SLIDE 19 Uniform prox-regular sets in Hilbert setting Uniform prox-regularity of constraint sets Application to constrained optimization Inverse image, intersection Notations, definitions Chebyshev set Clarke tangent cone, normal cone and subdifferential Uniform prox-regularity
Characterizations of uniform prox-regular sets
Let r ∈]0,+∞]. Convention: 1
r = 0 whenever r = +∞.
Theorem (R.A. Poliquin, R.T. Rockafellar, L. Thibault) Let H be a real Hilbert space, S be a nonempty closed subset of H , r ∈]0,+∞] be an extended
- real. The following assertions are equivalent.
(a) S is r-prox-regular. (b) For all x,x′ ∈ S, for all v ∈ NC(S;x), one has v,x′ − x ≤ 1
2r vx′ − x2.
(c) For all x ∈ S, for all ζ ∈ NC(S;x)∩BH and for all real t ∈]0,r], one has x ∈ ProjS(x + tζ). (d) For all x1,x2 ∈ S, for all i ∈ {1,2}, for all vi ∈ NC(S;xi)∩BH , one has
v1 − v2,x1 − x2 ≥ − 1
r x1 − x22 . (e) For all x,y ∈ S, for all t ∈ [0,1] such that (1− t)x + ty ∈ Ur (S), one has dS((1− t)x + ty) ≤ 1 2r t(1− t)y − x2 . (f) PS is well-defined on Ur (S) and locally Lipschitz continuous there. (g) The function d2
S is C1,1 (resp. C1, resp. Fréchet differentiable) on Ur (S).
If in addition S is weakly closed in H , then one can add the following: (h) PS is well-defined on Ur (S).
Florent Nacry, joint work with Samir Adly and Lionel Thibault Preservation of uniform prox-regularity