Property Tax Working Group January 3, 2017 Adequacy Level and Local - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

property tax working group
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Property Tax Working Group January 3, 2017 Adequacy Level and Local - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

School Funding Commission Property Tax Working Group January 3, 2017 Adequacy Level and Local Effort Q. How well funded is the district with an ideal equalized local tax effort (LCT)? Q. How well funded is the district with the current tax


slide-1
SLIDE 1

School Funding Commission Property Tax Working Group

January 3, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Adequacy Level and Local Effort

  • Q. How well funded is the district with

an ideal equalized local tax effort (LCT)?

  • Q. How well funded is the district with

the current tax effort (Real Revenues)?

  • Q. How can we discount current tax

effort based on ideal local effort and %

  • f adequacy and promote potential

property tax relief?

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview of the Model

3

Loc Local l Cap Capacit ity: How much can the district contribute? Base Base Fun Fundin ing g Min Minim imum: How much does the state currently contribute? 1.

  • 1. Ade

Adequacy Tar arget: How much does providing high quality education cost? Gap to Adequacy

  • 2. Ad

Adequacy Le Level: How well- funded is the district?

100% of

  • f

Ad Adequacy Tar arget

slide-4
SLIDE 4

This model distributes dollars based on how adequately funded a district is. The current level of funding for a district is its Ade dequacy Level:

  • The Adequacy Level is calculated by determining a district’s current

level of state funding plus its current level of local funding and dividing this by the district’s Adequacy Target.

  • For example, if a district has an Adequacy Target of $12,000 and

receives $4,000 in local funding and $5,000 in state funding, its Adequacy Level would be 75%.

Adequacy Level

4

Local Funding + Current State Funding Adequacy Target Adequacy Level =

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Loc
  • cal

l Cap apacit ity Tar arget (L (LCT CT) is a calculation of local effort—the amount a district would ideally contribute towards its Adequacy Target

  • Calculating the Local Capacity Target:
  • Step

ep 1: 1: Calculate an Effort Index for each district

  • High effort index = greater expected contribution
  • Low effort index = low expected contribution
  • Step

ep 2: 2: Convert Effort Index to Local Capacity Target (LCT) by comparing all districts in the state

  • LCT represents the percent of local support a district should ideally contribute
  • No district will be expected to pay more than 90% of their adequacy target
  • Step

ep 3: 3: Adjust LCT to allow for equalization of tax rates and new funds

Effort In Index: 3 Year Average of EAV Adequacy Target Districts with higher property wealth are expected to contribute a greater % toward adequacy, while districts with greater adequacy needs contribute less.

5

How much can a district contribute?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How much can a district contribute?

  • Some districts collect Real Receipts* from local taxes that are above their

LCT, some collect Real Receipts below their LCT

  • For districts taxing below their LCT, the formula uses their calculated LCT.
  • This means that districts are responsible for a portion of how inadequately

funded they are.

  • However, as districts raise more revenue to reach their target, they will not lose

their spot in line for new state dollars.

  • For districts taxing above their LCT, EBM adjusts their real receipts

downwards towards their LCT.

  • Creates incentive for these districts to lower taxes because doing so will

increase their eligibility for state dollars.

  • Adjustment is based on how far a district is from reaching their Adequacy

Target, so districts that tax at high rates but are still far from adequacy get the biggest adjustment of real revenue towards their LCT.

6 *Calculation of real receipts can be found in Appendix

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Local Capacity Target Adjustment in Action

7

Local Capacity Target

10 100% 0% of

  • f

Ad Adequacy Tar arget

District Taxing Below LCT District Taxing Above LCT Real Receipts Adjusted Local Capacity

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Using the Preliminary Adequacy Level as a Discount Factor

  • Preliminary Adequacy Level is the district’s Adequacy Level in an ideal state
  • Calculation is LCT + CPPRT + Base Funding Minimum
  • This is the district’s percent of adequacy that would be funded if the district

were contributing its Local Capacity Target

  • This Preliminary Adequacy Level is used as a Discount Factor to make 2

adjustments in the model

  • In the calculation of a district’s Local Capacity, the Discount Factor is used to adjust

real revenue downwards toward the ideal LCT

  • In the calculation of the Base Funding Minimum, the Discount Factor is used to

decrease the amount of the previous year’s poverty supplemental grant in the calculation of how adequately funded a district currently is, allowing for a smoother transition from a formula that incorporates poverty concentration to one that does not

8

Using the Preliminary Adequacy Level as a Discount Factor means that adjustments to formula components are based on need.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Calculating Local Capacity (Over LCT Example)

9

TYP YPE EAV AVE VERAGE (G (Greater of

  • f 3

3 YR YR Averag age

  • r
  • r Prio

rior Yea ear) Ade dequacy Tar arget Effort In Index Unit $17,350,979 $5,285,866 3.283 St Step 1: 1: Calculate the Effort Index (EAV/Adequacy Target) St Step 2: 2: Convert Effort Index to Local Capacity Target (LCT) by comparing all districts in the state (normal distribution) Norm

  • rmali

lized Effort Ind Index = = LCT CT Per ercent Di Distric ict Ca Calc lculated LCT CT Amount 10.74% $567,458

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Calculating Local Capacity (contd.)

10

Current Local Receipts (EAV*OTR-Trans) Over-LCT Amount (Current Local Receipts – LCT) Discount Factor aka Preliminary Adequacy Level [(LCT + CPPRT + Base Funding Minimum)/Adequacy Target] $804,709 $237,251 62% St Step 3: 3: Adjust LCT to allow for greater equalization of state funds and potential tax relief. Adjusted LCT [LCT + (Over-LCT Amount x Discount Factor)] Final Adjusted LCT $567,458 + ($237,251 x 62%) = $715,078 $715,078

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Calculating Local Capacity (Under LCT Example)

11

TYP YPE EAV AVE VERAGE (3 (3 YR YR Average or

  • r Prio

rior Year ear if f 10% 10% les ess) Ade dequacy Tar arget Effort In Index Adj Adjusted Ind Index (x (x 9/ 9/13 El Elem, 4/ 4/13 HS HS) HS $443,290,161 $12,816,736 34.587 10.642 St Step 1: 1: Calculate the Effort Index (EAV/Adequacy Target) St Step 2: 2: Convert Effort Index to Local Capacity Target (LCT) by comparing all districts in the state (normal distribution) Norm

  • rmali

lized Effort Ind Index = = LCT CT Per ercent Di Distric ict Ca Calc lculated LCT CT Amount 45.77% $567,458

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Calculating Local Capacity (contd.)

12

Current Local Receipts (EAV*OTR-Trans) Over-LCT Amount (Current Local Receipts – LCT) Discount Factor aka Preliminary Adequacy Level [(LCT + CPPRT + Base Funding Minimum)/Adequacy Target] $527,990

  • $39,468

NA because current receipts less than LCT St Step 3: 3: Adjust LCT to allow for greater equalization of state funds and potential tax relief. Adjusted LCT [LCT + (Over-LCT Amount x Discount Factor)] Final LCT = Calculated Effort NA because current receipts less than LCT $567,458