properties of dusty highly luminous starbursts back to
play

Properties of Dusty, Highly-Luminous Starbursts Back to the First - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Properties of Dusty, Highly-Luminous Starbursts Back to the First Billion Years of Cosmic Time Dominik A. Riechers Cornell University SMG20 Twenty Years of Submillimetre Galaxies August 02, 2017 Molecular Gas 2x2 arcmin 2 AzTEC-3: Most


  1. Properties of Dusty, Highly-Luminous Starbursts Back to the First Billion Years of Cosmic Time Dominik A. Riechers Cornell University SMG20 – Twenty Years of Submillimetre Galaxies August 02, 2017

  2. Molecular Gas 2x2 arcmin 2 § AzTEC-3: Most Distant Massive Starburst Galaxy 2010-13 § M gas = 5.3 x 10 10 ( a co /0.8) M sun SFR: ~1100 M sun /yr …or >3 M sun / day § Early Galaxy Proto-Cluster : 11 star-forming galaxy companions within r~2 Mpc COSMOS/AzTEC-3 (z=5.3)

  3. Molecular Gas 2x2 arcmin 2 § AzTEC-3: Most Distant Massive Starburst Galaxy 2010-13 § M gas = 5.3 x 10 10 ( a co /0.8) M sun SFR: ~1100 M sun /yr …or >3 M sun / day § Early Galaxy Proto-Cluster : 11 star-forming galaxy companions within r~2 Mpc COSMOS/AzTEC-3 (z=5.3) § 2017: - 17 z>5 DSFGs (incl. 3 at z>6) - 1 ALMA (serendip.; 1 mm) - 11 strongly lensed - 1 AzTEC 1.1 mm - 3-4 weakly magnified - 2 SCUBA 850 µm - 2-3 unlensed - 6 SPT 1.4+2.0 mm - 7 Herschel/SPIRE “Red” 250-500 µm - 15/17 from “blind” CO redshifts Riechers et al. 2010, 2013, 2014, 2017abc*; Capak et al. 2011; Walter et al. 2012; Combes et al. 2012; Vieira/Weiss et al. 2013; Strandet et al. 2016, 2017; Pavesi et al. 2017*; Fudamoto et al. 2017; Zavala et al. 2017

  4. Riechers et al. 2013 § Most common UV/optical lines typically dust-obscured in DSFGs § DSFGs have rich (sub)millimeter/far-infrared spectra, even at z>6 Þ Main diagnostic tools to understand physical properties of intense star formation

  5. 250 - 7000 GHz Spilker et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2017 § Probing deeper/broader by utilizing stacked spectra of lensing-magnified sources Þ powerful tool to access fainter diagnostic lines … but what can we learn from these lines?

  6. cm/mm: rich in line + continuum diagnostics JWST SPICA ALMA+CCAT JVLA Cosmic Eyelash model SED CNO fine structure lines ISM gas coolant CO ‘ladder’ *model* total gas masses excitation, dynamics Thermal dust phys. conditions (young stars) Smail et al. 2011 star formation PAHs + SiL Swinbank et al. 2011 Synchrotron + Free-Free (AGN+SNR) star formation

  7. cm/mm: rich in line + continuum diagnostics JWST SPICA ALMA+CCAT JVLA Cosmic Eyelash model SED Riechers et al. 2014a CNO fine structure lines 6.2 µm PAH ISM gas coolant CO ‘ladder’ *model* total gas masses excitation, dynamics Thermal phys. conditions dust (young stars) Smail et al. 2011 star formation PAHs + SiL Swinbank et al. 2011 Synchrotron + Free-Free (AGN+SNR) star formation

  8. Carilli & Walter 2013 § >200 CO detections in DSFGs to date: - ~50 SCUBA + AzTEC + LABOCA (Bothwell+; Riechers+; Coppin+; Yun+; Huynh+, …) - ~100 Herschel (Harris+; Lupu+; Riechers+; Zavala+; Fudamoto+, …) - ~40 SPT (Weiss/Vieira+; Strandet+; Aravena+) - ~5 ACT (Su+; Roberts-Borsani+; …) - ~12 Planck (Canameras+; Harrington+) - several “misc” (Swinbank+; Lestrade+; Leung+; Tamura+; Karim+, …)

  9. Simplest Version of “Star Formation Law”: Spatially Integrated Observables log L FIR ~ proxy for SFR L’ CO vs. L FIR as a surrogate for M gas vs. SFR One super-linear relation or Two sequences ( quiescent / starburst ) Bimodal or running conversion factor starbursts starbursts e c n …many subtleties, but: e u High-z galaxies higher on both axes MS galaxies q e s Quiescent and Starburst Galaxies n i a m log L’ CO ~ proxy for M(H 2 ) Carilli & Walter 2013 ARAA; after Daddi et al. 2010, Genzel et al. 2010

  10. const.? • Star-forming galaxies show 10-30x higher gas fractions at z=1-3 compared to present day Increase in gas fraction likely dominantly responsible for increase in star formation history • Little evidence for significant redshift evolution in gas depletion timescales in starbursts • Þ Star formation activity is elevated, but underlying physics are similar Aravena et al. 2016 (see also Bothwell et al. 2013; Magdis et al. 2012)

  11. Riechers et al. (2011d, 2011f); see also: Ivison et al. (2011) Early stage Intermediate stage Late stage ~30kpc & 750km/s ~20kpc & <100km/s 7-15kpc nucleus & tidal structure separation separation single broad, multi-peaked line abundant low-excitation gas Submillimeter Galaxies: Gas-Rich Starbursts along the “Merger Sequence” at z>2? Ø Nearby major mergers show increased SF efficiency relative to disks Ø SMGs could be “scaled up” versions of nearby IR-luminous galaxies/mergers Line profile and gas dynamics sometimes show evidence for major mergers

  12. SDP-81 (z=3.0) Hodge et al. 2012 High-Resolution Molecular Line Spectroscopy w/ interferometers yields velocity fields Gas Kinematics: Evidence for 2-15 kpc, rotating gas disks in DSFGs ALMA collab. et al. 2015; Dye et al. 2015; Swinbank et al. 2015; see also Rybak et al. 2015; Hatsukade et al. 2015

  13. HFLS3 (z=6.34): - smooth velocity profile at 0.2” res. - high velocity dispersion across 3.5 kpc - superposition of two components with very different line widths Þ likely disturbed/interacting system Riechers et al. 2013b

  14. [CII] AzTEC-3 (z=5.30): - Little evidence for velocity gradient at 0.6” res. - high velocity dispersion across 4 kpc - Simple, broad symmetric line profile - nearby UV-bright companions 1000 km/s Þ likely disturbed/interacting system Riechers et al. 2014b

  15. Carilli & Walter 2013 § 4 HCN & 4 HCO + & 2 HNC detections in DSFGs to date: - SMM J2135-0102 (z=2.3; HCN, tentative ; Danielson et al. 2011) - SDP 9 & 11 (z~1.7; 2x HCN, 2x HCO + , 1x HNC; Oteo et al. 2017) - ACT J0210+0015 (z~2.6; HCN, HCO + , HNC; Riechers+) - Planck G092.5+42.9 (z~3.3; HCO + ; Riechers+) also: several S/N~3 features in SPT stack (Spilker et al. 2014)

  16. Example: HFLS3 (z=6.34): 7 H 2 O lines detected up to E upper ~ 450 K, (shallow) coverage of 22 lines up to E upper > 1200 K Lines seen in emission, approaching strengths comparable to the brightest CO lines Þ Given the large difference in n crit to CO, significant collisional excitation is unlikely Þ H 2 O excitation is indistinguishable from Arp 220 Þ Consistent with radiative excitation in warm, obscured starburst Riechers et al. 2013b

  17. Linear relations: - H 2 O lines dominated by FIR pumping H 2 O traces dense, warm gas at high t dust - Yang et al. 2016

  18. Carilli & Walter 2013 § >60 [CII] detections in DSFGs to date § (much) smaller samples for [OI]63, [OIII]88, [NII]122 & 205 [CII] associated with multiple ISM phases (neutral/ionized gas, star forming regions…) à need multiple lines to study ISM actual properties

  19. CI à CII @11.26 eV à [CII] from PDR+HII HI à HII @ 13.6 eV NI à NII @14.53 eV à [NII] from HII only [CII] 158µm & [NII] 205 µm have similar critical density in HII regions à [CII]/[NII] ratio gives fraction of [CII] from neutral vs. ionized ISM à [NII]122/[NII]205 gives HII region density

  20. Observed: [CII], [NII]122, [NII]205 Have: - [CII] fraction from PDRs - HII region density [OI] from PDRs à [CII]/[OI] sensitive to PDR density

  21. • CLOUDY models: LOW [CII] High density and radiation from ionized intensity à high [CII]/[NII] gas • Similar ratio in nearby ULIRGs, dusty LBGs, DSFGs, QSOs à [NII] coming from diffuse (non-starbursting) gas • high [CII]/[NII] in dust-poor LBGs à similar to nearby HIGH [CII] low-metallicity dwarfs from ionized gas Updated from Pavesi, DR et al. 2016

  22. Cormier et al. 2015 metallicity metallicity ~T dust [CII]/[NII] not very sensitive to T dust & lines have similar n crit in HII regions [CII]/[NII] appears to rise steeply with metallicity à Fraction of [CII] from HII regions seems to decrease à Low [NII] thus may indicate that most N (and C, O) in higher ionization state à Consistent with rising [OIII]/[NII] & [OIII]/[CII] with metallicity

  23. Assuming [CI] is optically-thin and has a standard abundance: ~2-3x higher inferred M(H 2 ) than with standard a CO à either CO underpredicts gas mass, or C has higher than nominal abundance à M. Bothwell’s talk Bothwell et al. 2017 (see also Weiss et al. 2005; Riechers et al. 2009)

  24. M100 Herschel/SPIRE ALMA Spectral Energy Distribution Credits: X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO/D.Patnaude et al, Optical: ESO/VLT, Infrared: NASA/JPL/Caltech Flux density 250 350 500 µm wavelength - idea: z>4 galaxy dust SEDs preferentially peak beyond 500 µm Þ can use (sub)mm colors to determine reasonable photometric redshifts Þ “red” sources are strong candidates for starbursts at the earliest epochs Riechers et al. 2013b

  25. 10 10 SPIRE-Red SPIRE-Red SPIRE+SPT-Red 14 SPT SPT-Red 8 8 12 10 6 6 8 N N N 4 4 6 4 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 redshift redshift redshift SPT vs. Herschel-Red selection (CO spec-z only): - strongly overlapping, but different redshift distributions - indistinguishable when only taking “red” SPT sources Þ perhaps not surprising: preferentially followed up 870 µ m/1.3mm-bright Herschel-Red sources Þ Combine samples to obtain median redshift: z med =4.42

  26. Beyond Herschel-Red Selection: Red source(s) w/ SEDs rising to 870 µm Only 1/300 red sources followed up over ~1000 deg 2 w/ SCUBA-2/LABOCA: Unlensed Hyper-LIRG: 25 mJy @870 µm Riechers et al. 2017a

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend