project tartan preliminary design review pdr vehicle
play

Project TARTAN: Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Vehicle Summary: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Project TARTAN: Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Vehicle Summary: Dimensions and Materials Parameter Value Length 121 Outer Diameter 6.112 Inner Diameter 6 Materials Carbon Fiber / G12 Fiberglass Mass Dry: 454 oz Wet: 584 oz


  1. Project TARTAN: Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

  2. Vehicle Summary: Dimensions and Materials Parameter Value Length 121” Outer Diameter 6.112” Inner Diameter 6” Materials Carbon Fiber / G12 Fiberglass Mass Dry: 454 oz Wet: 584 oz 2

  3. Vehicle Summary: Stability Margin Parameter Value Static Stability Margin 2.63 CP (from Nose Cone) 93.874” CG (from Nose Cone) Dry: 73.076” Wet: 77.797” 3

  4. Vehicle Summary: Motor & Launch Considerations Motor: Aerotech L830W Apogee with L850W: 5,762 ft Bring down to 5,280 using ● Apogee Targeting System Rationale: Apogee with ballast within ● range of ATS correction 5,400-6,000ft ○ 4

  5. Launch 1. Nose Cone and Airframe 2. Payload and Payload Vehicle Deployment 3. Recovery Overview 4. ATS & Motor Retention 5

  6. Launch Vehicle Schematic { { { { Nose Cone Payload & Recovery Payload Deployment ATS & Motor Mount System 6

  7. Vehicle Alternative Designs: Nose Cone Fiberglass vs. Carbon Fiber ● Public Missiles vs. Madcow ● Considerations ● Size ○ Price ○ Compatability with Electronics ○ Unintentional RF Shielding ○ 7

  8. Vehicle Alternative Designs: Airframe Materials ● G10/G12 Fiberglass vs Carbon Fiber ○ Benefits to Carbon Fiber ● Stronger → Thinner Airframe → Lighter ○ Drawbacks to Carbon Fiber ● Expensive ○ Difficult to work with ○ 8

  9. Launch Vehicle Schematic { { { { Nose Cone Payload & Recovery Payload Deployment ATS & Motor Mount System 9

  10. Payload: Rover Two-Wheeled Option Four-Wheeled Option With Auger With Reversible Scoop 10

  11. Payload: Deployment Payload with spring loaded deployment mechanism Locking Mechanism to prevent premature firing 11

  12. Launch Vehicle Schematic { { { { Nose Cone Payload & Recovery Payload Deployment ATS & Motor Mount System 12

  13. Recovery: Recovery Bay Recovery Bay ● RF Shielding: Aluminum Shield Tape ○ Additive Aerospace Sled vs Made-In-House ○ Materials: PLA vs. Acrylic vs. Aluminum ■ Electronics ○ Leading Altimeter: PerfectFlite Stratologger CF ■ Independent Systems ■ Duracell 9V Battery ■ 13

  14. Recovery: Redundant Systems 14

  15. Recovery: Parachutes Drogue ● SkyAngle Classic I 24” ○ Terminal Velocity: 94.1 ft/s ○ Main ● FruityChute Iris Ultra 96” ○ Terminal Velocity: 16.4 ft/s ○ Maximum Landing Kinetic Energy: 65.28 ft-lbs ○ 15

  16. Recovery: GPS Telemetry Location: Payload Deployment Bay (Fiberglass) ● 19” away from nearest e-match in main parachute bay ○ Will use RF shielding to prevent premature deployment of main ○ parachute Model: BigRedBee 70cm 100mW GPS/APRS Transmitter ● Can transmit on any frequency in 125 Hz steps ○ 16

  17. Launch Vehicle Schematic { { { { Nose Cone Payload & Recovery Payload Deployment ATS & Motor Mount System 17

  18. Apogee Targeting System (ATS) Overview The ATS is an airbrake system designed to regulate the velocity of ● the rocket in flight. It consists of a set of four motor flaps that extend from the sides of ● the rocket to generate drag, slowing the rocket to ensure that it achieves the target apogee of 5280 ft. The extension of the flaps is determined by a control algorithm that ● uses data from an altimeter system and an inertial measurement unit. 18

  19. ATS Physical Design The air brake deployment system consists ● of a central rotation hub, the attached rotation piece, 4 connecting arms, 4 flaps, and 4 flap guides. Our current flap design is a rectangular ● shaped flap with a curved outer edge. While similar to our first flap design, this ● flap has the key advantage of having extra surface area and endure more force. 19

  20. ATS Algorithm Design The algorithm begins collecting data after motor burnout. ● The system will average measurements of multiple sensors or utilize ● a Kalman filter to clean the data. Drag force is calculated based on measured velocity and current flap ● extension. Based on the drag force, the current altitude, and the velocity the ● system will predict the estimated apogee. After apogee calculation, the system adjusts flap extension ● accordingly, feeds back the data, and repeats the process. 20

  21. Motor Retention System Thrust Plate ● 6061 vs 7075 ○ Thickness ○ Easy to manufacture ○ CNC Capabilities ○ 75mm flanged motor retainer and ● cap Very hard to manufacture ○ Reliable ○ 21

  22. Mission 1. Apogee Performance 2. Kinetic Energy & Descent 3. Drift Predictions 22

  23. Apogee Overall goal: 5,280 ft ● Current Apogee w/ L850W & no ballast: 5,762 ft ● Ballast to bring apogee within a few hundred feet of goal ○ ATS brings it down to actual goal ○ 23

  24. Kinetic Energy & Descent Landing Kinetic Energy ● Upper: 44.5 ft-lbs ○ Middle: 51.87 ft-lbs ○ Lower: 65.28 ft-lbs ○ RasAero Simulation: ● Descent Time: 83s ○ 24

  25. Drift OpenRocket Simulations ● Max 1,790ft ○ 20mph launching ○ downwind 25

  26. Quick update: Most requirements pertain ● to design of rocket and its Requirements design process. Requirements are kept in ● Verification mind during design process Internal design stop: ● December 6th 26

  27. Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend