Prevention Action Team MEETING #2, JUNE 28, 2019 Objectives Review - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Prevention Action Team

MEETING #2, JUNE 28, 2019

Objectives

 Review goals for “summer” conference calls  Review priority and feasibility ratings of strategies to support cancer prevention

 Discuss process of organizing data  Review Table  Discuss what is missing on list compared to our causal model

 Whittle down list of strategies to identify target strategies

 Remove strategies

Purpose of Action Team

 Long-Term

 Contextualize/prioritize Virginia Cancer Plan for our region  Submit competitive grant proposals for interventions/programs that meet the needs of the CCWW and region

 Summer 2019

 “Finalize” causal model to share with CAB in August  Organize sticker dot voting in a way that allows us to determine overlap/discrepancies in priority vs. feasibility and difference among community vs. academic members  Identify gaps between the causal models and strategies on VA Cancer Action Plan (i.e., are there things in the causal model that weren’t on the cancer action plan)  Identify top 2-4 priorities for our action team

 Next steps

 ‘Map’ (research) evidence to these priorities areas

STRATEGY R RATINGS GS

Quick Review of VA State Cancer Plan

5 Goals with specific objectives (and sub-objectives) and strategies to reach objectives

• 1. Reduce tobacco exposure.

 Decrease the percentage of Virginians who use tobacco products.

• 2. Improve nutrition and physical activity among

Virginians.  Increase the percentage of Virginians who meet daily recommended fruit and vegetable intake.  Increase the percentage of Virginians who meet physical activity guidelines.  Decrease the percentage of Virginians who are

• verweight or obese.
• 3. Reduce HPV infections among Virginians.

 Increase the percentage of Virginians under 18 years of age completing the HPV vaccine series.

• 4. Reduce exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the

sun and indoor tanning devices (to include, but not limited to tanning beds, booths, and sun lamps) among Virginians.  By 2022, Decrease the percentage of youth reporting sunburns in the past 12 months.  Decrease the percentage of youth who have used a tanning booth or sun lamp in the past 12 months.  Reduce melanoma incidence rate.

• 5. Reduce exposure to radon among Virginians.

 By 2022, increase the annual reported number of homes tested for radon.  By 2022, increase the annual reported number of homes mitigated for radon.

Review of Rating Process

 Rated 44 (!) strategies prioritized by Virginia Cancer Plan

 1 vote per person for top priority  5 votes per person for priority  5 votes per person for feasibility

 12 people voted

 8 from community organizations  4 from UVA (2 researchers and 2 outreach staff)

Our role

 Organize sticker dot voting in a way that allows us to determine overlap/discrepancies in priority vs. feasibility and difference among community vs. academic members  Identify gaps between the causal models and strategies on VA Cancer Action Plan (i.e., are there things in the causal model that weren’t on the cancer action plan)  Identify top 2-4 priorities for our action team

HOW CAN THE DATA BEST BE SUMMARIZED TO FACILITATE THIS PROCESS??

Too Much -- All Results

Too little -- High level review of findings

 Lots of variability and no clear cut consensus

 Limited overlap with priorities and feasibility  Community organizations and UVA often rated differently (e.g., one high and one low)

 Only 4 strategies rated by ≥2 people as a priority and ≥ 2 people as feasible

Just right – More results but organized …

 Removed strategies with less than two votes as a priority or as feasible  Organized into five categories

 Rated as priority and feasible by both groups  Rated as a priority and feasible overall with both groups having votes in one of the categories  Rated as a priority and feasible overall but not votes in each for each group  Rated as a priority (but not feasible) by one or more groups (both, only community, only UVA/research)  Rated as feasible (but not priority) by one or more groups (both, only community, only UVA/research)

 Added information about what goal and the rough method

Initial broad reactions? What’s missing from our causal model?

Initial broad reactions? What’s missing from our causal model? What could be removed? What do we really want to keep in?

NEXT S STEPS

Next Steps

 August 1st meeting  Do we want another call in between to refine further?  Between Meeting Tasks/Communication  Email out to team members unable to attend for feedback  Send out updated table for reaction  Thoughts on improving communication / presentation