Public Work rksh shop #1 #1 HART Tampa Arterial BRT Study - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

public work rksh shop 1 1
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Public Work rksh shop #1 #1 HART Tampa Arterial BRT Study - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Public Work rksh shop #1 #1 HART Tampa Arterial BRT Study December 9, 2019 BRT Study y Introduction Pu Purpose: Identify a corridor, using some combination of Florida, Nebraska and/or Fowler avenues to connect Downtown Tampa to the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Public Work rksh shop #1 #1

December 9, 2019

HART Tampa Arterial BRT Study

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BRT Study y Introduction

  • Pu

Purpose: Identify a corridor, using some combination of Florida, Nebraska and/or Fowler avenues to connect Downtown Tampa to the USF Tampa Campus

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Study G y Goals

  • Improve s

safety a y and t d transit

  • perating c

ng conditions

  • Improve co

e connec ectivity f for e east- wes est r routes

  • Improve l

e local al t tran ansit a acces ess f for co communities es b bet etween en U USF a and Do Downtown Tampa, i including g bicy cycl cle an and p ped edes estr trian co connec ectivity a and s signal alized ed cros

  • ssing i

improvem emen ents

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Identif ifie ied T Transit it Ne Needs ds

  • Expanded transit options for new

and existing riders

  • Better connectivity between USF

and Downtown Tampa (as recommended by previous HART plans and studies)

  • Premium transit service to support

the City of Tampa’s plans for denser redevelopment and long- term economic growth

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Tim imelin line

5

We are h e her ere

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Coor

  • ordinating Ef

Efforts

6

  • Heights Mobility Study (FDOT)
  • Tampa Streetcar Extension (City of Tampa)
  • Regional Rapid Transit (TBARTA)
  • Fowler Avenue Multimodal Corridor Study

(FDOT)

  • University Area Intermodal Center Study (FDOT)
  • Downtown Intermodal Center Study (FDOT)
  • US 41 and 41 B Improvements (FDOT)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Heights s Mobi bility S ty Stud udy

7

  • Consistent with concepts

that propose:

  • Business Access Transit

(BAT) lane or

  • r Mixed Traffic

north of Violet Street

  • Lane reduction and transit

lane south of Violet Street

  • Nonmotorized

enhancements

Heights Study Area Heights Study Corridor

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Removed due to overlap with MetroRapid North/South

Init itia ial l Alternativ ives & & Screenin ings

  • Seventeen (17) alternatives

identified

  • Florida Ave to Fowler Ave
  • Nebraska Ave to Fowler Ave
  • Remaining use 1 of 15 cross-streets

to connect from Florida Ave to Nebraska Ave

  • Conducted 2 screenings:
  • Fatal Flaw Analysis
  • Preliminary Alternatives Analysis
  • Recommended Alignment
  • Initial BRT Alignment
  • Long-Term BRT Alignment

8

17 Initial Alternatives Fatal Flaw Analysis 3 Preliminary Alternatives Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Recommended Alignment Waters Avenue Linebaugh Avenue Palm Avenue

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Initial BRT Alignment

  • Linebaugh Ave Alternative is

recommended

  • Provides the following benefits to the

study area:

  • A higher opportunity for infill and

redevelopment

  • Higher existing transit use and more

uses that are compatible with transit

  • Higher degree of supporting land use
  • A greater potential for transit travel

time savings Linebaugh Avenue:

Total Alignment: ~12.09 miles Dedicated Guideway: ~8.04 miles 66% Dedicated Guideway Median Stations: 7 Curbside Stations: 26 (13 pairs)

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Long-Term B BRT A Align gnmen ent

  • HART’s long-term preference is to

remain on Florida Ave to Fowler Ave

  • Key issues to be addressed:
  • Land uses at north end of Florida Ave

and at intersection with Fowler Ave

  • Ability to provide a dedicated lane

under I-275

  • Ease/efficiency of connectivity with

potential University Area Intermodal Center

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Next St Steps

  • 1. Identify Supporting Transit & Nonmotorized Projects
  • 2. Develop Project Prioritization Approach for Supporting Projects
  • 3. Update HART Board in January 2020
  • 4. Develop Recommended Alternative & Implementation Plan
  • 5. Next Public Workshop in late February 2020
  • 6. HART Board Decision in March/April 2020
  • 7. Begin Phase 2

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Tonight’s W s Work rksh shop

12

  • No

Non-motorized i improve

  • vements
  • Station for you to identify safety issues

within the study area

  • Information about Heights Mobility

Study available

  • Rev

eview r recommended I ended Initial B BRT Alignm nmen ent a and nd provide c comments s on:

  • Proposed alignment
  • Preferred elements of BRT
  • Other transit needs within the study

area or along intersecting routes Additional i info formation a available a about o

  • ther r

regional t transit studies a available.