6%
  • 21.1%
  • 0.5%

4. 2013-05-21 - 2013-06-24

  • 9.3%
  • 8.6%

0.6% Outperformance Fund Index Drawdown (EUR)

Save Earth Fund

14

Source: MSCI, CB Fonder

The fund compared to MSCI World during the largest drawdowns (EUR)

1 2 3 4

The fund has consistently performed well compared to index (MSCI World) during drawdowns

  • Our objective is that the fund should be a low-risk alternative within a segment characterised by high risk; we believe

the performance of the fund in drawdowns to be a testament to this.

Risk profile: The fund’s ability to preserve capital

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Save Earth Fund

15

Summary

  • Save Earth Fund offers a green and global equity exposure.
  • Three megatrends – in one fund. Save Earth Fund is one of few environmental funds which is free

to allocate between the sectors renewable energy, cleantech and water management, as well as geographically.

  • Save Earth Fund’s objective is to be a low-risk alternative in a segment characterized by high
  • risk. The fund's risk level (standard deviation) is in line with the MSCI World index and significantly

lower than that of most peers.

  • Since inception, the fund has performed well due to active allocation between regions and

sectors as well as to cash (to preserve capital). A large exposure to the water sector has been very important.

  • Today we see a more mature market, where many environmental investments look interesting. The

fact that more and more companies survive on their own, without subsidies, is crucial for a well-functioning market where investors are looking for long-term outperformance.

  • The fund is managed by a team of three portfolio managers.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Save Earth Fund

16

Share classes

CB Save Earth Fund, RC

  • Management fee:1.0%
  • Performance fee: 20% of positive return > MSCI World Net, with

collective, eternal and both absolute and relative High-Water Mark

  • Dividend: No
  • ISIN: LU0354788688

CB Save Earth Fund, IC

  • Management fee: 0.5%
  • Performance fee: 20% of return > MSCI World Net, with collective,

eternal and relative High-Water Mark

  • Dividend: No
  • ISIN: LU0354788506

CB Save Earth Fund, ID

  • Management fee: 0.5%
  • Performance fee: 20% of return > MSCI World Net, with collective,

eternal and relative High-Water Mark

  • Dividend: Yes, 6% of NAV yearly at end of October
  • ISIN: LU1053083884

N.B. The performance fee will be removed shortly

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Save Earth Fund

17

Fund facts

  • Fund name:

CB Save Earth Fund

  • Manager:

CB Asset Management AB

  • Domicile:

Luxembourg

  • Custodian:

SEB Fund Service, Luxembourg

  • Auditor:

PricewaterhouseCoopers S.ár.I.

  • UCITS-classification:

UCITS IV

  • Currency:

EUR

  • Liquidity/NAV:

Daily/Daily

  • Subscription/redemption fee

RC/IC: No/No, ID: No/Yes*

  • Fund launch:

June 9, 2008

  • Minimum investment:

RC: None, IC/ID: €500 000

  • ISIN/Reuters/Bloomberg:

*Max 1%, dependent on customer relationship

RC: LU0354788688 / 913218.FBF / CBSVERC LX IC: LU0354788506 / 68173241 / CBSICAE LX ID: LU1053083884 / N/A / CBIDLUX LX

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Save Earth Fund

18

Disclaimer

This document is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation to invest. Such offers or solicitations must be preceded or accompanied by a current offering document of the funds. This document is submitted to you confidentially solely in connection with your consideration of an investment in CB Save Earth Fund (the “Fund”). The preceding/upcoming pages constitute a summary

  • nly. No assurance can be given that the investment objective will be achieved, and investment

results may vary substantially over any given time period. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. The fund involves a degree of risk. An investor in the fund could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. The fund has fees that will reduce returns. The fund’s performance may be volatile.