presenting author disclosures
play

Presenting author disclosures O.H.: Roche consultancy; BMS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Longitudinal effect of luspatercept treatment on iron overload and iron chelation therapy in adult patients with -thalassemia in the BELIEVE trial Olivier Hermine, 1,2 Maria Domenica Cappellini, 3 Ali T . Taher, 4 Thomas D. Coates, 5,6 Vip


  1. Longitudinal effect of luspatercept treatment on iron overload and iron chelation therapy in adult patients with β -thalassemia in the BELIEVE trial Olivier Hermine, 1,2 Maria Domenica Cappellini, 3 Ali T . Taher, 4 Thomas D. Coates, 5,6 Vip Viprakasit, 7 Ersi Voskaridou, 8 Ashutosh Lal, 9 Hong Keng Liew, 10 S ilverio Perrotta, 11 Abderrahim Khelif, 12 Antonis Kattamis, 13 hetty, 14 George Zhang, 15 Yu (Olivia) Tian, 15 Dimana Miteva, 14 Tatiana Zinger, 14 Derek Tang, 15 Jeevan K. S . Backstrom, 16 John B. Porter 17 Jay T 1 Imagine Inst it ut e, INS ERM U1163, Universit y of Paris, Paris, France; 2 Depart ment of Hemat ology, Necker Hospit al, Assist ance Publique-Hôpit aux de Paris, Paris, France; 3 Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Policlinico Hospit al, Universit y of Milan, Milan, It aly; 4 Depart ment of Int ernal Medicine, American Universit y of Beirut Medical Cent er, Beirut , Lebanon; 5 Children's Cent er for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospit al Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; 6 US chool of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; 7 S iriraj Hospit al, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; 8 Thalassemia and S C Keck S ickle Cell Cent er of Laiko General Hospit al, At hens, Greece; 9 Universit y of California S an Francisco, Benioff Children’s Hospit al, Oakland, CA; 10 Hospit al S ult anah Bahiyah, Alor S et ar, Malaysia; 11 Universit à della Campania, Luigi Vanvit elli, Casert a, It aly; 12 Farhat Hached Teaching Hospit al, S ousse Universit y, Tunisia; 13 First Depart ment of Pediatrics, Nat ional and Kapodist rian University of At hens, At hens, Greece; 14 Celgene Int ernat ional, a Brist ol-Myers S quibb Company, Boudry, S witzerland; 15 Brist ol Myers S quibb, Princet on, NJ; 16 Acceleron Pharma, Cambridge, MA; 17 Universit y College London, Universit y College London Hospit als, London, UK Present at ion 1697

  2. Presenting author disclosures O.H.: Roche – consultancy; BMS – consultancy, research funding; AB S cience – consultancy, current equity holder in publicly-traded company, honoraria, patents, royalties, research funding; Alexion, Novartis - research funding. 2

  3. Introduction Figure 1. BELIEVE study trial design • RBC transfusions are the main supportive treatment Patients with β -t halassemia a ≥ 18 years of age, requiring regular RBC for chronic anemia due to β -thalassemia 1 t ransfusions (defined as: 6– 20 RBC unit s in t he 24 weeks prior t o randomization wit h no > 35-day t ransfusion-free period during t hat t ime) – Transfusion-dependent pat ient s require ICT t o prevent (N = 336) iron overload from RBC t ransfusions and associat ed Randomized 2:1 Double-blind period (48 weeks) complicat ions 2 • Thus, there is a clinical need to reduce transfusions Luspatercept b Placebo b 1 mg/ kg s.c. every 21 days and iron burden in patients with anemia due to s.c. every 21 days + BS C β -thalassemia + BS C (n = 224) (n = 112) • Luspatercept, a first-in-class erythroid maturation agent, is approved by the US Food and Drug S t udy Crossover from placebo to Administration for the treatment of anemia in adult unblinding luspatercept permitted (n = 92) patients with β -thalassemia requiring regular RBC transfusions 3– 6 Open-label Current study (up t o 5 years) status c • This analysis assessed the effect of long-term luspatercept use on iron loading and ICT use in the Post -t reat ment phase 3 BELIEVE trial (NCT02604433) 7 follow-up (3 years) a β - thalassemia or Hb E / β - thalassemia (compound β - thalassemia with mutation and/or multiplication of α -globin genes was allowed). b Patients could receive RBC transfusions to maintain their baseline Hb level and ICT. c The trial is fully enrolled and patients continue to receive treatment or follow-up. BSC, best supportive care; Hb, hemoglobin; ICT, iron chelation therapy; RBC, red blood cell; s.c., subcutaneously. 1. Taher AT, et al. Lancet 2018;391:155– 167. 2. Taher AT, Cappellini MD. Blood 2018;132:1781– 1791. 3. Suragani RNVS, et al. Blood 2014;123:3864– 3872. 4. Attie KM, et al. Am J Hemat ol 2014;89:766– 770. 5. Piga A, et al. Blood 2019;133:1279– 1289. 6. Reblozyl (luspatercept-aamt) [package insert]. Summit, NJ: Celgene Corporation; April 2020. 7. Cappellini MD, et al. 3 N Engl J Med 2020;382:1219– 1231.

  4. Results Table. Patient baseline characteristics Luspatercept Placebo Characteristic (N = 224) (N = 112) Age, median (range), years 30 (18– 66) 30 (18– 59) Female, n (% ) 132 (58.9) 63 (56.3) Hb (24 weeks), a median (range), g/dL 9.31 (4.5– 11.4) 9.15 (5.8– 11.7) RBC transfusion burden, median (range), units/12 weeks 6.1 (3– 14) 6.3 (3– 12) RBC transfusion burden, median (range), units/24 weeks 14 (6– 24) 15 (6– 26) Splenectomy, n (% ) 129 (57.6) 65 (58.0) SF, mean (SD), μg/L 2,097 (1,757) 1,845 (1,669) LIC, mean (SD), mg/g dw 12.0 (14.8) 10.1 (11.5) 154 (68.8) 75 (67.0) > 3 mg/ g dw, n (% ) Myocardial iron by T2* MRI, mean (SD), ms 33.5 (16.2) 34.8 (10.7) ICT use b,c , n (% ) Deferasirox 139 (62.3) 63 (57.8) Deferiprone 92 (41.3) 40 (36.7) Deferoxamine mesylat e / deferoxamine 83 (37.2) 39 (35.8) a Defined as the mean of all documented pre-transfusion Hb values during the 24 weeks prior to first dose for each patient. b Defined as started before the start of study treatment and either ended before the start of the study treatment or continued after study treatment. c Analyzed using the safety population (luspatercept n = 223, placebo n = 109). 4 dw, dry weight; LIC, liver iron concentration; SD, standard deviation; SF, serum ferritin; T2* MRI, T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

  5. Results (cont.) Figure 2. Decrease in SF categories baseline ≥ 1,000 μ g/ L to post-baseline < 1,000 μ g/ L (A) and baseline ≥ 2,500 μ g/ L to post-baseline < 2,500 μ g/ L (B) A B Baseline SF ≥ 1,000 μ g/L to post-baseline < 1,000 μ g/L Baseline SF ≥ 2,500 μ g/L to post- baseline < 2,500 μg/L 100 Placebo a Luspat ercept 90 80 +57.6% +40.5% 70 ) Patients (% +24.3% +24.6% 60 +54.8% +39.3% 46.4 (26/ 56) 50 P = 0.017 33.3 40 P = 0.227 P = 0.023 29.5 (7/ 21) P = 0.527 (38/ 129) 23.7 23.7 30 19.0 (32/ 135) (14/ 59) 17.0 (12/ 63) 12.3 (24/ 141) 20 8.8 8.3 7.7 (8/ 65) 5.0 (5/ 57) (2/ 24) (2/ 26) 10 (3/ 60) 0 Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks 1– 24 25– 48 49– 72 73– 96 1– 24 25– 48 49– 72 73– 96 Data cutoff: July 1, 2019. P values are estimated from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. SF levels ≥ 1,000 μg/L and ≥ 2,500 μg / L indicate iron overload and increased risk of cardiac-related mortality, respectively. 5 a Placebo patients evaluated up to Week 48.

  6. Results (cont.) Figure 3. Decrease in LIC (A) and myocardial iron T2* categories (B) A B LIC Myocardial iron T2* Baseline > 3 mg/g dw to post- baseline ≤ 3 mg/g dw Baseline ≤ 20 ms to post -baseline > 20 ms Placebo a Luspat ercept 14.3 16 30 25.0 (15/ 105) P = 0.417 P = 0.357 (6/ 24) 14 25 20.0 12 9.7 (6/ 30) P = 0.486 20 (13/ 134) ) ) Patients (% Patients (% 10 6.6 8 15 5.9 (4/ 61) (4/ 68) 9.1 4.2 6 (1/ 11) 10 (5/ 120) 4 5 2 0 0 Week 24 Week 48 Week 96 Week 48 Week 96 Data cutoff: July 1, 2019. Haenszel test. Patients with LIC ≥ 3 mg/g dw are considered to have iron overload. Myo cardial iron T2* < 20 ms indicates increased cardiac risk. P values are estimated from Cochran– Mantel– 6 a Placebo patients evaluated up to Week 48.

  7. Results (cont.) Figure 4. Luspatercept-treated patients receiving ≥ 1 ICT over time a • The mean (S D) daily dose of deferasirox in all Luspat ercept Luspat ercept Luspat ercept responders b (overall) non-responders luspatercept-treated patients at baseline was 100 1,332.37 mg (1,087.0) • During Weeks 85– 96, the mean change (S D) in 90 daily dose of deferasirox from baseline in the ) Patients (% luspatercept arm overall (n = 118), responders (n = 32), and non-responders (n = 86) was 80 −189.8 mg (768.5), −201.1 mg (740.2), and −185.6 mg (783.0), respectively 70 • The mean change (S D) in the luspatercept arm overall at Week 144 (n = 25) was −810.1 mg 60 (1,614.8) Weeks Overall 219 217 207 200 195 186 169 161 148 142 133 92 28 Responders 46 46 46 45 44 42 41 42 41 38 37 27 8 Non-responders 173 171 161 155 151 144 128 119 107 104 96 65 20 Data cutoff: July 1, 2019. Only a small number of patients could be evaluated at the later time points due to poor tracking and ICT adherence. a Includes only patients initially randomized to receive luspatercept. b Responders are defined as patients achieving ≥ 33% reduction in transfusion burden during Weeks 13 – 24, with a reduction of ≥ 2 RBC units, versus baseline. 7

  8. S ummary • A significant number of luspatercept- treated patients with baseline SF ≥ 1,000 μg/L shifted to SF < 1,000 μg/L during the first 48 weeks • The proportion of patients receiving ≥ 1 ICT gradually declined in both luspatercept responders and non-responders over time up to Week 144 • Both luspatercept responders and non-responders experienced decreases in mean daily dose of deferasirox over time 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend