Digital Data Preservation Digital Data Preservation Research into a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

digital data preservation digital data preservation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Digital Data Preservation Digital Data Preservation Research into a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Digital Data Preservation Digital Data Preservation Research into a solution for preservation of digital Research into a solution for preservation of digital information information Barry M. Lunt, Ph.D.; Professor, Information Barry M. Lunt,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 1 1

Digital Data Preservation Digital Data Preservation

Research into a solution for preservation of digital Research into a solution for preservation of digital information information Barry M. Lunt, Ph.D.; Professor, Information Barry M. Lunt, Ph.D.; Professor, Information Technology, BYU Technology, BYU Matthew R. Matthew R. Linford Linford, Ph.D.; Associate Professor, , Ph.D.; Associate Professor, Chemistry & Biochemistry, BYU Chemistry & Biochemistry, BYU Feng Feng Zhang, Ph.D. student; Chemistry & Biochemistry Zhang, Ph.D. student; Chemistry & Biochemistry Ryan Ryan Sydenham Sydenham, B.S student; Mechanical Engineering , B.S student; Mechanical Engineering

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 2 2

Presentation Outline Presentation Outline

  • Defining the Problem

Defining the Problem

  • Evidences of the Problem

Evidences of the Problem

  • Stimuli toward Research

Stimuli toward Research

  • Existing Optical Storage

Existing Optical Storage

  • Research Progress

Research Progress

  • Conclusion

Conclusion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 3 3

Defining the Problem Defining the Problem

  • All current methods of storing digital information

All current methods of storing digital information are ephemeral, by historical standards: are ephemeral, by historical standards:

  • Magnetic: 30

Magnetic: 30 – – 50 years 50 years

  • Optical (recordable): 7

Optical (recordable): 7 – – 23 years 23 years

  • Solid state (Flash memory): 10

Solid state (Flash memory): 10 – – 12 years 12 years

  • Much modern information has no analog

Much modern information has no analog counterpart counterpart

  • Digital information does not gracefully degrade

Digital information does not gracefully degrade

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 4 4

Evidences: Evidences:

“ “Longevity of CD Media Longevity of CD Media” ” – – Research at the Research at the Library of Congress Library of Congress

  • 125 CDs, randomly selected from 60,000 collection

125 CDs, randomly selected from 60,000 collection

All CDs experience the same conditions (normal storage and circulation)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 5 5

Evidences: Evidences:

“ “Longevity of CD Media Longevity of CD Media” ” – – Library of Congress Library of Congress Accelerated aging test Accelerated aging test

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 6 6

Evidences: Evidences: “ “Longevity of CD Media Longevity of CD Media” ” – – Library of Congress Library of Congress Accelerated aging test Accelerated aging test

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 7 7

Evidences: Evidences:

NIST NIST – – Accelerated aging test, CD Accelerated aging test, CD-

  • Rs

Rs

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 8 8

Evidences: Evidences: NIST NIST – – Accelerated aging test, CD Accelerated aging test, CD-

  • Rs

Rs

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 9 9

Evidences: Evidences: Fred Byers (NIST): Fred Byers (NIST): Accelerated aging test, CD Accelerated aging test, CD-

  • Rs

Rs Projected Time to Failure: 14.75 years; 23.09 Projected Time to Failure: 14.75 years; 23.09 years years

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 10 10

Evidences: Evidences: International Journal for the Preservation International Journal for the Preservation

  • f Library and Archival Material
  • f Library and Archival Material

The Relative Stabilities of Optical Disc Formats The Relative Stabilities of Optical Disc Formats

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 11 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 12 12

Stimuli: Stimuli: Computerworld Computerworld

  • www.computerworld.com/blogs/note/625

www.computerworld.com/blogs/note/625

  • Marian

Marian Prokop Prokop, 7/22/05 , 7/22/05 “ “Federal employees involved in preservation and Federal employees involved in preservation and archiving want the optical disks they use to have a archiving want the optical disks they use to have a lifespan of at least 40 years, according to a survey. lifespan of at least 40 years, according to a survey. The Government Information Preservation The Government Information Preservation Working Group is working the National Institute Working Group is working the National Institute

  • f Standards and Technology to establish a long
  • f Standards and Technology to establish a long-
  • term, or archival, standard measurement for

term, or archival, standard measurement for recordable CD and DVD media. recordable CD and DVD media.” ”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 13 13

Stimuli: Stimuli: Digital Documents Digital Documents

  • Digital photos

Digital photos

  • Digital videos

Digital videos

  • Computer software

Computer software

  • Computer models

Computer models

  • Blogs

Blogs

  • Other personal websites

Other personal websites

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 14 14

Stimulus Stimulus

“Predicting the Life Expectancy of Modern Predicting the Life Expectancy of Modern Tape and Optical Media Tape and Optical Media” ”

( (Vivek Vivek Navale Navale, National Archives and Records , National Archives and Records Administration; Aug 15, 2005, Administration; Aug 15, 2005, Vol Vol 9, #4) 9, #4) “ “[The study] shows the probability of failure as a [The study] shows the probability of failure as a function of time at 25 function of time at 25° °C and 50% RH. It predicts a C and 50% RH. It predicts a mean life time of mean life time of 1592 years 1592 years for CD for CD-

  • ROMS

ROMS stored under those conditions. stored under those conditions.” ”

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 15 15

  • Recording technologies

Recording technologies

  • Comparison of CD, DVD, BRD

Comparison of CD, DVD, BRD

  • Stamped

Stamped

  • ROM (writeable)

ROM (writeable) – – dye dye-

  • based

based

  • R/W (re

R/W (re-

  • writeable)

writeable) – – phase phase-

  • change

change

  • R/W (re

R/W (re-

  • writeable)

writeable) – – magneto magneto-

  • optical
  • ptical
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 16 16

Technology Migration

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 17 17

SEM of Stamped CD

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 18 18

SEM of CD-R

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 19 19

Confocal image of CD-R

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 20 20

Recordable Optical Discs

  • Works primarily through the use of

cyanine dyes that absorb energy and create a pit-like structures that act as Amplitude Gratings.

  • Use Groove tracking for “Writing”
  • function. Pit-like Gratings for the

“Reading” function.

Courtesy of Mark Worthington

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 21 21

REWRITABLE OPTICAL DISCS

  • RW technologies use phase

change materials. Active layer (metallic stack) changes states when exposed to pulsed low energy level. Returns to reflective state when exposed to higher energy level. (crystal/amorphous)

Courtesy of Mark Worthington

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 22 22

Magneto Magneto-

  • Optical Technology

Optical Technology

  • Based on Curie point of magnetic materials

Based on Curie point of magnetic materials

  • Uses:

Uses:

  • Laser to heat material to near Curie point

Laser to heat material to near Curie point

  • Magnetic field to change magnetization

Magnetic field to change magnetization

  • Kerr effect in read

Kerr effect in read-

  • back

back

  • Features:

Features:

  • Magnetic domain as small as spot size of laser

Magnetic domain as small as spot size of laser

  • Nearly infinite R/W cycles

Nearly infinite R/W cycles

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 23 23

Research Progress to Date Research Progress to Date

  • Research on stability and adhesion of metal

Research on stability and adhesion of metal films films

  • Tape test for adhesion

Tape test for adhesion

  • Boil test for stability

Boil test for stability

  • Research on size and optical properties of

Research on size and optical properties of recorded bits recorded bits

  • Protective layer for recording

Protective layer for recording

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 24 24

Recording Recording

  • Excellent optical contrast
  • Consistent spot characteristics
  • Can easily be made into the size necessary
  • Estimated lifetime of at least 1,000 years
  • Can be readily reduced to practice
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Mar 15, 2007 Mar 15, 2007 Family History Technology Family History Technology 25 25

Conclusion Conclusion

  • The problem is real
  • The need is great
  • Existing archival options are inadequate
  • Solutions exist using familiar materials and

processes