products of idempotent matrices over pr fer domains
play

Products of idempotent matrices over Prfer domains Laura Cossu - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Products of idempotent matrices over Prfer domains Laura Cossu based on a joint work with P . Zanardo Conference on Rings and Factorizations Graz, February 19-23, 2018 The property (ID n ) 2 of 21 The property (ID n ) The property (ID n )


  1. Products of idempotent matrices over Prüfer domains Laura Cossu based on a joint work with P . Zanardo Conference on Rings and Factorizations Graz, February 19-23, 2018

  2. The property (ID n ) 2 of 21

  3. The property (ID n ) The property (ID n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (ID n ) if any singular (det = 0) n × n matrix over R is a product of idempotent matrices. 2 of 21

  4. The property (ID n ) The property (ID n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (ID n ) if any singular (det = 0) n × n matrix over R is a product of idempotent matrices. I dempotent matrix : square matrix M such that M 2 = M . 2 of 21

  5. The property (ID n ) The property (ID n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (ID n ) if any singular (det = 0) n × n matrix over R is a product of idempotent matrices. I dempotent matrix : square matrix M such that M 2 = M . Standard form of a 2 × 2 non-identity idempotent matrix over R : � a b � , with a (1 − a ) = bc . c 1 − a 2 of 21

  6. Motivations and first results The problem of characterizing integral domains satisfying property (ID n ) has been considered since the middle of the 1960’s: 3 of 21

  7. Motivations and first results The problem of characterizing integral domains satisfying property (ID n ) has been considered since the middle of the 1960’s: J.A. E rdos , On products of idempotent matrices, Glasgow Math. J., 8: 118–122 , 1967. - Fields satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. 3 of 21

  8. Motivations and first results The problem of characterizing integral domains satisfying property (ID n ) has been considered since the middle of the 1960’s: J.A. E rdos , On products of idempotent matrices, Glasgow Math. J., 8: 118–122 , 1967. - Fields satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. T.J. L affey , Products of idempotent matrices, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 14 (4): 309–314 , 1983. - Euclidean domains satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. 3 of 21

  9. Motivations and first results The problem of characterizing integral domains satisfying property (ID n ) has been considered since the middle of the 1960’s: J.A. E rdos , On products of idempotent matrices, Glasgow Math. J., 8: 118–122 , 1967. - Fields satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. T.J. L affey , Products of idempotent matrices, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 14 (4): 309–314 , 1983. - Euclidean domains satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. J. F ountain , Products of idempotent integer matrices, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 110: 431–441 , 1991. - (ID n ) is equivalent to other properties in the class of PID’s. - The ring of integers Z and DVR’s satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. 3 of 21

  10. (ID n ) and (GE n ) in Bézout domains 4 of 21

  11. (ID n ) and (GE n ) in Bézout domains The property (GE n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (GE n ) if any invertible n × n matrix over R is a product of elementary matrices. 4 of 21

  12. (ID n ) and (GE n ) in Bézout domains The property (GE n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (GE n ) if any invertible n × n matrix over R is a product of elementary matrices. N ote : fields and Euclidean domains satisfy (GE n ) for every n > 0, not every PID satisfies (GE n ) for every n > 0. 4 of 21

  13. (ID n ) and (GE n ) in Bézout domains The property (GE n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (GE n ) if any invertible n × n matrix over R is a product of elementary matrices. N ote : fields and Euclidean domains satisfy (GE n ) for every n > 0, not every PID satisfies (GE n ) for every n > 0. Theorem (Ruitenburg - 1993) For a Bézout domain R (every f.g. ideal of R is principal) TFAE: (i) R satisfies (GE n ) for every integer n > 0; (ii) R satisfies (ID n ) for every integer n > 0. W. R uitenburg , Products of idempotent matrices over Hermite domains, Semigroup Forum, 46(3): 371–378 , 1993. 4 of 21

  14. Lifting properties 5 of 21

  15. Lifting properties If R is a Bézout domain: - R satisfies (ID 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (ID n ) for all n > 0 (Laffey’s lift - 1983); 5 of 21

  16. Lifting properties If R is a Bézout domain: - R satisfies (ID 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (ID n ) for all n > 0 (Laffey’s lift - 1983); - R satisfies (GE 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (GE n ) for all n > 0 (Kaplansky’s lift -1949). 5 of 21

  17. Lifting properties If R is a Bézout domain: - R satisfies (ID 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (ID n ) for all n > 0 (Laffey’s lift - 1983); - R satisfies (GE 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (GE n ) for all n > 0 (Kaplansky’s lift -1949). Thus, in a Bézout domain (ID 2 ) ⇔ (ID n ) ∀ n ⇔ (GE n ) ∀ n ⇔ (GE 2 ) . 5 of 21

  18. Lifting properties If R is a Bézout domain: - R satisfies (ID 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (ID n ) for all n > 0 (Laffey’s lift - 1983); - R satisfies (GE 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (GE n ) for all n > 0 (Kaplansky’s lift -1949). Thus, in a Bézout domain (ID 2 ) ⇔ (ID n ) ∀ n ⇔ (GE n ) ∀ n ⇔ (GE 2 ) . N ote : (GE 2 ) � (ID 2 ) outside Bézout domains: local non-valuation domains satisfy (GE 2 ) but not (ID 2 ). 5 of 21

  19. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout Q uestion : What about (ID n ) outside the class of Bézout domains? 6 of 21

  20. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout Q uestion : What about (ID 2 ) outside the class of Bézout domains? 6 of 21

  21. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout Q uestion : What about (ID 2 ) outside the class of Bézout domains? Theorem (Bhaskara Rao - 2009) Let R be a projective-free domain (every projective R -module is free). If R satisfies property (ID 2 ), then R is a Bézout do- main. .S. B haskara R ao , Products of idempotent matrices over integral domains, Linear K.P Algebra Appl., 430(10): 2690–2695 , 2009. 6 of 21

  22. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout Q uestion : What about (ID 2 ) outside the class of Bézout domains? Theorem (Bhaskara Rao - 2009) Let R be a projective-free domain (every projective R -module is free). If R satisfies property (ID 2 ), then R is a Bézout do- main. .S. B haskara R ao , Products of idempotent matrices over integral domains, Linear K.P Algebra Appl., 430(10): 2690–2695 , 2009. This result and those by Laffey and Ruitenburg suggested the following: Conjecture (Salce, Zanardo - 2014) If an integral domain R satisfies property (ID 2 ), then it is a Bézout domain. L. S alce , P . Z anardo , Products of elementary and idempotent matrices over integral domains, Linear Algebra Appl., 452:130–152 , 2014. 6 of 21

  23. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout N ote : - In view of Laffey’s lift, if this conjecture would be true, then every domain satisfying property (ID 2 ) would satisfy property (ID n ) for any n > 0. 7 of 21

  24. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout N ote : - In view of Laffey’s lift, if this conjecture would be true, then every domain satisfying property (ID 2 ) would satisfy property (ID n ) for any n > 0. - (GE 2 ) � Bézout Local non-valuation domains are non-Bézout domains satisfying (GE 2 ). 7 of 21

  25. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout N ote : - In view of Laffey’s lift, if this conjecture would be true, then every domain satisfying property (ID 2 ) would satisfy property (ID n ) for any n > 0. - (GE 2 ) � Bézout Local non-valuation domains are non-Bézout domains satisfying (GE 2 ). E xamples : Unique factorization domains Projective-free domains Local domains + (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout PRINC domains (introduced by Salce and Zanardo) 7 of 21

  26. (ID 2 ) ⇒ Prüfer Our first result in support of the conjecture is the following Theorem 1 If R is an integral domain satisfying property (ID 2 ), then R is a Prüfer domain (a domain in which every finitely generated ideal is invertible). 8 of 21

  27. (ID 2 ) ⇒ Prüfer Our first result in support of the conjecture is the following Theorem 1 If R is an integral domain satisfying property (ID 2 ), then R is a Prüfer domain (a domain in which every finitely generated ideal is invertible). Thus, it is not restrictive to study the conjecture inside the class of Prüfer domains. 8 of 21

  28. Sketch of the proof of Th.1 Idea of the proof of Theorem 1: we first prove as a preliminary result that, given a , b ∈ R non-zero a b � � product of idempotents ⇒ ( a , b ) invertible. 0 0 9 of 21

  29. Sketch of the proof of Th.1 Idea of the proof of Theorem 1: we first prove as a preliminary result that, given a , b ∈ R non-zero a b � � product of idempotents ⇒ ( a , b ) invertible. 0 0 If we assume that R has (ID 2 ), then every two-generated ideal of R is invertible. 9 of 21

  30. Sketch of the proof of Th.1 Idea of the proof of Theorem 1: we first prove as a preliminary result that, given a , b ∈ R non-zero a b � � product of idempotents ⇒ ( a , b ) invertible. 0 0 If we assume that R has (ID 2 ), then every two-generated ideal of R is invertible. We conclude since R is a Prüfer domain iff every two-generated ideal of R is invertible. 9 of 21

  31. A new relation between (ID 2 ) and (GE 2 ) 10 of 21

  32. A new relation between (ID 2 ) and (GE 2 ) Proving a preliminary technical result and using a characterization of the property (GE 2 ) over an arbitrary domain proved by Salce and Zanardo in 2014, we get that Theorem 2 If an integral domain R satisfies property (ID 2 ), then it also satisfies property (GE 2 ). 10 of 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend