preoperative cross is the preferred treatment for locally
play

Preoperative CROSS is the Preferred Treatment for Locally Advanced - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Preoperative CROSS is the Preferred Treatment for Locally Advanced GEJ ISGIO November 1, 2018 Disclosures Consulting: EMD Serono, Eli Lilly, FlatIron. Research Funding: Taiho, EMD Serono. Upper GI Tumor Classification and Staging 4


  1. Preoperative CROSS is the Preferred Treatment for Locally Advanced GEJ ISGIO November 1, 2018

  2. Disclosures • Consulting: EMD Serono, Eli Lilly, FlatIron. • Research Funding: Taiho, EMD Serono.

  3. Upper GI Tumor Classification and Staging 4 AJCC versions in 15 years - different • definitions! • Siewert Classification – Type I: center 1-5 cm proximal to GEJ – Type II: center 1 cm proximal to and 2 cm distal to the GEJ – Type III: center 2-5 cm distal to the GEJ with some involvement of GEJ. • Per AJCC 8 th edition Staging: – Siewert I-II considered esophageal cancers – Siewert type III lesions are considered gastric cancers

  4. Gastroesophageal Tumor Molecular Subtypes 164 esophageal tumors, 359 gastric adenocarcinomas and 36 additional adenocarcinomas at the GEJ Nature 2017: 541 , 169–175

  5. Approach to Locoregional GEJ Adenocarcinoma • Treatments are with curative intent. • Surgical resection alone is insufficient –> multimodality approach is the standard of care. • R0 resection is critical. • Completion of planned perioperative therapy is critical. • Pathological complete response is associated with the best outcomes.

  6. Prognostic Value of Pathologic Response • Analysis of 480 patients , 54% E/GEJ, 46 % G • Analysis of 824 patients, 72% E/GEJ, 28% G • Preoperative chemotherapy • Preoperative chemotherapy • OS 128.6 mo with TRG1 vs. 61.9 mo with TRG2 • OS 92.2 mo TRG 1 vs. 27.9 mo TRG 3 and 40.1 mo with TRG3 Schmidt et al, Brit J of Cancer 2014 (110): 1712-1720 Becker et al, Annals of Surgery 2011 (253): 934-939

  7. Rationale for Preoperative Chemoradiation • R0 resections are difficult to achieve. • Downsize the tumor à increase rates of R0 resection. • Downstage the tumor à increase pathological CR rates. • Preoperative therapies are better tolerated than post-operative treatments. Radiation field is smaller and more accurate.

  8. CROSS Trial Design Neoadjuvant CRT: Carboplatin AUC2 Esophagectomy Paclitaxel 50 mg/m 2 XRT 41.4 Gy § Esophageal cancer (SCC R or adenocarcinoma) § cT1N1M0 or cT2-3N0-1M0 1:1 § N=363 1° Endpoint: OS Esophagectomy • 26% GEJ tumors • 75% adenocarcinoma Van Hagen, et al., NEJM 2012; 366: 2074-2084; Shapiro et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090

  9. CROSS Trial Results • R0 resection: 69 à 92% • Pathologic CR: 29%, for adeno 23% • Median OS: 24 mo à 49 mo Van Hagen, et al., NEJM 2012; 366: 2074-2084; Shapiro et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090

  10. Recurrence Patterns after CROSS ChemoXRT + Surgery Alone HR (95% CI) P value Surgery (N=188) (N=178) Locoregional 39 (22%) 72 (38%) 0.45 (0.30-0.66) < 0.0001 Progression Distant 70 (39%) 90 (48%) 0.63 (0.46-0.87) 0.0040 Progression Overall 87 (49%) 124 (66%) 0.58 (0.44-0.76) < 0.0001 Progression Shapiro et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090

  11. POET: Preoperative Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy + CRT in GEJ Adenocarcinoma • The only phase 3 trial comparing 2 modalities. • N=126, adeno of lower esophagus and cardia. • Siewert I-III, cT3-4. No Siewert 3 actually enrolled. • Study did not complete accrual. • ARM A (N=59): Weekly 5FU/cis x 15 à resection • ARM B (N=60): Weekly 5FU/cis x 12 à CRT 30Gy (cis/etop) à resection Stahl et al, Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009; 27: 851=856.

  12. POET: Preoperative Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy + CRT in GEJ Adenocarcinoma CHEMO + CRT CHEMO pCR 14.4% 1.9% OS 30.8 mo 21 mo R1 resection 4.1 % 15.4 % Locoregional 18% (p 0.04) 38% Relapse Stahl et al, Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009; 27: 851=856; Stahl et al, Euro Journ of Cancer 2017; 81:183=190

  13. Meta-Analysis: Preop CRT vs. Chemo 17 trials, 4188 patients. Pooled analysis from 17 trials. Clear advantage of either modality could not be established. Sjoquist et al, Lancet Oncology 2011; 12: 681-92

  14. Recent Neoadjuvant Trials for E/GEJ Tumors Trial Regimen N Rate R0, % Path CR,% 3 yr OS Rate, % OEO5 (E+GEJ) CF x 2 451 59 1 39 ECX x 4 446 66 7 42 STO3 (64% E/GEJ) ECX x 3 533 64 8 50.3 ECX+ bev x3 530 61 11 48.1 FLOT4 (52% GEJ) ECX 360 74 6 48 FLOT 356 85 16 57 POET (GEJ) 5-FU/Cis 52 41 1.9 26.1 5-FU/Cis +CRT 49 88 14.3 47 CROSS (E+GEJ) No preop 188 69 N/A 44 CRT 178 92 29 58 Alderson, D et al, Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 1249–60; Cunningham et a, Lancet Oncology 2017; 18:357-70; Al-Batran et al, JCO 35, no. 15_suppl (May 20 2017) 4004-4004; Stahl et al, European Journ Cancer 2017; 81:183-190; Shapiro et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090

  15. STO3: R0 Resection by Location Total # of Primary Site R0, % Resections Esophageal 116 66% Siewert, I 102 61% Siewert, II 148 72% Siewert, III 157 75% Gastric 304 87% Cunningham et a, Lancet Oncology 2017; 18:357-70

  16. Ongoing Clinical Trials Trial Cohorts Treatments Study # ECF(X) x 3 à Surgery à ECF(X) x 3 G/GEJ; T3/4 or LN+ TOPGEAR NCT01924819 (N=752) ECF(X) x 2 à CRT 45Gy + CF(X) à Surgery à ECF(X) x 3 CROSS CRT à Surgery cT2-3, N0-1 E/GEJ NEO-AEGIS NCT01726452 (N=366) ECX à Surgery à ECX CROSS CRT à Surgery cN+, cT2-4a, E/GEJ ESOPEC NCT02509286 (N=438) FLOT à Surgery à FLOT

  17. What Is the Best Approach to Resectable GEJ Tumors? • It is not a question of CROSS or not. • Chemoradiation has a role in management of these tumors. • The question remains how to augment CROSS to improve patient outcomes: • Induction Chemotherapy? • Immunotherapy? • Targeted agents? • Radiation changes?

  18. Avelumab With Chemoradiation for Stage II/III Resectable Esophageal/GEJ Cancer (NCT03490292) PRE-OP ADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION Stage II/III SURGICAL AVELUMAB AVELUMAB Esophageal RESECTION 23 fractions, total 41.5 Gy Cancer Carboplatin/Paclitaxel, IV Q14D IV Q14D x 6 Day 80-100. (including GEJ) Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29. Days 29, 43, 57. Start ≤ 12 wks. Run-In Phase: N=6 1° Endpoint Part 1: Safety and Tolerability Expansion Cohort: N=18 2° Endpoint Part 2: Path CR rate

  19. Conclusions • Stage II/III GEJ adenocarcinoma is treated with curative attempt, but recurrence rates remain unacceptably high. • Multimodality approach is the mainstay of treatment. • Neoadjuvant CRT improves R0 resection and path CR rates. • Distant recurrences are a big concern. • Randomized data comparing neoadjuvant CRT to chemotherapy are lacking, but trials are ongoing. • Novel approaches are needed to improve current treatment strategies.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend