Proposed 1.5FE Primary School, Penyffordd Design Presentation to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

proposed 1 5fe primary school penyffordd design
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Proposed 1.5FE Primary School, Penyffordd Design Presentation to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Proposed 1.5FE Primary School, Penyffordd Design Presentation to Penyffordd Community Council 07.09.17 Delivering The Presentation Team Introductions Andy Garner Design and BIM Manager Wynne Construction Peter Fisk Associate / Senior


slide-1
SLIDE 1

07.09.17

Proposed 1.5FE Primary School, Penyffordd Design Presentation to Penyffordd Community Council

Delivering

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Presentation Team

Introductions

Andy Garner Design and BIM Manager Wynne Construction Peter Fisk Associate / Senior Architect Lovelock Mitchell Architects Rachael Fenton Senior Landscape Architect Ryder Landscape

Delivering

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

1.0 – Initial Programme 2.0 – Key Concerns derived from the Pre-Application Process

  • Design Stage (RIBA Stage 1) commenced on 04.05.17
  • Planning Programme
  • Pre Application process commenced on 03.07.17 concluding on 28.07.17
  • Target Planning Application submission date 14.08.17
  • Meeting with Community Council held on 26.07.17
  • Presentation given to the Design Commission for Wales on 13.07.17
  • Report from the commission issued on 02.08.17

Community

  • Traffic Impact
  • Building location
  • Architecture
  • Materials
  • Roofscape

Design Commission for Wales

  • Materials

Delivering

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Content

3.0 – Building Design 2.0 – The External Realm 4.0 – Sustainability

  • Architectural Constraints
  • Concept Genesis
  • GA Plans
  • Built Form
  • The Site
  • Crime Prevention / Security
  • Site Boundaries

Delivering

1.0 – Traffic Impact 5.0 – Visualisations 6.0 – Summary

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1.0 Traffic Impact

Residents concerns with the impact of additional traffic

  • Development of a Transport Statement.
  • Commissioned a full ‘Traffic Impact Assessment’
  • Mott Macdonald
  • Traffic Surveys commencing 6th September
  • Will cover both existing sites
  • Key arterial routes to the site
  • Immediate environs of the school
  • Key junctions around the school and on the approach to the estate roads.
  • The school are currently developing an active Travel Plan.
  • A full survey of current school transport modes has been completed.
  • The proposed planning application submission date has been changed.
  • We will review the conclusions and incorporate the recommendations of the TIA prior to

submission of the formal planning application.

  • Current target date for completion of the report is the 22nd September 2017.

Delivering

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2.0 External Realm – The Site

Pro’s :

  • 1. Building located centrally in the site.

Con’s :

  • 2. Positive Link between Car Park and

Main entrance.

  • 3. Loss of central tree belt, trees
  • approx. 150 years old. Potential

challenge from planning

  • 4. Playground adjacencies are not

successful.

  • 5. Access between KS2 and MUGA

would require crossing the secure boundary via the pitch.

  • 6. Services (sprinkler, bin store and

PV battery) would be located on the western boundary.

  • 7. Construction compound would be

located along western boundary.

  • 8. Additional fill required around the

main entrance, increasing construction traffic 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Car park School Yard MUGA Grass Pitch Wildlife Garden Play Zone

Delivering

  • 9. Main play area adjacent to existing

properties increasing Noise pollution. 9.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pro’s

  • 1. Cohesive layout of year group spaces.

Con’s

Grass Pitch Yard Play Zone MUGA Car park Wildlife Garden School

  • 2. Retained central belt of trees.
  • 3. Potential to extend drop off / turning

head.

  • 4. School located along residential

boundary with limited established screening vegetation.

  • 5. Disconnect between the Main

Entrance and public site access points.

  • 6. MUGA is disconnected from KS2

external play.

  • 7. School building does not benefit

from existing trees providing an established setting.

  • 8. Substantial earthworks required to

accommodate the new pitch, increasing construction traffic

  • 9. Substantial earthworks required to

accommodate the extended drop off, increasing construction traffic 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Delivering

  • 10. Loss of Community Sports provision.

2.0 External Realm – The Site

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Pro’s

  • 1. Cohesive layout of year group spaces

1.

  • 2. Retention of central tree belt
  • 3. The school building benefits from an

established arboreal setting and screening

  • 4. Wildlife garden is an integral part of the play

spaces

  • 5. The school building forms part of the

Secure Boundary Line

  • 6. Site legibility benefits from reception

being easily accessed by the pedestrian boulevard.

  • 7. No negative impact on ‘Right to Light’ to

adjacent properties

  • 8. Main play area for KS 1 & 2 located

centrally minimising noise pollution to adjacent properties Con’s

  • 9. On a temporary basis the school will

lose part of the existing play space during construction – overcome by creating MUGA first

  • 10. Building proximity to western and southern

boundary, however fully compliant with planning guidance on space around dwellings

Yard Grass Pitch MUGA Wildlife Garden Car park School

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 9. 10.

Delivering

2.0 External Realm – The Site

7. 8.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2.0 Crime Prevention / Security

Key Considerations:

  • 2. Allowing natural surveillance where possible
  • 3. Maintain community use

1. Meeting the Crime Prevention Officer, recommendations :

  • Retain existing front boundary vegetation
  • 1.8m high weld mesh fence is adequate as external boundary

treatment

  • Cut back over hanging branches
  • Fill in gaps identified within existing vegetation
  • Retain boundary vegetation along Public footpath
  • Offset new fence line from existing vegetation

Delivering

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2.0 Site Boundaries

Park Cres : retain existing frontage vegetation Bowling Green : retained boundary Corner : identified for infill planting and new fencing. Western residential boundary : reinforced with weld mesh fence Palisade fencing considered adequate, sections with chain link fencing reinforced with new weld mesh fence New weld mesh fence in front of existing boundary vegetation. Eastern Boundary : New weld mesh to replace existing chain link fence. Eastern Boundary : New hedgerow planting along existing fence line to tie in with existing. Secure car park and entrance area Secure by Design school grounds School pitch with community access MUGA Gaps in existing vegetation to be infilled with hedgerow planting.

Delivering

slide-11
SLIDE 11

3.0 Building Design

Architectural Constraints

Delivering

slide-12
SLIDE 12

3.0 Building Design

Concept Genesis

Delivering

slide-13
SLIDE 13

3.0 Building Design

GA Plan – Ground Floor

Delivering

slide-14
SLIDE 14

3.0 Building Design

GA Plan – First Floor

Delivering

slide-15
SLIDE 15

3.0 Building Design

Built Form

Delivering

slide-16
SLIDE 16

3.0 Building Design

Built Form

Delivering

slide-17
SLIDE 17

3.0 Building Design

Material Palette

Standing Seam Cladding

Background Materials Principal Materials

Render Cladding Natural Slate Cladding Weatherboarding

Delivering

slide-18
SLIDE 18

3.0 Building Design

Built Form

Delivering

slide-19
SLIDE 19

3.0 Building Design

Built Form

Delivering

slide-20
SLIDE 20

3.0 Building Design

Material Palette

HPL Timber effect Cladding

Background Materials Principal Materials

Render Cladding Natural Slate Cladding Weatherboarding Standing Seam roof Cladding

Delivering

slide-21
SLIDE 21

3.0 Building Design

Built Form

Delivering

slide-22
SLIDE 22

3.0 Building Design

Site Sections (Based upon OS Data) Section A Section B A A B B

Delivering

slide-23
SLIDE 23

REDUCING ENERGY DEMAND MEETING ENERGY DEMAND EFFICIENTLY RENEW ABLES

Delivering

A A B C D E F G H I J

Low energy low maintenance building that is simple to use, operate and maintain Fabric first approach to sustainability using passive measures as first principles ‘A’ Rated EPC and BREEAM Excellent rating is a requirement of the Client brief / Welsh Government Funding

B C D E F G H I J

N

REDUCE ENERGY DEMAND

MEETING ENERGY DEMAND EFFICIENTLY PROVISION OF ON- SITE RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY

THE ENERGY HIEARCHY APPROACH TO LOW ENERGY BUILDINGS IN DESIGN AND USE

Prevailing wind mainly from W & SW 09:00 12:00 16:00 Utilisation of existing foliage and site topography for shielding from winter prevailing wind Building orientation offers beneficial heat gain in winter from morning solar gain Summer sun path Winter sun path

4.0 Sustainability

Building orientation to the north limits heat loss from exposed façade in winter, protecting classroom areas. Limited classrooms with a south orientation reduced excessive heat gains in summer. Retaining existing foliage protects building from prevailing winter winds. Maximisation of daylighting through careful design and selection of fenestration inc: size, glazing specification (g- value/LTV etc). North lights to Atrium to provide permanent quality (no glare) daylight all year round Solar shading incorporated into building design via natural eaves and fixed solar shading to south aspect glazing High efficiency lighting and automatic controls High Thermal performance façade with low U-values and high air tightness for reducing heat loss in winter High efficiency heating plant including gas fired boiler plant and pumps Provision of automatic controls systems to monitor and target energy consumption against benchmarks Natural ventilation to be employed as primary ventilation system reducing the need for mechanical cooling On site roof mounted Photovoltaics cells together with battery storage facility. Provision of heat recovery ventilation systems where required to ensure energy conservation in winter/heating season

slide-24
SLIDE 24

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

1 2 3 4 5 6

Delivering

slide-25
SLIDE 25

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

1

Delivering

slide-26
SLIDE 26

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

Delivering

slide-27
SLIDE 27

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

2

Delivering

slide-28
SLIDE 28

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

Delivering

slide-29
SLIDE 29

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

3

Delivering

slide-30
SLIDE 30

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

Delivering

slide-31
SLIDE 31

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

4

Delivering

slide-32
SLIDE 32

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

Delivering

slide-33
SLIDE 33

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

5

Delivering

slide-34
SLIDE 34

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

Delivering

slide-35
SLIDE 35

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

6

Delivering

slide-36
SLIDE 36

5.0 Visualisations

3D Visualisations

Delivering

slide-37
SLIDE 37

6.0 Summary

Traffic

  • A full Traffic Impact Assessment is currently being carried out. This will drive the final proposals for the

site access, parking arrangements and any associated works to the highways infrastructure.

Site Layout

  • Conclusion of the site analysis has further reinforced the ideal building location and associated external

realm adjacencies is as originally designed. This arrangement ensures the most effective environment for Education.

Aesthetic

  • Further consideration of building aesthetics based on community & DCfW feedback has concluded with

a pitched roof option and a more traditional palette of materials.

Delivering

We have considered all Community and Design Commission feedback provided during the Pre-Application process and, where feasible and appropriate have endeavoured to address shared concerns.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Thank you for listening

Delivering