prehabilitation amp prognosis
play

Prehabilitation & Prognosis Reid Moseley Background Knee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Prehabilitation & Prognosis Reid Moseley Background Knee osteoarthritis: Degeneration of articular cartilage, leading to pain & other structural changes Affects approx. 13% of women & 10% of men age 60 & older


  1. Prehabilitation & Prognosis Reid Moseley

  2. Background ● Knee osteoarthritis: ○ Degeneration of articular cartilage, leading to pain & other structural changes ○ Affects approx. 13% of women & 10% of men age 60 & older ● Total knee arthroplasty: ○ Replacement of diseased articular cartilages with artificial components ○ Estimated 4.7 million Americans with TKA ○ High success rate: 89.3% of patients reported good to excellent results at 4.1 year avg. follow-up

  3. Patient Demographics & History ● Age: 67 years old ● Gender: female ● Occupation: interior decorator ● Lives with husband in 1 story house, 2 steps to enter ● PMH: ○ Left TKA , AFib, HTN, open cholecystectomy, incisional hernia repair ○ Independent PTA ○ Pt attended 6 wk prehabilitation program ○ No medications, except for pain medications administered by hospital ● Dx = elective right TKA due to severe right knee OA

  4. Physical Therapy Exam ● Subjective ○ Pt goal: “I want to have the same recovery as I did with my other knee.” ○ Pain = 2/10 (VAS) ● Objective ○ Swelling in R knee, incision/dressing intact ○ No sensation deficits ROM MMT R UE WFL Gross 5/5 L UE WFL Gross 5/5 R LE Knee grossly 0-70 deg, Knee & Hip 3-/5, limited by limited by p! & swelling p! & weakness L LE WFL Gross 5/5

  5. PT Exam ● Objective ○ Transfers: Mod Assist for sit to supine & supine to sit, Supervision assist for sit to stand ○ Balance: Sitting balance = good, Standing balance = fair ○ Gait: Ambulated 10 feet with rolling walker and contact guard assistance, slow cadence, no buckling noted in R knee ● Assessment ○ Patient presents with impaired functional mobility and strength related to recent R TKR and will benefit from additional PT to promote return to maximal functional independence. ○ Prognosis is good due to high treatment tolerance & high prior level of function.

  6. PT Exam ● Plan of Care ○ Patient will be seen BID for length of stay to address gait, transfers, strength & stair climbing ○ Goals: ■ Patient will be able to ascend 2 stairs with supervision assist and bilateral railings upon discharge ■ Patient will be able to ambulate 100 feet with supervision assist & a rolling walker upon discharge ■ Patient will improve standing balance to fair upon discharge ■ Patient will improve all transfers to supervision assist upon discharge.

  7. Interventions & Outcomes ● Rx: ○ Gait & stair training ○ Exercises: quad sets, SAQ’s, ankle pumps, heel slides, sitting knee flex/ext, supine hip abd/add ○ Game Ready: ice & compression ○ Pt education: HEP, use of Game Ready, transfers, gait with assistive device, stairs ● Outcomes ○ Patient pain level never surpassed 6/10 (even with activity) ○ Patient discharged home post-op day 3 ○ Supervision assist for all transfers ○ Patient standing static balance improved to “good”. ○ Patient could ambulate 130 feet with supervision assist & a rolling walker. ○ Patient could ascend 3 steps with supervision assist and bilateral railings.

  8. Is participation in a prehabilitation program a positive prognostic indicator for shorter hospital stays in elective TKR patients?

  9. Article 1 Does preoperative rehabilitation for patients planning to undergo joint replacement surgery improve outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

  10. Article 1 ● Purpose: ○ The clinical impact of physiotherapy on recovery after joint replacement remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical impact of prehabilitation before joint replacement. ● Participants: ○ Searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials ○ Had to be randomized controlled trials comparing preoperative rehabilitation programs v.s. No formal preoperative program, reporting at least 1 clinical relevant outcome of interest ■ Outcomes of interest: post-op VAS pain scores or pain subcomponents of WOMAC, patient functionality (WOMAC, SF-36, etc.), time to resume ADL’s, quality of life, patient satisfaction & post-op complications ■ Resource outcomes: hospital length of stay , readmissions, & total hospital or total health system costs ○ 399 titles/abstracts screened → 110 full text articles → 22 studies met the criteria (1492 pt’s)

  11. Methods & Results ● Methods: ○ 2 reviewers screened articles by title & abstract (based on predetermined eligibility criteria) → 2 reviewers screened for bias → 3 reviewers extracted data & data was verified by 4th viewer ○ Meta-analysis performed using the random effects model, RR & 95% CI for discrete outcomes, WMD & 95% CI for continuous outcomes ○ WOMAC was preferred measure, so all pain & function scores were converted to WOMAC ● Results: ○ Improvements in WOMAC pain score @ 4 wks (WMD -6.1), but not statistically significant after 4 wks (WMD -1.4) ○ Improvements in WOMAC function score @ 6-8 wks (WMD -3.9) & 12 wks (WMD -4.0), but statistically different after 12 wks (24 wks, WMD -0.5) ○ No significant differences in length of hospital stay (WMD -0.3 days) ○ No significant reductions in cost (WMD +0.5$)

  12. Article 1 ● Conclusion: ○ Effects of prehabilitation on pain & function are too small to be considered clinically important ○ Did not result in clinically significant differences in most measures of patient recovery, quality of life, length of stay & costs ● Strength/Limitations ○ Strengths: ■ systematic review of randomized controlled trials ■ Used standardized measurement of WOMAC pain & function scores ○ Limitations: ■ Lack of large randomized controlled trials ■ Definitions for prehabilitation and for outcomes measurements were heterogeneous across studies ■ Most studies provided an inadequate description of the components of the prehabilitation programmes provided (including frequency, intensity & duration)

  13. Article 2 Determinants of Function After Total Knee Arthroplasty

  14. Article 2 ● Purpose: ○ Identify preoperative determinants of functional status after a TKA ● Participants: ○ Eligibility criteria: (1). Scheduled for elective primary TKA, (2). Placed on joint arthroplasty waiting list at least 7 days before surgery, (3). Resided in the health region, (4). 40 years of age or older, (5). Spoke English ○ 377 eligible patients → 276 participating patients ■ Majority tended to be elderly women with OA

  15. Article 2 ● Methods: ○ Prospective cohort study ○ In-person interviews completed 31 days before and 6 months after surgery ■ questions regarding demographic information, joint pain, function and stiffness, HRQL, comorbid conditions, medical status, and ambulatory status ■ Knee PROM measured ■ SF-36 → overall function & quality of life (measured 0-100) ■ WOMAC → joint function & pain (measured 0-100) ○ Multiple linear regression performed for SF-36 & WOMAC ○ Functional improvement from baseline defined as 60% increase (~10 point increase) ● Results: ○ See next slide

  16. Article 2

  17. Article 2 ● Conclusions: ○ Preoperative joint function, BMI, type of walking device used before surgery, & preoperative walking distance were found to be predictors of joint & overall function @ 6 mo’s post-op ○ Patients with greater dysfunction prior to surgery will not attain comparable functional outcomes to those with less preop dysfunction ● Strengths/limitations: ○ Strengths: ■ Large number of participants ■ Univariate regression used to identify statistically significant variables → statistically significant variables then ran through multivariate regression ○ Limitations: ■ Accuracy of self-report measures of function ■ Only 1 follow-up ■ Lack of standardized post-op treatment

  18. Implications For My Patient ● Participation in a prehabilitation program was not associated with a signifcantly shorter hospital stay ● Participation in a prehabilitation program may not be most cost effective option for elective TKA patients ○ However, could be extremely beneficial for those with low baseline function ● Long term exercise program to increase baseline function will likely yield the best post-op outcomes ● Patient education: ○ Conversation with OA patients ○ Emphasize the importance of movement, activity & function and associations with positive TKA outcomes ○ The earlier, the better ● Can help identify patients who might require additional inpatient rehab

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend