- '.(. Pre- September o 11,2001, 50s and EAs identified specific - - PDF document

' ..

..

'

.

. ,

.:

........

. .'

TSA Watch Lists

.

.

. December 2002

",

. "

'. ~.

'.'

.,' ..

..'

,

..... . '

" Transportation Security Intelligenc¢ Seivi

,""", ,':.'; .. ~:~:

;:~.'

.

• .

Topics for Discussion , .

• Background & Evolution

~

Pre & Post September 11, 2001

• "The Lists"

,...:. Criteria & Requirel11ents

• Implementation
• AIr Carriers & LEOs
• .

problems and Issues

• TSA Initiatives

UNCLASSIFIED

," .',. ( f\ ~,

·f

, 'I; I :i: [ I t

• '.(.

. ,

• ¥
• ','

Pre- September

• 11,2001,
• 50s and EAs identified specific

individuals whom carriers couldnot ' , transport

. , SENSITIVE SECURITY N ..

lJ

• M'

.... .

• ....

........

, ,'September 12 -November200:1,

.. ,

• FAA disseminated the

watch list

• Supported by SD/EA
• : Denied tra'nsport
• November 2001, FAA assume

responsibility for the list

SENSITIVE SECURITY INFORMATION

(6')(2) -

fb·· \(3) ,

l Y·,

., /5-21;, 1(b) (c. "

",'

./

,./

.

• .

.•••. ~

f

• .

:""

. ..... , .

:

..

: .....

"C~)C2.),

Cb'i3),

' ,

1~2b"7(0/(

00ft2,

,t , _

.

2'

. '.:'

. I;

"

G .. •

.••

..

.

.>

... : ....

. .

• '

..

:

.

. '", .:"

",~; , "

• Mid~Dec

(\?)(~)

:. '

..

(b)(3) ....

'.

/5],017(6):. ' .'

. .

' ..

:

.... '.'

.:

, " ..

Criteria & Requirements' .

. .

• Additions/removals based on

request .' a'nd infofrom federal LE or Intel agencies

. ' .:'.

(b)(~)

(bX3) .

IS)O,7(G) . (Inn003

3'

Criteria

• No-Fly =

.preyent boarding of person who"

. .

. .;. Selectee = additional security for persons'who

CbXz)

(bX3)

j$20,7(c).

.TSA lists, are

":"(bX5)

• SENSITIVE SECURITY

Requirements .'

~,

• '.~

.

SENSiTIVE SECURITY INFORMATIO

:' (~)C2;).·

l.. b){ 3)"

I~J,o'7(c)

" t·

Air .Carrier Implementati()f!:·:'~

.

.

.

..

.

'

.• TSAdepends on pr.ivatejndu~tryto

'implement the SDs/EAsthat, support the lists

.. - S

A is a m'inimurn required'

• '~i}'o,~:'Z<'(

..... .

,,-.

"': .'.-

,,'

...

:,'

':':. "

. .

.' .

... LEO Response

• No-Fly .,------
• ..

• '~-.
• " ~

,

SENSITIVE SECURITY INFURMA

. .

"

'. .

~. ~.:

:.: .. '

.,' .

. ",: .... :

.

. ....... : .

(b)(3)" .

..

15~i),(b).·

.(bX~);

.

...

!lJl~:~"

\ " I.

.'

".

• ,,'

. ,"

'.:"

.,',

.

",.

. Problems & Solutions'

{b'·CL.) .

: (6X5). (bY?»

.' .

I:[)

()1(C~ c.~

.... (j)

.... : :

,

,...

.. " L-____

~_,_-_.,._,~.

' ...... "

~j~;,.:,~f:#.:"

'", ,'," ,',' " ",,' ,',,'"

,'_,

':"'"

~-,-~

' .

.

"Problems &S'olutions ..

• .,;

SENSITIVE SECURITY INFORMATION

(·b)(5)

(b){3) .

/52-017.(

L)

·

'

"

TSA Initiatives

• First anniversary of creation of TSA

watch lists

• 'CAPPS II

SENSITIVE SECURiTY INFORMATION

\ '"

Conclusion.

• Effective implementation requires a

partnership

• Communication
• Working Together

TSA + Air Carriers + FBI = Safe Flying Public

UNCLASSI

(h)(5)

(b)(3)

/5M?U-\ '

7

Questions?

'·:i

.

I

... UNCLASSI

.. =-

.~

'.

8