Quantitative Ethnography Well be doing some work in groups, so - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
quantitative ethnography
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quantitative Ethnography Well be doing some work in groups, so - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 24, 2023 289 likes •1.95k views

Quantitative Ethnography Well be doing some work in groups, so decide whether you want to sit with people you already know, or meet new folks. Either is fine! David Williamson Shaffer Vilas Distinguished Achievement Professor of Learning

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quantitative Ethnography

We’ll be doing some work in groups, so decide whether you want to sit with people you already know, or meet new folks. Either is fine!

David Williamson Shaffer

Vilas Distinguished Achievement Professor of Learning Science

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Obel Foundation Professor of Learning Analytics

Aalborg University at Copenhagen

Data Philosopher

Wisconsin Center for Educational Research

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Complex Collaborative Problem Solving

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Learning is a process of Enculturation

culture

slide-15
SLIDE 15

“A DISCOURSE is a socially accepted association among ways of using language, of thinking, feeling, believing, valuing, and of acting that can be used to identify oneself as a member of a socially meaningful group… or to signal (that one is playing) a socially meaningful role.”

  • Jim Gee

Learning is a process of Enculturation

culture

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DISCOURSE culture

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Learning is a process of Enculturation

DISCOURSE culture

slide-18
SLIDE 18

—David Williamson Shaffer

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

—David Williamson Shaffer —Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-20
SLIDE 20

—Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Soil

—Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Soil

Munsell Color Chart —Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Post hole

—Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

Soil

Munsell Color Chart

slide-24
SLIDE 24

CODE CODE CODE

—Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-25
SLIDE 25

CODE CODE

—Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

DISCOURSE culture CODE

slide-26
SLIDE 26

What are some CODES in the things you study?

CODE CODE

—Charles Goodwin

DISCOURSE culture CODE

slide-27
SLIDE 27

CODE CODE CODE

—Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Soil

Munsell Color Chart

CODE

—Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

—David Williamson Shaffer

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Post hole Soil

Munsell Color Chart —Charles Goodwin

Learning is a process of Enculturation

—David Williamson Shaffer

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Post hole Soil

Munsell Color Chart Epistemic Frame

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Post hole Soil

Munsell Color Chart Epistemic Frame

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Post hole Soil

Munsell Color Chart Epistemic Frame

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Post hole Soil

Munsell Color Chart Epistemic Frame

Learning is a process of Enculturation

slide-34
SLIDE 34

DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Virtual Internships

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Virtual Internships

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Virtual Internships

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyfJAtL93OU

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Virtual Internships

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Yes, one of my designs had a payload of 718, agility 281, recharge 7.88, safety 183, and price 14045. These attributes all meet company standards.

Virtual Internships

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Data

Yes, one of my designs had a payload of 718, agility 281, recharge 7.88, safety 183, and price 14045. These attributes all meet company standards.

Virtual Internships

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Yes, one of my designs had a payload of 718, agility 281, recharge 7.88, safety 183, and price 14045. These attributes all meet company standards.

Technical Requirements

Virtual Internships

slide-42
SLIDE 42

discourse DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44

discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

slide-45
SLIDE 45

discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

slide-46
SLIDE 46

discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

slide-47
SLIDE 47

discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

slide-48
SLIDE 48

discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

—Andrew Pickering Machinic Grip

slide-49
SLIDE 49

CODE

slide-50
SLIDE 50

CODE

Culturally-relevant and meaningful aspects of a

DISCOURSE

slide-51
SLIDE 51

CODE code

Culturally-relevant and meaningful aspects of a

DISCOURSE

slide-52
SLIDE 52

CODE code

Things that count as evidence or warrants for

CODES

Culturally-relevant and meaningful aspects of a

DISCOURSE

slide-53
SLIDE 53

CODE code

Things that count as evidence or warrants for CODES Culturally-relevant and meaningful aspects of a DISCOURSE

What are codes in things you study?

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Culturally-relevant and meaningful aspects of a DISCOURSE codes Things that count as evidence or warrants for CODES CODES

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Technical Requirements Data

Discussion of one or more criteria for device functionality: agility, payload, cost, recharge interval, and/or safety. Referring to or justifying decisions based on numerical values, results tables, graphs, research papers, or relative quantities.

The reason only one met the required payload is probably because PAM is not the best choice. if we can lift a payload of 564 N and we add 100 N more of metal, then our payload becomes 464 N

Virtual Internships

slide-56
SLIDE 56

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

slide-57
SLIDE 57

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

slide-58
SLIDE 58

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

Thick Description

slide-59
SLIDE 59

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

Thin Description

slide-60
SLIDE 60

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart

slide-61
SLIDE 61

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart

slide-62
SLIDE 62

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart

slide-63
SLIDE 63

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

Theoretical Saturation

Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart

slide-64
SLIDE 64

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

Theoretical Saturation

Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart

slide-65
SLIDE 65
slide-66
SLIDE 66

Justin Kim Please take a moment to introduce yourselves and indicate what actuator you have experience with. Elizabeth E. Hi everybody! Gabrielle F. Hi I'm Gabby Elizabeth E. I'm Elizabeth, and I spent the first part of this internship working with PAM Gabrielle F. I'm from Pneumatic Lena H. I am Lena and I worked with electric

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Justin Kim Please take a moment to introduce yourselves and indicate what actuator you have experience with. Elizabeth E. Hi everybody! Gabrielle F. Hi I'm Gabby Elizabeth E. I'm Elizabeth, and I spent the first part of this internship working with PAM Gabrielle F. I'm from Pneumatic Lena H. I am Lena and I worked with electric

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Justin Kim Please take a moment to introduce yourselves and indicate what actuator you have experience with. Elizabeth E. Hi everybody! Gabrielle F. Hi I'm Gabby Elizabeth E. I'm Elizabeth, and I spent the first part of this internship working with PAM Gabrielle F. I'm from Pneumatic Lena H. I am Lena and I worked with electric

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric?

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Technical Requirements

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Technical Requirements Technical Requirements

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Technical Requirements Technical Requirements Technical Requirements

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Technical Requirements Technical Requirements Technical Requirements Data

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Zachary H. The best prototype for hydraulic was payload 1044, agility 203, recharge interval 8.7, cost $14540, and safety 214. Lena H. It consisted of safety 190, cost 12875, recharge interval, 8.32, payload 552,and agility 263 Gabrielle F. Payload 608 agility 257 RI 8.52 cost $12740 and safety 206 Zachary H. It seems like most performed well with one or two attributes scoring low. Lena H. I mean if we need to improve safety we can us the PFC power source, even though it has a pretty poor rating in all other aspects Elizabeth E. I think we need to determine which attributes are the most important to us so that we can meet those internal requirements and then just company for the ones we find less important

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Zachary H. The best prototype for hydraulic was payload 1044, agility 203, recharge interval 8.7, cost $14540, and safety 214. Lena H. It consisted of safety 190, cost 12875, recharge interval, 8.32, payload 552,and agility 263 Gabrielle F. Payload 608 agility 257 RI 8.52 cost $12740 and safety 206 Zachary H. It seems like most performed well with one or two attributes scoring low. Lena H. I mean if we need to improve safety we can us the PFC power source, even though it has a pretty poor rating in all other aspects Elizabeth E. I think we need to determine which attributes are the most important to us so that we can meet those internal requirements and then just company for the ones we find less important Data Data Data

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Zachary H. The best prototype for hydraulic was payload 1044, agility 203, recharge interval 8.7, cost $14540, and safety 214. Lena H. It consisted of safety 190, cost 12875, recharge interval, 8.32, payload 552,and agility 263 Gabrielle F. Payload 608 agility 257 RI 8.52 cost $12740 and safety 206 Zachary H. It seems like most performed well with one or two attributes scoring low. Lena H. I mean if we need to improve safety we can us the PFC power source, even though it has a pretty poor rating in all other aspects Elizabeth E. I think we need to determine which attributes are the most important to us so that we can meet those internal requirements and then just company for the ones we find less important Data Data Data

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Zachary H. The best prototype for hydraulic was payload 1044, agility 203, recharge interval 8.7, cost $14540, and safety 214. Lena H. It consisted of safety 190, cost 12875, recharge interval, 8.32, payload 552,and agility 263 Gabrielle F. Payload 608 agility 257 RI 8.52 cost $12740 and safety 206 Zachary H. It seems like most performed well with one or two attributes scoring low. Lena H. I mean if we need to improve safety we can us the PFC power source, even though it has a pretty poor rating in all other aspects Elizabeth E. I think we need to determine which attributes are the most important to us so that we can meet those internal requirements and then just company for the ones we find less important Data Data Data Design Tradeoffs

slide-78
SLIDE 78

DESIGN TRADEOFFS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DATA

slide-79
SLIDE 79

DESIGN TRADEOFFS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DATA

slide-80
SLIDE 80

DESIGN TRADEOFFS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DATA

slide-81
SLIDE 81

DESIGN TRADEOFFS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DATA

slide-82
SLIDE 82

DESIGN TRADEOFFS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DATA

Can you draw a diagram about how your codes are related?

slide-83
SLIDE 83

DESIGN TRADEOFFS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DATA

Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart

slide-84
SLIDE 84

DESIGN TRADEOFFS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DATA

Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart Post hole Soil Munsell Color Chart

slide-85
SLIDE 85

DESIGN TRADEOFFS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DATA Theoretical Saturation

slide-86
SLIDE 86

DESIGN TRADEOFFS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS DATA

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Yes, one of my designs had a payload of 718, agility 281, recharge 7.88, safety 183, and price 14045. These attributes all meet company standards.

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Data

Yes, one of my designs had a payload of 718, agility 281, recharge 7.88, safety 183, and price 14045. These attributes all meet company standards.

Technical Requirements

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Data

Yes, one of my designs had a payload of 718, agility 281, recharge 7.88, safety 183, and price 14045. These attributes all meet company standards.

Technical Requirements

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Zachary H. The best prototype for hydraulic was payload 1044, agility 203, recharge interval 8.7, cost $14540, and safety 214. Lena H. It consisted of safety 190, cost 12875, recharge interval, 8.32, payload 552,and agility 263 Gabrielle F. Payload 608 agility 257 RI 8.52 cost $12740 and safety 206 Zachary H. It seems like most performed well with one or two attributes scoring low. Lena H. I mean if we need to improve safety we can us the PFC power source, even though it has a pretty poor rating in all other aspects Elizabeth E. I think we need to determine which attributes are the most important to us so that we can meet those internal requirements and then just company for the ones we find less important

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Zachary H. The best prototype for hydraulic was payload 1044, agility 203, recharge interval 8.7, cost $14540, and safety 214. Lena H. It consisted of safety 190, cost 12875, recharge interval, 8.32, payload 552,and agility 263 Gabrielle F. Payload 608 agility 257 RI 8.52 cost $12740 and safety 206 Zachary H. It seems like most performed well with one or two attributes scoring low. Lena H. I mean if we need to improve safety we can us the PFC power source, even though it has a pretty poor rating in all other aspects Elizabeth E. I think we need to determine which attributes are the most important to us so that we can meet those internal requirements and then just company for the ones we find less important Design Tradeoffs

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Zachary H. The best prototype for hydraulic was payload 1044, agility 203, recharge interval 8.7, cost $14540, and safety 214. Lena H. It consisted of safety 190, cost 12875, recharge interval, 8.32, payload 552,and agility 263 Gabrielle F. Payload 608 agility 257 RI 8.52 cost $12740 and safety 206 Zachary H. It seems like most performed well with one or two attributes scoring low. Lena H. I mean if we need to improve safety we can us the PFC power source, even though it has a pretty poor rating in all other aspects Elizabeth E. I think we need to determine which attributes are the most important to us so that we can meet those internal requirements and then just company for the ones we find less important Design Tradeoffs Data

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Zachary H. For hydraulic, payload and recharge interval were strengths, but safety was close to the company requirement. Daniel M. Elizabeth that was very similar to my group. We were able to reach all internal consultant requests, but the machine costed a lot. Gabrielle F. We used Pneumatic and it seemed to meet everyone's required and most preferred! Gabrielle F. Ourcost always met preferred costs Lena H. Yes and electric, depending on the other aspects, also met all required and most preferred Michael T. What were the results of the best prototype for pneumatic and electric? Zachary H. The best prototype for hydraulic was payload 1044, agility 203, recharge interval 8.7, cost $14540, and safety 214. Lena H. It consisted of safety 190, cost 12875, recharge interval, 8.32, payload 552,and agility 263 Gabrielle F. Payload 608 agility 257 RI 8.52 cost $12740 and safety 206 Zachary H. It seems like most performed well with one or two attributes scoring low. Lena H. I mean if we need to improve safety we can us the PFC power source, even though it has a pretty poor rating in all other aspects Elizabeth E. I think we need to determine which attributes are the most important to us so that we can meet those internal requirements and then just company for the ones we find less important Data Data Data Design Tradeoffs

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Moving Window

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Moving Window

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Moving Window

slide-97
SLIDE 97

Moving Window

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Moving Window

slide-99
SLIDE 99

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-100
SLIDE 100

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-102
SLIDE 102

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-103
SLIDE 103

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-104
SLIDE 104

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-105
SLIDE 105

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Epistemic Frame

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Epistemic Frame

slide-108
SLIDE 108

EPISTEMIC NETWORK ANALYSIS (ENA)

slide-109
SLIDE 109

EPISTEMIC NETWORK ANALYSIS (ENA)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RI8b3x85MVE

slide-110
SLIDE 110

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-111
SLIDE 111

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-112
SLIDE 112

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-113
SLIDE 113

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-114
SLIDE 114

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-115
SLIDE 115

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-116
SLIDE 116

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-117
SLIDE 117

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Dimensional Reduction of co-

  • ccurrence matrices
slide-118
SLIDE 118

Optimization of node positions

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-119
SLIDE 119

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-120
SLIDE 120

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-121
SLIDE 121

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-122
SLIDE 122

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

slide-123
SLIDE 123

Data from N=50 students

1st year college students 25 novices 25 more advanced

slide-124
SLIDE 124

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices

slide-125
SLIDE 125

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

More Advanced

slide-126
SLIDE 126

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-127
SLIDE 127

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-128
SLIDE 128

Novices More Advanced

slide-129
SLIDE 129

Novices More Advanced

slide-130
SLIDE 130

Novices More Advanced

slide-131
SLIDE 131

Novices More Advanced

slide-132
SLIDE 132

N = 50, p < 0.001, r2 = 39%

Novices More Advanced

slide-133
SLIDE 133

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

slide-134
SLIDE 134

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

p<α

slide-135
SLIDE 135

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

p<α

Theoretical Saturation

slide-136
SLIDE 136

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-137
SLIDE 137

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-138
SLIDE 138

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-139
SLIDE 139

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-140
SLIDE 140

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-141
SLIDE 141

Could you format your data this way?

slide-142
SLIDE 142
slide-143
SLIDE 143

rENA

slide-144
SLIDE 144

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-145
SLIDE 145

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-146
SLIDE 146

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-147
SLIDE 147

Data Design Tradeoffs Technical Requirements Collaboration

Novices More Advanced

slide-148
SLIDE 148
slide-149
SLIDE 149
slide-150
SLIDE 150

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

Theoretical Saturation

p<α

slide-151
SLIDE 151

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

Grounded Analysis Theoretical Saturation

p<α

slide-152
SLIDE 152

TD

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

p<α

Thick Description Theoretical Saturation

slide-153
SLIDE 153
slide-154
SLIDE 154
slide-155
SLIDE 155
slide-156
SLIDE 156
slide-157
SLIDE 157

TD

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

p<α

Thick Description Theoretical Saturation

slide-158
SLIDE 158

TD

code code code discourse field notes DISCOURSE culture CODE CODE CODE

p<α

Thick Description Big Data

slide-159
SLIDE 159

“The essential task of [ethnography] is not to codify abstract regularities but to make thick description possible, not to generalize across cases but to generalize within them.”

  • Clifford Geertz

See Shaffer and Serlin (2004), What good are statistics that don’t generalize?

slide-160
SLIDE 160

Dragan Gašević Learning Analytics Naomi Chesler Engineering Jeff Linderoth Engineering Asli Gocmen Urban Planning Lew Friedland Journalism Art Graesser Psychology Mike Zinn Engineering Kris Scopinich Outreach Education Zhijiang Cai Computer Science Ken Frank Statistics Morten Misfeldt Math Education

slide-161
SLIDE 161

You? Dragan Gašević Learning Analytics Naomi Chesler Engineering Jeff Linderoth Engineering Asli Gocmen Urban Planning Lew Friedland Journalism Art Graesser Psychology Mike Zinn Engineering Kris Scopinich Outreach Education Zhijiang Cai Computer Science Ken Frank Statistics Morten Misfeldt Math Education

slide-162
SLIDE 162
slide-163
SLIDE 163
slide-164
SLIDE 164

quantitativeethnography.org

slide-165
SLIDE 165