pythagoras theorem in noncommutative geometry
play

Pythagoras Theorem in Noncommutative Geometry Francesco DAndrea A - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pythagoras Theorem in Noncommutative Geometry Francesco DAndrea A c b B a C Workshop on Noncommutative Geometry and Optimal Transport Besanc on, 27/11/2014 Introduction The line element in nc geometry is the inverse of the


  1. Pythagoras Theorem in Noncommutative Geometry Francesco D’Andrea A c b B a C Workshop on Noncommutative Geometry and Optimal Transport Besanc ¸on, 27/11/2014

  2. Introduction ◮ The line element in nc geometry “is” the inverse of the Dirac operator: M 2 “ ds ∼ D − 1 ” ds M 1 ds 2 ◮ For a product of Riemannian manifolds M = M 1 × M 2 , with product metric: ds 1 ds 2 = ds 2 1 + ds 2 2 is an “infinitesimal” version of Pythagoras equality. D 2 = D 2 ◮ For a product of noncommutative manifolds (spectral triples): 1 ⊗ 1 + 1 ⊗ D 2 2 which is a sort of “inverse Pythagoras equality”: 1 1 1 ds 2 = + ( ⋆ ) ds 2 ds 2 1 2 See e.g.: A. Connes, Variations sur le th` eme spectral (2007), available on-line. ◮ Can we “integrate” ( ⋆ ) to get some (in)equalities for the distance in ncg? 1 / 19

  3. Pythagoras A a 2 = b 2 + c 2 c b or d ( B , C ) 2 = d ( A , B ) 2 + d ( A , C ) 2 ( † ) B a C Generalization to nc geometry: • what are points A , B , C , . . . ? • what is a right-angle triangle? • what is d ( A , B ) ? • is ( † ) still valid? Reference: FD & P . Martinetti, On Pythagoras Theorem for Products of Spectral Triples , Lett. Math. Phys. 103 (2013), 469–492. 2 / 19

  4. What are points? • Any topological space X is the spectrum of a commutative C ∗ -algebra A = C 0 ( X ) . • Points are linear maps δ x : C 0 ( X ) → C , δ x ( f ) := f ( x ) . Recall that: A state on a C ∗ -algebra A is a linear map ϕ : A → C which is positive, Definition. i.e. ϕ ( a ∗ a ) � 0 ∀ a ∈ A , and normalized: � ϕ � := sup a � = 0 | ϕ ( a ) | / � a � = 1 . � � • The set S ( A ) := states of A is a convex space. Extreme points are called pure states. � � � � � � • A = C 0 ( X ) ⇒ S ( A ) = δ x : x ∈ X probability measures on X ∧ pure states = . • Quantum mechanical interpretation: � a ∈ A : a = a ∗ � A s.a. := ← → physical observables outcome of a measure ← → eigenvalue of a (or residual spectrum) ϕ ∈ S ( A ) associates to any observable a its expectation value 3 / 19

  5. What is a right-angle triangle? Sp ( A 2 ) Pythagoras revised (here C = ( 0, 0 ) ): d ( δ b ⊗ δ c , δ 0 ⊗ δ 0 ) 2 = ( 0, c ) B ( b , c ) = d ( δ b , δ 0 ) 2 + d ( δ c , δ 0 ) 2 a c C b A ( b , 0 ) Sp ( A 1 ) Dictionary � Point A ( b , 0 ) pure state δ b of A 1 = C 0 ( R ) � Point ( 0, c ) pure state δ c of a second copy A 2 = C 0 ( R ) � Point B ( b , c ) product δ b ⊗ δ c : state of A 1 ⊗ A 2 ≃ C 0 ( R × R ) Given two separable states ϕ = ϕ 1 ⊗ ϕ 2 and ψ = ψ 1 ⊗ ψ 2 on A = A 1 ⊗ A 2 , is d ( ϕ , ψ ) 2 = d ( ϕ 1 , ψ 1 ) 2 + d ( ϕ 2 , ψ 2 ) 2 ? 4 / 19

  6. Spectral triples Example: the Hodge-Dirac operator M = oriented Riemannian manifold. Definition ◮ A = C ∞ A spectral triple is given by: 0 ( M ) ◮ H = Ω • ( M ) = L 2 -diff. forms ◮ a complex separable Hilbert space H ; ◮ D = d + d ∗ γ = (− 1 ) degree ◮ a ∗ -algebra A of bounded operators on H ; It is unital ⇐ ⇒ M is compact. ◮ a (unbounded) selfadjoint operator D on H s.t. [ D , a ] is bounded and a ( D + i ) − 1 is a Example: the generator of K 0 ( C ) compact operator for all a ∈ A . � � a � � 0 ◮ A = : a ∈ C It is called: 0 0 ◮ unital if 1 B ( H ) ∈ A ; ◮ H = C 2 � 0 � � 1 � ◮ even if ∃ a grading γ on H s.t. A is even and 1 0 ◮ D = γ = D is odd; 1 0 0 − 1 Note that this is a non-unital spectral ◮ non-degenerate if triple (because 1 M 2 ( C ) / ∈ A ), even if � � Span av : a ∈ A , v ∈ H ≡ H . A ≃ C is a unital algebra. 5 / 19

  7. What is d ( ϕ , ψ ) ? A spectral triple induces a distance on S ( A ) : � � d A , D ( ϕ , ψ ) := sup a ∈ A s.a. ϕ ( a ) − ψ ( a ) : � [ D , a ] � � 1 ∀ ϕ , ψ ∈ S ( A ) . , Monge d´ eblais et remblais problem: � Villani, Optimal transport, old and new c dµ 1 = distribution of material in a mine ( d´ eblais ) Same total mass: � � dµ 2 = distribution in the construction site ( remblais ) dµ 1 = dµ 2 = 1 (in suitable units) Moving a unit material from x to y = T ( x ) (transport plan) costs d geo ( x , y ) . The total cost is � � c T ( µ 1 , µ 2 ) := d geo ( x , T ( x )) dµ 1 ( x ) . For ϕ i ( f ) = f ( x ) dµ i ( x ) , the Wasserstein dist. is: W ( ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 ) := inf c T ( µ 1 , µ 2 ) ( † ) T : T ∗ ( µ 1 )= µ 2 ◮ On a complete Riem. manifold, ( † ) is the spectral distance of the Hodge-Dirac operator! 6 / 19

  8. Example: the SNCF spectral triple Let X ⊂ R n be a finite ∗ subset and x 0 a basepoint. Take x 0 = 0 to simplify the notations. � � f : X → C s.t. f ( 0 ) = 0 Let A := , e x be the indicator function of x ∈ X and { e ± } the canonical basis of C 2 , H := A ⊗ C 2 with orthonormal basis { e x ⊗ e ± } x ∈ X . The representation π of A on H and D are � f � � � x � − 1 e x ⊕ e ∓ if x � = 0 0 π ( f ) = D ( e x ⊕ e ± ) = 0 0 0 if x = 0 Then | f ( x ) | � [ D , π ( f )] � = sup � x � � 1 | f ( x ) − f ( y ) | � � x � + � y � ∀ x , y ∈ X (including 0 ) ⇒ x � = 0 The sup is attained on the function f x , y = � x � e x − � y � e y . Thus: � � x � + � y � if x � = y d A , D ( δ x , δ y ) ≡ d SNCF ( x , y ) = 0 if x = y ∗ For the compact resolvent condition, which could be dropped if only interested in the metric aspect. 7 / 19

  9. Optimal public-transport d geo ( Lyon , Besanc ¸on ) = 188 km d SNCF ( Lyon , Besanc ¸on ) = 720 km 8 / 19

  10. Optimal control Other “non-Riemannian” examples arise in minimization problems with constraints. Soft Moon landing. Falling cat. thrust = - k m ' H t L total mass = m H t L m g height = h H t L c c � 2012 Wolfram Media, Inc. � R. Montgomery, Commun. Math. Phys. 1990 Goal: minimize the amount of fuel. Goal: turn of 180 degrees while falling. Constraint: at height h = 0 the velocity must Constraint: while falling, keep the total angular momentum � J = 0. ∗ be � v = 0 (avoid crashing). ∗ Motion constrained on a distribution H ⊂ TM , with M the configuration space. R. Montgomery (1993): Gauge theory of the falling cat . 9 / 19

  11. The Carnot-Carath´ eodory distance A sub-Riemannian geometry on a manifold M consists of a vector sub-bundle H ⊂ TM with a fiber inner-product g ( · , · ) on it. A curve γ : [ 0, 1 ] → M is horizontal if ˙ γ ( t ) ∈ H ∀ t . The Carnot-Carath´ eodory distance is defined as: � 1 2 dt , d CC ( x , y ) := inf g ( ˙ γ ( t ) , ˙ γ ( t )) where the inf is on all horizontal curves from x to y . A contact manifold ( M , H ) is a 2 n + 1 -dimensional manifold M equipped with a codimension 1 vector sub-bundle H ⊂ TM which is completely non-integrable (that is, sections of H generate Vect ( M ) as a Lie algebra). Locally, H = ker τ where τ ∈ Ω 1 M satisfies τ ( dτ ) n � = 0 (contact 1 -form). Fact: there is a natural sub-Riemannian metric on any contact manifold. 10 / 19

  12. The Rumin complex Let τ be a contact for on a 2 n + 1 -dim. manifold M , and: I • = � τ , dτ � — differential ideal generated by τ . • J • = ker ( τ ∧ ) ∩ ker ( dτ ∧ ) — annihilator. • Theorem (Rumin, 1994) ∃ a 2nd order diff. op. D such that the following is a cochain complex: d d d D d d d → Ω n / I n → J n → J n + 1 → J 2 n + 1 Ω 0 / I 0 → Ω 1 / I 1 − − → . . . − − − − − − − → . . . − Its cohomology is the de Rham cohomology of M . Observations. For f ∈ C ∞ ( M ) : • D is not 1st order, so [ D , f ] is not bounded = ⇒ no spectral triple; 1 • [ D , f ] is bounded relatively to | D | 2 = ⇒ bounded Fredholm module; • [[ D , f ] , f ] is bounded, and [R. Yuncken, Bonn 2014] � � d CC ( x , y ) = | f ( x ) − f ( y ) | : � [[ D , f ] , f ] � � 2 sup . f ∈ C ∞ ( M ) 11 / 19

  13. Back to Pythagoras. . . Given two separable states ϕ = ϕ 1 ⊗ ϕ 2 and ψ = ψ 1 ⊗ ψ 2 on A = A 1 ⊗ A 2 , is d ( ϕ , ψ ) 2 = d ( ϕ 1 , ψ 1 ) 2 + d ( ϕ 2 , ψ 2 ) 2 satisfied by the spectral distance? S ( A 2 ) ϕ ϕ 2 d ( ϕ 2 , ψ 2 ) d ( ϕ , ψ ) ψ ψ 2 d ( ϕ 1 , ψ 1 ) ϕ 1 ψ 1 S ( A 1 ) A last ingredient is missing: on A = A 1 ⊗ A 2 we want a product metric. 12 / 19

  14. Products of spectral triples In nc geom., the Cartesian product of spaces is replaced by the product of spectral triples. Given two spectral triples ( A 1 , H 1 , D 1 , γ 1 ) and ( A 2 , H 2 , D 2 ) , their product ( A , H , D ) is A = A 1 ⊗ A 2 , H = H 1 ⊗ H 2 , D = D 1 ⊗ 1 + γ 1 ⊗ D 2 . ( † ) Here A 1 ⊗ A 2 is the algebraic tensor product. One can also consider the case when both spectral triples are odd, however note that: � 0 ( M ) , Ω • ( M ) , D = d + d ∗ , γ = (− 1 ) degree � ◮ In the Hodge-Dirac example C ∞ the spectral triple is even whatever is the dimension of M ! ◮ In the latter case, ( † ) corresponds to equipping M = M 1 × M 2 with the product metric. 13 / 19

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend