pyroxasulfone tank mixtures
play

Pyroxasulfone Tank-Mixtures P.M. Eure*, E.P. Prostko, and R.M. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Peanut Response to Foliar Applied Pyroxasulfone Tank-Mixtures P.M. Eure*, E.P. Prostko, and R.M. Merchant Department of Crop & Soil Sciences Introduction Inhibitor of VLCFA synthesis Low use rates Developed for use in corn,


  1. Peanut Response to Foliar Applied Pyroxasulfone Tank-Mixtures P.M. Eure*, E.P. Prostko, and R.M. Merchant Department of Crop & Soil Sciences

  2. Introduction • Inhibitor of VLCFA synthesis • Low use rates • Developed for use in corn, soybean, sunflower, and wheat

  3. Current and Future Pyroxasulfone Products BASF – (pyroxasulfone) FMC - (pyroxasulfone + fluthiacet) Valent - (pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin)

  4. Weed Control with Pyroxasulfone Non-treated control Pyroxasulfone 85 WG @ 1.5 oz/A* * 5 WAT

  5. Previous Research • Peanut Tolerance (Prostko et al. 2011) – PRE • Significant stunting at 1 of 2 locations – POST • Excellent tolerance when applied 44-51 days after planting – No reduction in peanut yield E.P. Prostko, T.L. Grey, T.M. Webster, and R.C. Kemerait ( 2011 ) Peanut Tolerance to Pyroxasulfone. Peanut Science: July 2011, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 111-114.

  6. Pyroxasulfone 85WG Applied 10 DAP 8 oz/A 4 oz/A P.M. Eure, E.P. Prostko, A.S. Culpepper, W.K. Vencill, and R.M. Merchant (2012) Cotton and Peanut Response to Pyroxasulfone, Southern Weed Science Society PROC: 65:101.

  7. Peanut Response to Pyroxasulfone 85WG @ 8 oz/A + NIS @ 0.25% v/v 10 DAP NTC 30 DAP 90 DAP 60 DAP 99 DAP

  8. Objective • Evaluate peanut response to pyroxasulfone applied POST with and without tank-mix partners

  9. Materials and Methods-I • Location: UGA Ponder Research Farm – 2009 – 2010 • Soil type: Tifton loamy sand

  10. Materials and Methods-II • Factorial design (2 x 6 ) – Pyroxasulfone 85WG (2) • 0 or 4 oz/A – Foliar herbicide system (6) • No foliar herbicide • Paraquat 2SL (8 oz/A) • Paraquat 2SL (12 oz/A) + Bentazon 4SL (8 oz/A) • Paraquat 2SL (12 oz/A) + Bentazon/Acifluorfen 4SL (24 oz/A) • Imazapic 2AS (4 oz/A) • Lactofen 2SC (12.5 oz/A) • All herbicide treatments included 0.25% v/v NIS

  11. Materials and Methods-III • Application method: • CO 2 -pressurized backpack sprayer • 15 GPA • DG 11002XR spray tips • Cultivar: ‘GA - 06G’ • Plots maintained weed- free

  12. Materials and Methods-IV • Data recorded – Peanut stunting – Yield • Adjusted to 10% moisture • Data subjected to ANOVA and means separated using Fisher’s Protected LSD Test ( P ≤ 0.10) when appropriate

  13. Results - Statistics • No interaction between year, pyroxasulfone rate, and foliar herbicide system • Main effects will be discussed: – Pyroxasulfone rate – Foliar herbicide system

  14. 2009

  15. Peanut Stunting 2 DAT 14 DAT 69 DAT 100 80 % Stunting 60 40 26 a 24 a 20 11 a 10 a 4 a 2 a 0 No Pyroxasulfone Pyroxasulfone *Data pooled over foliar herbicide systems

  16. Paraquat 2SL @ 8 oz/A Pyroxasulfone 85WG @ 4 oz/A + Paraquat 2SL @ 8 oz/A 42 DAT

  17. Peanut Stunting 2 DAT 14 DAT 69 DAT 100 80 % Stunting 60 43 a 40 36 b 34 b 24 c 19 a 18 a 17 a 20 13 d 5 b 4 a 4 a 4 a 3 bc 2 a 1 e 1 b 0 c 0 b 0 No Foliar Paraquat Paraquat Paraquat Imazapic Lactofen Herbicide + Bentazon + Bentazon/ Acifluorfen *Data pooled over pyroxasulfone rates

  18. Pyroxasulfone 85WG @ 4 oz/A NTC + Paraquat 2SL @ 12 oz/A + Bentazon 4SL @ 8 oz/A 42 DAT

  19. Peanut Yield 7000 6530 6390 6000 5000 4000 lbs/A 3000 2000 1000 0 No Pyroxasulfone Pyroxasulfone P=0.42 *Data pooled over foliar herbicide systems

  20. Peanut Yield 6910 7000 6500 6500 6480 6310 6080 6000 5000 4000 lbs/A 3000 2000 1000 0 No Foliar Paraquat Paraquat Paraquat Imazapic Lactofen Herbicide + Bentazon + Bentazon/ Acifluorfen *Data pooled pyroxasulfone rates P=0.21

  21. 2010

  22. Peanut Stunting 6 DAT 29 DAT 61 DAT 100 80 % Stunting 60 40 27 a 19 b 20 13 a 7 a 6 a 3 a 0 No Pyroxasulfone Pyroxasulfone *Data pooled over foliar herbicide systems

  23. Paraquat 2SL @ 8 oz/A Pyroxasulfone 85WG @ 4 oz/A + Paraquat 2SL @ 8 oz/A 29 DAT

  24. Peanut Stunting 6 DAT 29 DAT 61 DAT 100 80 60 % Stunting 40 33 a 33 a 30 a 23 b 18 a 17 a 20 16 c 11ab 9 b 8 a 7 a 5 a 4 b 4 a 3 a 0 d 0 c 0 a 0 No Foliar Paraquat Paraquat Paraquat Imazapic Lactofen Herbicide + Bentazon + Bentazon/ Acifluorfen *Data pooled pyroxasulfone rates

  25. Pyroxasulfone 85WG @ 4 oz/A NTC + Paraquat 2SL @ 12 oz/A + Bentazon 4SL @ 8 oz/A 29 DAT

  26. Peanut Yield 7000 5770 5910 6000 5000 4000 lbs/A 3000 2000 1000 0 No Pyroxasulfone Pyroxasulfone P=0.33 *Data pooled over foliar herbicide systems

  27. Peanut Yield 7000 6160 6130 5630 5670 5680 5780 6000 5000 4000 lbs/A 3000 2000 1000 0 No Foliar Paraquat Paraquat Paraquat Imazapic Lactofen Herbicide + Bentazon + Bentazon/ Acifluorfen P=0.57 *Data pooled pyroxasulfone rates

  28. Summary • Peanut stunting – 2009: Pyroxasulfone did not influence peanut stunting – 2010: Addition of pyroxasulfone to tank-mixtures increased peanut stunting 8% (6 DAT) – Complete recovery (29 DAT) • Peanut yield • No interaction between pyroxasulfone and foliar systems • No main effect of pyroxasulfone or foliar system on yield

  29. Future Research • Evaluate peanut cultivar response to PRE applied pyroxasulfone • Peanut tolerance to split applications • EPOST + POST • Tank-mixes of pyroxasulfone with other herbicides • Weed management systems • Evaluate pyroxasulfone efficacy on various weed species

  30. Questions or Comments?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend