PRISM
P R E S E N T A T I O N B U I L D E R B Y L O U I S T W E L V E
Jobcosting Strategy
Mike Lysecki CTO, LMN
PRISM Jobcosting Strategy P R E S E N T A T I O N B U I L D E R - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
1 PRISM Jobcosting Strategy P R E S E N T A T I O N B U I L D E R Mike Lysecki B Y L O U I S T W E L V E CTO, LMN 2 Advanced Jobcosting Strategy Why do we Jobcost? How should we jobcost? How can we use Jobcosting to make better
P R E S E N T A T I O N B U I L D E R B Y L O U I S T W E L V E
Jobcosting Strategy
Mike Lysecki CTO, LMN
decisions?
performance?
Advanced Jobcosting Strategy
ARE WE READY FOR JOBCOSTING?
Stages of Company Development
Do we provide services that are in- demand? Are we able to perform said services? Can we perform these services with consistent excellence? Can we accurately measure successes + failures? Can we
reward excellent performance?
Keys to Mastering Consistency
Keys to Mastering Measurement
made clear, won’t get done.”
Accounting Setup
Chart of Accounts Departments, Classes? Service Items Standardized Cost Codes
Tracking Labor
accounted for
simplicity and information
Tracking Materials
material est. vs. actual?
consume?
exceptions?
HOW CAN WE MAKE BETTER, MORE PROFITABLE DECISIONS?
PEOPLE WHO SAVE MONEY PEOPLE WHO MAKE MONEY
Mark’s ‘Non-Conventional’ Decisions
Profit
JOB A JOB B JOB C JOB D
Job Gross 51% 30% 40% 27% Job Net 26% 5% 15% 8% Sales $275K $436K $307K $480K Year Gross
41% 39% 31% 33%
Year Net
4% 16%
12%
Through/Hr
$67.14 $81.82 $63.00 $78.75 JOB COMPARISON (OVER A SEASON)
Why Jobcosting?
To identify the constraints and obstacles to higher profits for the company.
Typical Bottlenecks For Landscape Companies
Design / Specs + Estimating Sales + Marketing Equipment Field Crews (Production) Admin, Billing, Mgmt Materials
200K 150K 80K 100K 200K 150K 80K
Identifying Your Bottleneck(s)
Examples of Cost-Focused Decisions
Decision Actual Results
Keep wages low Reduced overall performance, more supervision required Reduce equipment costs Increases dependence on labor, reduces amount of work that can be completed. Less dependable equipment, more downtime, more overhead. Reduce software expenses Increases dependence on overhead staff. Increases data entry/manual work. Reduce material costs Increases labor/install time. Increases warranty risk.
The Real Questions
What do we need to change? What do we change to? How do we change?
Job-focused The Goal: Reduce costs to improve net profit.
Traditional Cost-Accounting
Company-focused The Goal: Increase throughput; maximize finite resources’ ability to generate revenue.
Throughput Accounting
MAXIMIZING THROUGHPUT
THROUGHPUT LABOR EQUIP OVERHEAD
THROUGHPUT
SALES
MINUS TOTALLY VARIABLE COSTS
We must reduce or eliminate overtime to improve profit.
Traditional Cost-Accounting
Overtime is profitable if we can maintain a certain level of productivity.
Throughput Accounting
No Overtime 5 Hrs OT 10 Hrs OT
Sales
$66.0K $74.3K $82.5K
Labor Hours
600h 675h 750h
Labor Costs
$12.0K $14.3K $16.5K
Equip Costs
$10.0K $10.0K $10.0K
Material Costs
$17.8K $20.0K $22.3K
Overhead Costs
$16.5K $16.5K $16.5K
Should We Work Overtime?
Assumes 15 person company at 100% productivity for all hours
No Overtime 5 Hrs OT 10 Hrs OT
Sales
$66.0K $74.3K $82.5K
Labor Hours
600h 675h 750h
Labor Costs
$12.0K $14.3K $16.5K
Equip Costs
$10.0K $10.0K $10.0K
Material Costs
$17.8K $20.0K $22.3K
Overhead Costs
$16.5K $16.5K $16.5K
Net Profit
$9.7K $13.5K $17.2K
Net Profit %
15% 18% 21%
Should We Work Overtime?
Assumes 15 person company at 100% productivity for all hours
No Overtime 5 Hrs OT 10 Hrs OT
Sales
$66.0K $72.2K $78.3K
Labor Hours
600h 675h 750h
Labor Costs
$12.0K $14.3K $16.5K
Equip Costs
$10.0K $10.0K $10.0K
Material Costs
$17.8K $19.5K $21.2K
Overhead Costs
$16.5K $16.5K $16.5K
Should We Work Overtime?
Assumes 15 person company at 70% productivity for overtime hours
No Overtime 5 Hrs OT 10 Hrs OT
Sales
$66.0K $72.2K $78.3K
Labor Hours
600h 675h 750h
Labor Costs
$12.0K $14.3K $16.5K
Equip Costs
$10.0K $10.0K $10.0K
Material Costs
$17.8K $19.5K $21.2K
Overhead Costs
$16.5K $16.5K $16.5K
Net Profit
$9.7K $11.9K $14.2K
Net Profit %
15% 17% 18%
Should We Work Overtime?
Assumes 15 person company at 70% productivity for overtime hours
No Overtime 5 Hrs OT 10 Hrs OT
Sales
$66.0K $72.2K $78.3K
Labor Hours
600h 675h 750h
Labor Costs
$12.0K $14.3K $16.5K
Equip Costs
$10.0K $10.0K $10.0K
Material Costs
$17.8K $19.5K $21.2K
Net Profit
15% 17% 18%
Throughput
$48.2K $52.7K $57.2K How Would Throughput View Overtime?
Limit wages to keep labor costs low.
Traditional Cost-Accounting
Skilled labor is worth the wages, if they drive more sales / productivity.
Throughput Accounting
$20/hr + 0% $24/hr + 5% $28/hr + 10%
Sales
$66.0K $69.3K $72.6K
Labor Costs
$9.9K $10.8K $11.6K
Equip Costs
$10.0K $10.0K $10.0K
Material Costs
$17.8K $18.7K $19.6K
Overhead Costs
$16.5K $16.5K $16.5K
Should We Hire Expensive?
Assumes a higher paid foreman – laborers paid the same.
$20/hr + 0% $24/hr + 5% $28/hr + 10%
Sales
$66.0K $69.3K $72.6K
Labor Costs
$9.9K $10.8K $11.6K
Equip Costs
$10.0K $10.0K $10.0K
Material Costs
$17.8K $18.7K $19.6K
Overhead Costs
$16.5K $16.5K $16.5K Net Profit
$11.7K $13.3K $14.9K
Throughput
$48.2K $50.6K $53.0K How Would Throughput View Hiring?
Assumes a higher paid foreman – laborers paid the same.
Keeping equipment costs down improves net profit.
Traditional Cost-Accounting
Makes it simple to calculate whether we should invest in equipment based on expected increase in productivity.
Throughput Accounting
Machine cost assumptions: Lease: $1,000/mo Fuel + Operating : $300/mo
No Equipment Equip + 5% Productivity Equip + 10% Productivity Sales
$52.8K $55.4K $58.0K
Labor Costs
$9.6K $9.6K $9.6K
Equip Costs
$7.9K $9.2K $9.2K
Material Costs
$14.2K $15.0K $15.7K
Overhead Costs
$13.2K $13.2K $13.2K
Should We Invest In Equipment?
Assumes 1 crew month + machine @ $1000/mo lease + $300/mo fuel + maintenance
No Equipment Equip + 5% Productivity Equip + 10% Productivity Sales
$52.8K $55.4K $58.0K
Labor Costs
$9.6K $9.6K $9.6K
Equip Costs
$7.9K $9.2K $9.2K
Material Costs
$14.2K $15.0K $15.7K
Overhead Costs
$13.2K $13.2K $13.2K
Net Profit
$7.8K $8.4K $10.3K
Should We Invest In Equipment?
Assumes 1 crew month + machine @ $1000/mo lease + $300/mo fuel + maintenance
No Equipment Equip + 5% Productivity Equip + 10% Productivity Sales
$52.8K $55.4K $58.0K
Labor Costs
$9.6K $9.6K $9.6K
Equip Costs
$7.9K $9.2K $9.2K
Material Costs
$14.2K $15.0K $15.7K
Overhead Costs
$13.2K $13.2K $13.2K
Net Profit
$7.8K $8.4K $10.3K
Throughput
$38.5K $40.4K $42.4K
How Would Throughput View Equipment?
Assumes 1 crew month + machine @ $1000/mo lease + $300/mo fuel + maintenance
If the machine drives an increase of 2.5% in productivity (sales), you should invest in the machine.
Does the decision improve throughput?
Throughput
Will the decision decrease operating expenses? (labor, overhead, equipment)
Expenses
Will the decision increase our return
(equipment, shop assets)
Investment
Priorities of Throughput-Focused Companies?
HOW CAN THIS APPLY TO JOBCOSTING?
Use throughput per hour to help evaluate the best jobs to take. ..and when to be aggressive with pricing Use throughput per hour to evaluate salesperson effectiveness. Use throughput and throughput per hour to jobcost completed jobs.
Priorities of Throughput-Focused Companies?
Brainstorm 3 potential ideas to improve throughput next year? Discuss a big lesson learned from a job last year? What are you doing to fix it? What are your greatest obstacles to accurate jobcosting? Use 5 Why’s.
P R E S E N T A T I O N B U I L D E R B Y L O U I S T W E L V E
Jobcosting Strategy
Mike Lysecki CTO, LMN