Present additional quantitative data Present preliminary report - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

present additional quantitative data
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Present additional quantitative data Present preliminary report - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Western Interstate Commission For Higher Education S OUTHEAST K ING C OUNTY H IGHER E DUCATION N EEDS A SSESSMENT Advisory Committee Meeting IV M UC UCKLESHOOT T RI RIBAL C OL OLLEGE O CTOBER 26, , 2016 ALASKA ARIZONA CALIFORNIA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Western Interstate Commission For Higher Education

ALASKA • ARIZONA • CALIFORNIA • COLORADO • HAWAI‘I • IDAHO • MONTANA • NEVADA • NEW MEXICO • NORTH DAKOTA OREGON • SOUTH DAKOTA • UTAH • WASHINGTON • WYOMING • U.S. PACIFIC TERRITORIES & FREELY ASSOCIATED STATES

MUC

UCKLESHOOT TRI RIBAL COL OLLEGE

OCTOBER 26, , 2016

SOUTHEAST KING COUNTY HIGHER EDUCATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Advisory Committee Meeting IV

slide-2
SLIDE 2

AGENDA

  • Welc

elcome (9.00 – 9.15 AM)

  • Introductio

ions (9.15 – 9.20 AM)

  • Mee

Meetin ing g Go Goal als (9.20 – 9.25 AM)

  • Proj
  • ject St

Status Up Update (9.25 – 9.30 AM)

  • Add

Addit itio ional l Qu Quantit itativ ive Data (9.30 – 9.40 AM)

  • Present Prelim

imin inary ry Repo eport (9.40 – 10:15 AM)

  • Br

Break (10.15 – 10.30 AM)

  • So

Solicit it Fee eedback on

  • n Preli

limin inary ry Rep epor

  • rt (10.30 – 11.45 AM)
  • Ne

Next St Steps (11.45 AM – 12.00 PM)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

WELCOME

Muckleshoot Tribe

slide-4
SLIDE 4

INTRODUCTIONS

Advisory Committee

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MEETING GOALS

  • Provide project status update
  • Present additional quantitative data
  • Present preliminary report
  • Solicit feedback on preliminary report
slide-6
SLIDE 6

PROJECT STATUS UPDATE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

UPDATED PROJECT TIMELINE

Aug August Sep September Oct ctober November Dec December

Stakeholder Interviews Data Collection Summarize & Interpret Findings Draft Preliminary Report Incorporate Feedback into Preliminary Report Create Final Report Incorporate Feedback into Final Report

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DATA

Additional Quantitative Data

slide-9
SLIDE 9

COMMUTING PATTERNS: SE KING COUNTY

Means of

  • f tr

transportation to

  • wor
  • rk

Mea ean Travel Tim ime to to Wor

  • rk

(Min inutes) St Standard De Devia iation (M (Min inutes) Sam Sample Si Size Car, truck, or van 31.54 19.87 52,854 Bus or trolley bus 75.24 37.46 978 Subway or elevated 79.66 10.26 379 Railroad 76.62 13.90 817 Walked 7.55 3.34 489 Other methods 17.66 13.80 839

Total 32.86 22.03 56,356

Data from Ali Modarres, Director and Professor of Urban Studies, UW - Tacoma

slide-10
SLIDE 10

King

98042 98058 98092 98059 98038 98010 98051 98027 98022

Snohomish Pierce Kitsap Thurston

Longacres Fredrickson Bellevue Plant II, DC, Southpark Seatac Renton Kent Auburn Everett, Payne Field

King

98042 98058 98092 98059 98038 98010 98051 98027 98022

Snohomish Pierce Kitsap Thurston

Longacres Fredrickson Bellevue Plant II, DC, Southpark Seatac Renton Kent Auburn Everett, Payne Field

COMMUTING PATTERNS: BOEING EMPLOYEES

slide-11
SLIDE 11

COMMUTING PATTERNS: BOEING EMPLOYEES

Boeing Location

ZIP 98010 ZIP 98022 ZIP 98027 ZIP 98038 ZIP 98042 ZIP 98051 ZIP 98058 ZIP 98059 ZIP 98092 SE King County Comm- uters

Percent Cumulative Percent Renton 14 27 34 95 102 9 143 114 49 587 26 26 Renton area 10 16 25 54 64 10 83 58 29 349 15 41 DC 6 10 21 56 69 6 66 49 34 317 14 55 Plant II 4 10 29 33 51 4 66 59 33 289 13 67 Kent 3 5 17 35 69 6 53 37 41 266 12 79 Auburn 2 24 7 27 35 3 13 9 68 188 8 87 Everett 3 1 16 16 18 2 23 56 6 141 6 93 Payne Field 1 1 15 3 10 21 10 10 71 3 96 South Park 2 5 4 4 3 4 22 1 97 Bellevue 4 5 3 2 3 2 2 21 1 98 Fredrickson 5 2 4 1 4 16 1 99 Longacres 1 1 5 2 1 2 2 14 1 100 Grand Total 44 99 171 338 434 42 477 400 284 2,289 100

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TRANSFER PATTERNS: FROM GREEN RIVER

(2014-2015)

120 107 101 60 45 24 16 10 1

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TRANSFER PATTERNS: FROM HIGHLINE (2014-2015)

150 146 110 58 26 20 19 13 6 3 1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TRANSFER PATTERNS: FROM RENTON (2014-2015)

5 5 4 4 4 2 1

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TRANSFER OUT AS A PERCENTAGE OF FTE ENROLLMENT (2014-2015)

9.7% 6.5% 0.9% 1.1% 7.9% 7.3% Highline Community College Green River College Renton Technical College Total (Technical Colleges) Total (Community Colleges) Total (All Institutions)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

TRANSFER OUT AS A PERCENTAGE OF FIRST-TIME AWARD-SEEKING UNDERGRADUATES (2014-2015)

95.3% 61.2% 12.8% 18.1% 69.0% 66.2% Highline Community College Green River College Renton Technical College Total (Technical Colleges) Total (Community Colleges) Total (All Institutions)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PRELIMINARY REPORT

Overview

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Overview of Southeast King County
  • Postsecondary Landscape
  • Economic Demand and Workforce Needs
  • Assessment of Need
  • Options for Consideration

PRELIMINARY REPORT

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Growing population with increasing

diversity

  • High percentage of working-age adults

without a degree (59 percent)

  • Fairly average median income within the

county

  • Lengthy car commutes are the norm

OVERVIEW OF SOUTHEAST KING COUNTY

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Public postsecondary institutions
  • Local two-year
  • Green River College, Renton Technical College, Highline College
  • Six four-year
  • Central Washington University, Eastern Washington University,

University of Washington, The Evergreen State College, Washington State University, Western Washington, University,

  • Western Governors University - Washington
  • Muckleshoot Tribal College
  • Partnerships with: Green River College, Northwest Indian

College, The Evergreen State College

  • Private Institutions

POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION LANDSCAPE

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Nursing
  • Sub-baccalaureate
  • Baccalaureate
  • Education
  • Sub-baccalaureate
  • Baccalaureate
  • Hospitality, Food, and Tourism
  • Baccalaureate

ECONOMIC DEMAND & WORKFORCE NEEDS

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Traditional-aged students are served by

the current postsecondary offerings

  • High population of some college, no

degree adults and limited completion

  • ptions
  • In high-demand nursing field, there is no

local, brick and mortar pathway to a BSN

ASSESSMENT OF NEED

slide-23
SLIDE 23

OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: PRINCIPLES

  • Demand is for provision of service, not a new

institution

  • Local response needs to be driven by local

demand, not institutional supply

  • Solution must be able to respond to changing

workforce demands

  • Travel considerations make local access

important

slide-24
SLIDE 24

OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: FEATURES

  • Flexible solution
  • Distance/hybrid options should be considered
  • Adult students are likely to be primary audience
  • Not limited to one provider
  • However, one provider per program
  • Provision of appropriate support services will be

key to success

slide-25
SLIDE 25

OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION

Functions Single Institution Multiple Institutions Government Entity Private Entity Landlord Equipment/ Technology Provider Site Management Teach Courses

X

Student Services Recruitment (Building Cohorts)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

NEXT STEPS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

NEXT STEPS

  • Upcoming activties
  • Final stakeholder interviews (October)
  • Finalize preliminary report (October)
  • Present to Washington Student

Achievement Council (November 9)

  • Draft final report (November)
slide-28
SLIDE 28

NEXT STEPS

  • Final Meeting of the Advisory Committee
  • November 18, 2016
  • City of Covington Council Chambers