precision measurement of the cosmic boron to carbon ratio
play

Precision Measurement of the Cosmic Boron-to-Carbon Ratio with AMS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Precision Measurement of the Cosmic Boron-to-Carbon Ratio with AMS A. Oliva, CIEMAT, Spain On behalf of the AMS Collaboration 33 rd ICRC 8 Jul 2013 Rio de Janeiro Multiple Measurements of Charge Carbon (Z=6) Z (cu) Tracker Plane 1 (L1)


  1. Precision Measurement of the Cosmic Boron-to-Carbon Ratio with AMS A. Oliva, CIEMAT, Spain On behalf of the AMS Collaboration 33 rd ICRC 8 Jul 2013 Rio de Janeiro

  2. Multiple Measurements of Charge Carbon (Z=6) Δ Z (cu) Tracker Plane 1 (L1) 0.30 1 0.33 TRD 0.16 Upper TOF (1 counter) 2 3-4 Tracker 5-6 0.12 Inner Tracker (L2-L8) 7-8 0.16 Lower TOF (1 counter) 0.32 RICH 9 Tracker Plane 9 (L9) 0.30 1 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  3. Multiple Measurements of Energy Tracker, R = p/Z 1 MDR (Z=6) ≈ 3TV 2 3-4 Tracker TOF , β 5-6 Δβ ( β =1, Z=6) ≈ 0.01 7-8 9 RICH , β Δβ ( β =1, Z=6) ≈ 5 × 10 -4 2 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  4. Flux and Ratio Determination B/C is a flux ratio . Flux is given by: Number of counts Bin Width Acceptance (m 2 sr) Efficiency Exposure Time K n is the kinetic energy per nucleon , is measured from TOF and RICH (beta) or from Tracker (rigidity) 3 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  5. Nuclei Identification in AMS H He Li Be B C N O F Ne Mg Na Al Si P S Cl Ar K Ca Sc Fe Ti V Cr Mn Ni Co 4 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  6. Nuclei Identification with Inner Tracker Contamination from neightboring charges < 10 -4 , identification efficiency is > 98%. O N C B Be Li He H 5 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  7. Identification of Fragmentation Events Layer 1 = 6.1 TRD = 6.0 UTOF = 7.6 R = 10 GV Inner = 4.8 LTOF = 5.2 RICH = 5.0 6 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  8. Purity Estimation Selection efficiency is >70% for both Boron and Carbon, ratio is ≈ 1. Boron selected with Inner Tracker and TOF. Background estimated down to accuracy of 0.1%. Events Boron Purity = 97% B 3 10 2 10 C  B O  B 10 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 Tracker L1 Charge 7 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  9. Estimation of Fragmentation Acceptance is convolution of geometry and fragmentation effects. Carbon selected with L1 and UTOF. Fragmentation distribution evaluated with LTOF. Data and MC agreement evaluated being at 2% level. Normalized Entries Carbon MonteCarlo -1 10 Data -2 10 -3 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 th 4 TOF Layer Charge 8 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  10. Track Efficiency The ratio of Boron and Carbon track efficiencies is calculated and cross-checked with MC up to 100 GV. Is about 2% correction. 1.3 B Track Eff. / C Track Eff. L1 high-Z hit 1.2 TRD track 1.1 1 0.9 Cutoff Rigidity Estimator 0.8 ECAL Rigidity Estimator 0.7 2 10 10 ECAL E Dep Rigidity Estimate (GV) 9 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  11. Trigger Efficiency Trigger efficiency is estimated with an unbiased trigger sample. Efficiency is > 95%, no apparent difference between B and C. ACC UTOF MAGNET LTOF ECAL High-Z particle TOF + ECAL Trigger Horizontal Particle Accepted Accepted Rejected 10 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  12. Top-of-the-Instrument Correction Carbon to Boron conversion on materials above L1. Correction to the ratio has been estimated with MC: e C  B = 0.005 ± 0.002. 11 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  13. Isotopic Fraction Evaluation RICH evaluates the isotopic composition of Boron. This fraction is used for the Tracker rigidity  kinetic energy conversion. 11 B/( 11 B + 10 B) = 0.7 ± 0.1  ~ 1% systematic error on ratio 0.31 Raw Boron-to-Carbon Ratio 0.3 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.26 10 11 11 B/( B+ B) = 80% 0.25 11 10 11 B/( B+ B) = 70% 11 10 11 0.24 B/( B+ B) = 60% RICH 0.23 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kinetic Energy (GeV/n) 12 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  14. Systematics (a) 2% from MC and data comparison of interactions. (b) 1% from isotopic composition evaluation. (c) <2% from TOI correction. (d) bin-to-bin migration error is <1% up to 200 GeV/n, and 2% above. Systematic error will be reduced with more data. 13 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  15. B/C Ratio 10% of total expected data 14 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  16. B/C Ratio (year > 2000) 10% of total expected data 15 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  17. AMS B/C Ratio 10% of total expected data 16 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

  18. Conclusions Measurement of the B/C between 0.5 to 670 GeV/n with AMS has been presented. Sources of differences between Boron and Carbon counting were investigated and corrections applied when needed. Main limitation for the ratio measurement and systematics error evaluation at high energy is the statistics. AMS has collected 10% of the expected statistics. The B/C behavior at high energy will be become more clear with more data. 17 /17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend