q2 2017 results teleconference safe harbor statement
play

Q2 2017 RESULTS TELECONFERENCE SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT Matters - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

16 August 2017 Q2 2017 RESULTS TELECONFERENCE SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT Matters discussed in this release may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial


  1. 16 August 2017 Q2 2017 RESULTS TELECONFERENCE

  2. SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT Matters discussed in this release may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance and may include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and statements other than statements of historical facts. The words “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “plan,” “potential,” “may,” “should,” “expect,” “pending” and similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this release are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Although the Company believes that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies that are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, the Company cannot guarantee that it will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections. Important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward- looking statements include the strength of the world economy and currencies, changes in charter hire rates and vessel values, changes in demand for “ton miles” of oil carried by oil tankers, the effect of changes in OPEC’s petroleum production levels and worldwide oil consumption and storage, changes in demand that may affect attitudes of time charterers to scheduled and unscheduled dry- docking, changes in TORM’s operating expenses, including bunker prices, dry-docking and insurance costs, changes in the regulation of shipping operations, including requirements for double hull tankers or actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability from pending or future litigation, domestic and international political conditions, potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents, political events or acts by terrorists. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward- looking statements contained in this release because they are statements about events that are not certain to occur as described or at all. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance, and actual results and future developments may vary materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, the Company undertakes no obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this release or to reflect the occurrence of 2 unanticipated events.

  3. TODAY’S PRESENTERS Jacob Meldgaard ▪ Executive Director in TORM plc ▪ CEO of TORM A/S since April 2010 ▪ Board member of Danish Ship Finance ▪ Previously Executive Vice President of the Danish shipping company NORDEN ▪ Prior to that he held various positions with J. Lauritzen and A.P. Møller-Mærsk ▪ More than 20 years of shipping experience Christian Søgaard-Christensen ▪ CFO of TORM A/S ▪ Prior to that with McKinsey & Co ▪ 10+ years in transportation Christian Mens ▪ Vice President, Head of IR, Communications and Treasury ▪ Previously Head of Funding & Capital Structure at DONG Energy ▪ Prior to that with Deloitte Financial Advisory Services ▪ 10+ years of Treasury experience 3

  4. HIGHLIGHTS FOR Q2 2017 • EBITDA of USD 36m and Profit before tax of USD -2m • RoIC of 2.1% and Earnings per share of USD 0.0 or DKK 0.0 Q2 2017 • Net Asset Value estimated at USD 707m as of 30 June 2017, corresponding to a NAV/share of USD 11.4 or DKK 74.2 Results • Solid balance sheet, Net Loan-to-Value of 51% and available liquidity of USD ~404m as of 30 June 2017 • Vessel values, as measured by brokers, increased by ~2% when comparing to Q1 2017 • TORM obtained average TCE freight rates of USD/day 13,841 in Q2 2017 • The second quarter of 2017 was characterized by continued inventory drawdowns, resulting in a weak product tanker freight market for most of the quarter Product tanker market • The third quarter of 2017 has started out with freight rates at rather weak levels, as the drawdown process for clean petroleum inventories continues • As of 7 August 2017, TORM has fixed 58% of its Q3 2017 earning days at an average TCE of USD/day 14,442 • The current market dip has allowed TORM to utilize its strong capital structure for transactions aiming to renew the fleet • During the second quarter of 2017, TORM completed the sale of the two 2000-built Handysize vessels: TORM Madison and TORM Trinity. Sales & Following the balance sheet date, TORM has sold one vessel, TORM Fox, a 2005-built Handysize vessel Purchase • Following the balance sheet date, TORM has purchased a total of six MR resale vessels for a total consideration of USD 185m: two for delivery in the third quarter of 2017 and the remaining four for delivery in 2019 • By the end of June 2017, the total product tanker order book stood at 11% of the total fleet, a low level in a historical perspective Corporate • In accordance with TORM’s Distribution Policy, the Board of Directors has approved an interim dividend totaling USD 1.2m corr esponding to events USD/share 0.02. The dividend is expected to be distributed on 12 September 2017 with the ex-dividend date on 24 August 2017 4

  5. PRODUCT TANKER FREIGHT RATES REMAINED FLAT IN Q2 Q2 West Spot rates • Overall, the market remained influenced by high product inventories and strong refinery runs on both 60 sides of the Atlantic LR2 (TC1) • 50 High inventories coupled with high local refinery throughput limited gasoline imports to the US • 40 Record high exports of clean petroleum products out of the US Gulf were primarily destined for South America (Brazil) 30 • Trade flows into West Africa increased towards the end of the quarter, mainly from Europe 20 10 Q2 East 0 • High jet and diesel inventories in Europe limited Middle East westbound exports through most of the Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec quarter 50 5-year average 2014 2015 2016 2017 LR1 (TC5) • Seasonal refinery maintenance in North Asia and China as well as lower exports out of India kept the 40 freight rates soft throughout the quarter • 30 Palm oil exports from East to West remained limited • Markets for all segments carrying dirty cargos experienced severe pressure negatively influenced by 20 OPEC production cuts 10 • Towards the end of the quarter, market conditions in the Far East improved as refiners came out of 0 maintenance and naphtha flows began to increase; however, the improved conditions were not Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec enough to drive up freight rates as tonnage supply remained ample 35 5-year average 2014 2015 2016 2017 MR (Average) Q3-to-date 30 • In the West, despite the fact that exports from the USG have continued at high levels on the back of 25 high refinery utilization and further supported by unplanned refinery outages in Mexico and Europe, 20 the market has softened. However, CPP inventory drawdowns are expected to continue and create 15 arbitrage opportunities 10 • In the East, increased refinery activity in the Middle East and India has positively affected MRs while 5 LRs have benefitted from increased flows of middle distillates to Europe on stronger demand and 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec stock draws in the latter region, further supported by a shutdown of North Europe’s largest refinery in 5-year average 2014 2015 2016 2017 Rotterdam Source: Clarksons. Spot earnings: LR2: TC1 Ras Tanura-> Chiba, LR1: TC5 Ras Tanura-> Chiba and MR: average basket of Rotterdam->NY, Bombay->Chiba, Mina Al Ahmadi->Rotterdam, Amsterdam->Lome, 5 Houston->Rio de Janeiro, Singapore->Sidney

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend