Quantum Hall physics: Introduction and current affairs Ulrich - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quantum hall physics introduction and current affairs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quantum Hall physics: Introduction and current affairs Ulrich - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantum Hall physics: Introduction and current affairs Ulrich Zuelicke u.zuelicke@massey.ac.nz Institute of Fundamental Sciences Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand International Summer School Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quantum Hall physics: Introduction and current affairs

Ulrich Zuelicke

u.zuelicke@massey.ac.nz

Institute of Fundamental Sciences Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

Introduction to basics of the quantum Hall effect sample geometry, measurement technique incompressibility

  • quantized Hall resistance

microsocpic origin of incompressibility role of disorder Overview of exotic interaction effects quasiparticles with fractional charge and statistics; composite fermions; chiral Luttinger liquids; quantum Hall ferromagnets fractional quantum Hall effect in rotating atomic gases

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction to the basics of the quantum Hall effect

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Two–dimensional electron systems

Quantum Hall (QH) effect observed in 2D electron systems placed in a perpendicular magnetic field

B

2DES with density n filling factor = n/B ν φ

important parame- ter: filling factor

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Two–dimensional electron systems

Quantum Hall (QH) effect observed in 2D electron systems placed in a perpendicular magnetic field

illustration taken from: Jeckelmann and Jeanneret ’01

typically realized in semiconductor heterostructures using band–gap engineering: (Ga,Al)As, (In,Al)As,

✂ ✂ ✂

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Two–dimensional electron systems

Quantum Hall (QH) effect observed in 2D electron systems placed in a perpendicular magnetic field

illustration taken from: Jeckelmann and Jeanneret ’01

typically realized in semiconductor heterostructures using band–gap engineering: (Ga,Al)As, (In,Al)As,

✂ ✂ ✂
  • riginal discovery of QH effect in silicon MOSFETs

Klitzing, Dorda, Pepper ’80

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.4

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Setup for transport measurement

mesoscopic current and voltage probes attached to sample, measure resistances

✄✆☎ ✝✟✞ ✠ ✡

and

✄✟☛ ☎ ✝ ☛ ✠ ✡ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✏ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✒ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗

I voltage probes source drain V

H

V

L

Büttiker ’86 source: PTB webpage

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.5

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Setup for transport measurement

mesoscopic current and voltage probes attached to sample, measure resistances

✄✆☎ ✝✟✞ ✠ ✡

and

✄✟☛ ☎ ✝ ☛ ✠ ✡ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✙ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✚ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✛ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✜ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✢ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ✧ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

I voltage probes source drain V

H

V

L

Büttiker ’86 Willett et al. ’87

  • bserve plateaux in
✄ ☛

where, with great precision (error

✩ ✪✫✭✬ ✮

),

✄ ✬ ✯ ☛ ☎ ✁✱✰ ✲ ✳ ✴

, concomitant with

✄ ✵ ✫

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.5

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Classical magnetotransport theory

electrodynamics in 2D:

✶✸✷ ☎ ✹✻✺✽✼ ✶✿✾❁❀ ✶✿✾ ☎ ✹❃❂ ✼ ✶ ✷ ❀ ✹ ✺ ☎ ✹❃❂ ✬ ✯

simple Drude theory yields (with

❄ ✰ ☎ ❅ ❆ ✠❈❇

):

✹ ❂ ☎ ❆ ❉ ❅❋❊❍●■ ❏ ❑ ▲ ▼ ❄ ✰ ◆ ❖ ✬ ✯ ✪ P ✪ ▼ ❄ ✰ ◆ ❖ ✬ ✯

ρ

H

ρ B

L

  • quantum Hall system not a classical conductor

at plateau: both longitudinal resistivity and conductivity vanish (possible because

❂ ☛

finite)

  • quantum Hall system: perfect conductor or insulator?

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.6

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Quantized

❘❚❙

: Thermodynamic argument

reasonable hypothesis: quantum Hall system is a bulk insulator, i.e., is incompressible in the bulk:

❯ ❉ ✠ ❯❲❱ ✵ ✫

*

µ n n

❳ ☎ P ✪ ✝ ❨ ✝ ❨ ❩ ☎ ✪ ✝ ❨ ❬ ✾ ❨ ✝ ❬ ✬ ✯ ❭ ✪ ❉ ❬ ❯ ❉ ❯❲❱

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.7

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Quantized

❘❚❙

: Thermodynamic argument

reasonable hypothesis: quantum Hall system is a bulk insulator, i.e., is incompressible in the bulk:

❯ ❉ ✠ ❯❲❱ ✵ ✫

*

µ n n

µ + δµ µ + δµ I δ I + I

incompressibility at magnetic–field–dependent density

❉ ❪

implies quantization of Hall resistance!

Widom ’82

❫ ☎ ❴ ❵ ❴❜❛ ❫ ❱ ☎ ❝ ❴ ❞ ❴ ❡ ❢ ❫ ❱

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.7

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Quantized

❘❚❙

: Thermodynamic argument

reasonable hypothesis: quantum Hall system is a bulk insulator, i.e., is incompressible in the bulk:

❯ ❉ ✠ ❯❲❱ ✵ ✫

*

µ n n

µ + δµ µ + δµ I δ I + I

incompressibility at magnetic–field–dependent density

❉ ❪

implies quantization of Hall resistance!

Widom ’82

❫ ✡ ☎ ❴ ❣ ❴❜❛ ❫ ❱ ☎ ❝ ❴ ❤ ✐ ❴ ❡ ❢ ❫ ❱

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.7

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Quantized

❘❚❙

: Thermodynamic argument

reasonable hypothesis: quantum Hall system is a bulk insulator, i.e., is incompressible in the bulk:

❯ ❉ ✠ ❯❲❱ ✵ ✫

*

µ n n

I δ I δ µ µ µ + I δ I + µ µ + δµ I δ

incompressibility at magnetic–field–dependent density

❉ ❪

implies quantization of Hall resistance!

Widom ’82

❫ ✡ ☎ ❴ ❣ ❴❜❛ ❫ ❱ ☎ ❝ ❴ ❤ ✐ ❴ ❡ ❢ ❫ ❱
  • ✄✟❥
☎ ❦ ❛ ✲ ❦ ❣ ☎ ✴ ✲ ✳ ❝♠❧♦♥ ❴ ❤ ✐ ❴ ❡ ❢ ✬ ✯

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.7

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Take–home message # 1: Quantized Hall resistance due to incompressibility (mobility gap).

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.8

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Incompressibility at integer

Schrödinger eq. for 2D electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field reads

q ♥ r ▼ ✶✸s ❖ ☎ ✾ r ▼ ✶ s ❖

with

q ♥ ☎ t ✶✸✉ ✈ ❅ ✶①✇ ▼❈② ❀ ③ ❖ ④ ❬ ⑤⑥❇ ☎ ⑦ ❄ ✰ ⑤ ✶✸✉ ❬⑨⑧ ❬ ⑦ ❬ ✈ ✶✸s ❬ ⑩ ⑧ ❬ P ❶❸❷ ⑦ ✶❲✇ ▼❈② ❀ ③ ❖ ☎ ✪ ⑤ ✶ s ❹ ✶ ❆

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.9

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Incompressibility at integer

Schrödinger eq. for 2D electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field reads

q ♥ r ▼ ✶✸s ❖ ☎ ✾ r ▼ ✶ s ❖

with

q ♥ ☎ t ✶✸✉ ✈ ❅ ✶①✇ ▼❈② ❀ ③ ❖ ④ ❬ ⑤⑥❇ ☎ ⑦ ❄ ✰ ⑤ ✶✸✉ ❬⑨⑧ ❬ ⑦ ❬ ✈ ✶✸s ❬ ⑩ ⑧ ❬ P ❶❸❷ ⑦ ✶❲✇ ▼❈② ❀ ③ ❖ ☎ ✪ ⑤ ✶ s ❹ ✶ ❆

find representation of

q ♥ ☎ ⑦ ❄ ✰ ❝❻❺ ❼ ❺ ✈ ✯ ❬ ❢

and angular momentum

❶ ❷ ☎ ⑦ ❝✽❽ ❼ ❽ P ❺ ❼ ❺ ❢

in terms of independent harmonic–oscillator ladder operators

❾ ❺ ❀ ❺ ❼ ❿

and

❾ ❽ ❀ ❽ ❼ ❿

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.9

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Incompressibility at integer

Schrödinger eq. for 2D electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field reads

q ♥ r ▼ ✶✸s ❖ ☎ ✾ r ▼ ✶ s ❖

with

q ♥ ☎ t ✶✸✉ ✈ ❅ ✶①✇ ▼❈② ❀ ③ ❖ ④ ❬ ⑤⑥❇ ☎ ⑦ ❄ ✰ ⑤ ✶✸✉ ❬⑨⑧ ❬ ⑦ ❬ ✈ ✶✸s ❬ ⑩ ⑧ ❬ P ❶❸❷ ⑦ ✶❲✇ ▼❈② ❀ ③ ❖ ☎ ✪ ⑤ ✶ s ❹ ✶ ❆

M

r

find representation of

q ♥ ☎ ⑦ ❄ ✰ ❝❻❺ ❼ ❺ ✈ ✯ ❬ ❢

and angular momentum

❶ ❷ ☎ ⑦ ❝✽❽ ❼ ❽ P ❺ ❼ ❺ ❢

in terms of independent harmonic–oscillator ladder operators

❾ ❺ ❀ ❺ ❼ ❿

and

❾ ❽ ❀ ❽ ❼ ❿

eigenstates of

q ♥

labelled by Landau–level index

and

❶❸❷

quantum # ; localized at

s ❵ ☎ ⑤ ▼ ❉ ✈ ✈ ✪ ❖ ⑧

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.9

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Incompressibility at integer

finite sample: external potential

✝ ▼ ② ❀ ③ ❖

confines electrons; Hamiltonain given by

q ♥ ✈ ✝ ▼ ② ❀ ③ ❖

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.10

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Incompressibility at integer

finite sample: external potential

✝ ▼ ② ❀ ③ ❖

confines electrons; Hamiltonain given by

q ♥ ✈ ✝ ▼ ② ❀ ③ ❖
  • scillator (Landau) levels degenerate in bulk but

bent upwards at sample boundary

M

2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 . . .

lowest Landau level second Landau level chemical potential

quantum number M

Fermi point chiral 1D

single−particle energy E

  • bulk gap at integer
  • at the same time: chiral

1D edge currents flowing

✡ ❵ ☎ ❅ ⑦ ❨ ✾ ❵ ❨

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.10

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Incompressibility at integer

finite sample: external potential

✝ ▼ ② ❀ ③ ❖

confines electrons; Hamiltonain given by

q ♥ ✈ ✝ ▼ ② ❀ ③ ❖
  • scillator (Landau) levels degenerate in bulk but

bent upwards at sample boundary

M

2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 . . .

lowest Landau level second Landau level chemical potential

quantum number M

Fermi point chiral 1D

single−particle energy E

  • bulk gap at integer
  • at the same time: chiral

1D edge currents flowing

✡ ❵ ☎ ❅ ⑦ ❨ ✾ ❵ ❨

Hall conductance:

❦ ❣ ❦ ❛ ☎ ✁ ✲ ✳ ✴

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.10

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Rôle of disorder

  • bserve quantum–Hall effect in large (mm–sized)

samples with plateaux extending over

➀ ❆➂➁ ✪

Tesla expect, however,

➃ ❡ ❡ ➄ ➅ ➆ ➇ ➈ ✪✫✭✬ ❬ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✪ ✫✭✬ ➉

typically resolution of puzzle: samples are disordered!

I δ I δ µ µ µ + δµ µ + δµ I δ I + I

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.11

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Take–home message # 2: Finite width of Hall plateaux in large samples due to disorder.

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.12

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Incompressibility at fractional

Tsui, Gossard, Störmer ’82

fractional filling factor

  • ccupy only states in lowest

Landau level (LLL), these are labelled by and (except close to edge) have the same (kinetic) energy

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.13

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Incompressibility at fractional

Tsui, Gossard, Störmer ’82

fractional filling factor

  • ccupy only states in lowest

Landau level (LLL), these are labelled by and (except close to edge) have the same (kinetic) energy wave function:

r➊❵ ▼❈② ❀ ③ ❖ ☎ ❵ ➋ ❵ ❅ ✬ ➌✽➍ ➌ ✳ ➎

with

➋ ☎ ② ✈ ➏ ③

, general LLL wave function:

r ▼❈② ❀ ③ ❖ ☎ ➐ ▼ ➋ ❖ ❅ ✬ ➌✽➍ ➌ ✳ ➎

where

➐ ▼ ➋ ❖ ✂ ✂ ✂

polynomial with, at most,

➑➓➒ ☎ ❆ ✇ ✠ ❧➔♥

zeroes

M

r

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.13

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Incompressibility at fractional

two–electron wave functions classified by relative and center–of–mass angular momenta

and are uniquely determined by analyticity requirement:

r → ❵ ▼ ➋ ✯ ❀ ➋ ❬ ❖ ☎ ▼ ➋ ✯ P ➋ ❬ ❖ → ▼ ➋ ✯ ✈ ➋ ❬ ❖ ❵ ❅ ✬ ➣ ➎ ↔↕ ❷ ➣ ↕ ✳❚➙ ↕ ❷ ✳ ↕ ✳ ➛

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.14

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Incompressibility at fractional

two–electron wave functions classified by relative and center–of–mass angular momenta

and are uniquely determined by analyticity requirement:

r → ❵ ▼ ➋ ✯ ❀ ➋ ❬ ❖ ☎ ▼ ➋ ✯ P ➋ ❬ ❖ → ▼ ➋ ✯ ✈ ➋ ❬ ❖ ❵ ❅ ✬ ➣ ➎ ↔↕ ❷ ➣ ↕ ✳❚➙ ↕ ❷ ✳ ↕ ✳ ➛

are eigenstates for arbitrary interaction

✝➝➜♠➞ ➟ ▼➠ ➋ ✯ P ➋ ❬ ➠ ❖

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.14

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Incompressibility at fractional

two–electron wave functions classified by relative and center–of–mass angular momenta

and are uniquely determined by analyticity requirement:

r → ❵ ▼ ➋ ✯ ❀ ➋ ❬ ❖ ☎ ▼ ➋ ✯ P ➋ ❬ ❖ → ▼ ➋ ✯ ✈ ➋ ❬ ❖ ❵ ❅ ✬ ➣ ➎ ↔↕ ❷ ➣ ↕ ✳❚➙ ↕ ❷ ✳ ↕ ✳ ➛

are eigenstates for arbitrary interaction

✝➝➜♠➞ ➟ ▼➠ ➋ ✯ P ➋ ❬ ➠ ❖

many-body Hamiltonian for electrons in LLL:

➡ ☎ ➢ ➤ ➥ ✝➝➜♠➞ ➟ ▼➠ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ➠ ❖➦❭ → ✝ → ➧ ↔ ✯➩➨ ❬ ➛ →
  • has discrete matrix elements in mM representation!

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.14

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Incompressibility at fractional

  • electron wave functions characterized by their zeroes!

consider finite sample with

electrons,

➑ ➒

flux quanta

  • many–body wave function

for electrons changes sign upon particle exchange

➑ ➒ ➫ ▼ ➋ ✯ ❀ ✂ ✂ ✂ ❀ ➋ ❞ ❖ ☎ ➭ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖ ❅ ✬ ➣ ➎ ➯➳➲ ↕ ❷ ➲ ↕ ✳

Laughlin ’83

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.15

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Incompressibility at fractional

  • electron wave functions characterized by their zeroes!

consider finite sample with

electrons,

➑ ➒

flux quanta

  • must

be polynomial in each particle coordinate with

➑ ➒

zeroes: sample size!

➫ ▼ ➋ ✯ ❀ ✂ ✂ ✂ ❀ ➋ ❞ ❖ ☎ ➭ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖ ❅ ✬ ➣ ➎ ➯➳➲ ↕ ❷ ➲ ↕ ✳

Laughlin ’83

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.15

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Incompressibility at fractional

  • electron wave functions characterized by their zeroes!

consider finite sample with

electrons,

➑ ➒

flux quanta

  • at least one zero at posi-

tion of every other electron, due to antisymmetry

➑➩➒ ➫ ▼ ➋ ✯ ❀ ✂ ✂ ✂ ❀ ➋ ❞ ❖ ☎ ➭ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖ ❅ ✬ ➣ ➎ ➯➳➲ ↕ ❷ ➲ ↕ ✳

Laughlin ’83

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.15

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Incompressibility at fractional

  • electron wave functions characterized by their zeroes!

consider finite sample with

electrons,

➑ ➒

flux quanta

  • position of remaining ze-

roes arbitrary in the absence

  • f interactions
➑➩➒ ➫ ▼ ➋ ✯ ❀ ✂ ✂ ✂ ❀ ➋ ❞ ❖ ☎ ➭ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖ ❅ ✬ ➣ ➎ ➯➳➲ ↕ ❷ ➲ ↕ ✳

Laughlin ’83

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.15

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Incompressibility at fractional

  • electron wave functions characterized by their zeroes!

consider finite sample with

electrons,

➑ ➒

flux quanta

➵ ✪ ✠ ➸

: to minimize inter- action energy, nucleate more zeroes at other electrons

➑➩➒ ➫ ▼ ➋ ✯ ❀ ✂ ✂ ✂ ❀ ➋ ❞ ❖ ☎ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖ ➺ ❅ ✬ ➣ ➎ ➯ ➲ ↕ ❷ ➲ ↕ ✳

Laughlin ’83

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.15

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Incompressibility at fractional

  • electron wave functions characterized by their zeroes!

consider finite sample with

electrons,

➑ ➒

flux quanta

  • not enough zeroes when
✁ ➁ ✪ ✠ ➸

!!

  • rigin of incom-

pressibility at

✁ ☎ ✪ ✠ ➸ ➑➩➒

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.15

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Incompressibility at fractional

  • electron wave functions characterized by their zeroes!

consider finite sample with

electrons,

➑ ➒

flux quanta

  • stray/missing zeroes are

quasiholes/electrons w/ frac- tional charge and statistics

➑➩➒

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.15

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Composite bosons / fermions

Source: Website of Bell Labs

  • zeroes of many–body wave

function can be understood as flux vortices (phase winding!)

  • singular gauge transformation

eliminates winding phase, intro- duces fictitious magnetic field many–electron wave function for

✁ ➄ ✪ ✠ ▼ ✉ ✈ ✪ ❖

:

➻ ➫ ☎ ➼➾➽ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖➪➚ ➙ ✯ ✵ ➻ ➫➳➶ ➹ ☎ ➼ ➽ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖

many–boson wave function in zero magnetic field

Zhang, Hansson, Kivelson ’89

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.16

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Composite bosons / fermions

Source: Website of Bell Labs

  • zeroes of many–body wave

function can be understood as flux vortices (phase winding!)

  • singular gauge transformation

eliminates winding phase, intro- duces fictitious magnetic field many–electron wave function for

✁ ➄ ✪ ✠ ▼ ✉ ✈ ✪ ❖

:

➻ ➫ ☎ ➼➾➽ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖➪➚ ➙ ✯ ✵ ➻ ➫➳➶ ➘ ☎ ➼➾➽ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖

many–fermion wave function at

✁ ➶ ➴ ☎ ✪

Jain ’89

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.16

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Composite bosons / fermions

Source: Website of Bell Labs

  • zeroes of many–body wave

function can be understood as flux vortices (phase winding!)

  • singular gauge transformation

eliminates winding phase, intro- duces fictitious magnetic field many–electron wave function for

✁ ➄ ✪ ✠ ▼ ✉ ✈ ✪ ❖

:

➻ ➫ ☎ ➼➾➽ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖➪➚ ➙ ✯ ✵ ➻ ➫➳➶ ➘ ☎ ➼➾➽ ▼ ❾ ➋ ➥ ❿ ❖ ➢ ➤ ➥ ▼ ➋ ➢ P ➋ ➥ ❖

many–fermion wave function at

✁ ➶ ➴ ☎ ✪

Jain ’89

more generally:

✁ ✬ ✯ ➶ ➴ ☎ ✁ ✬ ✯ P ✉ ✁ ➶ ➴ ☎ ❉➷✂ ✂ ✂

integer

  • quantum Hall effect at
✁ ☎ ❤ ❤ ➚ ➙ ✯

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.16

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Composite bosons / fermions

more generally:

✁ ✬ ✯ ➶ ➴ ☎ ✁ ✬ ✯ P ✉ ✁ ➶ ➴ ☎ ❉➷✂ ✂ ✂

integer

  • quantum Hall effect at
✁ ☎ ❤ ❤ ➚ ➙ ✯ ✁ ☎ ✪ ✠ ✉

: composite–fermion liquid

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.16

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Overview of nontrivial interaction physics in the quantum Hall regime

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.17

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Electron fractionalization

  • Laughlin state has all

electrons saturated with three flux tubes

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.18

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Electron fractionalization

  • make hole excitation,

i.e., physically remove an electron: leaves 3 zeroes

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.18

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Electron fractionalization

  • three

independent fractionally charged quasi- holes generated!

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.18

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Electron fractionalization

  • experimental verification: shot–noise measurements

Saminadayar et al. ’97; Reznikov et al. ’97

➬ ☎ ⑤ ❅ ❪ ✡ ➹

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.18

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Quantum–Hall edge excitations

integer

: energy gap due to Landau quantization E k z y x edge potential

  • low–lying 1D edge excitations

k E µ x y z W kF

F

−k

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.19

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Chiral Luttinger liquids

At fractional filling factors, e.g.,

✁ ☎ ❤ ❬ ❤ ➮ ✯

: energy gap due to interactions

Laughlin ’83

branches of chiral edge excitations predicted that form chiral Luttinger liquids

Wen ’91

tunneling from 3D contact into edge: expect

✡ ▼ ✝ ❖❈➱ ✝ ✃
  • bserve
❐✱❒ ❮ ❰ Ï ☎ ❐ ➟ Ð ❒Ñ

n

  • vergrowth

+

B

cleaved edge barrier quantum well 2DEG Grayson et al. ’98 Grayson et al. ’01 Chang et al. 01 Hilke et al. 01

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.20

slide-46
SLIDE 46

New tunneling geometry: 2D contact

V I p

z y x y

B

✉❈Ò

conserved in tunneling!

(Huber et al. ’02)

❣ ↔ Ó ➛ÕÔ ÖØ× Ù Ú Û ÜÞÝ ➇àß ↔ Ý ➨ ➚✽á ➛ â ➣ ã Ý ✬ ✲ Ó ✬ ➚ ✳ á ❬ → ä åæ ç è éëê ì íïî ð♠ñ ò Ù Ú✿ó ô Ö õ

eV k=X/l E k=X/l E

Landau–level spectroscopy chiral Luttinger liquids at

ö ÷ ✳ ø ➨ ✳ ù

UZ, Shimshoni, Governale ’02

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.21

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Quantum Hall ferromagnets

for 2D electrons in GaAs heterostructures in a high (

➈ úû

Tesla) magnetic field, Zeeman splitting is small cyclotron energy:

⑦❲ü✱ý ❭ ⑤ û

K

þ ÿ
  • Tesla

200 K Coulomb exchange:

✂ ✄ ☎✝✆ ⑧ ✞ ✟ û

K

þ ÿ
  • Tesla

150 K Zeeman splitting:

✠✡ ➹ ÿ ✞ û☞☛ ✟ þ ÿ
  • Tesla

5 K

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.22

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Quantum Hall ferromagnets

for 2D electrons in GaAs heterostructures in a high (

✌ úû

Tesla) magnetic field, Zeeman splitting is small cyclotron energy:

✍❲ü✱ý ✞ ✎ û

K

þ ÿ
  • Tesla

200 K Coulomb exchange:

✂ ✄ ☎✝✆ ✏ ✞ ✟ û

K

þ ÿ
  • Tesla

150 K Zeeman splitting:

✠✡ ➹ ÿ ✞ û☞☛ ✟ þ ÿ
  • Tesla

5 K electron system at

✑ ✒ ú

is 100% spin polarized even in the absence of Zeeman splitting: ideal ferromagnet

✓ ✔ ✓ ✔

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.22

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Quantum Hall ferromagnets

low–lying excitation in typical ferromagnets: spin waves with wave vector

✕✗✖

; created by

➬✙✘✛✚✢✜ ✒ ✚✤✣ ✥ ✦ ✚✢✣ ✧ ✚✢✜✩★ ✪ ✥ ✚ ✣ ★ ✫

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.23

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Quantum Hall ferromagnets

low–lying excitation in typical ferromagnets: spin waves with wave vector

✕✗✖

; created by

✬✙✘✛✚✢✭ ✒ ✚✤✣ ✥ ✦ ✚✢✣ ✧ ✚✢✭✩★ ✪ ✥ ✚ ✣ ★ ✫

generalization to the LLL quantum Hall ferromagnet: 1D wave vector

related to real–space distance

✖ ✏ ✄

q E k

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.23

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Quantum Hall ferromagnets

low–lying excitation in typical ferromagnets: spin waves with wave vector

✕✗✖

; created by

✬✙✘✛✚✢✭ ✒ ✚✤✣ ✥ ✦ ✚✢✣ ✧ ✚✢✭✩★ ✪ ✥ ✚ ✣ ★ ✫

generalization to the LLL quantum Hall ferromagnet: 1D wave vector

related to real–space distance

✖ ✏ ✄

q E k

Barret et al. ’95

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.23

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Skyrmions

low–lying charged excitations in quantum Hall ferro– magnets: skyrmion spin textures

✕✗✮ ✯ ✕✗✰ ✱

Sondhi et al. ’93

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.24

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Skyrmions

low–lying charged excitations in quantum Hall ferro– magnets: skyrmion spin textures

✕✗✮ ✯ ✕✗✰ ✱

Sondhi et al. ’93

spin texture results in additional (topological, Berry–phase) vector potential

✕✳✲✵✴ ✯ ✕✗✰ ✱

such that

✕✷✶✢✸ ✕✹✲✛✴ ✒ ✺✼✻ ✽✿✾ ✕✗✮ þ ✯ ❀❂❁ ✕ ✮ ✸ ❀❂❃ ✕✗✮ ✱

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.24

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Skyrmions

low–lying charged excitations in quantum Hall ferro– magnets: skyrmion spin textures

✕✗✮ ✯ ✕✗✰ ✱

Sondhi et al. ’93

spin texture results in additional (topological, Berry–phase) vector potential

✕✳✲✵✴ ✯ ✕✗✰ ✱

such that

✕✷✶✢✸ ✕✹✲✛✴ ✒ ✺✼✻ ✽✿✾ ✕✗✮ þ ✯ ❀❂❁ ✕ ✮ ✸ ❀❂❃ ✕✗✮ ✱

skyrmion texture reduces effective magnetic flux by

❄ ❅❇❆ ❈ ✄ ✰ ✕❉✶✢✸ ✕ ✲ ✴ ✒ ❊
  • ✕✗✮
✁ ☛ ☛ ☛

integer, hence quantum Hall gap occurs at electron number shifted by

✑ ❊
  • ✕✗✮
✁ ❋

skyrmion carries electric charge

✑ ❊
✮ ✁
  • International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP

, University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.24

slide-55
SLIDE 55

QHE in ultracold bose gases

interacting atoms confined in a 2D harmonic trap:

❍ ✒ ■❑❏ ✄ ▲ ✚✢▼ ◆ ❖◗P ■ ✄ ❘ ✚✢❙ ◆ ❖◗P ✄ ❘ ❚ ✻ ❯ ❱ ▲ ❲ ✯ ✕ ✰ ❯ ❳ ✕ ✰ ▲ ✱ ❳ ❨ ▲ ❩❭❬ ▲

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.25

slide-56
SLIDE 56

QHE in ultracold bose gases

interacting atoms confined in a 2D harmonic trap:

❍ ✒ ■❑❏ ✄ ▲ ✚✢▼ ◆ ❖◗P ■ ✄ ❘ ✚✢❙ ◆ ❖◗P ✄ ❘ ❚ ✻ ❯ ❱ ▲ ❲ ✯ ✕ ✰ ❯ ❳ ✕✗✰ ▲ ✱ ❳ ❨ ▲ ❩❭❬ ▲

when trap is rotating with frequency

: additional term; for

❨ ✒ ❪

: recover quantum-Hall Hamiltonian (

❪❴❫ ✒ ✎ ❪

)

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.25

slide-57
SLIDE 57

QHE in ultracold bose gases

interacting atoms confined in a 2D harmonic trap:

❍ ✒ ■❑❏ ✄ ▲ ✚✢▼ ◆ ❖◗P ■ ✄ ❘ ✚✢❙ ◆ ❖◗P ✄ ❘ ❚ ✻ ❯ ❱ ▲ ❲ ✯ ✕ ✰ ❯ ❳ ✕✗✰ ▲ ✱ ❳ ❨ ▲ ❩❭❬ ▲

when trap is rotating with frequency

: additional term; for

❨ ✒ ❪

: recover quantum-Hall Hamiltonian (

❪❴❫ ✒ ✎ ❪

) bose system: incompressible at

✑ ✒ ❵ ☎ ✎

(minimization

  • f contact–interaction energy possible only for
✑ ❛ ❵ ☎ ✎

)

❜ ✯❞❝ ❄❢❡ ☛ ☛ ☛ ❡ ❝ ❣ ✱ ✒ ❊ ✯❤ ❝ ▲ ✐ ✱ ❯ ❱ ▲ ✯❞❝ ❯ ❳ ❝ ▲ ✱ ✄ ✂ ✘ ❥ ❦ ❧♥♠ ↕ ❬ ♠ ↕ ❦ ❋

analog of fractional quantum Hall effect

  • Cooper, Wilkin ’99; Wilkin, Gunn ’00

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.25

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Creation of Laughlin quasiparticles

intense Laser beam simulates disorder potential; create fractionally charged quasiparticle

Paredes et al. ’01

direct spatial control: something condensed–matter experimentalists do not have!

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.26

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Measurement of fractional statistics

at intermediate Laser intensities: create superposition

  • f initial state and state with one more quasiparticle

use this to directly measure fractional statistics of Laughlin quasiparticles

Paredes et al. ’01

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.27

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Conclusions

Basics of the quantum Hall effect incompressibility

quantized Hall resistance integer effect: Landau quantization fractional effect: interactions finite plateau width due to disorder quenching of kinetic energy in the lowest Landau level gives rise to novel interaction effects: laboratory for multitude of correlated–electron states new avenues for the study of such effects in trapped cold atomic gases

International Summer School ”Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Scale and Low Dimensions”, ISSP , University of Tokyo, August 13 – 21, 2003 – p.28