presentation to the minnesota legislature february 5 2013
play

Presentation to the Minnesota Legislature February 5, 2013 by - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

American Council fur an Enlergy-Efficient Ecunnmy UTILITY SECTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN MINNESOTA: DOING WELL.MANY REASONS TO DO MORE Presentation to the Minnesota Legislature February 5, 2013 by Martin Kushler, Ph.D. Senior Fellow American


  1. American Council fur an Enlergy-Efficient Ecunnmy UTILITY SECTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN MINNESOTA: DOING WELL….MANY REASONS TO DO MORE Presentation to the Minnesota Legislature February 5, 2013 by Martin Kushler, Ph.D. Senior Fellow American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

  2. The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) • Nonprofit 501(c)(3) dedicated to advancing energy efficiency through research, communications, and conferences. Founded in 1980. • ~40 staff in Washington DC, + field offices in DE, MI, and WI. • Focus on End-Use Efficiency in Industry, Buildings, Utilities, and Transportation; and State & National Policy • Funding: Foundations (34%), Federal & State Grants (7%), Contract work (21%) Conferences and Publications (34%), Contributions and Other (4%) Martin Kushler, Ph.D. (Senior Fellow, ACEEE) • 30 years conducting research in the utility industry, including: • 10 years as Director of the ACEEE Utilities Program • 10 years as the Supervisor of the Evaluation section at the Michigan PSC • Have assisted over a dozen states with utility EE policies • Minnesota experience: • Advisor to Xcel CIP Advisory Board 2000-2008, 2012-present • Advisor to MN Legislative Auditor on CIP evaluation (2005) • Advisor to MNCEE, 2012-present 2 2 Arnennan Buuncil in: an Eh.er§y-EiF:cier1:Enunumy

  3. TOPICS • Minnesota’s energy disadvantage • Why energy efficiency should be the top priority • Energy efficiency as a utility system resource • Utility economic concerns regarding customer EE • Regulatory mechanisms to address utility concerns • Energy efficiency as economic development • A few current ‘hot topics’ • Grading Minnesota • Opportunities for further progress American Buuncil in: an ffiéréy-ElI:cieni Enunumy

  4. KEY POINT #1: MINNESOTA HAS A BIG ENERGY PROBLEM • Minnesota uses a lot of energy – Total cost $12 billion per year in 2000 By 2010, had increased to $21 billion!!! • Minnesota is essentially totally dependent on fuels imported from other states and countries Minnesota imports: – 100% of the coal and uranium used – 100% of oil & petroleum products – 100% of the natural gas 4 Amman Buuncil in: an £:1er§ge-EiF=cier1:Enunumy

  5. COST OF MINNESOTA ’ S ENERGY IMPORTS • Before the new ‘high energy cost’ era (circa 2000), roughly $7 billion per year was leaving Minnesota to pay for fuel imports • At 2010 market prices, this dollar outflow was over $13 billion per year THIS IS A HUGE ECONOMIC DRAIN ON MINNESOTA’S STATE ECONOMY! 5 American Buuncil in: an ffiéréy-ElI:cieni Enunumy

  6. Economic Burden on Minnesota Homes and Businesses: State Taxes vs. Energy Costs (2010) $25.0 $20.9 $20.0 $14.2 Billions of Dollars $15.0 $10.0 $13 billion drain for imported fuels $5.0 $0.0 Total MN Taxes (2010) Total MN Energy Costs (2010) C E E E - - Q 0 6 0 0 _ mmlmn fiuncll for an Energy-Efflnlam Euannmyr

  7. EFFECTS ON THE STATE ECONOMY This additional $6 billion annual drain on Minnesota’s economy is roughly equivalent to the lost payroll from closing 120 major manufacturing plants . (assuming 1000 jobs @ $50,000 each, per plant) Even the Wall Street Journal has written about the unprecedented transfer of wealth, calling it a “bonanza” and “windfall” for the handful of big energy producing states (i.e., AK, NM, ND, WY and TX) and countries (e.g., OPEC). 7 Amman Buunnil in: an £:12r§5'-EiF:ciel1£Enunumy

  8. KEY POINT #2: MINNESOTA’S FUTURE IS NOT IN FOSSIL FUELS MINNESOTA’S RECOVERABLE RESERVES AS A SHARE OF U.S. RECOVERABLE RESERVES (Source: U.S. EIA) • Coal: 0% • Oil: 0 % • Natural Gas: 0% [also Uranium: 0%] Why would Minnesota support policies that encourage greater consumption of these resources? (At the state OR federal level !) 8 A-'|1ur=.na:1 Buunuil in: an [;'|£F§}'-E€.‘:Ei3l1F.E|3UHUH'|)"

  9. 2011 Coal Production by Region Million Short Tons (peroent change from 2010) _ Wstern uncludnsnlaska} 5B?.*1 1-new ' _ Appiaclian . 335.1 ' £11-I1‘!-H Interior ' "IE-9.! _ - {'9.1‘i‘u] Source: LLS. Energy Information Administration, Quarterly Coei Report, October-December 2011 {April 2012), preliminary 2011 date. Production does not include refuse recovery. 9 i1.'nurua'| lluuiuil in’ an ['1arg','-E*"-ci2n'. Euununiy

  10. Figure 9. Oil proved resewes by state/area, 2010 U.S. Total: 25.2 billion barrels of crude oil plus lease condensate [ME Pacific Federal Olfshore WA MT _ 363 369 /*' _ .» VT I-I‘ I 4., NH T? NY: MA 55 3' IA PA ~"' ' ‘ff OH 34 NI C 1|. LN 54 MD —oE 64 wv 302 M01 lg VA N C ‘,4 TN1 AR ‘ 42 SC _.-- MS AL 254 60 GA ‘ll million barrels (statelarea count) I 1,001 16 6,356 (5) - 501161000 (6) "‘\ . 0. ‘ ~r‘,.n¢ M. /. 201 to 500 1 to 200 (16) 6 10 0 (20) I Data withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data

  11. --_:-:I-_I.i|r I.:II I I *--i"--‘Y/-' -‘.. .. . -'j_-,-I .' .51 - . . M .._’D:-:J,_’I_-'?‘r1.'.‘-t Lower 48 stat es shale plays "‘ I I :?~i:];.~*i '-4" »-'F' :0-‘ . 1"-;l_-1*--.__ E‘ “‘ -=\- -gs ‘-"- 1 - :1; \- -L ' . _ 1'-i~\. r ..,:. -. .-,1‘-I -11' . '.--*._-‘-_,._/?.i-.~'--"=_r»'- .=I_' II,-11 _'I~ .--at»-,-1,?¢>,_:;i_".:-1.0.’ 'i.~1‘-~,‘-I.--.11.).-.1" )- .4.-IZ.g _.II 'I{-‘Q1 '-‘T:"_'-i'§i.,L- It f_I-' '-I -u- ;"-"*:-<7?-" '. --"7?irJ’.?%€J.'*‘- Ni0brara* .4 - - --—--___ '"———______ II1" Montana r'\L'I * --1.-.~"-.,;--" i-‘:" * Q-';"' ‘Z " Tihrusl , - Bakkena as ~ _J___ ' = ew<>=B@i - Heflh“ -is Ir _ . "Q 1 {Fl :_I,:i'!': ' Williston ‘_LH’=I-‘- r ' ‘L 1" -l r’-II I ‘ '. II '¢.,' 1' '_.- _ -' I _ .1-"II IF _-"I II fI II |I II Hasm -—-._,.__ l"'F:j§\.,__\- _1 .-' I .2. 1%!‘ - .-1'; i,_II 1%‘; _ r .,51 " m_~i:'0wdsr_Rii1sr mi '§"¢"L K1’ - II I I? _.¢_ I- I 35lI@'_" _._—-B~EiSii2i__I| ‘1 L\\ 9 _.sa~’ I] 'L1.:"- 1 "J- . {.1 _.- ' I 1 e .- "‘. ii ll"-fir‘ _ - *IEl|_EiCl1iEit'l . ," N i __ i'|.|'|iC loan " 1 535;“ ' #2’? ~*-'1'-' ' 5'"--1-'__ . " Mancgs ~ I , 4 ‘gr; i -~.—=4____ I ._ res l'- ' 1 i Xv Ela in -nntrimi 4.. ' _ =Ii_, ;'. / 2 K I 7. .—I—-IT:"==-__f_‘I-%r%g1n I '_ ‘ ‘# ~§Z\I i I -.-;-._ _ i _ _ ._ _ .-,I .-I.-_-.iiir \_w- III ‘ ‘I _I_____.-—-" mm" Forsst , Jr i J" /' - Haé'ir1___ QM . . XII. _' _,II' -_;;_,- s_I-I_II_I_ Citi,iEIssin 5 IIIIIIIIIIS I I I‘ I »_ I _ . ' ,0 arc * " tics I H‘ -l - ' -.\. - I Piceéoéé-'fi 09 J 3 "~._ F) ' ,4‘ = iEBan.Joai;i',ii_ii-"'1--.1-5 '_ " 'l.CaWPi‘ .» _ _I iTIi'E '" Basin.iI_III " "3' I.=--;,¢_ ' , - i Mfll"5I__/4 ,I' Basin.-"' -__1 Elasin ' E:-:cello- " New-J -I ' ’ I . __ __ Mullqr -in I W, 1* —-—' rokss Platform Edllhmy _ -'.:-1-’i‘l=I__ I-' .iHerm'os -_ I . I .--ref‘ I; J If ED /3 HI _ _ _ Kl) M 1 I "H-___ " ' “ ,PfiI'6lEE§'@33m‘='!""- “ Pierre 1 I4-1.1‘ LI;___IIII'i,,r-———¢ 1' *s*"' ~uuasawo+er »1 TI‘ -#1———"“ | - - '\ ' .4 ' , , '1; . I -" .1 '-__- ...L___\ 4 q _ . //-"4 ' ‘ 1 ‘ Jui-'11 .f ‘ R ' .5an In Batqni ns a ko w LII i 6 ‘-. -~ ,1’ i s sin - 35'" 4 Ela in - F Chaffifl" ' | ' Pg .- -. —_ - 'lI X I Ii? _ I __ - I -' Palogtgiérfi Hams’ ELQEIIQI Fir ma Basin aikwgirgir IIII_III_cn"asmE_aIIHI If -Santa" iils'riEi.1= I -_'_' ' . __T_ '.‘ii'si_'_itura,'Los W1Q"“7‘i’~'~/"“‘-i.. Fln3.ri:l- _ vaiia,i,Is Ridge “~ 1’ ~‘_F.@_;_ I ilivalon-' ' I .II Bar Neal—"‘ l Proyincs xf HBII TIII_ 5 | A IJ '5;a;;in_g' . "I _ 4 lionefiprlng PIEIIIIIEI Miles . -_ I ""-~--.___.__1_I|-——-'~TI_—- Elasin Ft. ioonn Salt sin i _ I I K J sa ‘ \I 0 1011 -zuii Barnett Mafia Elflfilfl I -;Tusj$:fld__HI Jr“ 2 1 I ‘ ~ ‘ 1 I. 'ii",=lood_fo rd \&§‘I‘.° n { We "oh \___ J’ II II 21- I I ‘X E E - J a - 4 I;-Q” Bossier ; -II‘ Ii ' I'_"u,_ Pearsall .QI \,I i 1) ' "‘- ’-.<- _,_ '_--_ _ sstsr Shale nlaiis Basins ' ' - ' . Current plays 1 Mined Shae 8I !’ , L1-" '- I'LL I . U ' Prospective plaiis Chalk plow . .»=* 11 P-in ¢_~I ** Mixed shale 8. _ K, Stacked plays I l'm sdone play Ii?“ ,I.;= i Bhsllowsstf iioungsst xaamixed Shalea '11-

  12. As a matter of state policy, Minnesota should be trying to maximize the amount of energy efficiency it can accomplish… … and minimize the amount of additional fuel imports it needs 12 American Buuricil iii: ari tneroii-Eiiscierit Economy

  13. KEY POINT #3 It is much cheaper to save energy than it is to produce it. [We can save electricity for about one-third the cost of producing it through a new power plant …. With no carbon (CO 2 ) emissions] 13 American Buimcil in: arr tiiercii-Ell1cieniEcun0rnir

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend