quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity
play

Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity Lajos Di osi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity Lajos Di osi Wigner Centre, Budapest 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP National Research Development and Innovation Office Projects 2017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00001 and K12435 EU COST Action CA15220


  1. Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity Lajos Di´ osi Wigner Centre, Budapest 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP National Research Development and Innovation Office Projects 2017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00001 and K12435 EU COST Action CA15220 ‘Quantum Technologies in Space’ Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 1 / 17

  2. Abstract 1 Fragments from history 2 Semiclassical Gravity 1962-63: sharp metric 3 Sharp metric Newtonian limit Testing self-attraction Quantum control to generate potential (tutorial) 4 Quantum control to generate potential (summary) 5 Decoherent Semiclassical Gravity: unsharp metric 6 Unsharp metric Newtian limit ... coincides with DP wavefunction collapse theory Testing DP: LISA Pathfinder MAQRO Summary 7 Decoherent Semiclassical Gravity wouldn’t have been realized 8 without ... References 9 Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 2 / 17

  3. Abstract Quantum gravity has not yet obtained a usable theory. We apply the semiclassical theory instead, where the space-time remains classical (i.e.: unquantized). However, the hybrid quantum-classical coupling is acausal, violates both the linearity of quantum theory and the Born rule as well. Such anomalies can go away if we modify the standard mean-field coupling, building on the mechanism of quantum measurement and feed-back well-known in, e.g., quantum optics. The newtonian limit can fully be worked out, it leads to the gravity-related spontaneous wave function collapse theory of Penrose and the speaker. Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 3 / 17

  4. Fragments from history Bronstein (1935): A sharp space-time structure is unob- servable (because of Schwartzschild radii of test bodies). Quantization of gravity can not copy quantization of elec- tromagnetism. We may be enforced to reject our ordinary concept of space-time. 1906-1938 J´ anossy (1952): Quantum mechanics should be more clas- sical. Expansion of the wave packet might be limited by ˙ 2 M ψ ′′ ( x ) − γ ( x − � x � ) 2 ψ ( x ) + 1 i � 2 γ (∆ x ) 2 ψ ( x ) ψ ( x ) = if we accept superluminality caused by the nonlinear term. 1912-1978 K´ arolyh´ azy (1966): The ultimate unsharpness of space-time structure limits coherent expansion of massive objects’ po- sition (while individual particles can expand coherently with no practical limitations). 1929-2012 Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 4 / 17

  5. Semiclassical Gravity 1962-63: sharp metric Sharp classical space-time metric (Møller, Rosenfeld 1962-63): G ab = 8 π G c 4 � Ψ | ˆ T ab | Ψ � Schrödinger equation on background metric g : Ψ � = − i | ˙ ˆ H [ g ] | Ψ � � That’s our powerful effective hybrid dynamics for ( g ab , | Ψ � ) , but with fundamental anomalies (superluminality, no Born rule, ...) that are unrelated to relativity and even gravitation just related to quantum-classical coupling that makes Schrödinger eq. nonlinear No deterministic hybrid dynamics is correct fundamentally! Way out: metric cannot be sharp, must have fluctuations δ g ab . Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 5 / 17

  6. Sharp metric Newtonian limit G 00 = 8 π Gc − 4 � Ψ | ˆ T 00 | Ψ � ⇒ ∆Φ = 4 π G � Ψ | ˆ ̺ | Ψ � � ˆ � ˙ ˙ | Ψ � = − ( i / � )ˆ � ˆ H [ g ] | Ψ � ⇒ | Ψ � = − ( i / � ) H 0 + ̺ Φ dV | Ψ � ⇒ ⇒ Schrödinger-Newton Equation with self-attraction: � � ˆ � � ̺ ( x ) � Ψ | ˆ ̺ ( y ) | Ψ � | Ψ � = − i ˙ ˆ H 0 − G | Ψ � d x d y � | x − y | Single “pointlike” body c.o.m. motion: � | ψ ( y ) | 2 d y ψ ( x ) = i � 2 M ∇ 2 ψ ( x ) + i ˙ � GM 2 | x − y | ψ ( x ) � �� � self-attraction Solitonic solutions: ∆ x ∼ � 2 / GM 3 . Irrelevant for atomic M , grow relevant for nano- M : M ∼ 10 − 15 g , ∆ x ∼ 10 − 5 cm That’s quantumgravity in the lab [D. 1984]. Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 6 / 17

  7. Testing self-attraction Schrödinger-Newton Equation for 1 D motion of a Massive oscillator: ψ ( x ) = i � 2 M ψ ′′ ( x ) − iM � G ( x − � x � ) 2 � Ω 2 x 2 + ω 2 ˙ ψ ( x ) 2 � ω 2 G = const. × G × nuclear density in M Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 7 / 17

  8. Quantum control to generate potential (tutorial) Sequential measurements of ˆ x plus feedback: measurement unitary measurement unitary of x evolution of x evolution . . . | > M U | > M U | > ψ ψ ψ 1 2 0 1 2 feedback feedback outcome x 1 outcome x 2 At ∞ repetition frequency: time-continuous monitoring+feedback. = γ − 1 = � Ψ t | ˆ x | Ψ t � + δ x t E δ x t δ x s δ ( t − s ) x t ���� ���� � �� � ���� � �� � signal mean noise correlation γ = precision To generate a potential, take ˆ H fb ( t ) = Rx t ˆ x = R ( � Ψ t | ˆ x | Ψ t � + δ x t )ˆ x . | Ψ � = − i ˙ � (ˆ H 0 + 1 x 2 ) | Ψ �− 1 8 [ γ + 4 γ − 1 ( R / � ) 2 x � ) 2 2 R ˆ ] (ˆ x −� ˆ | Ψ � + . . . δ x | Ψ � � �� � � �� � � �� � � �� � stochastic to be minimized localisation fb − generated ρ = − i ρ ] − 1 ˙ � [ˆ H 0 + 1 x 2 , ˆ ˆ 2 R ˆ 2 � R [ˆ x , [ˆ x , ˆ ρ ]] Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 8 / 17

  9. Quantum control to generate potential (summary) Assume ˆ x is being monitored, yielding signal x t = � Ψ t | ˆ x | Ψ t � + δ x t . Apply feedback via the hybrid Hamiltonian ˆ H fb ( t ) = Rx t ˆ x = R � ˆ x � t ˆ x + R δ x t ˆ x � �� � � �� � ( white ) noise part of coupling sharp semiclassical coupling Sharp+noisy terms together cancel nonlinearity (and related anomalies) from the quantum dynamics: ρ = − i ρ ] − 1 ˙ � [ˆ H 0 + 1 x 2 , ˆ ˆ 2 R ˆ 2 � R [ˆ x , [ˆ x , ˆ ρ ]] New potential has been generated ‘semiclassically’ and consistently with quantum mechanics, but at the price of decoherence. Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 9 / 17

  10. Decoherent Semiclassical Gravity: unsharp metric Assume ˆ T ab is spontaneously measured (monitored) Let T ab be the measured value (called signal in control theory) Replace Møller-Rosenfeld 1962-63 by G ab = 8 π G c 4 T ab = 8 π G c 4 ( � ˆ T ab � + δ T ab ) i.e.: source Einstein eq. by the noisy signal (meanfield+noise) For backaction of monitoring, add terms to Schrödinger eq.: dt | Ψ � = − i d ˆ H [ g ] | Ψ � + nonlinear + stoch . terms � Tune precision of monitoring by Principle of Least Decoherence D 1990, Kafri, Taylor & Milburn 2014, Tilloy & D 2016-17 Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 10 / 17

  11. Unsharp metric Newtonian limit Assume ˆ ̺ is spontaneously measured (monitored) Let ̺ t be the measured value (called signal in control theory) Source classical Newtonian gravity by the signal: � d y Φ t ( x ) = − G | x − y | ̺ t ( y ) Introduce ˆ � ˆ H fb = ̺ Φ dV to induce Newton interaction For backaction of monitoring, add terms to Schrödinger eq.: dt | Ψ � = − i d ˆ H 0 | Ψ � + nonlinear + stoch . terms � Tune precision of monitoring by Principle of Least Decoherence Such theory of unsharp semiclassical gravity coincides with ... Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 11 / 17

  12. ... coincides with DP wavefunction collapse theory Unique ultimate unsharpness of Newton potential Φ (metric): � G E δ Φ t ( r ) δ Φ s ( y )= 2 | x − y | δ ( t − s ) By averaging over the stochastic Φ (metric), master eq. (D. 1986):   � d x d y � d x d y   d ˆ ρ � � dt = − i H 0 + G  − G  ˆ  | x − y | ˆ ̺ ( x )ˆ ̺ ( y ) , ˆ ρ | x − y | [ˆ ̺ ( x ) , [ˆ ̺ ( y ) , ˆ ρ ]]   2 2 � �    � �� � � �� � Newton pairpotential DP decoherence Double merit: Semiclassical theory of gravity, a hybrid dynamics of (Φ , | Ψ � ) free of anomalies (no superluminality, valid Born rule). Theory of G-related spontaneous collapse (Schrödinger’s Cats go collapsed). Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 12 / 17

  13. Testing DP: LISA Pathfinder Lajos Di´ osi (Wigner Centre, Budapest) Quantum control and semiclassical quantumgravity 23 Nov 2018, Wigner RCP 13 / 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend