Praxis Emma Wijnberg Occupational Therapy and Speaker Introduction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

praxis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Praxis Emma Wijnberg Occupational Therapy and Speaker Introduction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Praxis Emma Wijnberg Occupational Therapy and Speaker Introduction In Sensory Integration theory, praxis refers to the ability to plan new movements (Bundy, et al., 2002, p. 6). Three Processes (Ayres, 2005) - Ideation- Planning-


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Praxis

Emma Wijnberg Occupational Therapy and Speaker

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Three Processes (Ayres, 2005)

  • Ideation- Planning- Execution

Dependant on Sensory Integration Motor Pathways Clumsy, Awkward and Accident Prone Struggle with novel tasks Avoidance, Anxiety and Frustration

“In Sensory Integration theory, praxis refers to the ability to plan new movements” (Bundy, et al., 2002, p. 6).

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Ideation

Ideation is a cortical function of having an idea, and the ability to conceptualise a goal (Bundy, et al., 2002, p. 71)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Planning

Motor planning is the ability to determine the sequential steps or the series of movements that need to occur in order for the action to happen. (Bundy, et al., 2002)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Execution

Sensory information regarding the external environment, the position of the body, the degree of muscle contraction is all vital for the efficient adjustments and grading needed for the accurate execution of movement (Bundy, et al., 2002, p. 84).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Sensory Discrimination

Discrimination is the ability to interpret information. It allows you to filter various sensory input, sorting relevant detail from irrelevant input. (Bialer & Miller., 2011)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Tactile Discrimination

Tactile input is detected by receptors the skin. Dysfunction of the tactile system, therefore, affects a wide array of functional areas, including body scheme and awareness, motor planning abilities, visual perception, academic learning and social skills. Dorsal Column Medial Leminiscal Pathway

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Proprioceptive Discrimination

Information about where our body parts are in relation to one another and the external environment. Detected by receptors in the muscles, tendons and ligaments around joints. Dysfunction results in clumsiness, easily and frequently breaks things, exhibits low functional muscle tone, may fixate during movements, and present with mass movement patterns (Bundy, et al., 2002).

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Somatopraxis

“Somatodyspraxia is a type

  • f sensory integration

dyspraxia in which there is evidence of poor processing

  • f at least somatosensory

information. ” (Bundy, et al., 2002, pp. 71-72). Impaired tactile and proprioceptive discrimination

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Vestibular Discrimination

Vestibular input provides us with information regarding head position in relation to gravity. Motor responses play a role in balance, postural control, eye movements. Receptors: Semi-Circular Canals and Otolith Organs.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Bilateral Integration and Sequencing

Coordination of both sides of the body and the ability to perform sequences of

  • movements. (Bundy, et al., 2002,
  • p. 81).

Subtle, mild practic difficulty

“Bilateral integration and sequencing disorder is a type of sensory integrative-based dyspraxia in which there is evidence of deficits in vestibular and proprioceptive processing” (Bundy, et al., 2002, p. 72).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Visual Discrimination

Most important sense for our daily functioning (Bundy 2002). NB for learning new motor skills. Initially, vision guides the body’ s movements, until the skill is learnt, and becomes automatic.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Visuo Praxis

“The relationship between visual perception and visually directed praxis” (Parham, 2010, p.350) Difficulties using vision to coordinate movement, copy drawings and find objects in a busy background (Schaaf 2010, p. 272).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Postural Control

“Posture is that motor response which reflects an individual’ s relationship to the earth’ s surface and gravitational force. ” (Ayres, 2000, p. 75). Postural Control is the

  • verall ability to regulate

and control the quality of postural movements (Bundy, et al., 2002, p. 7).

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Postural- Occular Control

Postural-Occular Control is reliant on the integration

  • f the proprioceptive,

vestibular (specifically receptors on the semi- circular canals), and visual systems, to ensure smooth, coordinated eye movements and gaze stability during movement.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Auditory Discrimination

Auditory discrimination is the ability to recognise differences between sounds.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Praxis on Verbal Command

Praxis on verbal command refers to the child’ s ability to assume unfamiliar body positions, following a verbal command. Praxis on Verbal Command relies purely on verbal directions and not visual demonstration (Mailloux, 1990,

  • p. 591).

Consider postural and linguistic ability before diagnosis.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Signs of Praxis Difficulties

Developmental Delay Poor gross motor skills, avoidant Social difficulties Poor spatial awareness Slow and hesitant in most actions Appears not to be able to learn anything instinctively but must be taught skills Falls over frequently Poor pencil grip Cannot do jigsaws or shape sorting games Often anxious and easily distracted Does badly in class but significantly better on a one-to -one basis Reacts to all stimuli without discrimination and attention span is poor

  • May have trouble with written expression

Experiences great difficulty in copying from the blackboard Writes laboriously and immaturely Difficulty remembering and /or following instructions Disorganised

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Behavioral Difficulties

Low Self-Esteem Compensation Avoidance Delays Anxiety Disorganised

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Assessment

History Taking (Parent Interview) Classroom Observation Clinical Observations (structured and unstructured) Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT), Ayres 1989 Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, 1978 Miller Assessment for Preschoolers, Miller 1988 Movement Assessment Battery for children (Henderson & Sugden) Developmental Test of visual-motor integration (Beery) Test of Visual Perceptual Skills (Gardner) Sensory Profile (Winnie Dunn) Sensory Processing Measure (Lucy Miller)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Diagnosis and Classification

American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual V classifies dyspraxia under umbrella term of Developmental Co-

  • rdination Delay

Billable Diagnostic Code: R27.8 (Other lack of coordination) OR F82 (DCD)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Treatment

Ayres Sensory Integration Perceptual Motor Approach Sensorimotor Approach A cognitive goal directed approach (Older children) Teach Coping Skills Family support and education Concessions

slide-23
SLIDE 23

References

Ayres, A., 2007. Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT) Manual. Updated ed. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services. Ayres, A., 1972, 1978. Sensory Integration and Learning DIsorders. California: Western Psychological Services. Ayres, A., 2005. Sensory Integration and the Child: Understanding Hidden Sensory Challenges. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. Ayres, A., 2014. Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT) Manual. Updated ed. Torrance CA: Western Psychological Services. Dunn, W ., 2014. The Sensory Profile 2. s.l.:Pearson. Ayres, A., 1979. Sensory Integration and the Child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.. Valentin, D., 1997. Neurscience Online: Visual Processing: Cortical Pathways. [Online] 
 Available at: https:/ /nba.uth.tmc.edu/neuroscience/m/s2/chapter14.html
 [Accessed 27 January 2020]. Smith-Roley, 2002. s.l.: s.n. Silverthorn, D. U., 2010. Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach. 5 ed. San Fransisco: Pearson Education inc. Fox, S., 2006. Human Physiology. 9 ed. New York: McGraw Hill. Ayres, A., 2000. Sensory Integration and Learning Disorders. 11 ed. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. SAISI Research Commitee, 2005. Clinical Observations Adapted from J. Ayres: Administration and Interpretation. Revised ed. Johannesburg : South African Institute of Sensory Integration. Case-Smith, J., 2005. Occupational Therapy for Children. 5 ed. Missouri: Elsevier Mosby. Mailloux, Z., 1990. An overview of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(7), pp. 589-594. Mulligan, S., 1998. Patterns of Sensory Integration Dysfunction: A Confirmatory Factor Analiysis. The American Journal Of Occupational Therapy, 52(10), pp. 819-827. Martin, N., 2006. Test of Visual Perceptual Skills. 3 ed. California: Academic Therapy Publications. Ranna Parekh, M. M., 2017. American Psychiatric Association. [Online] 
 Available at: https:/ /www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/adhd/what-is-adhd
 [Accessed 20 February 2019]. Beery, K., N., B. & Buktenica, N., 2010. Beery VMI. 1 ed. s.l.:Pearson Clinical. Bear, M., Connors BW . & Paradiso, M., 2006. Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain. 3 ed. s.l.:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Beil, L. & Peske, N., 2009. Raising a Sensory Smart Child: The definitive Handbook for Raising a Sensory Smart Child. 2 ed. London: Penguin.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Beil, L. & Peske, N., 2009. Raising a Sensory Smart Child: The definitive Handbook for Raising a Sensory Smart Child. 2 ed. London: Penguin. Bialer, D. S. & Miller., L. J., 2011. No Longer A SECRET: Unique Common Sense Strategies for Children with Sensory or Motor Challenges., Arlington, TX: Sensory World. Blanche, E., Botticelli, T. & MK., H., 1995. Combining NDT and SI Principles, An Approach to Paeditatric Therapy.. Arizona ed. s.l.:Therapy Skill Builders, The Psychological Cooperation. Bodison, S. & Maillox, Z., 2006. The Sensory Integrationa and Praxis Tests, Illuminating Struggles and Strengths in Participation at School.. OT Practice, 11(17), pp. CE-1-CE7. Bundy, A., Lane, S. & Murray, E., 2002. Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice. 2 ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company. Cermaak, S., Morris, L. & Koomar, J., 1990. Praxis on Verbal Command and Imitation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(7), pp. 641-645. Cook, R. et al., 2004. Clinicak Observations of Gross Motor Items. 2 ed. Hatfield: Edina Rempress. Kiernan, J. & Rajakumar, N., 2013. Barr's: The Human Nervous System: An anatomical viewpoint. 10 ed. s.l.:Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. Lane, S. & Reynolds, S., 2012. Sensory Overresponsivity and Anxiety in Typically Developing Children and in Children with Autism and Attention Defecit Hyperactivity Disorder: Cause of Co-existance?. The Americak Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(5), pp. 595-603. Mailloux, Z. & Schaaf, R., 2015. Clinician's Guide for Implementing Ayres Sensory Integration: Promoting Participation for Children with Autism. 1 ed. s.l.:AOTA Press. Maillox, Z. et al., 2011. Verification and Clarification of Patterns of Sensory Integrative Dysfunction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(2), pp. 143-151. May-Benson, T. A. & Koomar, J. A., 2007. Identifying gravitational insecurity in children: A pilot study.. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Volume 61, pp. 142-147. Miller, et al., 2007. Concept Evolution in DSensory Integration: A Proposed Nosology for Diagnosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, pp. 135-138. Parham, L. & Mailloux, Z., 2010. Sensory Integration. In: Smith, J.C. and O’Brain, J.C., Eds., Occupational Therapy for Children. 6 ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier. Schaaf, R., Smith Roley, S. & Blanche, E., 2001. Sensory Integration With Diverse Populations. s.l.:USA Therapy Skill Builders. Weisner, M. & Beer, J., 1991. Correlations amoung Wis-R IQ's and Several Measures of Receptive and Expressive Language for Children Referred for Special Education.. PubMed, 69(3), pp. 1009-1010. Weiss, M. et al., 2011. The Screens Culture: Impact on ADHD. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord., 3(4), pp. 327-334.