Profitable Pre$ervation Accessing Historic Tax Credits Jason Yots, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

profitable pre ervation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Profitable Pre$ervation Accessing Historic Tax Credits Jason Yots, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Profitable Pre$ervation Accessing Historic Tax Credits Jason Yots, Preservation Studios www.preservationstudios.com Historic Tax Credits 2012 - By The Numbers 57,783 - Jobs created by HTCs 17,991 - Housing units created with HTCs (47% of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Profitable Pre$ervation

Accessing Historic Tax Credits

Jason Yots, Preservation Studios www.preservationstudios.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Historic Tax Credits 2012 - By The Numbers

57,783 - Jobs created by HTCs 17,991 - Housing units created with HTCs (47% of HTCs) 35% - Portion of that housing that is low-mod income $5.23 - Average HTC project cost (millions) $5.33 - Total HTC investment (billions) $1,045,255 - Average HTC project award (federal)

Source: National Park Service’s 2012 Annual Report on the HTC Program

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Historic Tax Credit Feasibility 3 Threshold Questions

Is your building eligible? Does your rehabilitation work qualify? Do you need tax credits, cash or both?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Historic Tax Credit Eligibility 3 Possible Paths

Individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places Contribution to an historic district listed in the NRHP Contribution to a “tax certified” local historic district

www.nps.gov/nr/

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Historic Rehabilitation Qualification The (Other) 10 Commandments

  • Dept. of Interior’s Standards for Treatment of

Historic Properties ... Rehabilitation (10) Preservation Briefs (47) Interpreting the Standards Bulletins (55)

www.nps.gov/TPS/tax-incentives.htm

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Using Historic Tax Credits 2 Options to Realize Value

Fund the rehabilitation project and then claim the HTCs (for the year the project is placed-in- service) Syndicate the HTCs to an investor and receive discounted equity (in milestone installments during the project)

HTC FAQs – www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/faqrehab.pdf

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND REFUNDABLE CREDITS

NYSAFAH Upstate Conference October 16, 2013 Prepared by: James S. DeBellis, CPA Salmin, Celona, Wehrle & Flaherty, LLP jdebellis@scwf-cpa.com

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Two types of Federal Historic Rehabilitation Credits 10% Credit

  • Building first placed in service prior to 1936.
  • Not listed on National Register of Historic Places or

not located in a Historic District.

  • Use must be Commercial.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

20% Credit

  • Must be a Certified Historic Structure.
  • Listed on National Register of Historic Places
  • r located in a Registered Historic District.
  • Use can be either Commercial or Residential.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Substantial Rehabilitation

  • Qualified Rehabilitation Expenses (QREs) must

exceed greater of $5,000 or the adjusted basis of the building at the beginning of the 24 month measuring period.

  • Eligible QREs include amounts incurred prior to

the first day of the 24 measuring period, during the 24 month measuring period and after the 24 month measuring period through December 31 of the year in which the 24 month period ends.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Alternate 60 Month Measuring Period for “Phased Rehabilitation”

  • Requirement that before the rehabilitation

begins, written plans exist showing the Rehab is expected to be completed in phases and is reasonably expected to take more than 24 months.

  • Must formally elect to use the 60 month

period.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Use of Multiple 24 Month measuring periods

  • Used to claim Historic credits in multiple years when

the 60 month period is not elected.

  • Example – Acquire four story building in Dec 2012

for $100K. Top three floors will be residential and first floor will be commercial. Incur $1Mil of QREs to rehab residential space and place in service on 12- 15-14 ($200K of QRES incurred between Jan and June 2013). Incur $400K of QRE’s for commercial space in 2015 and place in service 6-30-15.

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • First measuring period Dec 2012 – November 2014.
  • Adjusted basis at beginning of first measuring period

is $100K.

  • Eligible QREs during the measurement period are

$1mil.

  • Credits allowed in 2014 based on $1mil of QREs.
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Second Measuring period July 2013 – June 2015.
  • Adjusted basis at beginning of second measuring

period is $300K (Acq - $100K plus $200K prior to beginning of second 24 month measuring period).

  • Total cost incurred during second measuring period

are $1.2mil ($800K of residential plus $400K of commerical.

  • Since $1.2 mil of costs during second measuring

period exceeds adjusted basis of $300K, substantial rehabilitation rule is met.

  • Credits allowed in 2015 based on $400K of QREs.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

What qualifies as Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures - QREs

  • QREs are costs chargeable to a capital account in

connection with the rehabilitation of a qualifying building.

  • Only rehabilitation costs subject to 27.5 and 39 year

straight line depreciation.

  • Hard costs such as windows, doors, walls, ceilings, floors,

HVAC, plumbing, elevators, etc.

  • Soft cost directly related to the building such as architect &

engineering fees, reasonable developer fees, real estate taxes, interest and utilities incurred during the construction period, amortized construction loan costs incurred during the construction period, etc.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What doesn’t qualify as a QRE

  • Land and related costs
  • Building Acquisition and related costs
  • Site improvements and Landscaping
  • Enlargements
  • Personal property – appliances, equipment, etc.
  • Tax exempt use property
slide-18
SLIDE 18

When is Credit allowed

  • In the year the building is placed in service.
  • Placed In Service means that all or portions of

the building is placed in a condition of readiness and is available for a specifically assigned function.

  • There is a five year recapture period.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Types of Entity structures used Single entity

  • Usually through the use of a Limited Partnership

(LP) or an LLC.

  • Investor has 99.99% ownership interest.
  • Project developer has .01% ownership interest.
  • For tax depreciation purposes, must reduce basis
  • f the building by the full amount of the credit.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Master Lease Structure

  • Landlord Entity (LP or LLC) owns the building and

performs the rehabilitation.

  • Typically owned 90% by developer and 10% by Master

Tenant.

  • Master Tenant Entity (another LP or LLC) is responsible

for the operations of the building. Typically owned 99.99% by investor and .01% by developer.

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Master tenant leases the entire project from the

Landlord Entity for a fixed annual rent.

  • IRS allows the Landlord Entity to make a tax election

to pass the Historic Tax Credit through to the Master Tenant.

  • No building basis reduction required for depreciation.
  • Master Tenant Entity must include in gross income

each year, a ratable amount of the Historic credit over the tax depreciation life of the building (either 27.5 or 39 years).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Tax Exempt Use Issues

  • Eligible QREs do not include expenditures

allocable to “Tax Exempt Use” property.

  • Who is a Tax Exempt Entity
  • US Government and any state or local

agency - 501(c)(3) organization

  • Any foreign person or entity
  • Any Indian tribal government
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Residential Property

  • Tax exempt use property equals “the portion
  • f any tangible property” leased to a tax

exempt entity.

  • If 20% of residential space is leased to a tax

exempt entity, then 20% of otherwise allowable QREs will not be eligible for the credit.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Nonresidential Property

  • Property leased to a tax exempt entity in a

“disqualified lease” is treated as Tax Exempt Use property.

  • Exception – Only Tax Exempt Use property if the

portion of property leased to tax exempt entities under disqualified leases is more than 50 percent

  • f the property (35 percent prior to 2008).
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Disqualified Lease is any lease of the property to a tax exempt entity in which

  • The project utilized tax exempt financing and the tax

exempt entity participated in the financing.

  • The lease contains a fixed purchase price or an option

to buy.

  • The lease term is in excess of 20 years.
  • There was a sale/leaseback with the Tax Exempt

entity and the tax exempt entity used the property prior to the sale.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Partnerships & LLC’s with Tax exempt entities as

  • wners.
  • Tax Exempt use property to the extent any allocation
  • f partnership items to an exempt owner is not a

“qualified allocation”.

  • Qualified Allocation – all partnership items are

allocated to the tax exempt in the same proportion throughout its time of ownership.

  • If one or more partnership items are or can be

allocated disproportionately, tax exempt use property will be equal to highest allocable share of any item.

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Also applies to Tax Exempt Controlled

entities.

  • Tax exempt controlled entity is any

corporation in which 50% or more of the stock is held by one or more tax exempt entities.

  • Tax exempt controlled entity can make a Code

168(H) election to be taxed as a for profit entity to prevent tax exempt use status.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

New York State Historic Tax Credit

  • Credit is equal to 100% of the Federal credit subject

to a maximum of $5 million per structure for tax years beginning before January 1, 2020.

  • For tax years beginning January 1, 2020, the credit

will equal 30% of the Federal credit subject to a maximum of $100,000.

  • Building must be located in a qualified census track

as determined by NYS.

  • For tax years beginning January 1, 2015, the credit

will be refundable.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Historic Preservation Illustrated

John Oster, Edgemere October 16, 2013

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Edgemere is a housing developer Primary business: to equip our clients with the instrumental services necessary to enable them to develop residential projects

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Edgemere since 2001

  • Units

1,464

  • Total cost

$237,477,956

  • Concessionary loans/grants

$74,663,165

  • Federal/state housing credits $108,482,610
  • Historic credits

$9,865,746

  • Private ivestment

$96,156,417

  • Section 8 vouchers

355

  • Tax-exempt bonds (C&P)

$70,160,000

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Muldoon Gardens

Total cost 9,110,743 Permanent sources NYSHTF 1,534,184 FHLB 279,000 Interim income 21,779 Investor equity 6,819,070 Deferred development fee 456,710 Total permanent sources 9,110,743

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Equity

Proceeds from federal historic credit $0.95 1,430,400 Proceeds from upward adjuster $0.95 107,186 Proceeds from state historic credit $0.58 873,297 Proceeds from upward adjuster $0.58 65,440 Proceeds from federal low income credit $0.93 4,309,606 Proceeds from upward adjuster $0.54 33,140 Total investor equity 6,819,069

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Obstacles to conversions

  • Objections to Register listing (and therefore tax credits)
  • Participation of unprepared nonprofit sponsors – the Road to Hell is paved

with good intentions

  • Onerous preservation requirements
  • Architectural unsuitability – e.g. unworkable fenestration, unusable building

depth, lack of accessibility, excessive common space

  • Inadequate capitalization – too much debt, too small reserves
  • Inadequate discovery
  • Multiple environmental issues
  • Outrageous high costs
  • Marginal locations
  • Green vs Preservation issues e.g. insulation, penetrations, windows
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Reasons to do them anyway

  • For the challenge
  • Making money – more cost should equal more

markup

  • Interesting architecture and units
  • Solid structures – they don’t build ‘em like this

anymore

  • Higher equity, which should mean less debt
  • Warm fuzzies: community benefits, people love

them

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Many thanks to NYSAFAH and my fellow Exemplary Panelists! Edgemere Development 585-325-1450 john@edgemere.com stephanie@edgemere.com

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Nicholas V. Petragnani, Jr., SVP 315 North Clinton Street Syracuse, NY 13202 315-476-3173 npet etrag agnani nani@com

  • mmuni

unityp yp.com com www.com

  • mmun

unityp. yp.com com

Upstate New York Affordable Housing Conference

Historic Preservation & Refundable Credits October 16, 2013

slide-41
SLIDE 41

About CPC

 Not-for-profit corporation established in 1974 to provide financing to enable the development and ownership of low /

moderate income housing in New York State

 Loans are for subsidized and non-subsidized properties/projects  Our financing is provided by a consortium of 70 prominent banks, insurance companies and pension funds  Since inception, CPC has contributed over $8 billion to the preservation or creation of nearly 145,000 units of affordable

housing, initiated numerous downtown revitalizations, and improved the quality and energy efficiency of the multifamily stock.

 In Syracuse, Rochester & Buffalo, CPC has invested over $690 million in more than 16,000  Primary Focus:

  • Construction & Permanent Financing
  • Historic Renovation
  • Supportive Housing
  • Green Financing Initiatives
  • Freddie Mac Financing

 Upstate Investors Include:

  • New York State CRF
  • United Methodist Church
  • Freddie Mac
  • Collateral Trust Notes

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

 Across New York State, new and strategic housing investments that focus on historic revitalization have spurred

advanced downtown infrastructures.

 Downtown districts in cities rich with history, such as Syracuse, Buffalo, and Rochester are on the rise and

experiencing a rebirth, reminiscent of their prime at the turn of the twentieth century. Suburbia & Disinvestment

 The rise of suburbia after World War II caused the decline of these Upstate downtowns.  Cars became the preferred mode of transportation & suburban life became a nationwide trend.  Shopping malls developed to serve the growing suburban population.

Recognizing Historic Buildings and their Potential

 Early 2000: local governments recognized the growing need to revitalize their Main Streets to keep local economies viable.  Municipalities saw the value of utilizing innovative funding sources and private-public partnerships to help restore downtown.  One of the most important factors in the revitalization effort has been the investment in and creation of attractive housing stock

in these downtowns to create density and support convenience in upstate cities.

Historic Preservation & Adaptive Reuse

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Historic Preservation - A Lender’s Perspective

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Historic Preservation & Adaptive Reuse – A Lender’s Perspective

THE CHALLENGE

 High rehabilitation/construction costs  Pioneering projects in emerging neighborhoods  Hard to support rental rates  Financing gaps

PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS

 PILOT agreements/tax abatements, i.e. 485a  Incentives - $$$  Acquisition  Infrastructure improvements

44 44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Historic Preservation & Adaptive Reuse – A Lender’s Perspective

DEVELOPMENT TEAM

 Experienced Architect  Experienced Contractor/Construction Manager  Legal Counsel  Tax Credit Consultant/Accountant

DEAL COMPONENTS

 Part I, Part II and Part III  Commitment from a Syndicator/Investor with terms and equity pay-in schedule  Operating agreement or two-tier lease agreement with Investor

45 45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

CPC’s Work with Historic Preservation & Adaptive Reuse

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Map of Downtown Syracuse

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Pike Block Project

48

Pike Block Project: – CPC construction financing commitment totaling $13.7 million, with a SONYMA-Insured Pension Fund Permanent Mortgage take

  • ut of $9.6 million

– Acquisition, construction & conversion of four-buildings, essential to rebirth of South Salina Street in the heart of Downtown Syracuse – Project received federal & state historic tax credits; additional incentives & grants from NY State, City of Syracuse, Onondaga County, the Downtown Committee & National Grid were provided – Former department & other retail stores on site, built in late 1800s, will become new, mixed-use development with 78 market rate housing units with 4 three-bedroom units, 41 two-bedroom units, and 33 one-bedroom units with green components

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Dey’s Centennial Plaza, Syracuse

49

401 South Salina Street – CPC Construction Financing: $6,200,000 – Participants: M&T Bank, Pathfinder, Alliance Bank (construction and perm loan) – 45 market-rate units – Gut rehab of historic Dey Brothers department store comprised of four contiguous six- to eight- story masonry mixed-use buildings constructed in 1893 – Developers purchased site from the City of Syracuse & converted long vacant office space into mixed one- and two-bedroom residential units – 155,000sf of commercial/retail space of which 145,000sf is currently occupied

slide-50
SLIDE 50

13 South Fitzhugh Street – CPC construction financing: $3.7M & CPC SONYMA-insured Pension Fund permanent financing: $3.25M – The City of Rochester & New York State’s Empire State Development Corporation have committed an $800,000 Restore NY grant and a $700,000 construction bridge loan – Project will also receive Federal and State Historic Tax Credit equity The Academy Building, Rochester

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

391 Washington Street – CPC NYS Pension Fund Permanent Financing: $11.052M, insured by SONYMA – M&T Bank: $17.9M in construction financing for the residential units – National Grid Grant: $250,000 – Historic Tax Credit Equity (syndicated by Foss & Company): $10.752M – Transformation of historic building built in 1901 into 115 state-of-the-art apartments, while serving as a 34-room boutique hotel and provider of retail / banquet space Hotel @ The Lafayette, Buffalo

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Nicholas V. Petragnani, Jr., SVP 315 North Clinton Street Syracuse, NY 13202 315-476-3173 npet etrag agnani nani@com

  • mmuni

unityp yp.com com www.com

  • mmun

unityp. yp.com com

THANK YOU! QUESTIONS?